Unexplained Fetal Death (unexplained + fetal_death)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Unexplained fetal death: Are women with a history of fetal loss at higher risk?

AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 2 2009
Mary-Anne MEASEY
Aims: To identify factors, including the loss of a previous pregnancy before 20 weeks gestation, which are associated with increased risk of singleton antepartum unexplained fetal death (UFD) in Western Australia (WA) using information recorded in routine data collections. Methods: All fetal deaths in WA from 1990 to 1999 that underwent thorough post-mortem investigations were classified using the Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand Perinatal Death Classification System. All UFDs were selected as cases and unmatched controls were randomly drawn from all live births in WA occurring during the study period. Demographic and clinical information on cases and controls was obtained from the WA Midwives' Notification System. Multivariable logistic regression was carried out to determine the independent effect of risk factors and calculate odds ratios. Results: Almost one quarter (22%) of stillbirths were unexplained. Primigravid and primiparous women with a history of pregnancy loss before 20 weeks were at higher risk of UFD than multiparous women who had not experienced any loss. Women with a history of fetal death (after 20 weeks) had the highest risk of UFD. Conclusion: The current practice of closely monitoring pregnant women with a history of fetal loss or death should continue as this study suggests they may have a higher risk of poor obstetric outcome. Larger studies are needed to confirm the association between previous pregnancy loss and UFD. [source]


Aetiology of stillbirth: unexplored is not unexplained

AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, Issue 5 2007
Mary-Anne Measey
Abstract Objective: To describe the rate of and demographic factors associated with fetal postmortem investigation and to classify the cause of all fetal deaths that underwent postmortem investigation. To compare the proportion of deaths remaining unexplained after postmortem investigation with estimates derived from death certificates. Method: All fetal deaths in Western Australia (WA) from 1990 to 1999 were identified. These data were used to calculate postmortem rates and describe the characteristics of women consenting to postmortems. A multidisciplinary team classified the cause of all deaths that underwent postmortem investigation using the Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand Perinatal Death Classification System. The proportion of deaths that were unexplained was compared with estimates based on death certificates. Results: Of the 1,619 fetal deaths recorded for 1990 to 1999, 49% (n=789) underwent complete postmortem investigation. Based on investigations, 22% of the 789 fetal deaths were unexplained and a further 18% were identified as having fetal growth restriction. Based on death certificates, 42% were unexplained and 65% were later explained by postmortem investigation. Conclusion and Implications: Postmortem investigation rates are low. They reveal a cause of death for the majority of cases that are unexplained clinically. Epidemiological investigations of unexplained fetal death based on cases not subject to complete postmortem investigation may lead to inaccurate conclusions. A standardised definition for unexplained fetal deaths that distinguishes between cases with detailed investigation and those with limited or no investigation is needed. [source]