			Home About us Contact

Vegetative Community (vegetative + community)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Life Sciences	75%

Selected Abstracts

MARSH DEVELOPMENT AT RESTORATION SITES ON THE WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE RESERVATION, ARIZONA,

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, Issue 6 2003
Jonathan W. Long
ABSTRACT: To prioritize sites for riparian restoration, resource managers need to understand how recovery processes vary within landscapes. Complex relationships between watershed conditions and riparian development make it difficult to predict the outcomes of restoration treatments in the semiarid Southwest. Large floods in 1993 scoured riparian areas in the Carrizo watershed on the White Mountain Apache Reservation in east-central Arizona. We evaluated recovery at three of these sites using repeated photographs and measurements of channel cross sections and stream-side vegetation along permanent transects. The sites were mapped as lying on the same soil type, had similar streamside vegetative communities, and were similarly treated through livestock exclusion and supplemental seeding. However, the sites and individual reaches within the sites followed strikingly different development paths. Dramatic recovery occurred at a perennial reach where cover of emergent wetland plants increased from 4.7 percent (standard error = 0.8 percent) in October 1995 to 55.5 percent (standard error = 2.7 percent) in September 2001. At several other reaches, geologic and hydro geomorphic characteristics of the sites limited inputs of fine sediment or surface water, resulting in modest or negligible increases in emergent cover. Recovery efforts for highly valued marshlands in this region should prioritize perennial reaches in low gradient valleys where salty sediments are abundant. [source]

Differences in woody vegetation are unrelated to use by African elephants (Loxodonta africana) in Mkhuze Game Reserve, South Africa

AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, Issue 1 2010
Angela M. White
Abstract The reintroduction of African elephants into fenced game reserves throughout South Africa has presented managers with several challenges. Although elephants are a natural part of southern African ecosystems, their confinement to fenced protected areas in South Africa has exacerbated their potential to impact their habitats negatively. However, many studies investigating the impact of elephants have failed to control for the effects of other browsers on the vegetative community. In this study, we used location data on an elephant herd to delineate high-use and low-use areas. This paired design allowed us to minimize confounding factors that could explain differences in the structure, diversity and utilization of woody species. We found little evidence to suggest elephant-mediated change in, or selection for, the structure or diversity of woody species; however, our results suggest that elephants may be altering the composition of species by preferentially using areas with higher canopy diversity and by enhancing sapling recruitment. Although stripping of bark was higher in high-use areas, there was no evidence of differential mortality of tree species. Therefore, in our study area, and over the current time scale, elephants are having a negligible impact on the vegetative community. Résumé La réintroduction d'éléphants africains dans des réserves de faune clôturées dans toute l'Afrique du Sud représente plusieurs défis pour les gestionnaires. Bien que les éléphants fassent naturellement partie des écosystèmes d'Afrique australe, leur confinement dans des aires protégées clôturées en Afrique du Sud a exacerbé leur capacité d'avoir des impacts négatifs sur leurs habitats. Pourtant, les nombreuses études qui ont recherché l'impact des éléphants ont omis de contrôler l'effet des autres herbivores sur la communauté végétale. Dans cette étude, nous avons utilisé des données sur la localisation des hardes d'éléphants pour délimiter les zones plus ou moins fréquentées. Cette étude couplée nous a permis de minimiser les facteurs prêtant à confusion qui pouvaient expliquer des différences de structure, de diversité et d'utilisation des espèces ligneuses. Nous avons trouvé peu de preuves qui auraient indiqué que les éléphants changeaient ou sélectionnaient la structure ou la diversité des espèces ligneuses; cependant, nos résultats suggèrent que les éléphants pourraient modifier la composition des espèces en choisissant de préférence les zones où la diversité de la canopée est plus élevée et en stimulant le recrutement de jeunes plants. Même si les arrachages d'écorces étaient plus nombreux dans les zones très fréquentées, il n'y avait aucune preuve d'une mortalité différentielle selon les espèces d'arbres. C'est pourquoi, dans l'aire où nous avons travaillé, et pour le moment, on peut dire que les éléphants n'ont qu'un impact négligeable sur la communauté végétale. [source]

Dispersal limitation inferred from an experimental translocation of Lomatium (Apiaceae) species outside their geographic ranges

OIKOS, Issue 12 2009
Travis D. Marsico
Determining limitations on poleward range expansion is important for predicting how climate change will alter the distribution of species. For most species, it is not known what factors set their distributional limits and the role dispersal limitation might play if range-limiting factors were altered. We conducted a transplant study of three related and co-occurring Lomatium species at their northern range limits to test competing hypotheses of range limitation. We added seeds to experimental plots inside and outside the species' geographic range (a regional treatment) in a replicated design with vegetation intact and vegetation reduced (a disturbance treatment) and with herbivore access and herbivore exclusion (an herbivory treatment). Germination and reemergence were measured through two growing seasons, along with community-level variables. A fully-crossed linear mixed model revealed that Lomatium survivorship outside the current range was as good or better than survivorship within the range, at least when the vegetative community remained intact. This suggests that the species are dispersal limited. Germination often was improved in the presence of an intact vegetative community, but this potentially facilitative effect was absent in second-year reemergence. Plots exposed to herbivory had slightly, but significantly, reduced germination, though reemergence did not differ between herbivore treatments. Lomatium dissectum, a rare species, had significantly lower survivorship than its congeners, suggesting that range shifts in rare taxa may be particularly difficult. Seed additions beyond species' range limits may be a strategy for overcoming dispersal limitation and assisting species in poleward migrations. [source]