Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Uncorrected Refractive Error (uncorrected + refractive_error)
Selected AbstractsTreatment of Uncorrected Refractive Error Improves Vision-Specific Quality of LifeJOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Issue 6 2006Anne L. Coleman MD OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefit of eyeglasses and magnifiers in elderly patients with uncorrected refractive errors. DESIGN: A single-center, randomized, prospective, controlled trial (September 2001 to August 2003). SETTING: Los Angeles County, California. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty-one community-dwelling persons aged 65 and older who had habitual distance visual acuity of 20/32 or worse and whose distant visual acuity, near visual acuity, or both could be improved with eyeglasses, a magnifier, or both by two lines of acuity or more. INTERVENTION: Sixty-six were randomized to receive a prescription and voucher for free eyeglasses, a magnifier, or both immediately, and 65 were randomized to receive a prescription and voucher after the 3-month follow-up visit (the control group). MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was vision-specific functioning as measured using the 25-item National Eye Institute,Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). Secondary outcomes were distance and near visual acuity and overall functioning as measured using the Rosow-Breslau function questionnaire. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis of 3-month follow-up data, participants who received the eyeglasses prescription and voucher immediately had greater improvement in NEI-VFQ composite scores than the control group (P<.01). They also had greater improvement in perceptions of their general vision (P<.01), distance visual acuity (P=.03), near visual acuity (P=.04), and mental health (P=.02). CONCLUSION: Correction of uncorrected refractive error, one of the leading causes of visual impairment in older people, improved the vision-specific quality of life of community-dwelling older persons. [source] Prevalence and causes of visual impairment in a rural North-east China adult population: a population-based survey in Bin County, HarbinACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, Issue 6 2010Wulian Song Acta Ophthalmol. 2010: 88: 669,674 Abstract. Purpose:, To investigate the prevalence and causes of visual impairment in a rural population in north-east China. Methods:, A population-based study was conducted within Bin County, Harbin of north-east China. Low vision and blindness were defined using the World Health Organization categories of visual impairment. The prevalence of visual impairment was estimated, and causes were identified based on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) as well as presenting visual acuity (VA). Results:, Out of 5764 people, 4956 (86.01%) aged older than 40 participated in the study. The prevalence of visual impairment, low vision and blindness based on presenting VA was 9.6% (BCVA, 6.6%), 7.7% (BCVA, 4.9%) and 1.9% (BCVA, 1.7%), respectively. Taking the presenting VA, cataract (44%) was the most common cause for visual impairment followed by uncorrected refractive error (24%), treatable causes of visual impairment accounted for 68% of the total cases. Cataract (59%) and glaucoma (15%) were leading causes for blindness based on presenting VA. According to BCVA, cataract was the leading cause of visual impairment and blindness (58% and 60%, respectively), followed by glaucoma (17% and 15%, respectively). The prevalence of visual impairment was higher among women than men (p < 0.0001) and increasing with age (p < 0.0001) and decreasing with increasing education level (p = 0.0075). Conclusion:, Visual impairment was a serious public health problem in this rural population, with most of it easily remedied. Results highlighted the need for visual impairment prevention programs to an increasing number of elderly people, with a special emphasis on female and those with little or no education. [source] Public sector refraction and spectacle dispensing in low-resource countries of the Western PacificCLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, Issue 4 2008Jacqueline Ramke Abstract Background:, Given that uncorrected refractive error is a frequent cause of vision impairment, and that there is a high unmet need for spectacles, an appraisal of public sector arrangements for the correction of refractive error was conducted in eight Pacific Island countries. Methods:, Mixed methods (questionnaire and semi-structured interviews) were used to collect information from eye care personnel (from Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, Cook Islands, Samoa, Tonga and Tuvalu) attending a regional eye health workshop in 2005. Results:, Fiji, Tonga and Vanuatu had Vision 2020 eye care plans that included refraction services, but not spectacle provision. There was wide variation in public sector spectacle dispensing services, but, except in Samoa, ready-made spectacles and a full cost recovery pricing strategy were the mainstay. There were no systems for the registration of personnel, nor guidelines for clinical or systems management. The refraction staff to population ratio varied considerably. Solomon Islands, Tuvalu and Vanuatu had the best coverage by services, either fixed or outreach. Most services had little promotional activity or community engagement. Conclusions:, To be successful, it would seem that public sector refraction services should answer a real and perceived need, fit within prevailing policy and legislation, value, train, retain and equip employees, be well managed, be accessible and affordable, be responsive to consumers, and provide ongoing good quality outcomes. To this end, a checklist to aid the initiation and maintenance of refraction and spectacle systems in low-resource countries has been constructed. [source] The challenge of uncorrected refractive error: driving the agenda of the Durban Declaration on refractive error and service developmentCLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, Issue 3 2010Kovin S Naidoo BSc BOptom MPH OD The purpose of this article is to highlight the challenge of uncorrected refractive error globally, as well as to discuss recent advocacy successes and innovative programs designed to address the need for broader refractive error service development, particularly in developing countries. The World Health Organization's VISION 2020: The Right to Sight program first posed the challenge to national governments to give priority to strategies and resources targeted towards avoidable causes of blindness and visual impairment, so that these unnecessary forms of blindness or visual impairment can be eliminated globally by the year 2020. The blindness prevention community is challenged to increase in scale its initiatives, which support the attainment of VISION 2020: The Right to Sight goals primarily and the United Nation's Millennium Development Goals indirectly. The Durban Declaration on Refractive Error and Service Development was the outcome of a meeting of eye-care professionals, researchers, governments, civil society and industry in March 2007 and still stands as a guiding document to the blindness prevention community for the elimination of avoidable blindness due to uncorrected refractive error. [source] | ||||||||||