Home About us Contact | |||
Base Tumors (base + tumor)
Kinds of Base Tumors Selected AbstractsCytogenetic analysis of 101 skull base tumorsHEAD & NECK: JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES & SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, Issue 5 2008Ziv Gil MD Abstract Background. Skull base tumors are rare neoplasms and the cytogenetic data on these tumors are limited. The authors cytogenetically analyzed a large series of tumors and compared the findings with patients' pathologic data. Methods. The karyotypes of pathologically confirmed samples of 101 patients, who were operated for oncological extirpation of tumors, were analyzed using G-banding and spectral-karyotyping techniques. Results. Of the 67 malignant tumors, 32 (48%) had chromosomal aberrations, some with complex numerical and structural chromosomal anomalies. Recurrent chromosomal breakpoints were identified in squamous cell carcinomas, adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACCs), sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas, chordomas, and sarcomas. Specific breakpoints established the diagnosis of various soft tissue sarcomas. Novel chromosomal aberrations were found in various other malignant and benign tumors. Conclusion. This study highlights the value of cytogenetic analysis for diagnosis of skull base tumors. The data add further information on the biological behavior of these rare neoplasms. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2008 [source] Particle beam radiotherapy for head and neck tumors: Radiobiological basis and clinical experienceHEAD & NECK: JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES & SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, Issue 8 2006Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa MD Abstract Background. Head and neck tumors are often located near critical organs, making it impossible to deliver a dose of conventional radiotherapy high enough to eradicate the disease. Our aim was to review the potential benefits and available clinical experience of particle beam therapy (hadrontherapy) in the treatment of these tumors. Methods. A review of the literature was carried out through a MEDLINE search (publications between 1980 and 2005). Results. A review of the available clinical data shows that particle beam therapy can offer several radiobiological and physical advantages over conventional photon radiotherapy: improved dose distribution permits dose escalation within the target and optimal sparing of normal tissue. Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that there may be benefits to using hadrontherapy for tumors characterized by poor radiosensitivity and critical location. At present, the most used hadrons are protons and, as yet on an experimental basis, carbon ions. It is now well accepted that there are certain indications for using proton therapy for skull base tumors (chordoma and chondrosarcoma), paranasal sinus carcinomas, selected nasopharyngeal tumors, and neutron/ion therapy for salivary gland carcinomas (in particular, adenoid cystic tumors). Its viability in other cases, such as locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, soft tissue sarcoma, and bone sarcoma, is still under investigation. Conclusions. Hadrontherapy can be beneficial in the treatment of tumors characterized by poor radiosensitivity and critical location. Further clinical and radiobiological studies are warranted for improved selection of patient population. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2006 [source] Free tissue transfer and local flap complications in anterior and anterolateral skull base surgeryHEAD & NECK: JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES & SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, Issue 10 2002Jason A. Heth MD Abstract Background Advances in reconstructive techniques over the past two decades have allowed the resection of more extensive skull base tumors than had previously been possible. Despite this progress, complications related to these cases remain a concern. Methods Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the relationship of host, tumor, defect, treatment, and reconstructive variables to wound and systemic complications after anterior and anterolateral skull base resections. The study included 67 patients receiving local flap (LF) or free tissue transfer (FTT) reconstructions during an 8-year period. Results Overall, 28% of patients had a major wound complication, and 19% had a major systemic complication. LF and FTT flaps had similar rates of wound complications. LF reconstructions were associated with late wound breakdown problems, and FTT flap complications were primarily acute surgery,related problems. Conclusions The surgical reconstruction of skull base defects should be planned on the basis of the ability of the technique to attain safe closure and maintain integrity after radiation therapy. