Transperitoneal Approach (transperitoneal + approach)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic adrenalectomy according to tumor size

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 12 2005
ISAO HARA
Objectives: In order to evaluate the indication and usefulness of laparoscopic adrenalectomy, clinical outcomes of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for patients with adrenal tumors were examined. Whether tumor size affects surgical outcome was analysed, along with the long-term clinical outcome for these patients. Patients and methods: A total of 63 patients with adrenal tumor underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy in our institute between 1999 and 2003. A laparoscopic transperitoneal approach was used in all cases. Underlying pathologies comprised Cushing syndrome (n = 12), pheochromocytoma (n = 13), primary aldosteronism (n = 21), non-functioning adenoma (n = 12) and others (n = 5). Results: No open conversion was performed. Mean operative duration was 239 min, and mean estimated blood loss was 134 mL. Tumor diameter was significantly smaller for primary aldosteronism than for Cushing syndrome, which in turn was significantly smaller than for adrenocorticotropic hormone-independent macronodular hyperplasia (AIMAH). No significant differences in surgical outcome and postoperative recovery were noted between large (,5 cm) and small (<5 cm) tumors. Long-term clinical outcome was better for patients with pheochromocytoma or primary aldosteronism than for patients with Cushing syndrome. Conclusions: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for benign tumor offers excellent surgical outcomes and convalescence. This is true for both small and large tumors. [source]


Laparoscopic nephropexy: Treatment outcome and quality of life

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 1 2004
YOSHIYUKI MATSUI
Abstract Background:, The recent introduction of laparoscopic procedures has markedly altered urological surgery. Laparoscopic nephropexy has attracted the attention of urologists as a treatment for nephroptosis. Herein, we describe our experiences and quality-of-life outcome of laparoscopic nephropexy and discuss its indications and surgical techniques. Methods:, From May 1998 to February 2002, six female patients, ranging in age from 20 to 64 years (median age 39.8 years), with symptomatic nephroptosis underwent laparoscopic nephropexy. Mean preoperative downward kidney displacement was 2.25 vertebral bodies (range 2,2.5) and all affected kidneys were tilted at orthostasis. One patient underwent nephropexy through the transperitoneal approach and the remaining patients underwent nephropexy through the retroperitoneal approach. To evaluate surgical results, postoperative follow-up interview (pain visual analog scale and the short-form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire) and objective examinations were performed. Results:, All procedures were accomplished without complication. Postoperative intravenous pyelography correctly confirmed fixed kidney in both supine and erect positions. All patients reported an improvement of symptoms approximately 1 month after nephropexy and no symptoms have recurred during the follow-up period (range 6.3,50.7 months). On the SF-36, two domains, including role limitations due to emotional problems (RE) and mental health (MH), exhibited significant improvement postoperatively (P = 0.0405 and P = 0.0351, respectively). Conclusions:, Laparoscopic, in particular retroperitoneoscopic, nephropexy yields excellent outcomes and greatly improves general health-related quality of life, particularly mental status, as a minimally invasive treatment for symptomatic nephroptosis. [source]


TRAM flap delay: an extraperitoneal laparoscopic technique

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 10 2005
Ardalan Ebrahimi
Although the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap is the gold standard in autogenous breast reconstruction, it is less reliable in patients at high risk of ischaemic compromise. A preliminary delay procedure involving ligation of the deep inferior epigastric vessels has been shown to augment flap vascularity and improve outcome in those high risk patients undergoing unipedicled TRAM flap reconstruction. Despite previous description of a transperitoneal laparoscopic technique, surgical delay generally continues to be performed as an open procedure. This may reflect apprehension over the transperitoneal approach with its attendant risk of injury to intra-abdominal organs and vessels as well as adhesion formation. In this paper we describe an extraperitoneal laparoscopic technique for TRAM flap delay. Access to the deep inferior epigastric vessels is obtained using an extraperitoneal approach similar to that used for total extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and the vessels are easily identified and ligated using a single working port. While further study is required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technique, we report this as an alternative to the known open procedure which may be particularly useful for bilateral TRAM flap delay with the potential for reduced operative time, postoperative pain and scarring by avoiding bilateral inguinal incisions. [source]


Oncological outcome of 100 laparoscopic radical nephrectomies for clinically localized renal cell carcinoma

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 7 2005
Man-Chiu Cheung
Background: Laparoscopic renal surgery is now accepted within the urological community and its indication is extended to oncological operation. The oncological outcome and survival of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for clinically localized renal cell carcinoma were evaluated. Methods: From October 1998 to July 2003, 100 patients underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for clinically localized renal cell carcinoma. All operations were performed by transperitoneal approach with early vascular control. Perioperative events and pathological data were recorded prospectively. Patients were followed up by clinical examination, chest radiograph, ultrasonography and/or computed tomography where appropriate. Results: The median age of patients was 61 years. Median operating time was 120 min and blood loss was 100 mL. There were five open conversions. There was no perioperative mortality but 11 patients had complications. Resection margins were clear in all but one patient. The median tumour size was 4.6 cm. The median follow-up time was 30 months. All patients survived up to the date of review. No patient developed port-site recurrence but two patients had recurrence at the renal bed 1 year after the operation. Five patients developed distant metastases involving liver, lung and bone. Conclusion: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is a safe and efficacious treatment option for clinically localized renal cell carcinoma. The intermediate-term oncological outcome appears favourable. [source]


Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: A single-center experience of 100 cases

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 11 2008
Takatsugu Okegawa
Objectives: To report our experience with the retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches of laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods: Between July 2001 and December 2007, 100 patients with RCC underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy at our institution for clinically localized RCC. Fifty-three patients received a retroperitoneal procedure and 47 received a transperitoneal procedure. The perioperative and oncological outcomes of these groups were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Mean follow up was 34 months. No statistically significant difference was found between the two approaches in terms of pathological stage, operative time, need for additional procedures such as adrenalectomy and/or lymph node sampling, estimated blood loss, need for blood transfusions, analgesic requirement, length of hospital stay, or the incidence of minor or major complications. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 90% for both the retroperitoneal and transperitoneal procedures. The 5-year overall survival rates were 98% and 96%, respectively. Therefore, no significant difference was observed in the long-term oncological outcome between the two groups. Conclusions: Tumor control and surgical morbidity in laparoscopic radical nephrectomy seem not to be significantly influenced by the approach. [source]