Home About us Contact | |||
Voice Therapy (voice + therapy)
Selected AbstractsAerodynamic Changes as a Result of Vocal Function Exercises in Elderly MenTHE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 10 2008Stephen Gorman PhD Abstract Objectives/Hypothesis: Voice therapy can improve the vocal quality of elderly patients with voice problems, but the changes in vocal aerodynamics associated with physiologic voice therapy are not well documented. The purpose of the present study was to determine the changes in vocal aerodynamics as a result of the management program known as Vocal Function Exercises (VFEs). Study Design: Pre- and post-treatment differences in VFE maximum phonation times (MPT) and measures of vocal aerodynamics were analyzed. Methods: There were 19 participants, aged 60 to 78 years, who performed VFEs twice a day for 12 weeks. Aerodynamic measures of glottal airflow and subglottic pressure were collected at comfortable, high, and low pitches both before the initiation of the exercise program and again at its conclusion. MPT data were collected weekly. Results: The participants showed continuous improvement in VFE MPT across the 12 weeks. Significant differences occurred from pre- to post-therapy on some measures of vocal aerodynamics relating to glottic closure. Conclusions: Decrease in glottic airflow was achieved, with a concomitant increase in subglottic pressure, but without an increase in acoustic power (comfortable and low pitch). Improvement in VFE MPT mirrored the improvement in vocal aerodynamics. [source] The efficacy of voice therapy in patients after treatment for early glottic carcinomaCANCER, Issue 1 2006Christine D. L. van Gogh M.D. Abstract BACKGROUND After treatment for early glottic carcinoma, a considerable number of patients end up with voice problems that interfere with daily life activities. The objective of this randomized and controlled study was to assess the efficacy of voice therapy in these patients. METHODS Of 177 patients, 6,120 months after treatment for early glottic carcinoma, 70 patients (40%) suffered from voice impairment based on a 5-item screening questionnaire. Approximately 60% of those 70 patients were not interested in participating in the current study. Twenty-three patients who were willing to participate were assigned randomly either to a voice therapy group (n = 12 patients) or to a control group (n = 11 patients). Multidimensional voice analyses (the self-reported Voice Handicap Index [VHI], acoustic and perceptual voice quality analysis, videolaryngostroboscopy, and the Voice Range Profile) were conducted twice: before and after voice therapy or with 3 months in between for the control group. RESULTS Statistical analyses of the difference in scores (postmeasurement minus premeasurement) showed significant voice improvement after voice therapy on the total VHI score, percent jitter, and noise-to-harmonics ratio in the voice signal and on the perceptual rating of vocal fry. CONCLUSIONS Voice therapy proved to be effective in patients who had voice problems after treatment for early glottic carcinoma. Improvement not only was noticed by the patients (VHI) but also was confirmed by objective voice parameters. Cancer 2006. © 2005 American Cancer Society. [source] Hoarse voice in adults: an evidence-based approach to the 12 minute consultationCLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, Issue 1 2009I. Syed Background:, The hoarse voice is a common presentation in the adult ENT clinic. It is estimated that otolaryngology/voice clinics receive over 50 000 patients with dysphonia each year. Good vocal function is estimated to be required for around 1/3 of the labour force to fulfil their job requirements. The assessment and management of the patient with a hoarse voice is potentially a complex and protracted process as the aetiology is often multi-factorial. This article provides a guide for the clinician in the general ENT clinic to make a concise, thorough assessment of the hoarse patient and engage in an evidence based approach to investigation and management. Method:, Literature search performed on 4 October 2008 using EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane databases using subject headings hoarse voice or dysphonia in combination with diagnosis, management, investigation, treatment, intervention and surgery. Results:, General vocal hygiene is beneficial for non organic dysphonia but the evidence base for individual components is poor. There is a good evidence base for the use of voice therapy as first line treatment of organic dysphonia such as vocal fold nodules and polyps. There is little evidence for surgical intervention as first line therapy for most common benign vocal fold lesions. Surgery is, however, the treatment of choice for hoarseness due to papillomatosis. Both CO2 laser and microdissection are equally acceptable modalities for surgical resection of common benign vocal fold lesions. Laryngopharyngeal reflux is commonly cited as a