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 24: 00,00, 2002 [source] Palatal adhesion: The treatment of unilateral palatal paralysis after high vagus nerve injuryHEAD & NECK: JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES & SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, Issue 8 2002James L. Netterville MD Abstract Background Resection of skull base tumors commonly necessitates intraoperative sacrifice of lower cranial nerves at the level of the jugular foramen. Sequelae of unilateral vagus nerve loss include ipsilateral laryngeal paralysis, ipsilateral palatal and pharyngeal paralysis, and velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) marked by hypernasal speech and nasopharyngeal reflux of liquids during swallowing. Methods Palatal adhesion (PA), a procedure whereby the unilaterally paralyzed palate is attached to the posterior pharyngeal wall, decreases the size of the velopharyngeal port and minimizes the symptoms. This study assessed the outcome of PA in 31 patients with VPI secondary to proximal vagus nerve injury. Results PA decreased postoperative nasality in 96% of patients. Nasopharyngeal reflux was significantly improved in 83%. Three patients (11%) had minor wound breakdown postoperatively, all of which healed completely with conservative management. Conclusion PA offers a favorable result with minimal concomitant morbidity and is recommended for patients with VPI secondary to unilateral proximal vagus nerve paralysis. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 24: 721,730, 2002 [source] Chordoma and chondrosarcoma: Similar, but quite different, skull base tumorsCANCER, Issue 11 2007Kaith Almefty BBA Abstract BACKGROUND Chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the skull base are frequently amalgamated because of similar anatomic location, clinical presentation, and radiologic findings. The chondroid chordoma variant has been reported to carry a better prognosis. The objective of the current study was to investigate the distinctions between these 3 entities. METHODS The data concerning 109 patients with chordoma, chondroid chordoma, and chondrosarcoma who were treated by a single surgeon with maximum surgical resection and frequently by adjunct proton beam radiotherapy between 1990 and 2006 were analyzed retrospectively. Pathologic distinction was established by cytokeratin and epithelial membrane antigen staining. Clinical, radiologic, pathologic, and cytogenetic studies were analyzed in relation to disease recurrence and death. RESULTS The average follow-up was 48 ± 37.5 months (range, 1,191 months). There were no reliable distinguishing clinical or radiologic features noted between the groups. Chondrosarcoma patients had a significantly better outcome compared with chordoma patients with regard to survival and recurrence-free survival (P = .028 and P < .001, respectively), whereas patients with chondroid chordoma had a poor outcome similar to chordoma patients with regard to survival and recurrence-free survival (P = .337 and P = .906, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Chordoma and chondrosarcoma differ with regard to their origin and histology, and differ markedly with regard to outcome. Chondroid chordomas behave in a manner that is clinically similar to chordomas, with the same prognosis. Both chordoma types demonstrate an aggressive clinical course and poor outcome after disease recurrence. The optimal treatment for all groups of patients involves radical surgical resection followed by high-dose radiotherapy in patients with chordomas. Radiotherapy may not be necessary in patients with low-grade chondrosarcoma. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society. [source] Craniofacial surgery for malignant skull base tumorsCANCER, Issue 6 2003Report of an International Collaborative Study Abstract BACKGROUND Malignant tumors of the skull base are rare. Therefore, no single center treats enough patients to accumulate significant numbers for meaningful analysis of outcomes after craniofacial surgery (CFS). The current report was based on a large cohort that was analyzed retrospectively by an International Collaborative Study Group. METHODS One thousand three hundred seven patients who underwent CFS in 17 institutions were analyzable for outcome. The median age was 54 years (range, 1,98 years). Definitive treatment prior to CFS had been administered in 59% of patients and included radiotherapy in 367 patients (28%), chemotherapy in 151 patients (12%), and surgery in 523 patients (40%). The majority of tumors (87%) involved the anterior cranial fossa. Squamous cell carcinoma (29%) and adenocarcinoma (16%) were the most common histologic types. The margins of surgical resection were reported close/positive in 412 patients (32%). Adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy was received by 510 patients (39%), and chemotherapy was received by 57 patients (4%). RESULTS Postoperative complications were reported in 433 patients (33%), with local wound complications the most common (18%). The postoperative mortality rate was 4%. With a median follow-up of 25 months, the 5-year overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival rates were 54%, 60%, and 53%, respectively. The histology of the primary tumor, its intracranial extent, and the status of surgical margins were independent predictors of overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS CFS is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with malignant tumors of the skull base. The histology of the primary tumor, its intracranial extent, and the status of surgical margins are independent determinants of outcome. Cancer 2003;98:1179,87. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11630 [source] |