Transplant Outcome (transplant + outcome)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Kinds of Transplant Outcome

  • kidney transplant outcome
  • liver transplant outcome


  • Selected Abstracts


    Biologic Markers as Predictors for Liver Transplant Outcome

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 1 2010
    R. B. Freeman
    The rate of change of AFP levels before transplantation is another, maybe more biologically relevant, way to assess liver transplant prognosis for hepatocellular cancer. See article by Vibert et al on page 129. [source]


    Marked Variation of the Association of ESRD Duration Before and After Wait Listing on Kidney Transplant Outcomes

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 9 2010
    J. D. Schold
    Numerous studies report a strong association between pretransplant end-stage renal disease (ESRD) duration and diminished transplant outcomes. However, cumulative waiting time may reflect distinct phases and processes related to patients' physiological condition as well as pre-existing morbidity and access to care. The relative impact of pre- and postlisting ESRD durations on transplant outcomes is unknown. We examined the impact of these intervals from a national cohort of kidney transplant recipients from 1999 to 2008 (n = 112 249). Primary factors explaining prelisting ESRD duration were insurance and race, while primary factors explaining postlisting ESRD duration were blood type, PRA% and variation between centers. Extended time from ESRD to waitlisting had significant dose,response association with overall graft loss (AHR = 1.26 for deceased donors [DD], AHR = 1.32 for living donors [LD], p values < 0.001). Contrarily, time from waitlisting (after ESRD) to transplantation had negligible effects (p = 0.10[DD], p = 0.57[LD]). There were significant associations between pre- and postlisting ESRD time with posttransplant patient survival, however prelisting time had over sixfold greater effect. Prelisting ESRD time predominately explains the association of waiting time with transplant outcomes suggesting that factors associated with this interval should be prioritized for interventions and allocation policy. The degree to which the effect of prelisting ESRD time is a proxy for comorbid conditions, socioeconomic status or access to care requires further study. [source]


    Transplant Outcomes and Economic Costs Associated with Patient Noncompliance to Immunosuppression

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 11 2009
    B. W. Pinsky
    We describe factors associated with immunosuppression compliance after kidney transplantation and examine relationships between compliance with allograft outcomes and costs. Medicare claims for immunosuppression in 15 525 renal transplant recipients with at least 1 year of graft function were used to calculate compliance as medication possession ratio. Compliance was categorized by quartiles as poor, fair, good and excellent. We modeled adjusted associations of clinical factors with the likelihood of persistent compliance by multiple logistic regressions (aOR), and estimated associations of compliance with subsequent graft and patient survival with Cox proportional hazards (aHR). Adolescent recipients aged 19,24 years were more likely to be persistently noncompliant compared to patients aged 24,44 years (aOR 1.49 [1.06,2.10]). Poor (aHR 1.80 [1.52,2.13]) and fair (aHR 1.63[1.37,1.93]) compliant recipients were associated with increased risks of allograft loss compared to the excellent compliant recipients. Persistent low compliance was associated with a $12 840 increase in individual 3-year medical costs. Immunosuppression medication possession ratios indicative of less than the highest quartile of compliance predicted increased risk of graft loss and elevated costs. These findings suggest that interventions to improve medication compliance among kidney transplant recipients should emphasize the benefits of maximal compliance, rather than discourage low compliance. [source]


    HLA-C and Liver Transplant Outcomes: Interpreting the Facts

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 7 2009
    J. B. Mendel
    The current issue contains a report contradicting an earlier report published in this journal casting doubt on the association of HLA-C genotype with liver transplant outcomes. See Brief Communication by Tran et al on page 1674,1678. [source]


    Recipient Outcomes for Expanded Criteria Living Kidney Donors: The Disconnect Between Current Evidence and Practice

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 7 2009
    Y. Iordanous
    Older individuals or those with medical complexities are undergoing living donor nephrectomy more than ever before. Transplant outcomes for recipients of kidneys from these living expanded criteria donors are largely uncertain. We systematically reviewed studies from 1980 to June 2008 that described transplant outcomes for recipients of kidneys from expanded criteria living donors. Results were organized by the following criteria: older age, obesity, hypertension, reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR), proteinuria and hematuria. Pairs of reviewers independently evaluated each citation and abstracted data on study and donor characteristics, recipient survival, graft survival, serum creatinine and GFR. Transplant outcomes for recipients of kidneys from older donors (,60 years) were described in 31 studies. Recipients of kidneys from older donors had poorer 5-year patient and graft survival than recipients of kidneys from younger donors [meta-analysis of 12 studies, 72% vs. 80%, unadjusted relative risk (RR) of survival 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83,0.95]. In meta-regression, this association diminished over time (1980s RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65,0.96 vs. 1990s RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85,0.99). Few transplant outcomes were described for other expanded criteria. This disconnect between donor selection and a lack of knowledge of recipient outcomes should give transplant decision-makers pause and sets an agenda for future research. [source]


