Vocal Function (vocal + function)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Integration of Ultra High-Speed Color Videoendoscopy with Time-Synchronized Measures of Vocal Function

THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue S1 2009
Daryush D. Mehta SM
No abstract is available for this article. [source]


The Use of Buccal Mucosa Graft at Posterior Cricoid Splitting for Subglottic Stenosis Repair,

THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 12 2001
Robert Thomé PhD
Abstract Background Since 1955, when Réthi established the posterior cricoid split augmentation (PCSA) method, several authors have published supporting reports of the validity and proven efficacy of its basic principles. A 27-year prospective, retrospective study. Objectives To report on experience in performing the PCSA method for subglottic and/or posterior,glottic stenosis repair using buccal mucosa interposition grafting at posterior cricoid split and stenting for 8 weeks, and to assess the impact on vocal function. Methods From 1972 on, 60 patients (45 adults, 15 children, aged 8 mo to 72 y) with subglottic and/or posterior,glottic stenosis were operated on using a modified PCSA method. The surgical technique consisted of posterior cricoid splitting, including or not the interarytenoid muscle; wide lateral retraction of the posterior cricoid halves; buccal mucosa interposition grafting and stenting for 8 weeks. The factors evaluated included the subglottic remodeling rate, donor and recipient sites morbidity, time to decannulation, rate of graft take, and phonatory function tests. Results The modified PCSA procedure resulted in a decannulation rate of 90%, 18 (30%) of which had further procedure to achieve decannulation, and 6 adult patients (10%) were considered failures because of restenosis. The rate of take of the mucosa graft was 100% in both children and adults, with complete epithelialization of the grafted area, the mucosa not becoming dry and crusty. No interarytenoid muscle division resulted in near-normal to normal glottic voicing. Interarytenoid muscle division determined supraglottic voicing with inspiratory noise and pneumophonic incoordination, breathy and hoarse voice, low fundamental frequency, limited dynamic range, and shortened phonation time. Conclusion The PCSA procedure with buccal mucosa graft is reliable, safe, and highly successful with respect to the graft incorporation and subglottic remodeling. The division or not of the interarytenoid muscle is the most important factor influencing the postoperative vocal function. [source]


NERVE STIMULATION IN THYROID SURGERY: IS IT REALLY USEFUL?

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 5 2007
Thorbjorn J Loch-Wilkinson
Background: Monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) has been claimed in some studies to reduce rates of nerve injury during thyroid surgery compared with anatomical dissection and visual identification of the RLN alone, whereas other studies have found no benefit. Continuous monitoring with endotracheal electrodes is expensive whereas discontinuous monitoring by laryngeal palpation with nerve stimulation is a simple and inexpensive technique. This study aimed to assess the value of nerve stimulation with laryngeal palpation as a means of identifying and assessing the function of the RLN and external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (EBSLN) during thyroid surgery. Methods: This was a prospective case series comprising 50 consecutive patients undergoing total thyroidectomy providing 100 RLN and 100 EBSLN for examination. All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative vocal cord and voice assessment by an independent ear, nose and throat surgeon, laryngeal examination at extubation and all were asked to complete a postoperative dysphagia score sheet. Dysphagia scores in the study group were compared with a control group (n = 20) undergoing total thyroidectomy without nerve stimulation. Results: One hundred of 100 (100%) RLN were located without the use of the nerve stimulator. A negative twitch response occurred in seven (7%) RLN stimulated (two bilateral, three unilateral). Postoperative testing, however, only showed one true unilateral RLN palsy postoperatively (1%), which recovered in 7 weeks giving six false-positive and one true-positive results. Eighty-six of 100 (86%) EBSLN were located without the nerve stimulator. Thirteen of 100 (13%) EBSLN could not be identified and 1 of 100 (1%) was located with the use of the nerve stimulator. Fourteen per cent of EBSLN showed no cricothyroid twitch on EBSLN stimulation. Postoperative vocal function in these patients was normal. There were no instances of equipment malfunction. Dysphagia scores did not differ significantly between the study and control groups. Conclusion: Use of a nerve stimulator did not aid in anatomical dissection of the RLN and was useful in identifying only one EBSLN. Discontinuous nerve monitoring by stimulation during total thyroidectomy confers no obvious benefit for the experienced surgeon in nerve identification, functional testing or injury prevention. [source]


Hoarse voice in adults: an evidence-based approach to the 12 minute consultation

CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, Issue 1 2009
I. Syed
Background:, The hoarse voice is a common presentation in the adult ENT clinic. It is estimated that otolaryngology/voice clinics receive over 50 000 patients with dysphonia each year. Good vocal function is estimated to be required for around 1/3 of the labour force to fulfil their job requirements. The assessment and management of the patient with a hoarse voice is potentially a complex and protracted process as the aetiology is often multi-factorial. This article provides a guide for the clinician in the general ENT clinic to make a concise, thorough assessment of the hoarse patient and engage in an evidence based approach to investigation and management. Method:, Literature search performed on 4 October 2008 using EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane databases using subject headings hoarse voice or dysphonia in combination with diagnosis, management, investigation, treatment, intervention and surgery. Results:, General vocal hygiene is beneficial for non organic dysphonia but the evidence base for individual components is poor. There is a good evidence base for the use of voice therapy as first line treatment of organic dysphonia such as vocal fold nodules and polyps. There is little evidence for surgical intervention as first line therapy for most common benign vocal fold lesions. Surgery is, however, the treatment of choice for hoarseness due to papillomatosis. Both CO2 laser and microdissection are equally acceptable modalities for surgical resection of common benign vocal fold lesions. Laryngopharyngeal reflux is commonly cited as a cause of hoarseness but the evidence base for treatment with gastric acid suppression is poor. Despite the widespread use of proton pump inhibitors for treating laryngopharyngeal reflux, there is high quality evidence to suggest that they are no more effective than placebo. Conclusion:, A concise and thorough approach to assessment in the general ENT clinic will provide the diagnosis and facilitate the management of the hoarse voice in the majority of cases. Voice therapy is an important tool that should be utilised in the general ENT clinic and should not be restricted to the specialist voice clinic. If there is no improvement after initial measures, the larynx appears normal and/or the patient has failed initial speech & language therapy, referral to a specialist voice clinic may be helpful. More research is still required particularly with regard to laryngopharyngeal reflux which is often cited as an important cause of hoarseness but is still poorly understood. [source]