Bengal Test (bengal + test)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Kinds of Bengal Test

  • rose bengal test


  • Selected Abstracts


    Rose Bengal test: diagnostic yield and use for the rapid diagnosis of human brucellosis in emergency departments in endemic areas

    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, Issue 3 2005
    J. D. Ruiz-Mesa
    Abstract The aim of the present study was to analyse the diagnostic yield of the rose Bengal test for the rapid diagnosis of human brucellosis in an emergency department in an area where the disease is endemic. The study included 711 patients diagnosed initially with brucellosis and 270 controls. Brucellosis patients were divided into three groups: group I, individuals with no regular exposure to or history of brucellosis; group II, individuals exposed repeatedly to Brucella infection; and group III, individuals infected with Brucella who had received appropriate treatment during the previous 12 months. Blood cultures were positive for 445 (62.6%) brucellosis patients, while the remaining 266 (37.4%) patients were diagnosed according to clinical and serological criteria. The overall sensitivity of the rose Bengal test was 92.9%. The specificities for groups I, II and III were 94.3%, 91.7% and 76.9%, respectively, with positive likelihood ratios of 16.5, 10.4 and 4.2, respectively. The diagnostic gain after the performance of the rose Bengal test was good or very good in patients with no previous exposure to Brucella or history of brucellosis, but poor in patients who were exposed repeatedly to Brucella or had a history of brucellosis and a low pre-test probability. Use of the rose Bengal test as the sole technique for the diagnosis of brucellosis in endemic areas should be considered very carefully in the context of patients who are exposed repeatedly to Brucella or have a history of brucellosis. [source]


    Paraplegia associated with brucellosis involving the anterior lumbrosacral nerve roots

    JOURNAL OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, Issue 1 2003
    Umit Hidir Ulas
    Abstract We report the case of a 21-year-old man with paraplegia due to brucellosis involvement of lumbosacral anterior roots. Lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging showed contrast enhancement of anterior roots and the anterior part of duramater. Conduction block was found at the level of the lumbosacral anterior roots by electrophysiological studies, including magnetic stimulation study. Wright agglutination, Rose Bengal tests and bacterial culture obtained from cerebrospinal fluid confirmed the diagnosis of neurobrucellosis. Oral administration of ceftriaxon with additional rifampin was effective, and after 3 months of treatment, laboratory data resolved and clinical signs partially improved. [source]


    Conjunctival impression cytology and tear-film changes in patients with familial Mediterranean fever

    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, Issue 1 2009
    Aylin Karalezli
    Abstract. Purpose:, To evaluate the ocular surface changes and tear-film functions in patients with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). Methods:, This prospective case,control clinical study examined 35 patients with FMF (group 1) and 35 controls (group 2). All patients underwent a full ophthalmological examination. Ocular surface changes were evaluated by determining cell content of surface conjunctival epithelium using conjunctival impression cytology and tear-film functions using Schirmer-I, break-up time (BUT), corneal fluorescein and Rose Bengal tests. Subjective ocular complaints were scored with a four-point scale. Between-group results were compared. Results:, In group 1, impression cytology revealed grade 0 changes in 15 eyes, grade 1 changes in 11 eyes and grade 2 changes in nine eyes in group 1; in group 2, it revealed grade 0 changes in 27 eyes, grade 1 changes in five eyes and grade 2 changes in three eyes (p = 0.013). Mean goblet cell density was 765 ± 45 cells/mm2 in group 1 and 1730 ± 100 cells/mm2 in group 2 (P < 0.001). Mean results on the Schirmer-I test results were 17.36 ± 3.18 mm in group 1 and 19.60 ± 4.17 mm in group 2 (p = 0.364). Mean BUT was 8.20 ± 1.60 seconds in group 1 and 9.93 ± 2.33 seconds in group 2 (p = 0.001). Mean corneal fluorescein and Rose Bengal staining scores were 3.26 ± 1.67 and 0.96 ± 0.71 in group 1 and 1.37 ± 0.34 and 0.40 ± 0.49 in group 2 (p = 0.037, p = 0.005). The presence of subjective ocular complaints was more frequent in group 1 than in group 2. Conclusion:, Despite normal tear production, the ocular surface and tear-film functions of FMF patients differ from those of healthy individuals. These changes may be related to the chronic inflammatory nature of FMF. [source]