Home  About us  Contact
 

Vestibular Stimulation (vestibular + stimulation)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Kinds of Vestibular Stimulation

  • galvanic vestibular stimulation
    		•

    Selected Abstracts

    Response to Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation in Patients with Unilateral Vestibular Loss

    THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 1 2006
    Hyun Jik Kim MD
    Abstract Objectives: This study sought to characterize various responses to galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) by comparing GVS-induced eye movements in healthy subjects and patients with vestibular function loss. The study also aimed to estimate the clinical significance of GVS tests. Finally, an effort was made to localize the primary excitation site of stimulation in the vestibular system. Materials and Methods: Three parameters of response to GVS, spontaneous nystagmus, galvanic stimulating nystagmus (GSN), and postgalvanic stimulating nystagmus (PGSN), were evaluated in 20 normal subjects and 14 patients with complete unilateral vestibular function loss resulting from labyrinthectomy or vestibular neurectomy using a three-dimensional video-electronystagmography technique. Results: In normal subjects, GSN was detected in all subjects and was directed toward the negative electrode. PGSN was also detected but was directed toward the opposite electrode. When the negative electrode was attached to the intact side in unilateral vestibular loss subjects, GSN was always directed toward the negative electrode and PGSN was never observed. When the negative electrode was attached to the lesion side, however, GSN was detected in only one case, and PGSN was observed and directed to the intact side in 13 patients. Conclusions: The response to GVS in vestibular loss patients differed from that in normal subjects, which suggests that GVS could be useful for estimating the extent of vestibular function loss. The fact that the patterns of GVS response differed so significantly suggests that the primary site of excitation is not central but is instead the peripheral vestibular organ. [source]

    Cervical dystonia responsive to acoustic and galvanic vestibular stimulation

    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, Issue 9 2006
    Sally M. Rosengren BSc
    Abstract Abstract: We examined the effects of acoustic and galvanic vestibular stimulation in a patient with cervical dystonia. Acoustic stimulation consisted of three conditions: "baseline" (no stimulation), "vestibular" (500 Hz bone-conducted tone bursts), and "control" (5,000 Hz tone bursts). Rectified electromyographic activity in the sternocleidomastoid was measured. Galvanic stimulation (1.5,2.5 mA current steps) was delivered to the mastoids, and head acceleration was measured. Vestibular acoustic stimulation reduced neck muscle activity between 16% and 44% (P < 0.001), and galvanic stimulation reduced head acceleration by 22.5% (P = 0.028). The patient reported subjective improvement in head control. Vestibular stimulation can reduce neck muscle activity in cervical dystonia and give symptomatic relief. © 2006 Movement Disorder Society [source]

    Modulation of the soleus H-reflex following galvanic vestibular stimulation and cutaneous stimulation in prone human subjects

    MUSCLE AND NERVE, Issue 2 2009
    Catherine R. Lowrey MSc
    Abstract There is evidence to suggest that vestibular and somatosensory inputs may interact when they are processed by the central nervous system, although the nature of the individual sensory contributions to this interaction is unknown. We examined the effects of a combined vestibular and cutaneous conditioning stimulus on the motoneuron pool that supplies the soleus muscle via the Hoffman reflex (H-reflex). We applied galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS; bipolar, binaural, 500 ms, 2.5-mA square-wave pulse) and cutaneous stimulation (medial plantar nerve; 11 ms, three-pulse train, 200 HZ) to prone human subjects and examined changes in the amplitude of the H-reflex. GVS alone caused facilitation (approximately 20%) of the H-reflex, whereas ipsilateral cutaneous stimulation alone caused a 26% inhibition. Paired GVS and cutaneous stimulation resulted in a linear summation of the individual conditioning effects. H-reflex amplitudes observed after paired conditioning with GVS and cutaneous stimulation could be predicted from the amplitudes observed with individual conditioning. These results suggest that in the prone position, when the muscles are not posturally engaged, vestibular and somatosensory information appear to sum in a linear fashion to influence the reflex response of lower limb motoneurons. Muscle Nerve 40: 213,220, 2009 [source]

    Response to Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation in Patients with Unilateral Vestibular Loss

    THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 1 2006
    Hyun Jik Kim MD
    Abstract Objectives: This study sought to characterize various responses to galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) by comparing GVS-induced eye movements in healthy subjects and patients with vestibular function loss. The study also aimed to estimate the clinical significance of GVS tests. Finally, an effort was made to localize the primary excitation site of stimulation in the vestibular system. Materials and Methods: Three parameters of response to GVS, spontaneous nystagmus, galvanic stimulating nystagmus (GSN), and postgalvanic stimulating nystagmus (PGSN), were evaluated in 20 normal subjects and 14 patients with complete unilateral vestibular function loss resulting from labyrinthectomy or vestibular neurectomy using a three-dimensional video-electronystagmography technique. Results: In normal subjects, GSN was detected in all subjects and was directed toward the negative electrode. PGSN was also detected but was directed toward the opposite electrode. When the negative electrode was attached to the intact side in unilateral vestibular loss subjects, GSN was always directed toward the negative electrode and PGSN was never observed. When the negative electrode was attached to the lesion side, however, GSN was detected in only one case, and PGSN was observed and directed to the intact side in 13 patients. Conclusions: The response to GVS in vestibular loss patients differed from that in normal subjects, which suggests that GVS could be useful for estimating the extent of vestibular function loss. The fact that the patterns of GVS response differed so significantly suggests that the primary site of excitation is not central but is instead the peripheral vestibular organ. [source]

    Post-stroke tactile allodynia and its modulation by vestibular stimulation: a MEG case study

    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 6 2009
    P. D. McGeoch
    Background,,, There is behavioural evidence that caloric vestibular stimulation (CVS) can alleviate central pain. Several such patients have also noted that it reduces tactile allodynia, an especially ill-understood phenomenon in these patients. Aims of the study,,, The first aim is to use magnetoencephalography (MEG) to study neural activity associated with tactile allodynia in central post-stroke pain (CPSP). The second is to assess how this would be affected, if at all, by CVS. The third is to assess the ability of the VESTAL solution for MEG to detect anterior cingulate activation. Methods,,, A 58-year-old woman with CPSP, and marked unilateral tactile allodynia, participated in a MEG study with imaging pre- and post-CVS. Results,,, Tactile simulation within the patient's allodynic area resulted in contralateral activation of the primary motor and anterior cingulate cortices, which had normalized 24 h post-CVS. Conclusions,,, We suggest that the unexpected primary motor cortex activation in response to light touch in the allodynic area arises from inappropriate activation of a normal mechanism, which may occur when a threat to homeostasis is present, to lower motor thresholds and allow for more rapid performance of corrective actions. We propose this may be mediated by the interoceptive cortex in the dorsal posterior insula. [source]