Home  About us  Contact
 

Vesicle Invasion (vesicle + invasion)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Kinds of Vesicle Invasion

  • seminal vesicle invasion
    		•

    Selected Abstracts

    Nomogram to predict seminal vesicle invasion using the status of cancer at the base of the prostate on systematic biopsy

    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 6 2010
    Makoto Ohori
    Objective: The aim of this study was to predict seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) by developing a new nomogram based on clinical features including the status of cancer at the base of the prostate on systematic biopsy. Methods: We studied the 466 patients with T1,3N0M0 prostate cancer who were treated with radical prostatectomy at three institutions. Preoperative clinical variables were correlated with the presence or absence of SVI with an area under the curve (AUC) of receiver,operator characteristics analysis. A nomogram was developed to predict SVI based on logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 81 patients (17%) had SVI. Cancer was present in a biopsy core from the base of the prostate in 209 patients, of whom 32.5% had SVI, compared with only 5% of the 257 patients without cancer at the base of the prostate (P < 0.005). On multivariate analysis, serum prostate-specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score, clinical T stage, and presence or absence of cancer in a biopsy core at the base of the prostate were significant predictors of SVI (P < 0.005 for all). The AUC of a standard model including clinical stage, Gleason score, and prostate-specific antigen was 0.83, which was significantly enhanced by including the presence of cancer at the base of the prostate (none, unilateral or bilateral lobes) (AUC 0.87, P= 0.023). Based on the logistic analysis, we developed the nomogram to predict SVI. The calibration plots appeared to be excellent. Conclusion: The information of presence or absence of cancer at the base from prostate biopsy and the resulting nomogram allow an accurate prediction of SVI in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. [source]

    Editorial Comment to Nomogram to predict seminal vesicle invasion using the status of cancer at the base of the prostate on systematic biopsy

    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 6 2010
    Kazutaka Saito md phd
    No abstract is available for this article. [source]

    Role of systematic ultrasound-guided staging biopsies in predicting extraprostatic extension and seminal vesicle invasion in men with prostate cancer

    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, Issue 3 2002
    Koji Okihara MD
    Abstract Purpose To assess the presence of extraprostatic extension and seminal vesicle invasion in men with prostate cancer, we performed systematic staging biopsies targeting neurovascular bundles, seminal vesicles, and other extraprostatic tissues before the men underwent radical prostatectomy. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical efficacy of these systematic staging biopsies compared with digital rectal examination (DRE) and transrectal sonography (TRUS). Methods Two hundred forty-four candidates for prostatectomy who had a diagnostic biopsy Gleason score of 8 or higher and/or indications of extraprostatic extension (eg, seminal vesicle invasion) by DRE or TRUS underwent staging biopsies using an 18-gauge Tru-Cut needle under real-time TRUS guidance between June 1997 and March 2000. We determined the number of staging biopsy cores to be taken based on the Gleason score of the diagnostic biopsy as well as abnormal DRE and/or TRUS findings. The chi-square test was used to evaluate the statistical significance of differences. Results There were no complications of staging biopsy. In 75 (31%) of the 244 patients, results of the staging biopsies were positive. The clinical stage was upgraded by staging biopsy in 18 (24%) of these 75 patients. After the staging biopsies, 90 patients underwent radical prostatectomy. Among these 90 patients, staging biopsy specimens were positive for cancer in 20 (47%) of the 43 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and in 1 (2%) of the 47 patients who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. There were no false-positive staging biopsies in either group. Among the 90 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy, the false-negative rate for the prediction of organ-confined disease was 43% (30/69) for staging biopsies compared with 29% (10/34) for TRUS. The diagnostic accuracy of staging biopsies (67%; 60/90) was higher than that of DRE (52%; 47/90; p < 0.05) but lower than that of TRUS (79%; 71/90; p = 0.066). Conclusions Staging biopsies can reliably sample extraprostatic tissue, including the seminal vesicles and neurovascular bundles. Positive staging biopsy results can aid in the selection of treatment options and in the prediction of outcome for individual patients by providing definitive histologic confirmation of locally advanced disease. Conventional predictive variables for staging can be applied when the results of staging biopsies are negative. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 30:123,131, 2002; DOI 10.1002/jcu.10052 [source]

    Does perineural invasion on prostate biopsy predict adverse prostatectomy outcomes?

    BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 11 2010
    Stacy Loeb
    Study Type , Prognostic (case series) Level of Evidence 4 OBJECTIVE To determine the relationship between perineural invasion (PNI) on prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) outcomes in a contemporary RP series, as there is conflicting evidence on the prognostic significance of PNI in prostate needle biopsy specimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 2002 to 2007, 1256 men had RP by one surgeon. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the relationship of PNI with pathological tumour features and biochemical progression, respectively, after adjusting for prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage and biopsy Gleason score. Additional Cox models were used to examine the relationship between nerve-sparing and biochemical progression among men with PNI. RESULTS PNI was found in 188 (15%) patients, and was significantly associated with aggressive pathology and biochemical progression. On multivariate analysis, PNI was significantly associated with extraprostatic extension and seminal vesicle invasion (P < 0.001). Biochemical progression occurred in 10.5% of patients with PNI, vs 3.5% of those without PNI (unadjusted hazard ratio 3.12, 95% confidence interval 1.77,5.52, P < 0.001). However, PNI was not a significant independent predictor of biochemical progression on multivariate analysis. Finally, nerve-sparing did not adversely affect biochemical progression even among men with PNI. CONCLUSION PNI is an independent risk factor for aggressive pathology features and a non-independent risk factor for biochemical progression after RP. However, bilateral nerve-sparing surgery did not compromise the oncological outcomes for patients with PNI on biopsy. [source]

    The ,CaP Calculator': an online decision support tool for clinically localized prostate cancer

    BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 10 2010
    Matthew S. Katz
    Study Type , Prognosis (risk model) Level of Evidence 2a OBJECTIVE To design a decision-support tool to facilitate evidence-based treatment decisions in clinically localized prostate cancer, as individualized risk assessment and shared decision-making can decrease distress and decisional regret in patients with prostate cancer, but current individual models vary or only predict one outcome of interest. METHODS We searched Medline for previous reports and identified peer-reviewed articles providing pretreatment predictive models that estimated pathological stage and treatment outcomes in men with biopsy-confirmed, clinical T1-3 prostate cancer. Each model was entered into a spreadsheet to provide calculated estimates of extracapsular extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and lymph node involvement (LNI). Estimates of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) outcome after radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT), and clinical outcomes after RT, were also entered. The data are available at http://www.capcalculator.org. RESULTS Entering a patient's 2002 clinical T stage, Gleason score and pretreatment PSA level, and details from core biopsy findings, into the CaP Calculator provides estimates from predictive models of pathological extent of disease, four models for ECE, four for SVI and eight for LNI. The 5-year estimates of PSA relapse-free survival after RT and 10-year estimates after RP were available. A printout can be generated with individualized results for clinicians to review with each patient. CONCLUSIONS The CaP Calculator is a free, online ,clearing house' of several predictive models for prostate cancer, available in an accessible, user-friendly format. With further development and testing with patients, the CaP Calculator might be a useful decision-support tool to help doctors promote evidence-based shared decision-making in prostate cancer. [source]

    Ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate diagnosed on transurethral biopsy or resection is not always indicative of aggressive disease: implications for clinical management

    BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 4 2010
    Hakan Aydin
    Study Type , Prognosis (case series) Level of Evidence 4 OBJECTIVE To report the clinicopathological characteristics of 23 cases of ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate (DCP) and discuss the implications for clinical management, as DCP is considered an aggressive subtype of prostate adenocarcinoma (PA). PATIENTS AND METHODS The presence of DCP in transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSB) is associated with adverse pathological findings at radical prostatectomy (RP) and clinical outcomes, and the significance of detecting DCP initially in transurethral biopsy (UB) or transurethral resection (TURP) in the present era of screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is unclear. The study included 23 cases of pure DCP without acinar PA diagnosed on UB or TURP. Demographic information, serum PSA level, follow-up surgical procedures (RP, TURP or TRUSB) and outcome data were collected. RESULTS The mean age of the men was 67.5 years and the mean PSA level before the procedure was 12.5 ng/mL; 14 cases were detected on UB and nine were diagnosed on TURP. The mean (range) follow-up was 4 (1,23) months after the initial procedure. In all, 21 (89%) patients had DCP or PA in follow-up procedures. Two (11%) patients had no residual cancer, one on RP and the other on two repeat TURPs. DCP or PA was found in 12 RP cases; four patients had Gleason score 7 PA, three of which were organ-confined, and eight had Gleason score ,8 PA. Extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion and regional lymph node metastasis were present in seven, six and two cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Most DCP diagnosed on UB or TURP in this contemporary series was associated with aggressive PA, but a subset presented as a small periurethral tumour with no concomitant acinar PA, and was eradicated by the initial biopsy/TURP alone. We recommend that patients with a diagnosis of DCP on UB or TURP undergo follow-up TURP and TRUSB before radical surgery is offered. [source]

