Home About us Contact | |||
Tamoxifen Alone (tamoxifen + alone)
Selected AbstractsPrognostic value of c-erbB2 expression in breast cancerJOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, Issue 4 2002Shinichi Tsutsui MD Abstract Background and Objectives An overexpression of c-erbB2 has been reported to be associated with a poor clinical outcome in breast cancer, however, its prognostic value remains controversial especially in patients with node negative breast cancer, and regarding the estrogen receptor (ER) status. Methods Immunohistochemical staining for c-erbB2 was performed on the primary breast cancer from 698 Japanese patients with a mean follow-up duration of 54 months. Results The c-erbB2 expression was positive in 120 (17.2%) of 698 cases, which inversely correlated with the ER status. Both univariate and multivariate analyses indicated the c-erbB2 expression to be a significant prognostic factor for the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), while the same efffect was also seen in the patient groups with node negative as well as node positive breast cancer. A univariate anlysis also indicated a subgroup with the positive c-erbB2 and negative ER to have both a worse DFS and OS than the other subgroups. The patients with positive c-erbB2 had a significantly worse DFS and OS than the patients with negative c-erbB2 in all patient groups stratified according to the adjuvant therapies, while the prognostic significance of c-erbB2 on DFS was also found in the patients with the node negative breast cancer who received adjuvant tamoxifen alone. Conclusions The c-erbB2 expression is an independent significant factor for breast cancer and the prognostic significance remains in the node negative as well as node positive breast cancer, while the same effect was also found in all subgroups stratified according to the adjuvant therapies. In addition, the combination of c-erbB2 and ER made it possible to identify the subgroup with the worst clinical outcome. J. Surg. Oncol. 2002;79:216,223. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] The ATAC adjuvant breast cancer trial in postmenopausal women: baseline endometrial subprotocol dataBJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 12 2003S. Duffy Objective The ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) trial is a randomised, double-blind trial comparing ,Arimidex' (anastrozole), alone or in combination with tamoxifen, relative to tamoxifen alone as a five year adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. Because tamoxifen is associated with endometrial pathology, the ATAC endometrial subprotocol was initiated to establish the background prevalence of pathology, and to assess prospectively the incidence and nature of intrauterine changes before and following endocrine therapy. Setting International. Population and Study Design Two hundred and eighty-five women entered the subprotocol: the mean age was 60 years (range 44,80 years); 113 women (40%) had taken hormone replacement therapy prior to randomisation, and 238 women were parous (84%). The age at onset of the menopause was 32,58 years, with the majority becoming menopausal between 46 and 55 years of age. Two hundred and seventy-two women had a hysteroscopy before they commenced trial medication. Hysteroscopy was performed successfully in 265 women. In six women, failure of hysteroscopy at baseline led to withdrawal from the study. Three of the women who withdrew had a pipelle biopsy taken. Therefore, the total number of endometrial biopsies at baseline was 268. Main outcome measures To assess the demographic characteristics of women entering the endometrial subprotocol and their hysteroscopic and histological findings before commencing trial medication. Results At hysteroscopy, there was a diagnosis of endometrial polyps in 34 women (13%), fibroids in 16 women (6%) and one case of suspicious endometrium, which was confirmed as a polyp on histology. Only 21 of the 34 polyps seen hysteroscopically were proven histologically (62% accuracy of hysteroscopy). Final histology found the prevalence of endometrial diagnostic categories as follows: 123 inactive endometrium (46%), 20 benign polyps (7%), 17 secretory endometrium (6%), 7 proliferative endometrium (3%), 3 atypical hyperplasia (2 in a polyp), 1 simple hyperplasia (in a polyp) and 1 fibroid. The remaining women had pipelle samples with insufficient tissue obtained, indicating a normal endometrial cavity. Conclusion This is the first study of such size in gynaecologically asymptomatic breast cancer patients. This paper describes the findings in individual patients before any trial treatment was given. In this baseline group, 82% (219/268) of women had a normal endometrial cavity; 18% (49/268) had endometrial activity (proliferative or secretory endometrium in 9%) or an intracavity abnormality (hyperplasia, polyps and a fibroid in 9%). In total, 36% of biopsies had insufficient tissue for diagnosis, which in combination with a normal hysteroscopy was classed as normal. The appearance of a polyp hysteroscopically in this group was not proven histologically in approximately 40% of cases. The development of uterine pathology over time in the ATAC study will subsequently be assessed against the findings of this baseline paper. [source] Late follow-up of a randomized trial of surgery plus tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone in women aged over 70 years with operable breast cancerBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 6 2004M. Fennessy Background: Breast cancer has been considered a more indolent disease in the elderly, who are less tolerant of aggressive therapy. This trial tested the hypothesis that tamoxifen without surgery would provide adequate control of breast cancer for the remainder of life in elderly women, thereby sparing them surgery. Method: Women aged over 70 years with operable, invasive breast cancer were randomized to receive either tamoxifen alone or surgery plus tamoxifen. Time to treatment failure (TTF), indicating initial primary treatment failure, was the primary endpoint. Overall mortality, and death from breast cancer were also compared between the two groups. Results: Between 1984 and 1991, 455 patients were included in the trial. The analysis was based on a median follow-up of 12·7 years. The TTF was significantly shorter in the tamoxifen alone group: hazard ratio (HR) 4·41 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 3·31 to 5·88). Ninety-three (40·4 per cent) of 230 patients randomized to tamoxifen alone underwent surgery for the management of their disease. Both overall mortality and mortality from breast cancer were significantly increased in the tamoxifen alone group, although the survival curves did not diverge for the first 3 three years: HR 1·29 (95 per cent c.i. 1·04 to 1·59) and 1·68 (95 per cent c.i. 1·15 to 2·47) respectively. Conclusion: Omission of primary surgery in unselected elderly women with operable breast cancer who were fit for the procedure resulted in an increased rate of progression, therapeutic intervention and mortality. Copyright © 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] |