Home  About us  Contact
 

Voice Handicap (voice + handicap)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Terms modified by Voice Handicap

  • voice handicap index
    		•

    Selected Abstracts

    Voice profile after type I or II laser chordectomies for T1a glottic carcinoma

    HEAD & NECK: JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES & SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, Issue 11 2009
    Elisabeth V. Sjögren MD
    Abstract Background Can a "typical" voice in terms of auditory perception be defined after type I or II chordectomy? Do other parameters in a multidimensional voice protocol correlate to this perceptual profile? Methods Voice evaluation using a multidimensional voice protocol including perceptual (GRBAS; grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain scale), acoustic, aerodynamic, stroboscopic analyses, and self-assessment (Voice Handicap Index [VHI]) in a cohort of 37 consecutive patients with T1a midcord glottic carcinoma. Results Sixty-five percent of patients had dysphonia, dominated by mild breathiness (mean grade 1.4). Voice Handicap was minimal (mean VHI 19). Acoustic and aerodynamic parameters were only mildly deviant. The correlations between perceptual analysis and the other parameters were weak. Conclusion The typical laser treated voice (type I or II resections) is characterized by mild breathiness in perceptual analysis. Correlations with other parameters, including patients' self assessment, are weak. Therefore, these outcomes do not form 1 integrated voice profile. This may have consequences for clinical decision-making. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2009 [source]

    Injection versus medialization laryngoplasty for the treatment of unilateral vocal fold paralysis,

    THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 9 2010
    Follow-Up at Six Months
    Abstract Objectives/Hypothesis: To determine whether injection laryngoplasty or medialization laryngoplasty is more effective in the long-term treatment of unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP). Study Design: A retrospective study of patients with UFVP who underwent either injection or medialization laryngoplasty at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences between July 29, 2003 and November 18, 2005. Methods: The data analyzed included patient characteristics and type of intervention, along with the pretreatment and post-treatment parameters of videostrobolaryngoscopy, perceptual voice analysis, and patients' subjective assessment of voice handicap. Results: Thirty-four patients were evaluated, 15 new and 19 from a previous study. The average time from intervention to post-treatment evaluation in the new cohort was 4.8 months (range, 1.5,10.5 months). The average time from intervention to post-treatment in the combined cohort was 6.4 months (range, 1,24 months). Improvements were demonstrated in each of the measured voice parameters in both the injection and the medialization groups, and no significant differences were found in the degree of improvement between the two groups. Limited data on aerodynamic and acoustic voice measurements showed a trend toward improvement in each treatment group. Conclusions: Injection and medialization laryngoplasty were comparable in achieving voice improvement at the average long-term follow-up of 6 months. Laryngoscope, 2010 [source]

    Voice, Speech, and Swallowing Outcomes in Laser-Treated Laryngeal Cancer,

    THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 6 2003
    Matthew C. Jepsen MD
    Abstract Objective To describe preliminary voice, speech, and swallowing outcomes in patients treated by endoscopic laser excision of laryngeal cancer with or without adjuvant radiation therapy. Study Design Retrospective review. Methods Seventeen surgically treated patients (five T2 glottic and 12 clinically staged T2 supraglottic squamous cell carcinomas) participated in the study. Self-ratings of voice (Voice Handicap Index) and swallowing (M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory) were completed, as well as independent auditory-perceptual ratings of voice and speech recordings. Results Although no significant difference between Voice Handicap Index, M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory, and listener ratings was identified based on tumor site and irradiation status, there was a trend toward poorer outcomes in patients who received adjuvant radiation therapy. Whereas the patients having supraglottic cancer tended to report better voice but poorer swallowing outcomes, the glottic cancer group displayed the opposite pattern. Severity on Voice Handicap Index correlated significantly with listener severity ratings of speech, suggesting that the patients' perception of their voice handicap was similar to the listeners' judgments of their speech severity. Conclusions The results suggest the following trends: 1) Adjuvant radiation therapy was associated with poorer outcomes for voice, speech, and swallowing and may be associated with more impairment than surgery alone and 2) poorer outcomes on voice and swallowing were observed for the glottic and supraglottic cancer groups, respectively. To bolster these preliminary findings, additional outcomes studies in patients treated with conservation therapy are needed. [source]

    Multidimensional assessment of female tracheoesophageal prosthetic speech

    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, Issue 6 2006
    R. Kazi
    Objective:, The objective of this study was to undertake a multidimensional assessment of female tracheoesophageal prosthetic speech. Study Design:, A cross-sectional cohort study. Setting:, Head and Neck Unit in a tertiary oncology referral centre. Patients:, Ten female and 10 male total laryngectomy patients with no signs of recurrence and using voice prosthesis were compared to 10 normal female speakers. Intervention(s):, Electroglottographic and acoustic analysis of voice parameters for both sustained vowel /i/ and connected speech, perceptual evaluation using GRBAS (with 2 experienced raters) and questionnaire assessment using the University of Washington Quality of Life and the Voice Handicap Index. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, (v. 14, SPSS Inc., Chicago III). Results:, Median age of the female larygectomy patiemts was 65 years (range: 41-81), that of male laryngectomees was 66.5 years (range: 40-79) and that of the normal female subjects was 47.5 years (range: 35-72). All electroglottographic, acoustic parameters and GRBAS ratings of the female laryngectomy patients were significantly worse as compared with the normal female subjects. The median fundamental frequency (111.8 Hz) was comparable to male tracheoesophageal speakers (115.8 Hz). Mean composite University of Washington Quality of Life score and overall Voice Handicap Index score was 79.3(12.5) and 47.5(27.6) for the female laryngectomy patients and for the males was 81.2 (9.6) and 39.4(18.7). Conclusions:, Gender frequency differences as seen in normal subjects are lost following a laryngectomy operation as evidenced by electroglottographic and perceptual data. Although the quality of life scores are comparable to the male tracheoesophageal speakers, they exhibit a greater voice handicap as compared to their male counterparts. [source]