    Cellular senescence in pretransplant renal biopsies predicts postoperative organ function

    AGING CELL, Issue 1 2009
    Liane M. McGlynn
    Summary Older and marginal donors have been used to meet the shortfall in available organs for renal transplantation. Post-transplant renal function and outcome from these donors are often poorer than chronologically younger donors. Some organs, however, function adequately for many years. We have hypothesized that such organs are biologically younger than poorer performing counterparts. We have tested this hypothesis in a cohort of pre-implantation human renal allograft biopsies (n = 75) that have been assayed by real-time polymerase chain reaction for the expression of known markers of cellular damage and biological aging, including CDKN2A, CDKN1A, SIRT2 and POT1. These have been investigated for any associations with traditional factors affecting transplant outcome (donor age, cold ischaemic time) and organ function post-transplant (serum creatinine levels). Linear regression analyses indicated a strong association for serum creatinine with pre-transplant CDKN2A levels (p = 0.001) and donor age (p = 0.004) at 6 months post-transplant. Both these markers correlated significantly with urinary protein to creatinine ratios (p = 0.002 and p = 0.005 respectively), an informative marker for subsequent graft dysfunction. POT1 expression also showed a significant association with this parameter (p = 0.05). Multiple linear regression analyses for CDKN2A and donor age accounted for 24.6% (p = 0.001) of observed variability in serum creatinine levels at 6 months and 23.7% (p = 0.001) at 1 year post-transplant. Thus, these data indicate that allograft biological age is an important novel prognostic determinant for renal transplant outcome. [source]


    Identification of patients best suited for combined liver,kidney transplantation: Part II

    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2002
    Connie L. Davis MD Associate Professor of Medicine
    Liver-kidney transplantation (LKT) should be reserved for those recipients with primary disease affecting both organs. However, increasing transplant list waiting times have increased the development and duration of acute renal failure before liver transplantation. Furthermore, the need for posttransplant calcineurin inhibitors can render healing from acute renal failure difficult. Because of the increasing requests for and controversy over the topic of a kidney with a liver transplant (OLT) when complete failure of the kidney is not known, the following article will review the impact of renal failure on liver transplant outcome, treatment of peri-OLT renal failure, rejection rates after LKT, survival after LKT, and information on renal histology and progression of disease into the beginnings of an algorithm for making a decision about combined LKT. [source]


    Pathophysiology of renal disease associated with liver disorders: Implications for liver transplantation.

    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2002
    Part I
    Renal and hepatic function are often intertwined through both the existence of associated primary organ diseases and hemodynamic interrelationships. This connection occasionally results in the chronic failure of both organs, necessitating combined liver-kidney transplantation (LKT). Since 1988, more than 850 patients in the United States have received such transplants, with patient survival somewhat less than that for patients receiving either organ alone. Patients with renal failure caused by acute injury or hepatorenal syndrome have classically not been included as candidates for combined transplantation because of the reversibility of renal dysfunction after liver transplantation. However, the rate and duration of renal failure before liver transplantation is increasing in association with prolonged waiting list times. Thus, the issue of acquired permanent renal damage in the setting of hepatic failure continues to confront the transplant community. The following article and its sequel (Part II, to be published in vol 8, no 3 of this journal) attempt to review the problem of primary and secondary renal disease in patients with end-stage liver disease, elements involved in renal disease progression and recovery, the impact of renal disease on liver transplant outcome, and results of combined LKT; outline the steps in the pretransplantation renal evaluation; and provide the beginnings of an algorithm for making the decision for combined LKT. [source]


    The effect of glutamine supplementation on hematopoietic stem cell transplant outcome in children: A case,control study

    PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 1 2008
    Baris Kuskonmaz
    Abstract:, HSCT associated morbidity and mortality is usually attributed to high-dose chemotherapy/radiotherapy regimens used for conditioning. Glutamine (Gln), a conditionally essential amino acid during severe catabolic states, has been shown to have favorable effects in patients with malignancies and in those undergoing HSCT. However, controversy exists regarding its routine use. Studies in children investigating gln supplementation are very limited. In the present study, including 21 gln-supplemented and 20 control pediatric patients, gln supplementation was shown to reduce the duration of fever and decrease the incidence of SOS during the HSCT course. In addition, a decrease in drug-related toxicity and a trend toward reduced incidence of severe mucositis were observed. [source]


    Immune Reconstitution Following Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 9 2010
    S. Gurkan
    Depletional induction therapies are routinely used to prevent acute rejection and improve transplant outcome. The effects of depleting agents on T-cell subsets and subsequent T-cell reconstitution are incompletely defined. We used flow cytometry to examine the effects of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) on the peripheral T-cell repertoire of pediatric and adult renal transplant recipients. We found that while rATG effectively depleted CD45RA+CD27+ naïve and CD45RO+CD27+ central memory CD4+ T cells, it had little effect on CD45RO+CD27, CD4+ effector memory or CD45RA+CD31,, CD45RO+CD27+ and CD45RO+CD27, CD8+ T cell subsets. When we performed a kinetic analysis of CD31+ recent thymic emigrants and CD45RA+/RO+ T cells, we found evidence for both thymopoiesis and homeostatic proliferation contributing to immune reconstitution. We additionally examined the impact of rATG on peripheral CD4+Foxp3+ T cells. We found that in adults, administration of rATG-induced peripheral expansion and new thymic emigration of T cells with a Treg phenotype, while CD4+Foxp3+ T cells of thymic origin predominated in children, providing the first evidence that rATG induces Treg in vivo. Collectively our data indicate that rATG alters the balance of regulatory to memory effector T cells posttransplant, providing an explanation for how it positively impacts transplant outcome. [source]


    Thrombotic Microangiopathy After Kidney Transplantation

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 7 2010
    M. Noris
    Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a severe complication of kidney transplantation that often causes graft failure. TMA may occur de novo, often triggered by immunosuppressive drugs and acute antibody-mediated rejection, or recur in patients with previous history of hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Recurrent TMA is very rare in patients who had developed end-stage renal failure following HUS caused by Shiga-toxin producing E. scherichia coli, whereas disease recurrence is common in patients with atypical HUS (aHUS). The underlying genetic defect greatly impacts the risk of posttransplant recurrence in aHUS. Indeed recurrence is almost the rule in patients with mutations in genes encoding factor H or factor I, whereas patients with a mutation in membrane-cofactor-protein gene have a good transplant outcome. Prophylactic and therapeutic options for posttransplant TMA, including plasma therapy, combined kidney and liver transplantation and targeted complement inhibitors are discussed in this review. [source]


    Safety and Efficacy of Raltegravir in HIV-Infected Transplant Patients Cotreated with Immunosuppressive Drugs

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2009
    L. Tricot
    Solid organ transplantations (SOT) are performed successfully in selected HIV-infected patients. However, multiple and reciprocal drug,drug interactions are observed between antiretroviral (ARV) drugs and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) through CYP450 metabolization. Raltegravir (RAL), a novel HIV-1 integrase inhibitor, is not a substrate of CYP450 enzymes. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 13 HIV-infected transplant patients treated by an RAL + two nucleosidic reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) regimen, in terms of tolerability, ARV efficacy (plasma viral load, CD4 cell count), drug interactions, RAL pharmacokinetics and transplant outcome. Thirteen patients with liver (n = 8) or kidney (n = 5) transplantation were included. RAL was initiated (400 mg BID) either at time of transplantation (n = 6), or after transplantation (n = 7). Median RAL trough concentration was 507 ng/mL (176,890), which is above the in vitro IC95 for wild type HIV-1 strains (15 ng/mL). Target trough levels of CNIs were promptly obtained with standard dosages of tacrolimus or cyclosporine. RAL tolerability was excellent. There was no episode of acute rejection. HIV infection remained controlled. After a median follow-up of 9 months (range: 6,14), all patients were alive with satisfactory graft function. The use of an RAL + two NRTI-based regimen is a good alternative in HIV-infected patients undergoing SOT. [source]


