Home About us Contact | |||
ThinPrep Pap Tests (thinprep + pap_test)
Selected AbstractsThinPrep Pap test of endocervical adenocarcinoma with lymph node metastasis: Report of a case in a 17-year-old woman,DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, Issue 9 2010David G. Wagner M.D. Abstract Endocervical adenocarcinoma is an uncommon malignancy that is composed of multiple subtypes and accounts for ,15% of all cervical cancers. In this article, we describe the cytomorphology and differential diagnosis of an AJCC clinical stage IIIb, FIGO IB2 endocervical adenocarcinoma in a 17-year-old woman in a ThinPrep Pap test. The patient was a 17-year-old G0P0 white woman with no significant past medical history and no prior history of cervical dysplasia. She presented to her physician with a putrid vaginal discharge. A sample was sent to cytology that was interpreted as atypical endocervical cells, favor neoplasia. A subsequent cervical biopsy was diagnosed as endocervical adenocarcinoma with villoglandular features and ultimately, a hysterectomy with lymph node dissection was performed. The final diagnosis was endocervical adenocarcinoma with metastasis to three pelvic lymph nodes. The cytomorphology of endocervical adenocarcinoma on ThinPrep Pap test is similar to that described for conventionally-processed Pap smears. This difficult diagnosis should be considered on a ThinPrep Pap test, regardless of age when the characteristic cytomorphology is observed. On a cytology sample, it is advisable to state atypical endocervical cells, adenocarcinoma in situ, or endocervical adenocarcinoma without providing a specific subtype even if there is a predominance of features for a particular subtype. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2010;38:633,638. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Comparative study: conventional cervical and ThinPrep® Pap tests in a routine clinical settingCYTOPATHOLOGY, Issue 4 2002A. Grace The conventional Papanicolaou smear is associated with variable false positive and false negative rates, difficulties with interpretation and high unsatisfactory and suboptimal rates. Newer fluid-based methods such as the ThinPrep® 2000 system (Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, MA) are said to overcome these difficulties. The aim of this study was to compare the conventional smear with the ThinPrep® method in a busy, routine cytology screening laboratory setting. One thousand split samples were evaluated. Using ThinPrep®, the results showed an increased sensitivity and a dramatic improvement in specimen adequacy, with a combined 17.2% reduction in ,unsatisfactory' and ,suboptimal' reports. Screening time per slide was also reduced to 3,4 min. In conclusion, we report an increase in sensitivity, a reduction in screening time and a dramatic improvement in specimen adequacy with the ThinPrep® method. [source] HPV detection rate in discordant Pap tests between cytotechnologists and pathologistsDIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, Issue 5 2009David C. Chhieng M.D. Abstract When a Pap test is referred for pathologist review, it is accompanied by the cytotechnologist's provisional interpretation. Discordant interpretations between pathologists and cytotechnologists are sometimes noted. The objective is to correlate HPV detection rate with both estimated false-negative fraction (EFNF) and ASC to SIL ratio among discordant ASC cases. ThinPrep Pap tests in which the cytotechnologists' provisional interpretations were up- or down-graded by pathologists to ASC were retrieved between January and December 2006. HPV DNA testing was performed using hybrid capture technique. EFNFs and ASC to SIL ratio were estimated for cytotechnologists and pathologists, respectively. Overall, the EFNF ratio was 3.4% and the high-risk HPV DNA detection rates in cases that were "over-" or "under-" interpreted by technologists were 0.71 and 0.40, respectively. The overall ASC to SIL ratio was 1.41 and the high-risk HPV DNA detection rates in cases that were upgraded or downgraded to ASC were 0.40 and 0.71, respectively. In conclusion, our ASC to SIL ratios and EFNF were within acceptable range. We did not observe any association between ASC to SIL ratio and HPV detection rate in cases that were upgraded or downgraded to ASC by pathologists or between EFNF ratio and HPV detection rate in cases that were "over-interpreted" (or "under-interpreted") by cytotechnologists. The HPV detection rates for ASC cases that were originally "over-interpreted" by cytotechnologists were comparable to the HPV detection rates for LSIL, whereas those that were underinterpreted were comparable to the HPV detection rate for ASC. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2009. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] ThinPrep Pap tests in patients with endometrial cancer: A histo-cytological correlationDIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, Issue 7 2007Jianhong Zhou M.D. Abstract The aim of this retrospective study was to correlate cytological diagnoses of endometrial cancers in ThinPrep Pap tests with the histological diagnoses. ThinPrep specimens from 67 patients within 12 mo of the histological diagnosis of endometrial cancer were studied. Of this study sample, 89.6% had abnormal Pap tests. Abnormal Pap tests occurred in 96.8, 68.4, and 100% of patients with grades 1, 2, or 3 endometrial cancers, respectively. Of patients with endocervical involvement, 88.9% had positive or suspicious Pap tests, compared with 41.1% without endocervical involvement (LR = 7.85, P < 0.01). Of patients with ,50% myometrial invasion, 78.9% had positive or suspicious Pap tests, compared with 34.8% with less than 50% invasion (LR = 10.97, P < 0.01). Positive or suspicious Pap tests were found in 59.5 and 32.1% of those with tumors ,3 cm or <3cm, respectively (LR = 4.85, P < 0.05). Diagn. Cytopathol. 2007;35:448,453. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] |