Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Various Specialties (various + specialty)
Selected AbstractsGuidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries.DENTAL TRAUMATOLOGY, Issue 4 2007Abstract ,, Trauma to the primary dentition present special problems and the management is often different as compared with permanent teeth. An appropriate emergency treatment plan is important for a good prognosis. Guidelines are useful for delivering the best care possible in an efficient manner. The International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) has developed a consensus statement after a review of the dental literature and group discussions. Experienced researchers and clinicians from various specialties were included in the group. In cases in which the data did not appear conclusive, recommendations were based on the consensus opinion of the IADT board members. The guidelines represent the current best evidence based on literature research and professional opinion. In this third article out of three, the IADT Guidelines for the management of traumatic injuries in the primary dentition, are presented. [source] Guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries.DENTAL TRAUMATOLOGY, Issue 3 2007Abstract,,, Avulsion of permanent teeth is the most serious of all dental injuries. The prognosis depends on the measures taken at the place of accident or the time immediately after the avulsion. Replantation is the treatment of choice, but cannot always be carried out immediately. An appropriate emergency management and treatment plan is important for a good prognosis. Guidelines are useful for delivering the best care possible in an efficient manner. The International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) has developed a consensus statement after a review of the dental literature and group discussions. Experienced researchers and clinicians from various specialties were included in the group. In cases in which the data did not appear conclusive, recommendations were based on the consensus opinion of the IADT board members. The guidelines represent the current best evidence based on literature research and professional opinion. In this second article of three, the IADT Guidelines for management of avulsed permanent teeth are presented. [source] Guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries.DENTAL TRAUMATOLOGY, Issue 2 2007Abstract,,, Crown fractures and luxations occur most frequently of all dental injuries. An appropriate treatment plan after an injury is important for a good prognosis. Guidelines are useful for delivering the best care possible in an efficient manner. The International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) has developed a consensus statement after a review of the dental literature and group discussions. Experienced researchers and clinicians from various specialties were included in the group. In cases where the data did not appear conclusive, recommendations were based on the consensus opinion of the IADT board members. The guidelines represent the current best evidence, based on literature research and professional opinion. In this first article of three, the IADT Guidelines for management of fractures and luxations of permanent teeth will be presented. [source] New and experimental approaches to treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a comprehensive review of emerging treatment strategiesDIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 11 2004R. Eldor Abstract Diabetic foot ulcers occur in up to 15% of all diabetic patients and are a leading cause of nontraumatic amputation worldwide. Neuropathy, abnormal foot biomechanics, peripheral vascular disease and external trauma are the major contributors to the development of a foot ulcer in the diabetic patient. Therapy today includes repeated debridement, offloading, and dressings, for lower grade ulcers, and broad spectrum antibiotics and occasionally limited or complete amputation for higher grades, requiring a team effort of health care workers from various specialties. The large population affected by diabetic foot ulcers and the high rates of failure ending with amputation even with the best therapeutic regimens, have resulted in the development of new therapies and are the focus of this review. These include new off loading techniques, dressings from various materials, methods to promote wound closure using artificial skin grafts, different growth factors or wound bed modulators and methods of debridement. These new techniques are promising but still mostly unproven and traditional approaches cannot be replaced. New and generally more expensive therapies should be seen as adding to traditional approaches. [source] Interspecialty and intraspecialty differences in the management of thyroid nodular disease and cancerHEAD & NECK: JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES & SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, Issue 6 2005FRACS, Jonathan R. Clark MBBS Abstract Introduction. The management of thyroid cancer includes multiple medical specialties. Physicians from different specialties may vary in opinion regarding the optimal investigation and treatment of patients. Little data exist evaluating