Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Trade-off Hypothesis (trade-off + hypothesis)
Selected AbstractsCancellation of Executive Stock Options: Tax and Accounting Income Considerations,CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, Issue 3 2003Amin Mawani Abstract Canadian firms face a trade-off between reporting higher accounting income and paying lower taxes that arises from their ability to cancel in-the-money executive stock options and making a substitute cash payment to the executive instead of issuing shares. Firms' trade-off hypotheses are operationalized in a multilateral framework and empirically tested using insider-trading data. The multilateral approach is designed to control for the incentive effects of alternative compensation schemes and to determine the cancellation payment that keeps the executive indifferent between receiving cash or shares. The results show that firms consider both taxes and financial reporting costs in determining their option cancellation behavior. [source] SEXUAL SELECTION AND IMMUNE FUNCTION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTEREVOLUTION, Issue 2 2008Kurt A. McKean The evolution of immune function depends not only on variation in genes contributing directly to the immune response, but also on genetic variation in other traits indirectly affecting immunocompetence. In particular, sexual selection is predicted to trade-off with immunocompetence because the extra investment of resources needed to increase sexual competitiveness reduces investment in immune function. Additional possible immunological consequences of intensifying sexual selection include an exaggeration of immunological sexual dimorphism, and the reduction of condition-dependent immunological costs due to selection of ,good genes' (the immunocompetence handicap hypothesis, ICHH). We tested for these evolutionary possibilities by increasing sexual selection in laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster for 58 generations by reestablishing a male-biased sex ratio at the start of each generation. Sexually selected flies were larger, took longer to develop, and the males were more sexually competitive than males from control (equal sex ratio) lines. We found support for the trade-off hypothesis: sexually selected males were found to have reduced immune function compared to control males. However, we found no evidence that sexual selection promoted immunological sexual dimorphism because females showed a similar reduction in immune function. We found no evidence of evolutionary changes in the condition-dependent expression of immunocompetence contrary to the expectations of the ICHH. Lastly, we compared males from the unselected base population that were either successful (IS) or unsuccessful (IU) in a competitive mating experiment. IS males showed reduced immune function relative to IU males, suggesting that patterns of phenotypic correlation largely mirror patterns of genetic correlation revealed by the selection experiment. Our results suggest increased disease susceptibility could be an important cost limiting increases in sexual competitiveness in populations experiencing intense sexual selection. Such costs may be particularly important given the high intersex correlation, because this represents an apparent genetic conflict, preventing males from reaching their sexually selected optimum. [source] Trade-offs between the shade-avoidance response and plant resistance to herbivores?FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, Issue 6 2005Tests with mutant Cucumis sativus Summary 1Plants exhibit adaptations to many stresses, including light competition and herbivory. The expression of these traits may interact negatively, potentially instigating a trade-off. 2We employed a combination of genetically altered Cucumis sativus varieties and phenotypic manipulations to test for trade-offs in field experiments. The different genetic lines of C. sativus were altered in their phytochrome-mediated shade responses and the production of terpenoid defence compounds. 3Cucumber plants constitutively expressing the shade-avoidance response had 93% more herbivory by specialist beetles compared with wild types. The long-hypocotyl mutants also produced leaves with fewer trichomes, greater toughness and a higher carbon to nitrogen ratio (C : N) than wild types. Plants lacking defensive cucurbitacins had 23% longer internodes than the cucurbitacin-producing line. 4We then manipulated the plant phenotype by artificially imposing neighbours' shade on plants with and without cucurbitacins. As expected, plants responded to shade by growing longer hypocotyls and first internodes, but few trade-offs were found between plant line and shade treatment and, although herbivory levels were very low, there was a trend towards reduced damage on shaded plants. 5The use of genetically altered plant lines provided strong evidence for the trade-off hypothesis, while phenotypic manipulations did not support the hypothesis. [source] Resource specialization in a phytophagous insect: no evidence for genetically based performance trade-offs across hosts in the field or laboratoryJOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, Issue 4 2009S. J. AGOSTA Abstract We present a field test of the genetically based performance trade-off hypothesis for resource specialization in a population of the moth Rothschildia lebeau whose larvae primarily feed on three host plant species. Pairwise correlations between growth vs. growth, survival vs. survival and growth vs. survival across the different hosts were calculated, using families (sibships) as the units of analysis. Of 15 pairwise correlations, 14 were positive, 5 significantly so and none were negative. The same pattern was found using complementary growth and survival data from the laboratory. Overall, we found no evidence of negative genetic correlations in cross-host performance that would be indicative of performance trade-offs in this population. Rather, variation among families in performance appears to reflect ,general vigour' whereby families that perform well on one host perform well across multiple hosts. We discuss the implications of positive genetic correlations in cross-host performance in terms of the ecology and evolution of host range. We argue that this genetic architecture facilitates colonization of novel hosts and recolonization of historical hosts, therefore contributing to host shifts, host range expansions, biological invasions and introductions, and host ranges that are regionally broad but locally narrow. [source] Virulence evolution and the trade-off hypothesis: history, current state of affairs and the futureJOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, Issue 2 2009S. ALIZON Abstract It has been more than two decades since the formulation of the so-called ,trade-off' hypothesis as an alternative to the then commonly accepted idea that parasites should always evolve towards avirulence (the ,avirulence hypothesis'). The trade-off hypothesis states that virulence is an unavoidable consequence of parasite transmission; however, since the 1990s, this hypothesis has been increasingly challenged. We discuss the history of the study of virulence evolution and the development of theories towards the trade-off hypothesis in order to illustrate the context of the debate. We investigate the arguments raised against the trade-off hypothesis and argue that trade-offs exist, but may not be of the simple form that is usually assumed, involving other mechanisms (and life-history traits) than those originally considered. Many processes such as pathogen adaptation to within-host competition, interactions with the immune system and shifting transmission routes, will all be interrelated making sweeping evolutionary predictions harder to obtain. We argue that this is the heart of the current debate in the field and while species-specific models may be better predictive tools, the trade-off hypothesis and its basic extensions are necessary to assess the qualitative impacts of virulence management strategies. [source] | ||||||||||