			Home About us Contact

Type 2 HRS (type 2 + hr)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Lack of renal improvement with nonselective endothelin antagonism with tezosentan in type 2 hepatorenal syndrome,,

HEPATOLOGY, Issue 1 2008
Florence Wong
Renal vasoconstriction is a key factor in the development of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and may be secondary to increased activities of endothelin-1, a potent renal vasoconstrictor. To assess the effects of tezosentan, a nonselective endothelin receptor antagonist, on renal function in patients with type 2 HRS, six male patients, 56.3 ± 2.5 years old, with cirrhosis and type 2 HRS were treated with tezosentan; ascending doses of 0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 mg/hour, each for 24 hours, were used for the initial 2 patients, but a constant dose of 0.3 mg/hour for up to 7 days was used for the remaining 4 patients. The glomerular filtration rate, renal plasma flow, 24-hour urinary volume, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, tezosentan levels, and vasoactive hormones were measured daily. Albumin was given as required. The study was stopped early because of concerns about the safety of tezosentan in type 2 HRS. Five patients discontinued the study early; one stopped within 4 hours because of systemic hypotension (MAP < 70 mm Hg), and 4 patients stopped at ,4 days because of concerns about worsening renal function (serum creatinine increased from 180 ± 21 to 222 ± 58 ,mol/L, P > 0.05) and decreasing urine volume (P = 0.03) but without a significant change in MAP. The plasma tezosentan concentrations were 79 ± 34 ng/mL at a steady state during infusion at 0.3 mg/hour. The plasma endothelin-1 concentrations increased from 2.7 ± 0.3 pg/mL at the baseline to 19.1 ± 7.3 pg/mL (P < 0.05). Conclusion: An endothelin receptor blockade potentially can cause a deterioration in renal function in patients with cirrhosis and type 2 HRS. Caution should be taken in future studies using endothelin receptor antagonists in these patients. (HEPATOLOGY 2007.) [source]

Terlipressin therapy with and without albumin for patients with hepatorenal syndrome: Results of a prospective, nonrandomized study

HEPATOLOGY, Issue 4 2002
Rolando Ortega
Vasopressin analogues associated with albumin improve renal function in hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). The current study was aimed at assessing the efficacy of the treatment, predictive factors of response, recurrence of HRS, and survival after therapy. Twenty-one consecutive patients with HRS (16 with type 1 HRS, 5 with type 2 HRS) received terlipressin (0.5-2 mg/4 hours intravenously) until complete response was achieved (serum creatinine level < 1.5 mg/dL) or for 15 days; 13 patients received intravenous albumin together with terlipressin. Twelve of the 21 patients (57%) showed complete response. Albumin administration was the only predictive factor of complete response (77% in patients receiving terlipressin and albumin vs. 25% in those receiving terlipressin alone, P = .03). Treatment with terlipressin and albumin was associated with a remarkable decrease in serum creatinine level, increase in arterial pressure, and suppression of the renin-aldosterone system. By contrast, no significant changes in these parameters were found in patients treated with terlipressin alone. Only 1 patient showed ischemic adverse effects. Recurrence of HRS occurred in 17% of patients with complete response. The occurrence of complete response was associated with an improved survival. In conclusion, terlipressin therapy reverses HRS in a high proportion of patients. Recurrence rate after treatment withdrawal is uncommon. Albumin appears to improve markedly the beneficial effects of terlipressin. [source]

Prognosis of hepatorenal syndrome , has it changed with current practice?

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2004
P. Angeli
Summary The Consensus Conference on Hepatorenal Syndrome (HRS) organized by the International Ascites Club in 1994 redefined HRS, introduced new diagnostic criteria that are now widely accepted, and proposed the distinction between two types of HRS: type 1 and type 2. Before the introduction of the new therapeutic options, the median survival of patients with type 1 HRS was only 1.7 weeks, and 6,12 months in patients with type 2 HRS. Liver transplantation (LT) was the first therapeutic option to change the prognosis of cirrhotic patients with HRS and 5-year survival after LT in patients with HRS is only slightly less than that of transplanted patients without HRS and markedly increased when compared to survival in nontransplanted patients with HRS. Nevertheless, a large proportion of patients die before LT is possible because of the poor prognosis of HRS and the prolonged waiting times in most transplant centres. Other therapeutic approaches were therefore developed to increase survival in patients with HRS. Vasoconstrictors and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) are the most promising. The administration of vasoconstrictors together with albumin has been shown to reverse type 1 HRS and even to completely normalize renal function in 60,70% of treated patients. To date, four studies assessing TIPS in the management of type 1 HRS have been reported and TIPS insertion was technically successful in all of them. Given the shortage of donors for LT, vasoconstrictor therapy and TIPS strategies may be considered as a bridge to LT in patients with type 1 HRS. [source]

Hepatorenal syndrome: A proposal for kidney after liver transplantation (KALT)

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2007
Richard Ruiz
Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a well-recognized complication of end-stage liver disease. Once thought to be a reversible condition with liver transplantation (LT) alone, HRS may directly contribute to the requirement for long-term dialysis posttransplant. As a result, discussion has now focused on whether or when a kidney allograft should be considered for these patients. Using the International Ascites Club guidelines with a pretransplant serum creatinine (SCr) >2.0 mg/dL to define HRS, 130 patients undergoing LT over a 10-yr period were identified, for an overall incidence of 9%. Patient survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 yr were 74%, and 68%, and 62%, respectively. Survival was significantly worse when compared to non-HRS patients undergoing LT over the same study period (P = 0.0001). For patients presenting with type 2 HRS, 7 patients (6%) developed irreversible kidney failure posttransplant compared to 0.34% in the non-HRS population (P < 0.0001). Five of these patients died within 1 yr with a median survival time of 139 days. Combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKT) for patients with HRS is not recommended. However, an improvement in outcome can be accomplished by addressing those patients who require dialysis greater than 60 days posttransplant. We propose a role for kidney after liver transplantation (KALT) in select HRS patients. Liver Transpl 13:838,843, 2007. © 2007 AASLD. [source]