    New Insights into Mechanisms of Spontaneous Liver Transplant Tolerance: The Role of Foxp3-Expressing CD25+CD4+ Regulatory T Cells

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2008
    W. Li
    Liver allografts in mice are accepted across MHC barriers without requirement for immunosuppressive therapy. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain largely undefined. In this study, we investigated the role of Foxp3-expressing CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells (Treg) in the induction of murine liver transplant tolerance. Foxp3+CD25+CD4+ T cells were increased in liver grafts and recipient spleens from day 5 to day 100 posttransplantation, associated with enhanced CTLA4 and TGF-, expression and IL-4 production. Depletion of recipient CD25+CD4+ T cells using anti-CD25 mAb (250 ,g/day) induced acute liver allograft rejection. This was associated with a decreased ratio of Foxp3+ Treg: T effector cells, decreased IL-4 and elevated IL-10 and IL-2 production by graft-infiltrating T cells, and reduced apoptotic activity of graft-infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in anti-CD25-mAb-treated recipients. Thus, the data suggest that Foxp3+CD25+CD4+Treg are involved in spontaneous acceptance of liver allografts in mice. The ratio of Treg to T effector cells appears to determine liver transplant outcome. CTLA4, IL-4, TGF-, and apoptosis of graft-infiltrating T cells are also associated with liver transplant tolerance and may contribute, at least in part, to the mechanisms of Treg-mediated immune regulation in this model. [source]


    Renal Transplantation in Indo-Asian Patients in the UK

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 4 2006
    M. D. Dooldeniya
    Membership of some ethnic groups has an effect on renal transplant outcome but little is known about the impact of Indo-Asian ethnicity, despite this group's high incidence of renal disease. We compared outcomes in Indo-Asians and Caucasians at the Hammersmith Hospital (Indo-Asians, N = 46; Caucasians, N = 90), in the Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Surveillance (LOTESS) database of cyclosporin-treated renal transplant recipients (Indo-Asians, N = 254; Caucasians, N = 4262) and the National Transplant Database held by UK Transplant (Indo-Asians, N = 459; Caucasians, N = 4831). The baseline demographic and co-morbid characteristics of the two ethnic groups were comparable, save for more diabetes in the Indo-Asian community. Following transplantation, the incidence of delayed graft function and steroid-resistant acute rejection were also comparable, as were graft and patient survival (out to 5 years) and graft function. In addition, post-transplant blood pressure, levels of cholesterol and triglycerides and exposure to corticosteroids and cyclosporin were comparable. However, when patients who were not diabetic before transplantation were studied separately, there was an increased incidence of diabetes in the Indo-Asian community (Hammersmith data: Indo-Asians 10.9% vs. Caucasians 3.3%, p = 0.02; LOTESS data Indo-Asians 5.5% vs. Caucasians 1.6%, p < 0.0001). Subsequent management of this group should pursue immunosuppressive regimens less likely to impair post-transplant glucose tolerance. [source]


    CD30, a marker to detect the high-risk kidney transplant recipients

    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2008
    Camelia Spiridon
    Abstract:,Background:, Sensitization of potential renal transplant recipients may impact the selection of donors and the outcome of transplant. Another element of the potential kidney transplant recipient immune system that provides useful information regarding the transplant outcome is the immunologic CD30 molecule. Methods and results:, This study shows a significant correlation between the pre-transplant high level of soluble CD30 and increased incidence of post-transplant infection. Only 7/34 (20.6%) of the patients who had a low level of sCD30 (<90 U/mL) developed infection as compared with the 25/58 (43.1%) of the patients who had a high level (>90 U/mL) of sCD30 (p < 0.04). Higher level of sCD30 pre-transplant was also correlated with the increased level of serum creatinine (p < 0.05) and pre-transplant malignancy (p < 0.04). A significant higher level of sCD30 was also noted among females (74%), as compared with males (50%) with p < 0.03. In addition, significant effect of 3,6 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches on rejection was seen. Conclusions:, These results show that higher pre-transplant immunologic reactivity measured by sCD30 level was associated with post-transplant outcome. The high level of sCD30 among females may indicate an active immunologic status, perhaps because of previous pregnancies. [source]