cause of hoarseness but the evidence base for treatment with gastric acid suppression is poor. Despite the widespread use of proton pump inhibitors for treating laryngopharyngeal reflux, there is high quality evidence to suggest that they are no more effective than placebo. Conclusion:, A concise and thorough approach to assessment in the general ENT clinic will provide the diagnosis and facilitate the management of the hoarse voice in the majority of cases. Voice therapy is an important tool that should be utilised in the general ENT clinic and should not be restricted to the specialist voice clinic. If there is no improvement after initial measures, the larynx appears normal and/or the patient has failed initial speech & language therapy, referral to a specialist voice clinic may be helpful. More research is still required particularly with regard to laryngopharyngeal reflux which is often cited as an important cause of hoarseness but is still poorly understood. [source] Aerodynamic Changes as a Result of Vocal Function Exercises in Elderly MenTHE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 10 2008Stephen Gorman PhD Abstract Objectives/Hypothesis: Voice therapy can improve the vocal quality of elderly patients with voice problems, but the changes in vocal aerodynamics associated with physiologic voice therapy are not well documented. The purpose of the present study was to determine the changes in vocal aerodynamics as a result of the management program known as Vocal Function Exercises (VFEs). Study Design: Pre- and post-treatment differences in VFE maximum phonation times (MPT) and measures of vocal aerodynamics were analyzed. Methods: There were 19 participants, aged 60 to 78 years, who performed VFEs twice a day for 12 weeks. Aerodynamic measures of glottal airflow and subglottic pressure were collected at comfortable, high, and low pitches both before the initiation of the exercise program and again at its conclusion. MPT data were collected weekly. Results: The participants showed continuous improvement in VFE MPT across the 12 weeks. Significant differences occurred from pre- to post-therapy on some measures of vocal aerodynamics relating to glottic closure. Conclusions: Decrease in glottic airflow was achieved, with a concomitant increase in subglottic pressure, but without an increase in acoustic power (comfortable and low pitch). Improvement in VFE MPT mirrored the improvement in vocal aerodynamics. [source] Hoarseness: Is It Really Laryngopharyngeal Reflux?,THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 2 2008Seth M. Cohen MD Abstract Objective/Hypothesis: This study will test the hypothesis that proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use is prevalent among patients referred for hoarseness and will assess the ultimate diagnosis and factors associated with patients' voice outcomes. Study Design: Retrospective review of patients in a tertiary care voice clinic. Methods: Patients with a primary diagnosis of hoarseness, who were taking or had taken PPIs in the previous 2 months and referred to a tertiary care voice clinic, were identified. The dosage and length of PPI administration, patient report of gastroesophageal reflux (GER), presence of findings suggesting muscle tension dysphonia (MTD), patient demographics, diagnosis, chronicity of symptoms, interventions, follow-up, and outcome were determined. Results: Of 299 patients, 264 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 47.2 years, with a range of 18 to 89 years, with 26.7% male and 73.3% female. Among patients referred for voice problems, 148 (56.1%) had previously tried PPIs or were currently on PPI treatment; 44 (29.7%) stopped taking their PPI because of continued hoarseness, and 104 (70.3%) had persistent hoarseness and associated throat complaints despite continued PPI treatment. Among patients who quit taking their PPI because of continued voice complaints, 79.5% did not have traditional GER symptoms of heartburn or regurgitation. The most common treatment after referral was voice therapy, with an overall voice therapy response rate of 62.7%. Conclusions: PPI use is prevalent among patients referred because of persistent hoarseness. Whether patients have GER or MTD may influence patients' voice outcomes in response to PPI treatment. [source] The efficacy of voice therapy in patients after treatment for early glottic carcinomaCANCER, Issue 1 2006Christine D. L. van Gogh M.D. Abstract BACKGROUND After treatment for early glottic carcinoma, a considerable number of patients end up with voice problems that interfere with daily life activities. The objective of this randomized and controlled study was to assess the efficacy of voice therapy in these patients. METHODS Of 177 patients, 6,120 months after treatment for early glottic carcinoma, 70 patients (40%) suffered from voice impairment based on a 5-item screening questionnaire. Approximately 60% of those 70 patients were not interested in participating in the current