			Home About us Contact

Worker Schemes (worker + scheme)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Humanities and Social Sciences	75%

Selected Abstracts

Key worker services for disabled children: what characteristics of services lead to better outcomes for children and families?

CHILD: CARE, HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT, Issue 2 2006
P. Sloper
Abstract Background, Research has shown that families of disabled children who have a key worker benefit from this service and recent policy initiatives emphasize the importance of such services. However, research is lacking on which characteristics of key worker schemes for disabled children are related to better outcomes for families. Methods, A postal questionnaire was completed by 189 parents with disabled children who were receiving a service in seven key worker schemes in England and Wales. Path analysis was used to investigate associations between characteristics of the services and outcomes for families (satisfaction with the service, impact of key worker on quality of life, parent unmet need, child unmet need). Results, The four path models showed that key workers carrying out more aspects of the key worker role, appropriate amounts of contact with key workers, regular training, supervision and peer support for key workers, and having a dedicated service manager and a clear job description for key workers were associated with better outcomes for families. Characteristics of services had only a small impact on child unmet need, suggesting that other aspects of services were affecting child unmet need. Conclusions, Implications for policy and practice are discussed, including the need for regular training, supervision and peer support for key workers and negotiated time and resources for them to carry out the role. These influence the extent to which key workers carry out all aspects of the key worker's role and their amount of contact with families, which in turn impact on outcomes. [source]

Care co-ordination and key worker schemes for disabled children: results of a UK-wide survey

CHILD: CARE, HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT, Issue 1 2004
V. Greco
Abstract Aim To investigate the prevalence and nature of care co-ordination and key worker services for disabled children and their families. Methods Postal survey of 225 Children with Disabilities Teams across the UK. Results Out of 159 questionnaires returned (70%), 35 (22%) reported having a care co-ordination scheme, with 30 (19%) of these providing key workers for families. The majority had multiagency and parent involvement in setting up and overseeing the schemes. However, multiagency funding was less common and funding for many schemes was short term. Different models of key working were apparent. Five schemes employed full-time key workers. In 21 schemes, professionals key worked with a few families as part of a larger case load, and in three schemes, both types of key workers were employed. Most schemes provided initial or ongoing training for key workers, but a few provided neither of these. Discussion The proportion of areas having care co-ordination or key worker services is consistent with findings on research with parents of disabled children, which reports that less than one-third of families have a key worker. The extent of multiagency involvement in planning and overseeing the operation of the service was positive but joint funding was more problematic. There was considerable variation in service models and as yet, little is known about whether or how such variations relate to outcomes for children and families. Further research will investigate these issues. [source]

Key Worker Services for Disabled Children: the Views of Parents

CHILDREN & SOCIETY, Issue 3 2007
Veronica Greco
This study reports the findings from 68 interviews with parents of disabled children who are users of seven key worker schemes in England and Wales. The interviews which lasted for one hour each, were tape-recorded, transcribed and analysed according to both a priori and emerging themes. The findings from this study have implications for policy and practice, for example, the necessity of protected time for key workers, the necessity of conveying clear information about the key worker's role, the importance of access to training and information for the key worker, the need for key workers to be proactive, and for their involvement in care plan and review meetings. Copyright © 2006 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2006 National Children's Bureau [source]

Caring for people with learning disability: a survey of general practitioners' attitudes in Southampton and South-west Hampshire

BRITISH JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, Issue 1 2000
Ken SteinArticle first published online: 24 DEC 200
The aim of the present paper was to examine general practitioners' (GPs') beliefs about: the demands made on the primary care team by people with learning disability; their confidence in meeting health care needs and perceived training requirements; attitudes towards specialist or generic health service provision, and current contact with specialist teams; and attitudes towards screening in people with learning disability. A postal questionnaire was sent to a randomly selected partner from 95% of the practices in the Southampton and South-west Hampshire Health District. Forty-eight (75%) GPs responded and few were undecided about the demands placed on primary care teams, but beliefs were mixed. Most GPs were confident in dealing with the medical care needs of people with learning disability and the majority felt that training courses would not be worthwhile, except to learn more about specialist services where contact was very low and a ,link worker' scheme had had little apparent impact. Most respondents agreed that GPs should meet the medical needs of people with learning disability as part of general medical services and approximately half had a positive attitude towards providing regular health checks. Respondents were cautious about offering cervical cancer screening to women with learning disability. A small minority suggested that they would take no action to follow up a non-attendance for mammography. As a heterogeneous population, it is not surprising that GPs' attitudes vary widely. Further research is required to establish the nature and scale of demands made on primary health care teams, and to evaluate systematic means of addressing health care needs of people with learning disability. [source]