Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Ulcer Complications (ulcer + complications)
Selected AbstractsTrends in peptic ulcer pharmacotherapyFUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Issue 1 2004Bülent Sivri Abstract Considering the diseases of the stomach and duodenum, peptic ulcer has been the one with a significant clinical impact. The pathophysiology of peptic ulcer has centred on an imbalance between aggressive and protective factors. The discovery of Helicobacter pylori as a cause of peptic ulcer has changed our approach greatly towards this disease. Despite the decreasing frequency of H. pylori -induced peptic ulcers, peptic ulcer remains a major clinical problem partly because nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related ulcers and hospital admissions for ulcer complications associated with NSAIDs have increased in frequency. The interaction between H. pylori and NSAIDs is one of the most controversial issues in peptic ulcer. In this article, current concepts of peptic ulcer etiopathogenesis and the management of peptic ulcer according to the etiology were reviewed. [source] Adverse effects of conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the upper gastrointestinal tractFUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Issue 4 2003Michael J. S. Langman Abstract This article reviews the clinical and epidemiological features of conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) related peptic ulcer complications, and the associated risk factors. The degree of gastrointestinal toxicity varies widely between the available drugs and with dose of each. The risk of ulcer complications can however be reduced, and perhaps completely removed, by using the lowest dose of the least toxic member of the class. Enteric coating and other delayed release formulations have not been shown to reduce risk. Estimates of the imposed disease burden have varied widely, in part through assuming that risks in selected patient groups will necessarily translate to the general population. Nevertheless, the imposed disease burden is one of the largest associated with current drug treatment. Associated risk factors such as prior ulcer, corticosteroid use and concurrent aspirin as well as general cardiovascular disease will raise the likelihood of an ulcer complication in NSAID takers and non-takers. Therefore, strategies dependent on substituting COX-selective drugs will then be only partially successful. [source] Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Does Not Reduce the Incidence of Gastroduodenal Ulcers in Patients on Long-term NSAID Treatment: Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled TrialHELICOBACTER, Issue 5 2007Helena T.J.I. De Leest Abstract Background:,,Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the major causes of gastroduodenal ulcers. Studies on the benefit of eradication of H. pylori in NSAID users yielded conflicting results. Objective:, To investigate whether H. pylori eradication in patients on long-term NSAIDs reduces the incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers. Methods:, Patients on long-term NSAID treatment and who are H. pylori positive on serologic testing, were randomly assigned to either H. pylori eradication (omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin) or placebo. Primary endpoint was the presence of endoscopic gastric or duodenal ulcers 3 months after randomization. Results:, One hundred sixty-five (48%) of a total of 347 patients were on gastroprotective medication. At endoscopy, gastroduodenal ulcers were diagnosed in 6 (4%) and 8 (5%) patients in the eradication and placebo group, respectively (p = .65). During follow-up of 12 months, no symptomatic ulcers or ulcer complications developed. No significant differences were found in the development of gastroduodenal erosions, dyspepsia, or in quality of life. Conclusion:,H. pylori eradication therapy in patients on long-term NSAID treatment had no beneficial effect on the occurrence of ulcers, erosions, or dyspepsia. Ulcer rates in both study arms are remarkably low, in both patients with and without gastroprotective therapy. [source] Clinical trends in ulcer diagnosis in a population with high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infectionALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 1 2005M. A. Pérez-Aisa Summary Background :,It is unknown whether the incidence of peptic ulcer changes in areas with a high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection. Aim :,To determine trends in peptic ulcer complications in a community with a high prevalence of H. pylori infection. Methods :,New endoscopic diagnoses of peptic ulcers and their complications from 1985 to 2000 were obtained. H. pylori infection in the adult population, the number of prescriptions for anti-secretory drugs and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were also evaluated. Results :,Although the global prevalence of H. pylori infection remains high in this population (>60%), a 41.4 to 25.4% decrease in the incidence of peptic ulcers and ulcer complications was observed. This was associated with a decrease in the prevalence of H. pylori infection in people under 65 years of age, a 3.5-fold