Home  About us  Contact
 

Urodynamic Practice (urodynamic + practice)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Kinds of Urodynamic Practice

  • good urodynamic practice
    		•

    Selected Abstracts

    Good urodynamic practices: Uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies,,

    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, Issue 3 2002
    Werner Schäfer
    Abstract This is the first report of the International Continence Society (ICS) on the development of comprehensive guidelines for Good Urodynamic Practice for the measurement, quality control, and documentation of urodynamic investigations in both clinical and research environments. This report focuses on the most common urodynamics examinations; uroflowmetry, pressure recording during filling cystometry, and combined pressure,flow studies. The basic aspects of good urodynamic practice are discussed and a strategy for urodynamic measurement, equipment set-up and configuration, signal testing, plausibility controls, pattern recognition, and artifact correction are proposed. The problems of data analysis are mentioned only when they are relevant in the judgment of data quality. In general, recommendations are made for one specific technique. This does not imply that this technique is the only one possible. Rather, it means that this technique is well-established, and gives good results when used with the suggested standards of good urodynamic practice. Neurourol. Urodynam. 21:261,274, 2002. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

    The impact of formal education and training on urodynamic practice in the United Kingdom: A survey

    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, Issue 5 2006
    Julie Ellis-Jones
    Abstract Aim A previous survey of personnel performing urodynamics had shown that half of the respondents thought that their training had been inadequate. In order to address this the outcome of a 4-day practical course for teaching urodynamics, which has been running since 1995 at the Bristol Urological Institute, was reviewed. We were not aware of any published studies that have assessed the impact of formal urodynamic training on clinical practice. With this in mind we set out to determine whether the education and training we had given had changed urodynamic practice in the UK. Methods Postal questionnaires were sent out to 84 delegates who had attended the course over a 2-year period (2001,2003). Paired questionnaires were used to assess urodynamic practice before and after the course and also to establish whether their practice had changed as a direct result of attending the certificate course. Results The results suggested that 79% of those responders had changed their practice since completing the course. Significant changes to practice were observed in checking calibration, confidence in setting-up equipment, interpretation of urodynamic traces and ability to check the accuracy of the results. Conclusions The results of this survey suggest that attendance at a recognised urodynamic training course has had an impact on clinical practice in the UK. Training and education raises the level of confidence and ability to perform and interpret urodynamic investigations, which has wide implications for the accuracy, reliability and consistency of urodynamic investigations performed by those without formal training. Neurourol. Urodynam. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

    Good urodynamic practices: Uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies,,

    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, Issue 3 2002
    Werner Schäfer
    Abstract This is the first report of the International Continence Society (ICS) on the development of comprehensive guidelines for Good Urodynamic Practice for the measurement, quality control, and documentation of urodynamic investigations in both clinical and research environments. This report focuses on the most common urodynamics examinations; uroflowmetry, pressure recording during filling cystometry, and combined pressure,flow studies. The basic aspects of good urodynamic practice are discussed and a strategy for urodynamic measurement, equipment set-up and configuration, signal testing, plausibility controls, pattern recognition, and artifact correction are proposed. The problems of data analysis are mentioned only when they are relevant in the judgment of data quality. In general, recommendations are made for one specific technique. This does not imply that this technique is the only one possible. Rather, it means that this technique is well-established, and gives good results when used with the suggested standards of good urodynamic practice. Neurourol. Urodynam. 21:261,274, 2002. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

    Quality control in urodynamics: a review of urodynamic traces from one centre

    BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 3 2003
    J. Sullivan
    OBJECTIVE To investigate quality control in our unit and to enable other units to compare their results, as experience from central reviews of urodynamic traces for multicentre trials has suggested that poor quality control is common. PATIENTS AND METHODS All consecutive male urodynamic tests conducted over 1 year were reviewed. A list of criteria to assess the quality of the records was devised, based upon International Continence Society guidelines on ,good urodynamic practice', and on other sources. Eligible traces were analysed for aspects of quality control, e.g. baseline pressures and coughs to test pressure transmission. The data were analysed to establish how often quality criteria were met, and identify areas for improvement. RESULTS In 100 eligible traces, the baseline detrusor pressure was 0,10 cmH2O in 86, and , 5 to +10 cmH2O in 94%. Baseline intravesical and abdominal pressure were 30,50 cmH2O in 68% and 73% of cases, respectively. Coughs were present before filling in 94%, during filling in 95%, before voiding in 72% and after voiding in 87% of cases. The cough-test frequency was sufficient in 30% of traces. In 11 the intravesical pressure line fell out during voiding. CONCLUSION Most of the traces assessed met the quality criteria defined, but significant defects were not uncommon. Some of the problems identified suggest areas of urodynamic technique which should be studied in more detail. We intend to modify our quality control practices, and hope to show an improvement on re-audit. We hope that other urodynamic departments will be encouraged to review their practice, and we aim to improve our results. [source]

    Good urodynamic practices: Uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies,,

    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, Issue 3 2002
    Werner Schäfer
    Abstract This is the first report of the International Continence Society (ICS) on the development of comprehensive guidelines for Good Urodynamic Practice for the measurement, quality control, and documentation of urodynamic investigations in both clinical and research environments. This report focuses on the most common urodynamics examinations; uroflowmetry, pressure recording during filling cystometry, and combined pressure,flow studies. The basic aspects of good urodynamic practice are discussed and a strategy for urodynamic measurement, equipment set-up and configuration, signal testing, plausibility controls, pattern recognition, and artifact correction are proposed. The problems of data analysis are mentioned only when they are relevant in the judgment of data quality. In general, recommendations are made for one specific technique. This does not imply that this technique is the only one possible. Rather, it means that this technique is well-established, and gives good results when used with the suggested standards of good urodynamic practice. Neurourol. Urodynam. 21:261,274, 2002. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]