    Kidney graft survival in patients with hepatitis C: a single center experience

    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 1 2008
    J Arango
    Abstract:, Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is highly prevalent in renal transplant candidates; however, its effect on the transplant outcome is still controversial. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of HCV infection in the outcome of kidney transplantation in a single transplant center. The study population 144 HCV, randomized selected patients and 64 HCV+ patients transplanted from 1973 to 2000, followed for up to 60 months post-transplantation. This retrospective study included the following variables: type of dialysis, time on renal replacement therapy, number of transfusions before and after transplantation, number of transplants, type of donor, immunosuppression, and rejection episodes. The Kaplan,Meier method was used to estimate graft and patient survival. Log-rank test was used to assess the difference in survival between HCV+ and HCV,. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the relation between graft and patient survival. HCV+ and HCV, patients had similar demographic and clinical characteristics; however, a higher number of HCV+ patients received blood transfusions after transplantation. Patient survival was not significantly different in 39 HCV+ and 96 HCV, patients transplanted with living-related donors (71% and 77% at five yr, respectively). Similarly, there was not significant difference in 25 HCV+ and 48 HCV, patients transplanted with kidneys from deceased donors, although there was a tendency to better outcome in HCV, patients (55% and 72% at five yr respectively). Regarding graft survival, there was also no differences in HCV+ and HCV, recipients of living-related grafts (61% and 66% at five yr post-transplant, respectively) and recipients of kidneys from deceases donors (44% and 41%, respectively). The results show that HCV+ patients can be transplanted with the same success than HCV, patients. [source]


    Review of select transplant subpopulations at high risk of failure from standard immunosuppressive therapy

    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 5 2000
    Mark H Deierhoi
    Despite improvements in short-term graft and patient survival rates for solid organ transplants, certain subgroups of transplant recipients experience poorer clinical outcome compared to the general population. Groups including pediatrics, African-Americans, diabetics, cystic fibrosis patients, and pregnant women require special considerations when designing immunosuppressive regimens that optimize transplant outcomes. Problems specific to pediatric transplant recipients include altered pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs, such as cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus (poor absorption, increased metabolism, rapid clearance), the need to restore growth post-transplantation, and a high incidence of drug-related adverse effects. African-Americans have decreased drug absorption and bioavailability, high immunologic responsiveness, and a high incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus. Diabetics and cystic fibrosis patients exhibit poor absorption of immunosuppressive agents, which may lead to underimmunosuppression and subsequent graft rejection. Pregnant women undergo physiologic changes that can alter the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressives, thus requiring careful clinical management to minimize the risks of either under- or overimmunosuppression to mother and child. To achieve an optimal post-transplant outcome in these high-risk patients, the problems specific to each group must be addressed, and immunosuppressive therapy individualized accordingly. Drug formulation greatly impacts upon pharmacokinetics and the resultant level of immunosuppression. Thus, a formulation with improved absorption (e.g., CsA for microemulsion), higher bioavailability, and less pharmacokinetic variability may facilitate patient management and lead to more favorable outcomes, especially in groups demonstrating low and variable bioavailability. Other strategies aimed at improving transplant outcome include the use of higher immunosuppressive doses, different combinations of immunosuppressive agents, more frequent monitoring, and management of concurrent disease states. [source]


    Liver transplantation for malignancies in children,

    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue S2 2010
    Sue V. McDiarmid
    Key Points 1. Hepatoblastoma (HB) is the most common primary pediatric liver malignancy. The majority of children with HB are resection candidates. Determining which children should undergo resection or primary liver transplantation is essential to the prognosis. 2. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common pediatric primary liver malignancy. Most children with HCC are not resection candidates. Transplantation offers improved survival for appropriate candidates in comparison with nontransplant options. 3. Unlike children with HCC, children with HB and extrahepatic spread to the lungs have acceptable transplant outcomes if the disease has been eradicated by chemotherapy or surgical removal at the time of transplantation. 4. Chemotherapy is an important adjuvant for improving outcomes for children with HB, but its benefits for children with HCC are unproven. 5. Demonstrated extrahepatic spread at the time of transplantation is a contraindication to transplantation for patients with HCC or HB. Macroinvasion at the time of transplantation is a relative contraindication to transplantation. 6. Children with primary hepatic malignancies who are transplant candidates should be prioritized on the deceased donor waiting list. However, the criteria for prioritizing adult HCC patients have not been proven to be relevant for children. Liver Transpl 16:S13-S21, 2010. © 2010 AASLD. [source]


    Outcomes of kidney transplantation in children with nephronophthisis: An analysis of the North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies (NAPRTCS) Registry

    PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2008
    Lorraine A. Hamiwka
    Abstract:, NPHP is an autosomal recessive chronic tubulointerstitial nephropathy that progresses to ESRD. In the 2006 NAPRTCS report, NPHP was the primary diagnosis in 2.8% of all renal transplant patients. At our pediatric center, that covers a population in which the NPHP1 gene is prevalent, 24% of transplant recipients had a primary diagnosis of NPHP. Since no previous literature reports have documented kidney transplant outcomes in patients with NPHP, a review of the 2006 NAPRTCS database was performed. The results of this review illustrate that patients with NPHP as their underlying kidney disease have a significantly better overall graft survival when compared with all other patients registered in the NAPRTCS database. Sub-analysis demonstrated that this benefit is statistically significant only for LD kidney transplant recipients. CrCl was better in NPHP at all time points from transplant up to five-yr follow-up. Moreover, in NPHP LD transplant recipients the decline of CrCl over five yr was slower compared with non-NPHP LD transplant recipients. Rates of thrombosis, acute, and chronic rejection as well as causes of graft failure were similar in NPHP patients and all other patients. This review demonstrates that NPHP transplant recipients have excellent outcomes that are shown to be better compared with the general pediatric transplant population. [source]


    Marked Variation of the Association of ESRD Duration Before and After Wait Listing on Kidney Transplant Outcomes

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 9 2010
    J. D. Schold
    Numerous studies report a strong association between pretransplant end-stage renal disease (ESRD) duration and diminished transplant outcomes. However, cumulative waiting time may reflect distinct phases and processes related to patients' physiological condition as well as pre-existing morbidity and access to care. The relative impact of pre- and postlisting ESRD durations on transplant outcomes is unknown. We examined the impact of these intervals from a national cohort of kidney transplant recipients from 1999 to 2008 (n = 112 249). Primary factors explaining prelisting ESRD duration were insurance and race, while primary factors explaining postlisting ESRD duration were blood type, PRA% and variation between centers. Extended time from ESRD to waitlisting had significant dose,response association with overall graft loss (AHR = 1.26 for deceased donors [DD], AHR = 1.32 for living donors [LD], p values < 0.001). Contrarily, time from waitlisting (after ESRD) to transplantation had negligible effects (p = 0.10[DD], p = 0.57[LD]). There were significant associations between pre- and postlisting ESRD time with posttransplant patient survival, however prelisting time had over sixfold greater effect. Prelisting ESRD time predominately explains the association of waiting time with transplant outcomes suggesting that factors associated with this interval should be prioritized for interventions and allocation policy. The degree to which the effect of prelisting ESRD time is a proxy for comorbid conditions, socioeconomic status or access to care requires further study. [source]


    Access and Outcomes Among Minority Transplant Patients, 1999,2008, with a Focus on Determinants of Kidney Graft Survival

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 4p2 2010
    P.-Y. Fan
    Coincident with an increasing national interest in equitable health care, a number of studies have described disparities in access to solid organ transplantation for minority patients. In contrast, relatively little is known about differences in posttransplant outcomes between patients of specific racial and ethnic populations. In this paper, we review trends in access to solid organ transplantation and posttransplant outcomes by organ type, race and ethnicity. In addition, we present an analysis of categories of factors that contribute to the racial/ethnic variation seen in kidney transplant outcomes. Disparities in minority access to transplantation among wait-listed candidates are improving, but persist for those awaiting kidney, simultaneous kidney and pancreas and intestine transplantation. In general, graft and patient survival among recipients of solid organ transplants is highest for Asians and Hispanic/Latinos, intermediate for whites and lowest for African Americans. Although much of the difference in outcomes between racial/ethnic groups can be accounted for by adjusting for patient characteristics, important observed differences remain. Age and duration of pretransplant dialysis exposure emerge as the most important determinants of survival in an investigation of the relative impact of center-related versus patient-related variables on kidney graft outcomes. [source]


    HLA-C and Liver Transplant Outcomes: Interpreting the Facts

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 7 2009
    J. B. Mendel
    The current issue contains a report contradicting an earlier report published in this journal casting doubt on the association of HLA-C genotype with liver transplant outcomes. See Brief Communication by Tran et al on page 1674,1678. [source]


    Recipient Outcomes for Expanded Criteria Living Kidney Donors: The Disconnect Between Current Evidence and Practice