increase in the number of prescriptions of proton-pump inhibitors and an increase in the number of prescriptions of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, especially coxibs. Conclusions :,In an area with a high prevalence of H. pylori infection, the incidence of peptic ulcer and associated complications is declining rapidly. This was associated with a reduction of the prevalence of H. pylori infection in the young and a widespread use of proton-pump inhibitors. The increase in the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, especially coxibs, has not changed the tendency. [source] Prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastrointestinal complications , review and recommendations based on risk assessmentALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 10 2004F. K. L. Chan Summary The incidence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related ulcer complications remains high despite the availability of potent anti-ulcer drugs and selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related ulcer complications can be minimized by prospective assessment of patients' baseline risk, rational choice and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and selective use of co-therapy strategies with gastroprotectives. Current recommendations regarding strategies using anti-ulcer drugs and cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors for prevention of clinical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug upper gastrointestinal events are largely derived from studies using surrogates such as endoscopic ulcers, erosions, and symptoms in low- to average-risk patients. Conclusions based on surrogate and potentially manipulatable end-points are increasingly suspect with regard to applicability to clinical situations. This article reviews the risks associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs including aspirin and includes the effect of the patients' baseline risk, and the confounding effects of Helicobacter pylori infection. In addition, uncertainties regarding the clinical efficacy of anti-ulcer drugs and cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors against non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related ulcer complications are put into perspective. We propose management strategies based on the risk category: low risk (absence of risk factors) (least ulcerogenic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug at lowest effective dose), moderate risk (one to two risk factors) (as above, plus an antisecretory agent or misoprostol or a cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor), high risk (multiple risk factors or patients using concomitant low-dose aspirin, steroids, or anticoagulants) (cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor alone with steroids, plus misoprostol with warfarin, or plus a proton pump inhibitors or misoprostol with aspirin), and very high risk (history of ulcer complications) (avoid all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, if possible or a cyclo-oxygenase-2 plus a proton pump inhibitors and/or misoprostol). The presence of H. pylori infection increases the risk of upper gastrointestinal complications in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users by two- to fourfold suggesting that all patients requiring regular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy be tested for H. pylori. [source] Interactions between Helicobacter pylori and other risk factors for peptic ulcer bleedingALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 3 2002W. A. Stack To investigate the role of Helicobacter pylori, expressing the virulence marker CAGA (cytotoxin associated gene product A) in ulcer complications and its interaction with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and other risk factors. Design: Case control study using conditional logistic regression analysis. Setting: University and City Hospitals, Nottingham. Subjects: 203 consecutive patients with ulcer bleeding and 203 age- and sex-matched controls. Results: Ulcer bleeding was more likely with positive H. pylori serology (odds ratio = 3.3, 95% CI: 1.7,6.6 for CagA positive, but only OR = 1.6, 95% CI: 0.7,3.7 for CagA negative serology), current smoking (OR 2.2, 95% CI: 1.04,4.7), aspirin , 300 mg daily (OR 7.7, 95% CI: 2.8,20.6), all other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs: OR 10.6, 95% CI: 3.1,35.7 for , 1 defined daily dose lower and OR 22.6, 95% CI: 6.2,82.0 for higher doses) and past ulcer history (OR 5.6, 95% CI: 2.3,14.1). Aspirin , 300 mg daily was used by 25.1% of patients vs. 7.4% of controls. Smoking only enhanced risk in the presence of H. pylori, with a synergistic interaction (interaction odds ratio = 4.9, 2.4,9.9, P=0.002). Conversely, risks with non-aspirin NSAIDs were reduced in the presence of H. pylori, particularly if CagA-positive (interaction odds ratio=0.21, 0.05,0.9, P=0.03). Conclusions: CagA positive H. pylori infection is associated with an increased risk of ulcer bleeding. The risk from non-aspirin NSAIDs is even higher, but is less in H. pylori infected people. Low-dose aspirin is now commonly associated with ulcer bleeding. [source] Quantitative assessment of the gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risk-benefit of celecoxib compared to individual NSAIDs at the population level,,PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, Issue 4 2007Cristina Varas-Lorenzo MD Abstract Purpose To estimate the net cardiovascular (CV) (coronary heart disease, stroke, congestive heart failure), and gastrointestinal (GI) (peptic ulcer complications) risk-benefit public health impact of the use of celecoxib compared to non-selective NSAIDs in the arthritis population. Methods We applied discrete event simulation models to data from the US National Health Surveys, CV risk-prediction models from the Framingham Heart Study, and population-based studies. Models took into account the multifactorial effect of risk factors, comorbidity, and competing risk of mortality. We simulated the natural history of CV and GI disease in the U.S. arthritis population over 1 year, through the individual baseline cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risk profile. This model was modified with relative risks associated with the use of each treatment. The mean number of events was estimated for each end-point in each model: natural history, celecoxib, diclofenac, ibuprofen, naproxen. The number of events for celecoxib was compared with each NSAID. Results The evaluation included 1% of the U.S. population with arthritis. Celecoxib, when applied to 100,000 patients over 1 year, resulted in 570 (range from sensitivity analysis: 440,691), 226 (124,313), and 746 (612,868) fewer ulcer complications than diclofenac, ibuprofen, and naproxen, respectively. There were 20 (16,25), 8 (4,12), and 27 (22,32) fewer deaths from ulcer complications, respectively. No increase in cardiovascular events or all cause mortality was observed for celecoxib versus the other individual NSAIDs. Conclusion Results from these simulations suggest a gastrointestinal benefit for celecoxib not offset by increased cardiovascular events or mortality. The methodology used here provides a risk-benefit assessment framework for evaluating the public heath impact of drugs. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Underutilization of gastroprotective measures in patients receiving nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugsARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 8 2002Walter Smalley Objective To determine the frequency of use of recommended gastroprotective strategies in a cohort of patients receiving recurrent treatment with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Methods A cross-sectional study was performed using administrative data from the Tennessee Medicaid (TennCare) program. The study population consisted of 76,765 recurrent recipients of NSAIDs (NSAID users), comprising 24% of the 319,402 persons ages 50 years or older enrolled in the TennCare program from January 1999 through June 2000. Frequency of use of either of 2 recommended gastroprotective strategies, involving either traditional NSAIDs combined with recommended anti-ulcer cotherapy or use of a selective cyclooxygenase 2,inhibiting drug (coxib), was measured and categorized by risk for ulcer complication. Results Among this cohort of recurrent NSAID users, 16% received 1 of the 2 recommended gastroprotective therapies: 10% received traditional NSAIDs along with antiulcer drugs at the recommended doses and 6% received coxibs. Among those patients with ,2 risk factors for ulcer complications (age 75 years or older, peptic ulcer or gastrointestinal bleeding in the past year, or concurrent use of oral anticoagulants or corticosteroids), 30% received such gastroprotective therapy. Conclusion Use of recommended strategies to decrease ulcer complications in vulnerable populations is relatively uncommon. [source] Current practice of emergency vagotomy and Helicobacter pylori eradication for complicated peptic ulcer in the United KingdomBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 1 2003A. D. Gilliam Background The aim was to assess the current opinion of surgeons, by subspecialty, towards vagotomy and the practice of Helicobacter pylori testing, treatment and follow-up, in patients with bleeding or perforated duodenal ulcer. Methods A postal questionnaire was sent to 1073 Fellows of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland in 2001. Results Some 697 valid questionnaires were analysed (65·0 per cent). Most surgeons did not perform vagotomy for perforated or bleeding duodenal ulcer. There was no statistical difference between the responses of upper gastrointestinal surgeons and those of other specialists for perforated (P = 0·35) and bleeding (P = 0·45) ulcers. Respondents were more likely to perform a vagotomy for bleeding than for a perforated ulcer (P < 0·001). Although more than 80 per cent of surgeons prescribed H. pylori eradication treatment after operation, fewer than 60 per cent routinely tested patients for H. pylori eradication. Upper gastrointestinal surgeons were more likely to prescribe H. pylori treatment and test for eradication than other specialists (P < 0·01). Conclusion Most surgeons in the UK no longer perform vagotomy for duodenal ulcer complications. Copyright © 2002 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd [source] | |||||||||||||||||||