study. Twenty-three patients who were willing to participate were assigned randomly either to a voice therapy group (n = 12 patients) or to a control group (n = 11 patients). Multidimensional voice analyses (the self-reported Voice Handicap Index [VHI], acoustic and perceptual voice quality analysis, videolaryngostroboscopy, and the Voice Range Profile) were conducted twice: before and after voice therapy or with 3 months in between for the control group. RESULTS Statistical analyses of the difference in scores (postmeasurement minus premeasurement) showed significant voice improvement after voice therapy on the total VHI score, percent jitter, and noise-to-harmonics ratio in the voice signal and on the perceptual rating of vocal fry. CONCLUSIONS Voice therapy proved to be effective in patients who had voice problems after treatment for early glottic carcinoma. Improvement not only was noticed by the patients (VHI) but also was confirmed by objective voice parameters. Cancer 2006. © 2005 American Cancer Society. [source] Hoarse voice in adults: an evidence-based approach to the 12 minute consultationCLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, Issue 1 2009I. Syed Background:, The hoarse voice is a common presentation in the adult ENT clinic. It is estimated that otolaryngology/voice clinics receive over 50 000 patients with dysphonia each year. Good vocal function is estimated to be required for around 1/3 of the labour force to fulfil their job requirements. The assessment and management of the patient with a hoarse voice is potentially a complex and protracted process as the aetiology is often multi-factorial. This article provides a guide for the clinician in the general ENT clinic to make a concise, thorough assessment of the hoarse patient and engage in an evidence based approach to investigation and management. Method:, Literature search performed on 4 October 2008 using EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane databases using subject headings hoarse voice or dysphonia in combination with diagnosis, management, investigation, treatment, intervention and surgery. Results:, General vocal hygiene is beneficial for non organic dysphonia but the evidence base for individual components is poor. There is a good evidence base for the use of voice therapy as first line treatment of organic dysphonia such as vocal fold nodules and polyps. There is little evidence for surgical intervention as first line therapy for most common benign vocal fold lesions. Surgery is, however, the treatment of choice for hoarseness due to papillomatosis. Both CO2 laser and microdissection are equally acceptable modalities for surgical resection of common benign vocal fold lesions. Laryngopharyngeal reflux is commonly cited as a cause of hoarseness but the evidence base for treatment with gastric acid suppression is poor. Despite the widespread use of proton pump inhibitors for treating laryngopharyngeal reflux, there is high quality evidence to suggest that they are no more effective than placebo. Conclusion:, A concise and thorough approach to assessment in the general ENT clinic will provide the diagnosis and facilitate the management of the hoarse voice in the majority of cases. Voice therapy is an important tool that should be utilised in the general ENT clinic and should not be restricted to the specialist voice clinic. If there is no improvement after initial measures, the larynx appears normal and/or the patient has failed initial speech & language therapy, referral to a specialist voice clinic may be helpful. More research is still required particularly with regard to laryngopharyngeal reflux which is often cited as an important cause of hoarseness but is still poorly understood. [source] Self-assessment of voice therapy for chronic dysphoniaCLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, Issue 1 2004R. Speyer Self-assessment of voice therapy for chronic dysphonia The effects of voice therapy in a group of chronically dysphonic patients are determined using two quality-of-life (QOL) instruments: the Voice Handicap Index (VHI), and a simple three-item outcome scale (three visual analogue scales). Both instruments measure changes in the quality of the voice itself and in the extent of impairment resulting from the dysphonia as experienced by the patient in social and occupational settings. Statistical tests conducted on pre- and post-treatment data indicated significant improvements on both instruments for the group as a whole. At the individual level, however, the effects were diverse. For roughly 50% of the subjects, a significant improvement could be established. The positive changes as measured with the three-item scale were greater than those measured with the VHI. The results suggest that the two QOL instruments measure slightly different aspects of the subjective perception of the therapy effects. In order to obtain a general evaluation of the patient's handicap, it may suffice to ask some simple questions. [source] |