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 7 2009
    Y. Iordanous
    Older individuals or those with medical complexities are undergoing living donor nephrectomy more than ever before. Transplant outcomes for recipients of kidneys from these living expanded criteria donors are largely uncertain. We systematically reviewed studies from 1980 to June 2008 that described transplant outcomes for recipients of kidneys from expanded criteria living donors. Results were organized by the following criteria: older age, obesity, hypertension, reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR), proteinuria and hematuria. Pairs of reviewers independently evaluated each citation and abstracted data on study and donor characteristics, recipient survival, graft survival, serum creatinine and GFR. Transplant outcomes for recipients of kidneys from older donors (,60 years) were described in 31 studies. Recipients of kidneys from older donors had poorer 5-year patient and graft survival than recipients of kidneys from younger donors [meta-analysis of 12 studies, 72% vs. 80%, unadjusted relative risk (RR) of survival 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83,0.95]. In meta-regression, this association diminished over time (1980s RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65,0.96 vs. 1990s RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85,0.99). Few transplant outcomes were described for other expanded criteria. This disconnect between donor selection and a lack of knowledge of recipient outcomes should give transplant decision-makers pause and sets an agenda for future research. [source]


    Posttransplant Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome Is Associated with Bronchial Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 4 2009
    S. Hodge
    Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) compromises lung transplant outcomes and is characterised by airway epithelial damage and fibrosis. The process whereby the normal epithelial configuration is replaced by fibroblastic scar tissue is poorly understood, but recent studies have implicated epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT). The primary aim of this study was to assess the utility of flow cytometry in detecting and quantifying EMT in bronchial epithelial cells. Large airway brushings were obtained at 33 bronchoscopies in 16 BOS-free and 6 BOS grade 1,3 patients at 2,120 months posttransplant. Flow cytometry was used to assess expression of the mesenchymal markers ,SMA, S100A4 and ED-A FN and HLA-DR. TGF ,1 and HGF were measured in Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Expression of all three mesenchymal markers was increased in BOS, as was HLA-DR. BAL HGF, but not TGF ,1 was increased in BOS. Longitudinal investigation of one patient revealed a 100% increase in EMT markers concurrent with a 6-fold increase in BAL TGF ,1 and the diagnosis of BOS at 17 months posttransplant. Flow cytometric evaluation of bronchial epithelium may provide a novel and rapid means to assess lung allografts at risk of BOS. [source]


    Effect of Comorbidity Adjustment on CMS Criteria for Kidney Transplant Center Performance

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2009
    E. D. Weinhandl
    The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) uses kidney transplant outcomes, unadjusted for standard comorbidity, to identify centers with sufficiently higher than expected rates of graft failure or patient death (underperforming centers) that they may be denied Medicare participation. To examine whether comorbidity adjustment would affect this determination, we identified centers that would have failed to meet 1-year graft survival criteria, 1992,2005, with and without adjustment using the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Adjustment was performed for each U.S. center for 24 consecutive (overlapping) 30-month intervals, including 102 176 adult deceased-donor and living-donor kidney transplant patients with Medicare as primary payer 6 months pretransplant. For each interval, we determined percent positive agreement (PPA) (number of centers underperforming both before and after adjustment, divided by number underperforming either before or after adjustment). Overall PPA was 80.8%, with no evidence of a trend over time. Among deceased-donor recipients, 10 of 31 comorbid conditions were predictors of graft failure in at least half of the intervals, as were six conditions among living-donor recipients. Lack of comorbidity adjustment may disadvantage centers willing to accept higher risk patients. Risk of jeopardizing Medicare funding may give centers incentive to deny transplantation to higher risk patients. [source]


