Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Warming Systems (warming + system)
Kinds of Warming Systems Selected AbstractsORIGINAL ARTICLE: A randomised single blinded study of the administration of pre-warmed fluid vs active fluid warming on the incidence of peri-operative hypothermia in short surgical procedures,ANAESTHESIA, Issue 9 2010J. C. Andrzejowski Summary We compared the effect of delivering fluid warmed using two methods in 76 adult patients having short duration surgery. All patients received a litre of crystalloid delivered either at room temperature, warmed using an in-line warming device or pre-warmed in a warming cabinet for at least 8 h. The tympanic temperature of those receiving fluid at room temperature was 0.4 °C lower on arrival in recovery when compared with those receiving fluid from a warming cabinet (p = 0.008). Core temperature was below the hypothermic threshold of 36.0 °C in seven (14%) patients receiving either type of warm fluid, compared to eight (32%) patients receiving fluid at room temperature (p = 0.03). The administration of 1 l warmed fluid to patients having short duration general anaesthesia results in higher postoperative temperatures. Pre-warmed fluid, administered within 30 min of its removal from a warming cabinet, is as efficient at preventing peri-operative hypothermia as that delivered through an in-line warming system. [source] Effectiveness of cutaneous warming systems on temperature control: meta-analysisJOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, Issue 6 2010Cristina Maria Galvão galvão c.m., liang y. & clark a.m. (2010) Effectiveness of cutaneous warming systems on temperature control: meta-analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing,66(6), 1196,1206. Abstract Title.,Effectiveness of cutaneous warming systems on temperature control: meta-analysis. Aim., This paper is a report of a meta-analysis to identify the effectiveness of different types of cutaneous warming systems in temperature control for patients undergoing elective surgery. Background., Hypothermia is a common and serious complication of surgery. Different cutaneous warming systems are used to prevent hypothermia during surgery but there have been no previous meta-analyses of the effectiveness of different warming systems in controlling temperature. Data sources., We conducted a search of the CINAHL (2000 to April 2009), Medline (2000 to April 2009), Embase (2000 to April 2009) and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (2000 to April 2009) databases for randomized controlled trials published in English, Spanish and Portuguese. The primary outcome measure of interest was core body temperature. Methods., A systematic review incorporating meta-analysis was carried out. Results., From 329 papers, 23 trials compared warming systems. Forced-air warming systems had a strong tendency towards superior temperature control over passive insulation via cotton blankets (mean difference: 0·29°C; 95% confidence interval: ,0·02 to 0·59, three trials 292 patients) and radiant warming systems (mean difference: 0·16°C; 95% confidence interval: ,0·01 to 0·33, three trials, 161 patients). However, circulating water garments tended to be more effective than forced-air warming systems (mean difference: ,0·73°C; 95% confidence interval: ,1·51 to 0·05, I2 = 97%; four trials, 198 patients). Pooled results approached statistical significance and indicated clinically meaningful differences in temperature control. Conclusion., Current evidence suggests that circulating water garments offer better temperature control than forced-air warming systems, and both are more effective than passive warming devices. [source] A systematic review of the effectiveness of cutaneous warming systems to prevent hypothermiaJOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, Issue 5 2009Cristina M Galvão Aims., To retrieve and critique recent randomised trials of cutaneous warming systems used to prevent hypothermia in surgical patients during the intraoperative period and to identify gaps in current evidence and make recommendations for future trials. Background., Hypothermia affects up to 70% of anaesthetised surgical patients and is associated with several significant negative health outcomes. Design., Systematic review using integrative methods. Methods., We searched CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and Medline databases (January 2000,April 2007) for recent reports on randomised controlled trials of cutaneous warming systems used with elective patients during the intraoperative period. Inclusion criteria., We included randomised control trials examining the effects of cutaneous warming systems used intraoperatively on patients aged 18 years or older undergoing non-emergency