Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Tacrolimus Dose (tacrolimus + dose)
Selected AbstractsEffect of coadministered lopinavir and ritonavir (Kaletra) on tacrolimus blood concentration in liver transplantation patientsLIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 9 2003Ashokkumar B. Jain With the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), HIV positivity is no longer a contraindication for liver transplantation. Some of the antiretroviral agents, particularly protease inhibitors (e.g., ritonavir, indinavir, and nelfinavir) have been described as potent inhibitors of the metabolism of certain immunosuppressive drugs. In this article we describe a profound interaction between tacrolimus and Kaletra (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) (a combination of lopinavir and ritonavir) in 3 liver transplantation patients. Patient 1, who was maintained on a 5 mg twice daily dose of tacrolimus with a trough blood concentration around 10.6 ng/mL, required only 0.5 mg of tacrolimus per week after addition of Kaletra to achieve similar tacrolimus blood concentrations, with a half-life of 10.6 days. In patient 2, the area under the blood concentration versus time curve for tacrolimus increased from 31 ng/mL/h to 301 ng/mL/h after addition of Kaletra, with a corresponding half-life of 20 days. When the patient was subsequently switched to nelfinavir, the half-life decreased to 10.3 days. Patient 3, who was maintained with 4 to 8 mg/d of tacrolimus and a corresponding blood concentration of 10 ng/mL before Kaletra, required a tacrolimus dose of 1 mg/wk and tacrolimus concentrations of 5 ng/mL with Kaletra. In conclusion, a combination of lopinavir and ritonavir led to a much more profound increase in tacrolimus blood concentrations than use of single protease inhibitor, nelfinavir. A tacrolimus dose of less than 1 mg/wk may be sufficient to maintain adequate blood tacrolimus concentrations in patients on Kaletra. Patients may not need a further dose of tacrolimus for 3 to 5 weeks depending on liver function when therapy with Kaletra is initiated. Great caution is required in the management of tacrolimus dosage when Kaletra is introduced or withdrawn in HIV-positive patients after liver transplantation, particularly in the presence of hepatic dysfunction. [source] Oral administration of tacrolimus in the presence of jejunostomy after liver transplantationPEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2001Toshimichi Hasegawa Abstract: The feasibility of oral administration of tacrolimus in the presence of an intestinal stoma after liver transplantation (LTx) has not been adequately demonstrated. A 10-month-old girl underwent LTx with biliary reconstruction using a Roux-en Y loop. She developed intestinal perforation and underwent a jejunostomy at 40,50 cm distal to the jejunojejunostomy of the Roux-en Y loop on day 8 post-LTx. Tacrolimus was given twice daily via a nasogastric tube or orally; the initial dose of tacrolimus was 0.10 mg/kg/day. Until the time of intestinal perforation, the trough level of tacrolimus ranged from 13.0 to 19.6 ng/mL. The dose-normalized trough concentration (DNTC) of tacrolimus ranged from 130 to 196 ng.kg.daypermg.mL (control: 80,145 ng.kg.daypermg.mL). For a 2-week period when the patient was septic, the tacrolimus dose was reduced to 0.05 mg/kg/day, with a subsequent trough level of 3.6,5.1 ng/mL (DNTC: 72,102 ng.kg.daypermg.mL). After 3 weeks, the dose was increased to 0.175 mg/kg/day with the disappearance of infection; the trough level ranged from 8.5 to 9.7 ng/mL with a peak level of 26.3 ng/mL (DNTC: 48.5,55.4 ng.kg.daypermg.mL). After the initiation of oral feeding, the dose was slightly increased to 0.20 mg/kg/day with the trough level ranging from 8.1 to 9.8 ng/mL (DNTC: 40.5,49 ng.kg.daypermg.mL). After closure of the jejunostomy, the dose of tacrolimus was reduced to 0.075 mg/kg/day to maintain the same trough level (7.9,9.1 ng/mL) and the DNTC ranged from 105 to 121 ng.kg.daypermg.mL. In conclusion, oral administration of tacrolimus may achieve the therapeutic level, even in the presence of jejunostomy after LTx, although the bioavailability is decreased. [source] Pharmacokinetics for Once- Versus Twice-Daily Tacrolimus Formulations in De Novo Kidney Transplantation: A Randomized, Open-Label TrialAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 11 2009Z. Wlodarczyk Tacrolimus, a cornerstone immunosuppressant, is widely available as a twice-daily formulation (Tacrolimus BID). A once-daily prolonged-release formulation (Tacrolimus QD) has been developed that may improve adherence and impart long-lasting graft protection. This study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) of tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplant patients treated with Tacrolimus QD or Tacrolimus BID. A 6-week, open-label, randomized comparative study was conducted in centers in Europe and Australia. Eligible patients received Tacrolimus QD or Tacrolimus BID. PK profiles