Home  About us  Contact
 

Zinc Phosphate (zinc + phosphate)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Chemistry55%
Medical Sciences44%

Terms modified by Zinc Phosphate

  • zinc phosphate cement
    		•

    Selected Abstracts

    Network Topology of a Hybrid Organic Zinc Phosphate with Bimodal Porosity and Hydrogen Adsorption,

    ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE, Issue 33 2009
    Shu-Hao Huang
    Füll,s auf! Ein nanoporöses hybrides Zinkphosphat (siehe Bild; ,[Zn2PO4]-Säulen in Dunkelblau) mit in die Struktur integrierten organischen Liganden (Amin: grau; Arylcarboxylat: cyan) weist eine ungewöhnliche bimodale Porosität und Wasserstoffgas-Speicherfähigkeit auf. [source]

    ChemInform Abstract: New Crystalline Layered Zinc Phosphate with 10-Membered-Ring Channels Perpendicular to Layers.

    CHEMINFORM, Issue 34 2009
    Zhi Lin
    Abstract ChemInform is a weekly Abstracting Service, delivering concise information at a glance that was extracted from about 200 leading journals. To access a ChemInform Abstract of an article which was published elsewhere, please select a "Full Text" option. The original article is trackable via the "References" option. [source]

    Synthesis of a Single Four-Ring (S4R) Molecular Zinc Phosphate and Its Assembly to an Extended Polymeric Structure: A Single-Crystal and in situ MAS NMR Investigation.

    CHEMINFORM, Issue 51 2003
    Srinivasan Natarajan
    Abstract For Abstract see ChemInform Abstract in Full Text. [source]

    ChemInform Abstract: Synthesis of a Layered Zinc Phosphate, [NH3(CH2)2NH2 (CH2)3NH3] [Zn2(PO4)(HPO4)2] ×H2O, and Its Transformation to an Extra-Large Pore Three-Dimensional Zinc Phosphate, [NH3(CH2)2NH2 (CH2)3NH3] [Zn3(PO4)(HPO4)3].

    CHEMINFORM, Issue 28 2002
    Srinivasan Natarajan
    Abstract ChemInform is a weekly Abstracting Service, delivering concise information at a glance that was extracted from about 100 leading journals. To access a ChemInform Abstract of an article which was published elsewhere, please select a "Full Text" option. The original article is trackable via the "References" option. [source]

    Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation

    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 12 2008
    Christian Mehl
    Abstract Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the retrievability of cemented implant crowns using two different removal devices. The influence of five cement types and two cement application techniques was evaluated. Methods: Forty copings were cast from a CoCr alloy for 40 tapered titanium abutments (5° taper, 4.3 mm diameter, 6 mm height, Camlog, Germany). Twenty copings were modeled as single crowns, whereas 20 copings were modeled with an extension to simulate fixed partial dentures (FPDs). Before cementation, the inner surfaces of the copings were air-abraded (50 ,m Al2O3 particles at 2.5 bars), while the abutments were used as delivered with machined surfaces. Copings were cemented with eugenol-free zinc oxide (Freegenol), zinc phosphate (Harvard), glass ionomer (Ketac Cem), polycarboxylate (Durelon) and so-called self-adhesive resin (RelyX Unicem) cement. Cement was applied in a thin film band of 1 or 3 mm to the cervical margin of the inner surface of the copings, respectively. After cementation, specimens were stored in saline solution for 24 h. The Coronaflex and a standardized custom-made removal device were used to remove the copings from the abutments. Results: Using the same cement, no statistically significant influence with regard to the type of restoration (crown/FDP), cement application mode and device was detected (P>0.05). Therefore, data of specimens cemented with the same cement were pooled. Median attempts to remove the copings were: zinc oxide: 3, self-adhesive resin: 3, zinc phosphate: 5, glass ionomer: 16 and polycarboxylate: 58. Four levels of significance (P<0.0001) were found: (1) zinc oxide/self-adhesive resin; (2) zinc phosphate; (3) glass ionomer; and (4) polycarboxylate. Conclusions: Zinc phosphate and glass ionomer cement might be suitable for a so-called ,semipermanent' (=retrievable) cementation, while polycarboxylate seems to provide the most durable cementation. [source]

    Effect of preparation convergence on retention and seating discrepancy of complete veneer crowns

    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, Issue 10 2004
    D. C. N. Chan
    summary, The purpose of this study was to evaluate the retention and marginal seating discrepancy of complete veneer crown cemented with zinc phosphate using various preparation convergence designs. The method employed was that of cementing cast metal crowns onto 46 metal dies fabricated as complete veneer crown preparations with various convergence angles ranging from 0° to 70° and a shoulder finish line. The marginal discrepancy was calculated by measuring the change in crown height before and after cementation using an optical measuring microscope. The force required to remove the crowns from the dies in a vertical direction was determined using an Instron universal testing machine and recorded as retention. The increase in preparation convergence exhibited a wide variation of seating discrepancy between specimens, ranging from 4·58 ± 1·13 to 73·13 ± 78·32 ,m. Significant tilting of crown was observed as the convergence angle of preparation increased. The retention values ranged from 4·03 ± 0·61 to 12·12 ± 0·33 MPa. The Pearson analysis revealed statistically significant correlations between preparation convergence and marginal discrepancy (r = +0·62), and retention (r = ,0·91). Complete veneer crown retention and marginal discrepancy were influenced by the preparation convergence design. [source]

