			Home About us Contact

Whole Chromosome (whole + chromosome)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Life Sciences	50%

Selected Abstracts

Redefining monosomy 5 by molecular cytogenetics in 23 patients with MDS/AML

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, Issue 6 2007
Angèle Herry
Abstract Deletion of the long arm of chromosome 5 [del(5q)] or loss of a whole chromosome 5 (,5) is a common finding, arising de novo in 10% of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and in 40% of patients with therapy-related MDS or AML. We investigated by molecular cytogenetics 23 MDS/AML patients for whom conventional cytogenetics detected a monosomy 5. Monosomy 5 was redefined as unbalanced or balanced translocation and ring of chromosome 5. Loss of 5q material was identified in all 23 patients, but one. One copy of EGR1(5q31) or CSF1R(5q33,34) genes was lost in 22 of the 23 patients. Chromosome 5p material was a constant chromosomal component of derivative chromosomes or rings in all patients, but one. Sequential fluorescent in situ hybridization studies with whole chromosome paints and region-specific probes, used as a complement to conventional cytogenetic analysis, allow a better interpretation of karyotypes in MDS/AML patients. [source]

Prader,Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome,

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, Issue 3 2010
Karin Buiting
Abstract Prader,Willi syndrome (PWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS) are two distinct neurogenetic disorders in which imprinted genes on the proximal long arm of chromosome 15 are affected. Although the SNORD116 gene cluster has become a prime candidate for PWS, it cannot be excluded that other paternally expressed genes in the chromosomal region 15q11q13 contribute to the full phenotype. AS is caused by a deficiency of the UBE3A gene, which in the brain is expressed from the maternal allele only. The most frequent genetic lesions in both disorders are a de novo deletion of the chromosomal region 15q11q13, uniparental disomy 15, an imprinting defect or, in the case of AS, a mutation of the UBE3A gene. Microdeletions in a small number of patients with PWS and AS have led to the identification of the chromosome 15 imprinting center (IC). The IC consists of two critical elements, which act in cis to regulate imprinting in the whole chromosome 15q11q13 imprinted domain. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Mixture Modeling for Genome-Wide Localization of Transcription Factors

BIOMETRICS, Issue 1 2007
Sündüz Kele
Summary Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by DNA microarray analysis (ChIP-chip methodology) is an efficient way of mapping genome-wide protein,DNA interactions. Data from tiling arrays encompass DNA,protein interaction measurements on thousands or millions of short oligonucleotides (probes) tiling a whole chromosome or genome. We propose a new model-based method for analyzing ChIP-chip data. The proposed model is motivated by the widely used two-component multinomial mixture model of de novo motif finding. It utilizes a hierarchical gamma mixture model of binding intensities while incorporating inherent spatial structure of the data. In this model, genomic regions belong to either one of the following two general groups: regions with a local protein,DNA interaction (peak) and regions lacking this interaction. Individual probes within a genomic region are allowed to have different localization rates accommodating different binding affinities. A novel feature of this model is the incorporation of a distribution for the peak size derived from the experimental design and parameters. This leads to the relaxation of the fixed peak size assumption that is commonly employed when computing a test statistic for these types of spatial data. Simulation studies and a real data application demonstrate good operating characteristics of the method including high sensitivity with small sample sizes when compared to available alternative methods. [source]

Mechanism of malsegregations at meiosis: premature centromere separation and precocious division in female Chinese hamsters stimulated with gonadotropic hormones

CONGENITAL ANOMALIES, Issue 3 2000
Shin-ichi Sonta
ABSTRACT, Using female Chinese hamsters stimulated with pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), we investigated the influence of hormonal stimulation upon meiotic segregation in oocytes. In 1,576 oocytes ovulated spontaneously from 197 non-treated mature females, the number (percentage) of hyperhaploid oocytes with more than 12 (12,14) chromosomes was 16 (1.0%). These cells had no extra single chromatids, but all had extra chromosomes. Single chromatids were seen in 7 (0.4%) cells with a haploid chromosome set. On the other hand, a total of 1,329 and 1,198 second meiotic (MII) oocytes from 64 mature females and 61 immature females stimulated with PMSG and hCG, respectively, were subjected to chromosomal analysis. Single chromatids were seen in 34 (2.6%) and 62 (5.2%) of these oocytes, respectively. Since these chromatids were mostly paired and the sister chromatids existed near each other in many cells, they may have separated from some chromosomes of haploid cells. Compared with the non-treated females, the frequency of cells with single chromatids was significantly greater in oocytes from both mature and immature females stimulated with PMSG and hCG. The number (percentage) of hyperhaploid cells from mature and immature PMSG-hCG-stimulated females, respectively, was 15 (1.1%) and 14 (1.2%), which was not significantly greater than that in non-treated females. Most of these cells had extra whole chromosomes but one oocyte from mature females and one from immature females had an extra single chromatid. These findings indicate that such hormonal stimulation induces premature centromere separation in MII oocytes and precocious division at anaphase I, which can be assumed by the presence of MII cells with extra single chromatids. Considering that no or less hyperhaploid MII oocytes with an extra single chromatid were seen in oocytes from spontaneous ovulation and from artificial ovulation on hormonal stimulation, these findings suggest that the major mechanism of malsegregations at first meiotic (MI) division is not a precocious division but rather, errors such as nondisjunction of homologous chromosomes (dyads). [source]