    The maximum tumour length in biopsy cores as a predictor of outcome after radical prostatectomy

    BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 2 2008
    Norihiro Hayashi
    OBJECTIVES To evaluate maximum tumour length (MTL) in biopsy cores as a predictor of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-failure, systemic failure, and death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS We assessed 209 men with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with RP; preoperative variables were correlated with unfavourable pathological characteristics in the RP specimens and with outcome after surgery, using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS The median (range) MTL was 4 (0.2,19) mm and correlated with adverse pathological findings, including specimen Gleason score (P = 0.003), pT3 (P < 0.001), seminal vesicle invasion (P < 0.001) and lymph node involvement (P = 0.019) in multivariate analysis. Preoperative PSA (P < 0.001), biopsy Gleason score (P = 0.002), and MTL (P = 0.045) were independent predictors of PSA failure, whereas only MTL remained a predictor of systemic-failure (P < 0.001) and death from prostate cancer (P = 0.004). The median (range) follow-up after surgery was 90 (17,152) months, during which 83 patients had PSA failure, 20 developed systemic failure and 15 died from prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS The MTL correlates well with adverse pathological findings and appears to be an independent predictor of outcome after RP. Patients with a greater MTL might have cancer with an aggressive phenotype and therefore be candidates for more aggressive therapies. [source]

    Outcome after radical prostatectomy with a pretreatment prostate biopsy Gleason score of ,8

    BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 6 2003
    M. Manoharan
    The use of radical prostatectomy to treat patients with high-grade prostate cancer is the subject of much discussion, and the authors from Miami present their considerable experience in this field. They show that patients with a pre-treatment biopsy of Gleason score of ,8 may benefit from radical prostatectomy, assuming a clinical stage of T1,T2, and particularly if their PSA level is <20 ng/mL. Authors from Palermo present data on the long-term outcome of antiandrogen monotherapy in advanced prostate cancer, with the 12-year results of a phase II study. This is a very interesting evaluation, showing that patients with an early objective response have a prolonged progression-free and overall survival. In a large series of superficial bladder tumours, urologists from Tokyo identify a group of patients with tumours of low malignant potential with a high recurrence rate, but a very low invasive property. They suggest that those tumours should be referred to as having a low malignant potential, rather than being called superficial bladder carcinoma. OBJECTIVE To determine the outcome and predictors of recurrence in patients with a pretreatment prostate biopsy Gleason score (GS) of ,,8 and treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 1048 consecutive patients who underwent RP by one surgeon (M.S.S.); patients who had a pretreatment biopsy GS of ,,8 were identified. Information was recorded on patient age, initial prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, clinical stage, biopsy GS, pathology GS, extraprostatic extension (EPE), tumour volume, surgical margin status, seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and lymph node involvement. The results were assessed statistically using the Kaplan-Meier method, univariate log-rank tests and multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazards regression. RESULTS In all, 123 patients met the initial selection criteria; 44 were excluded from further analyses (five salvage RP, 23 <,1 year follow-up and 16 adjuvant treatment). Thus 79 patients were included in the uni- and multivariate analyses; 25 (31%) patients had a GS of ,,7 in the RP specimen and 54 (69%) remained at GS ,,8. The mean follow-up was 55 months, the age of the patients 63 years and the mean (sd) initial PSA level 13 (12) ng/mL. The overall biochemical failure rate was 38% (41% if the final GS was , 8 and 32% if it was ,,7). For those with a GS of ,,8 in the RP specimen, 20% (11/54) were organ-confined; two patients (2.5%) in this group developed local recurrence. If the final GS was ,,7, 52% (13/25) were organ-confined. In the univariate analysis, significant risk factors for recurrence were PSA ,,20 ng/mL, EPE, SVI, a positive surgical margin and tumour volume. Cox's proportional regression indicated that a PSA of ,,20 ng/mL (hazard ratio 7.9, 95% confidence interval 2.6,24.2, P < 0.001), the presence of EPE (4.2, 1.6,10.9, P = 0.004) and a positive surgical margin (3.8, 1.5,9.7, P = 0.005) were significant independent predictors in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION RP is a reasonable treatment option for patients with a prostate biopsy GS of ,8 and clinical stage T1,2. These patients have a high chance of remaining disease-free if their PSA level is ,,20 ng/mL. Patients with a pretreatment biopsy GS of ,,8 should be counselled about the potential differences between the biopsy and the RP specimen GS. [source]