the differences within or between various specialties treating thyroid disease. This study aims to examine responses from a variety of specialty physicians closely involved in the medical or surgical management of thyroid disease to provide evidence as to whether any difference exists. Methods. A cross-sectional survey of attendees at the 5th Biennial Course on the Management of Thyroid Nodular Disease and Cancer was conducted using an anonymous electronic touch pad system. Touch pads were given to 213 attendees who were asked to respond to 44 questions. This study analyzes the responses obtained from 19 selected questions (43%) and compares the results between endocrinologists (n = 48), general surgeons (n = 41), otolaryngologists (n = 61), and pathologists (n = 20). Results. Responses were obtained from 69% of endocrinologists, 68% of general surgeons, 72% of otolaryngologists, and 65% of pathologists. Statistically significant interspecialty differences were observed in 12 (63%) of 19 questions. Each question and a summary of responses from all touch pads were recorded. Conclusions. Significant differences in the attitudes toward, and presumably the practice of, managing thyroid nodular disease and cancer exist between specialties. An understanding of these differences is helpful when working as a multidisciplinary team to optimize patient care. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck27: XXX,XXX, 2005 [source] The contribution of MD,PhD training to academic orthopaedic facultiesJOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, Issue 4 2001John M. Clark Little is known about the distribution of research-trained physicians across the various specialties. To document the extent to which MD,PhD programs are a source of research-trained faculty for orthopaedic departments, this study examined the specialty choices of graduates of the Medical Scientist Training Program (MSTP) from 1964 to 1994. The MSTP, a combined MD,PhD program supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, (NIGMS), produces roughly 25% of all MD,PhDs in the US. Methods. Copies of the appendices from training grant applications containing information on MSTP graduates were obtained from the NIGMS. Also, a questionnaire was mailed to 116 university-affiliated orthopaedic surgery departments asking how many faculty were MD's, PhDs or MD,PhDs. Results. Records were obtained for all MST programs. Information on postdoctoral training and/or a current position was reported for 1615 graduates who earned both MD and PhD. Of these graduates, 277 chose non-clinical paths. The other 1338 entered a residency or internship. Of these, 593 were still in residency training, 566 were academic faculty members and 130 were in private practice. In the records, 12 (0.9%) were listed as orthopaedic surgical residents (6) or faculty (6). At this time, all 12 have completed training, and 11 are in academic practice. Eighty-three departments replied to the questionnaire. In that sample of 1761 faculty positions, 1478 were MDs, 217 were PhDs and 36 (2.0%) were MD-PhDs. Conclusion. Despite robust support of MD,PhD programs, the number of dual degree recipients on orthopaedic faculties is small when compared to the relative size of the specialty. Other sources of research-trained staff should perhaps be developed. © 2001 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. [source] Factors affecting future choice of specialty among first-year medical students of the University of the West Indies, TrinidadMEDICAL EDUCATION, Issue 1 2007Nelleen S Baboolal Background, This study was conducted to determine factors that influence career choice among 1st-year medical students. Design And Methods, A cross-sectional survey of 170 1st-year medical students from the University of the West Indies, St Augustine Campus was undertaken with a questionnaire designed to assess their perceptions of careers in various specialties. Likert scales were used to quantify the reasons for their preferences. Results, The response rate was 136/170 (80%). The age of respondents ranged from 16 to 36 years, mean 20.45, SD 2.88. Of the generic factors students considered important in their choice of a specialty, students ranked the ability to help patients the highest (rating of 1.44), along with the diagnosis and treatment of disease second (rating of 1.49); 38 (27.9%) cited medicine, 26 (19.1%) surgery, 13 (9.6%) paediatrics, 10 (7.4%) family practice and 4 (2.9%) psychiatry as their chosen career. Students begin their medical training with the view that a career in psychiatry is less attractive than other specialties surveyed. The average attractiveness was estimated as surgery 1.64, medicine, 1.81, paediatrics 1.95 and psychiatry 2.57. The differences between the averages were highly significant (F = 57.6, P < 0.001). Conclusion, The findings suggest that although 1st-year medical students rank the diagnosis and treatment of disease and the ability to help patients as the greatest influence in choosing a specialty, internal medicine was the most popular chosen career, while the surgical specialties were identified as the most attractive. Medical students have serious reservations about psychiatry as a career choice. [source] | ||||||||||