    The Retention of Cast Metal Dowels Fabricated by Direct and Indirect Techniques

    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, Issue 1 2010
    MDentSci, Wael M. Al-Omari BDS
    Abstract Purpose: To explore the effect of fabrication technique, cement type, and cementation procedure on retention of cast metal dowels. Methods and Materials: Eighty intact single-rooted teeth were selected. The clinical crown was removed at the cementoenamel junction level. Each root was prepared to receive a cast metal dowel of 10-mm length and 1.45 mm in diameter. The 80 specimens were divided into two major groups of 40 based on fabrication technique (direct and indirect). Each group was further divided into four subgroups of ten based on the cement type (zinc phosphate and glass ionomer), and cementation procedure (with and without lentulo spiral). The dowels were subjected to a constantly increasing tensile force, in a universal Instron testing machine, at crosshead speed of 5 mm/min until failure. Results: The most significant factor to affect retention was the cementation procedure, as cementation with lentulo spiral produced greater retention than cementation without the use of lentulo spiral (p < 0.05); however, there seems to be a close interaction between fabrication technique, cement type, and cementation procedure (p= 0.051). The least retentive group was the one fabricated by direct technique, cemented with zinc phosphate without the use of lentulo spiral. Conclusion: Fabrication technique does not affect retention of cast dowels, except when zinc phosphate was the luting agent and placed in the canal space without using a lentulo spiral. The cementation procedure had a significant effect on retention; thus, it is recommended that cementation should be done using the lentulo spiral. [source]

    A Zeolite-Like Zinc Phosphonocarboxylate Framework and Its Transformation into Two- and Three-Dimensional Structures

    CHEMISTRY - AN ASIAN JOURNAL, Issue 12 2007
    Zhenxia Chen
    Abstract Three zinc phosphonocarboxylates, Zn2(pbc)2,Hdma,H3O,2H2O (1), Zn(pbc),Hdma (2), and Zn4.5(pbc)3(OH)(H2O)0.5,Hdma (3) (H3pbc=4-phosphonobenzoic acid, dma=dimethylamine) were synthesized by the mixed solvothermal reaction of Zn(Ac)2,2H2O and 4-phosphonobenzoic acid in N,N -dimethylformamide (DMF) and water. The zigzag and ladderlike chains completely constructed by triply fused 4-membered rings (denoted SBU-1) are linked by the organic moieties to form the 3D zeolite-like structure 1 and the layered structure 2, respectively. As for structure 3, a new second building unit (SBU-2) formed by the inset of the [Zn3O12] trimer into the 4-membered ring as well as SBU-1 is observed. The connections between the two types of SBUs lead to a "zinc phosphate" layer, which is linked by the organic groups to generate a 3D pillar-layered structure. Both solution-mediated and solid-state transformations of 1 to 2 and 3 were observed. A possible mechanism for the transformation is proposed. Gas sorption studies show that 1 has accessible pores for methanol and water and exhibits size selectivity for alcohols. [source]

    Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation

    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 12 2008
    Christian Mehl
    Abstract Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the retrievability of cemented implant crowns using two different removal devices. The influence of five cement types and two cement application techniques was evaluated. Methods: Forty copings were cast from a CoCr alloy for 40 tapered titanium abutments (5° taper, 4.3 mm diameter, 6 mm height, Camlog, Germany). Twenty copings were modeled as single crowns, whereas 20 copings were modeled with an extension to simulate fixed partial dentures (FPDs). Before cementation, the inner surfaces of the copings were air-abraded (50 ,m Al2O3 particles at 2.5 bars), while the abutments were used as delivered with machined surfaces. Copings were cemented with eugenol-free zinc oxide (Freegenol), zinc phosphate (Harvard), glass ionomer (Ketac Cem), polycarboxylate (Durelon) and so-called self-adhesive resin (RelyX Unicem) cement. Cement was applied in a thin film band of 1 or 3 mm to the cervical margin of the inner surface of the copings, respectively. After cementation, specimens were stored in saline solution for 24 h. The Coronaflex and a standardized custom-made removal device were used to remove the copings from the abutments. Results: Using the same cement, no statistically significant influence with regard to the type of restoration (crown/FDP), cement application mode and device was detected (P>0.05). Therefore, data of specimens cemented with the same cement were pooled. Median attempts to remove the copings were: zinc oxide: 3, self-adhesive resin: 3, zinc phosphate: 5, glass ionomer: 16 and polycarboxylate: 58. Four levels of significance (P<0.0001) were found: (1) zinc oxide/self-adhesive resin; (2) zinc phosphate; (3) glass ionomer; and (4) polycarboxylate. Conclusions: Zinc phosphate and glass ionomer cement might be suitable for a so-called ,semipermanent' (=retrievable) cementation, while polycarboxylate seems to provide the most durable cementation. [source]