were obtained following the first tacrolimus dose (day 1), and twice under steady-state conditions. As secondary objectives, efficacy and safety parameters were also evaluated. Sixty-six patients completed all PK profiles (34 Tacrolimus QD, 32 Tacrolimus BID). Mean AUC0,24 of tacrolimus on day 1 was approximately 30% lower for Tacrolimus QD than Tacrolimus BID (232 and 361 ng.h/mL, respectively), but was comparable by day 4. There was a good correlation and a similar relationship between AUC0,24 and Cmin for both formulations. Efficacy and safety data were also comparable over the 6-week period. Tacrolimus QD can be administered once daily in the morning on the basis of the same systemic exposure and therapeutic drug monitoring concept as Tacrolimus BID. [source] Apparent low absorbers of cyclosporine microemulsion have higher requirements for tacrolimus in renal transplantationCLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 4 2007Andrew A. House Abstract:, Bioavailability and exposure of cyclosporine microemulsion and tacrolimus in renal transplantation are governed by many complex factors. Failure to achieve therapeutic two-h post-dose (C2) levels despite adequate doses of cyclosporine ("low absorbers") may merit conversion to tacrolimus. We compared tacrolimus dose requirements in "low absorbers" (n = 15) with a random control group of de novo tacrolimus patients (n = 14). Low absorbers failed to reach target C2 despite increasing dose from 10.1 to 16.2 mg/kg/d. At conversion the mean C2 was 969 ng/mL (95% CI: 684,1255; target 1700 ng/mL). Low absorbers tended to be younger, heavier, and diabetic. Despite a similar initial tacrolimus dose (0.17,0.18 mg/kg/d), low absorbers required a much higher daily dose to achieve target; 0.25 vs. 0.16 mg/kg/d (p = 0.016). Furthermore, daily maintenance tacrolimus remained much higher in low absorbers at three wk (0.22 vs. 0.13 mg/kg/d, p = 0.012). Although not statistically significant, this group experienced an acute rejection rate of 33%, compared with 21% in the control group. Patients treated with cyclosporine as initial immunosuppression who fail to reach target C2 levels in a timely fashion are at risk for impaired bioavailability of tacrolimus. Based on our data, a starting dose of 0.25 mg/kg/d in divided doses may be warranted for low absorbers converting to tacrolimus; however, we encourage larger studies with formal pharmacokinetic analysis in this population. [source] Prospective monitoring of lipid profiles in children receiving pravastatin preemptively after renal transplantationPEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2005Lavjay Butani Abstract:, Hyperlipidemia is common after renal transplantation (Tx) and contributes to the increased cardiovascular morbidity seen in the post-transplant period. Limited data are available on the utility of the statins in children after renal Tx. This 12-month prospective study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of pravastatin in reducing dyslipidemia after renal Tx in children and to determine predictors of dyslipidemia after Tx. From August 2001 to April 2004, all 17 newly transplanted pediatric renal transplant recipients at our center were preemptively treated with pravastatin from the immediate post-transplant period. Fasting lipid profiles were obtained at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after Tx. Trends in the lipid profile were analyzed using the repeated measures general linear model (GLM). A historical cohort of pediatric renal-transplant recipients not treated with pravastatin was used as the control population. The mixed effects GLM was used for multivariable logistic regression analyses to determine the independent effect of age, pretransplant cholesterol (Chol), body mass index (BMI), creatinine clearance (CrCl), and corticosteroid and tacrolimus doses on the development of dyslipidemia. The mean age of the children at Tx was 8.7 yr. The GLM analysis showed that with time, there was a significant decline in the total Chol, serum triglyceride (TG), LDL and also HDL-Chol (p-value <0.05 for each). Compared with the controls, the mean serum Chol was lower at all time points post-transplant in the treated patients. However, despite treatment, the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia increased from 31% pretransplant to 53% at 1-month, but declined thereafter to 6% at 3 and 6 months and 0% at 1 yr. Multivariable regression analyses showed the prednisone dose, pretransplant Chol and age to be the most important risk factors for the development of dyslipidemia. No child developed complications related to therapy. In summary, pravastatin is safe in the post-transplant period in children and reduces serum Chol, LDL-Chol and TG. An unexpected finding in our study was the decline in HDL-Chol after Tx. Whether the preemptive use of the statins will result in lower cardiovascular morbidity, especially considering the concomitant reduction in HDL-Chol remains to be determined. [source] | ||||||||||