Home  About us  Contact
 

Trauma System (trauma + system)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

Traumatic occupational injuries in Hispanic and foreign born workers

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, Issue 4 2010
Linda Forst MD
Abstract Background Hispanic and foreign-born workers suffer high rates of occupational fatality. Reasons for this are not well understood. Our aim was to gather information about the details related to severe, non-fatal occupational injuries in this vulnerable population. Methods Eight years of data were obtained from an urban trauma center. In addition, medical consultations of individuals admitted for an occupational injury during an 8-month period are reported. Results Hispanics were more highly represented than expected; their number of injuries steadily rose. Hispanics were more likely to be injured by machinery and hand tools. Workers reported hazardous working conditions, lack of workers compensation, short time in current employment, and not working in their usual job. Conclusion Trauma systems can provide a glimpse of risk factors for severe injuries in vulnerable workers. We recommend greater use of this data source, follow backs, long-term follow up of individuals, and improvement of surveillance of vulnerable working populations. Am. J. Ind. Med. 53:344,351, 2010. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

A comparison of severely injured trauma patients admitted to level 1 trauma centres in Queensland and Germany

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 3 2010
Johanna M. M. Nijboer
Abstract Background:, The allocation of a trauma network in Queensland is still in the developmental phase. In a search for indicators to improve trauma care both locally as state-wide, a study was carried out comparing trauma patients in Queensland to trauma patients in Germany, a country with 82.4 million inhabitants and a well-established trauma system. Methods:, Trauma patients ,15 years of age, with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) , 16 admitted to the Princess Alexandra Hospital (PAH) and to the 59 German hospitals participating in the Trauma Registry of the German Society for Trauma Surgery (DGU-G) during the year 2005 were retrospectively identified and analysed. Results:, Both cohorts are comparable when it comes to demographics and injury mechanism, but differ significantly in other important aspects. Striking is the low number of primary admitted patients in the PAH cohort: 58% versus 83% in the DGU-G cohort. PAH patients were less physiologically deranged and less severely injured: ISS 25.2 ± 9.9 versus 29.9 ± 13.1 (P < 0.001). Subsequently, they less often needed surgery (61% versus 79%), ICU admission (49% versus 92%) and had a lower mortality: 9.8% versus 17.9% of the DGU-G cohort. Conclusions:, Relevant differences were the low number of primary admissions, the lesser severity of injuries, and the low mortality of the patients treated at the PAH. These differences are likely to be interrelated and Queensland's size and suboptimal organization of trauma care may have played an important role. [source]

Epidemiology of post-injury multiple organ failure in an Australian trauma system

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 6 2009
David C. Dewar
Abstract Background:, The epidemiology of post-injury multiple organ failure (MOF) is reported internationally to have gone through changes over the last 15 years. The purpose of this study is to describe the epidemiology of post-injury MOF in Australia. Methods:, A 12-month prospective epidemiological study was performed at the John Hunter Hospital (Level-1 Trauma Centre). Demographics, injury severity (ISS), physiological parameters, MOF status and outcome data were prospectively collected on all trauma patients who met inclusion criteria (ICU admission; ISS > 15; age > 18, head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) <3 and survival >48 h). MOF was prospectively defined by the Denver MOF score greater than 3 points. Data are presented as % or Mean+/,SEM. Univariate statistical comparison was performed (Student t -test, X2 test), P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results:, Twenty-nine patients met inclusion criteria (Age 40+/,4, ISS 29+/,3, Male 62%), five patients developed MOF. The incidence of MOF among trauma patients admitted to ICU was 2% (5/204) and 17% (5/29) in the high-risk cohort. The maximum average MOF score was 6.3 +/,1, with the average duration of MOF 5+/,2 days. Two patients had respiratory and cardiac failure, two patients had failure of respiratory, cardiac and hepatic systems, while one patient had failure of respiratory, hepatic and renal systems. One MOF patient died, all non MOF patients survived. MOF patients had longer ICU stays (20+/,4 versus 7+/,0.8 P= 0.01), tended to be older (60+/,11 versus 35+/,4 p=0.07). None of the previously described independent predictors (ISS, base deficit, lactate, transfusions) were different when the MOF patients were compared with the non-MOF patients. Conclusion:, The incidence of MOF in Australia is consistent with the international data. In Australia MOF continues to cause significant late mortality and morbidity in trauma patients. MOF patients have longer ICU stay than high-risk non MOF patients, and use significant resources. Our preliminary data challenges the timeliness of the 10-year-old independent predictors of post-injury MOF. The epidemiology, the clinical presentation and the independent predictors of post-injury MOF require larger scale reassessment for the Australian context. [source]

Trauma Center Utilization for Children in California 1998,2004: Trends and Areas for Further Analysis

ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 4 2007
N. Ewen Wang MD
Abstract Background: While it is known that trauma systems improve the outcome of injury in children, there is a paucity of information regarding trauma system function amid changes in policies and health care financing that affect emergency medical systems for children. Objectives: To describe the trends in the proportion of pediatric trauma patients acutely hospitalized in trauma-designated versus non,trauma-designated hospitals. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of a population-based cohort obtained by secondary analysis of a publicly available data set: the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development Patient Discharge Database from 1998 to 2004. Patients were included in the analysis if they were 0,19 years old, had International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnostic codes and E-codes indicative of trauma, had an unscheduled admission, and were discharged from a general acute care hospital (N= 111,566). Proportions of patients hospitalized in trauma-designated hospitals versus non,trauma-designated hospitals were calculated for Injury Severity Score and death. Injury Severity Scores were calculated from ICD-9 codes. Primary outcomes were hospitalization in a trauma center and death two or more days after hospitalization. Results: Over the study period, the proportion of children aged 0,14 years with acute trauma requiring hospitalization and who were cared for in trauma-designated hospitals increased from 55% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 54% to 56%) in 1998 to 66% (95% CI = 65% to 67%) in 2004 (p < 0.01). For children aged 15,19 years, the proportion increased from 55% (95% CI = 54% to 57%) in 1998 to 74% (95% CI = 72% to 75%) in 2004 (p < 0.0001). When trauma discharges were stratified by injury severity, the proportion of children with severe injury who were hospitalized in trauma-designated hospitals increased from 69% (95% CI = 66% to 72%) in 1998 to 84% (95% CI = 82% to 87%) in 2004, a rate higher than in children with moderate injury (59% [95% CI = 58% to 61%] in 1998 and 75% [95% CI = 74% to 76%] in 2004) and mild injury (51% [95% CI = 50% to 52%] in 1998 and 63% [95% CI = 62% to 64%] in 2004) (p < 0.0001 for each injury severity category and both age groups). Of the hospitalized children who died two or more days after injury (n= 502), 18.1% died in non,trauma-designated hospitals (p < 0.002 for children aged 0,14 years; p = 0.346 for children aged 15,19 years). Conclusions: An increasing majority of children with trauma were cared for in trauma-designated hospitals over the study period. However, 23% of children with severe injuries, and 18.1% of pediatric deaths more than two days after injury, were cared for in non,trauma-designated hospitals. These findings demonstrate an important opportunity for improvement. If we can characterize those children who do not access the trauma system despite severe injury or death, we will be able to design clinical protocols and implement policies that ensure access to appropriate regional trauma care for all children in need. [source]

Triage and mortality in 2875 consecutive trauma patients

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 2 2010
R. MEISLER
Background: Most studies on trauma and trauma systems have been conducted in the United States. We aimed to describe the factors predicting mortality in European trauma patients, with focus on triage. Methods: We prospectively registered all trauma patients in Eastern Denmark over 12 consecutive months. We analysed the flow of trauma patients through the system, the time spent at different locations, and we assessed the risk factors of mortality. Results: We included 2875 trauma patients, of whom 158 (5.5%) died before arrival at the hospital. Most patients (75.3%) were brought to local hospitals and patients primarily (n=82) or secondarily triaged (n=203) to the level I trauma centre were the most severely injured. Secondarily transferred patients spent a median of 150 min in the local hospital before transfer to the level I trauma centre and 48 min on transportation. Severe injury with an injury severity score >15 was seen in 345 patients, of whom 118 stayed at the local hospital. They had a significantly higher mortality than 116 of those secondarily transferred [45/118, 38.1% vs. 11/116, 9.7% (P<0.0001)]. Mortality within 30 days was 4.3% in admitted patients, and significant risk factors of death were violence [odds ratio (OR)=5.72], unconsciousness (OR=4.87), hypotension (OR=4.96), injury severity score >15 (OR=27.42), and age. Conclusions: Around 50% of all trauma deaths occurred at the scene. Increased survival of severely injured patients may be achieved by early transfer to highly specialised care. [source]

Trauma Center Utilization for Children in California 1998,2004: Trends and Areas for Further Analysis

ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 4 2007
N. Ewen Wang MD
Abstract Background: While it is known that trauma systems improve the outcome of injury in children, there is a paucity of information regarding trauma system function amid changes in policies and health care financing that affect emergency medical systems for children. Objectives: To describe the trends in the proportion of pediatric trauma patients acutely hospitalized in trauma-designated versus non,trauma-designated hospitals. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of a population-based cohort obtained by secondary analysis of a publicly available data set: the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development Patient Discharge Database from 1998 to 2004. Patients were included in the analysis if they were 0,19 years old, had International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnostic codes and E-codes indicative of trauma, had an unscheduled admission, and were discharged from a general acute care hospital (N= 111,566). Proportions of patients hospitalized in trauma-designated hospitals versus non,trauma-designated hospitals were calculated for Injury Severity Score and death. Injury Severity Scores were calculated from ICD-9 codes. Primary outcomes were hospitalization in a trauma center and death two or more days after hospitalization. Results: Over the study period, the proportion of children aged 0,14 years with acute trauma requiring hospitalization and who were cared for in trauma-designated hospitals increased from 55% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 54% to 56%) in 1998 to 66% (95% CI = 65% to 67%) in 2004 (p < 0.01). For children aged 15,19 years, the proportion increased from 55% (95% CI = 54% to 57%) in 1998 to 74% (95% CI = 72% to 75%) in 2004 (p < 0.0001). When trauma discharges were stratified by injury severity, the proportion of children with severe injury who were hospitalized in trauma-designated hospitals increased from 69% (95% CI = 66% to 72%) in 1998 to 84% (95% CI = 82% to 87%) in 2004, a rate higher than in children with moderate injury (59% [95% CI = 58% to 61%] in 1998 and 75% [95% CI = 74% to 76%] in 2004) and mild injury (51% [95% CI = 50% to 52%] in 1998 and 63% [95% CI = 62% to 64%] in 2004) (p < 0.0001 for each injury severity category and both age groups). Of the hospitalized children who died two or more days after injury (n= 502), 18.1% died in non,trauma-designated hospitals (p < 0.002 for children aged 0,14 years; p = 0.346 for children aged 15,19 years). Conclusions: An increasing majority of children with trauma were cared for in trauma-designated hospitals over the study period. However, 23% of children with severe injuries, and 18.1% of pediatric deaths more than two days after injury, were cared for in non,trauma-designated hospitals. These findings demonstrate an important opportunity for improvement. If we can characterize those children who do not access the trauma system despite severe injury or death, we will be able to design clinical protocols and implement policies that ensure access to appropriate regional trauma care for all children in need. [source]