    Effects of Donor Age and Cell Senescence on Kidney Allograft Survival

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 1 2009
    A. Melk
    The biological processes responsible for somatic cell senescence contribute to organ aging and progression of chronic diseases, and this may contribute to kidney transplant outcomes. We examined the effect of pre-existing donor aging on the performance of kidney transplants, comparing mouse kidney isografts and allografts from old versus young donors. Before transplantation, old kidneys were histologically normal, but displayed an increased expression of senescence marker p16INK4a. Old allografts at day 7 showed a more rapid emergence of epithelial changes and a further increase in the expression of p16INK4a. Similar but much milder changes occurred in old isografts. These changes were absent in young allografts at day 7, but emerged by day 21. The expression of p16INK4a remained low in young kidney allografts at day 7, but increased with severe rejection at day 21. Isografts from young donors showed no epithelial changes and no increase in p16INK4a. The measurements of the alloimmune response,infiltrate, cytology, expression of perforin, granzyme B, IFN-, and MHC,were not increased in old allografts. Thus, old donor kidneys display abnormal parenchymal susceptibility to transplant stresses and enhanced induction of senescence marker p16INK4a, but were not more immunogenic. These data are compatible with a key role of somatic cell senescence mechanisms in kidney transplant outcomes by contributing to donor aging, being accelerated by transplant stresses, and imposing limits on the capacity of the tissue to proliferate. [source]


    Simultaneous Liver,Kidney Transplantation: Evaluation to Decision Making

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 7 2007
    C. L. Davis
    Questions about appropriate allocation of simultaneous liver and kidney transplants (SLK) are being asked because kidney dysfunction in the context of liver failure enhances access to deceased donor organs. There is specific concern that some patients who undergo combined liver and kidney transplantation may have reversible renal failure. There is also concern that liver transplants are placed prematurely in those with end-stage renal disease. Thus to assure allocation of transplants only to those truly in need, the transplant community met in March 2006 to review post-MELD (model for end-stage liver disease) data on the impact of renal function on liver waitlist and transplant outcomes and the results of SLK. [source]


    CMS oversight, OPOs and transplant centers and the law of unintended consequences

    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2009
    Richard J. Howard
    Abstract:, The Health Resources and Services Administration launched collaboratives with the goals of increasing donation rates, increasing the number of organs transplanted, eliminating deaths on the waiting list and improving outcomes. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recently published requirements for organ procurement organizations (OPOs) and transplant centers. Failure to meet CMS performance measures could result in OPOs losing their service area or transplant centers losing their CMS certification. CMS uses analyses by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) to evaluate a transplant center's performance based on risk-adjusted outcomes. However, CMS also uses a more liberal (one-sided) statistical test rendering more centers likely to qualify as low performing. Furthermore, the SRTR model does not incorporate some important patient variables in its statistical model which may result in biased determinations of quality of care. Cumulatively, there is much unexplained variation for transplant outcomes as suggested by the low predictive ability of survival models compared to other disease contexts. OPOs and transplant centers are unlikely to quietly accept their elimination. They may take certain steps that can result in exclusion of candidates who might otherwise benefit from transplantation and/or result in fewer transplants through restricted use of organs thought to carry higher risk of failure. CMS should join with transplant organizations to ensure that the goals of the collaborative are not inhibited by their performance measures. [source]


    Review of select transplant subpopulations at high risk of failure from standard immunosuppressive therapy

    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 5 2000
    Mark H Deierhoi
    Despite improvements in short-term graft and patient survival rates for solid organ transplants, certain subgroups of transplant recipients experience poorer clinical outcome compared to the general population. Groups including pediatrics, African-Americans, diabetics, cystic fibrosis patients, and pregnant women require special considerations when designing immunosuppressive regimens that optimize transplant outcomes. Problems specific to pediatric transplant recipients include altered pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs, such as cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus (poor absorption, increased metabolism, rapid clearance), the need to restore growth post-transplantation, and a high incidence of drug-related adverse effects. African-Americans have decreased drug absorption and bioavailability, high immunologic responsiveness, and a high incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus. Diabetics and cystic fibrosis patients exhibit poor absorption of immunosuppressive agents, which may lead to underimmunosuppression and subsequent graft rejection. Pregnant women undergo physiologic changes that can alter the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressives, thus requiring careful clinical management to minimize the risks of either under- or overimmunosuppression to mother and child. To achieve an optimal post-transplant outcome in these high-risk patients, the problems specific to each group must be addressed, and immunosuppressive therapy individualized accordingly. Drug formulation greatly impacts upon pharmacokinetics and the resultant level of immunosuppression. Thus, a formulation with improved absorption (e.g., CsA for microemulsion), higher bioavailability, and less pharmacokinetic variability may facilitate patient management and lead to more favorable outcomes, especially in groups demonstrating low and variable bioavailability. Other strategies aimed at improving transplant outcome include the use of higher immunosuppressive doses, different combinations of immunosuppressive agents, more frequent monitoring, and management of concurrent disease states. [source]