surgery. Studies published in English, Spanish or Portuguese with a comparison group that consisted of either usual care or active cutaneous warming systems without prewarming were reviewed. Results., Of 193 papers initially identified, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. There was moderate evidence to indicate that carbon-fibre blankets and forced-air warming systems are equally effective and that circulating-water garments are most effective for maintaining normothermia during the intraoperative period. Few trials reported costs. Conclusions., Carbon-fibre blankets and forced-air warming systems are effective and circulating-water garments may be preferable. Future research should measure the direct and indirect costs associated with competing systems. Relevance to clinical practice., Nurses can use this review to inform their selection of warming interventions in perioperative nursing practice. They can also assess other factors such as nursing workload, staff training and equipment maintenance, which should be incorporated into future research. [source] Differences among forced-air warming systems with upper body blankets are small.ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 9 2003A randomized trial for heat transfer in volunteers Background:, Forced-air warming is known as an effective procedure in prevention and treatment of perioperative hypothermia. Significant differences have been described between forced-air warming systems in combination with full body blankets. We investigated four forced-air warming systems in combination with upper body blankets for existing differences in heat transfer. Methods:, After approval of the local Ethics Committee and written informed consent, four forced-air warming systems combined with upper body blankets were investigated in a randomized cross-over trial on six healthy volunteers: (1) BairHuggerÔ 505 and Upper Body Blanket 520, Augustine Medical; (2) ThermaCareÔ TC 3003, GaymarÔ and OptisanÔ Upper Body Blanket, Brinkhaus; (3) WarmAirÔ 134 and FilteredFlowÔ Upper Body Blanket, CSZ; and (4) WarmTouchÔ 5800 and CareDrapeÔ Upper Body Blanket, Mallinckrodt. Heat transfer from the blanket to the body surface was measured with 11 calibrated heat flux transducers (HFTs) with integrated thermistors on the upper body. Additionally, the blanket temperature was measured 1 cm above the HFT. After a preparation time of 60 min measurements were started for 20 min. Mean values were calculated over 20 min. The t -test for matched pairs with Bonferroni-Holm-correcture for multiple testing was used for statistical evaluation at a P -level of 0.05. The values are presented as mean±SD. Results:, The WarmTouchÔ blower with the CareDrapeÔ blanket obtained the best heat flux (17.0±3.5 W). The BairHuggerÔ system gave the lowest heat transfer (8.1±1.1 W). The heat transfer of the ThermaCareÔ system and WarmAirÔ systems were intermediate with 14.3±2.1 W and 11.3±1.0 W. Conclusions:, Based on an estimated heat loss from the covered area of 38 W the heat balance is changed by 46.1 W to 55 W by forced-air warming systems with upper body blankets. Although the differences in heat transfer are significant, the clinical relevance of this difference is small. [source] Wet forced-air warming blankets are ineffective at maintaining normothermiaPEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 7 2008ERICA P. LIN MD Summary Background:, Forced-air warming systems have proven effective in preventing perioperative hypothermia. To date, reported adverse events relate primarily to overheating and thermal injuries. This study uses a simple model to show that forced-air warming blankets become ineffective if they get wet. Methods:, Temperature sensor probes were inserted into three 1-liter fluid bags. Group C bags served as the control. Groups D (dry) and W (wet) bags were placed on Bair Hugger® Model 555 (Arizant Healthcare, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN, USA) pediatric underbody blankets. The warming blanket for Group W bags was subsequently wet with irrigation fluid. Temperature was documented every 5 min. This model was repeated two times for a total of three cycles. Statistical analysis was performed using anova for repeated measures. Results:, Starting temperatures for each model were within a 0.3°C range. Group C demonstrated a steady decline in temperature. Group D maintained and slightly increased in temperature during the observation period, while Group W exhibited a decrease in temperature at a rate similar to Group C. These results were significant at P < 0.005. Conclusions:, A wet forced-air warming blanket is ineffective at maintaining normothermia. Once wet, the warming blanket resulted in cooling similar to the control group. [source] | ||||||||||||||||||||||