Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Suspected Pulmonary Embolism (suspected + pulmonary_embolism)
Selected AbstractsEmergency Medicine Practitioner Knowledge and Use of Decision Rules for the Evaluation of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Variations by Practice Setting and Training LevelACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 1 2007Michael S. Runyon MD Abstract Background Several clinical decision rules (CDRs) have been validated for pretest probability assessment of pulmonary embolism (PE), but the authors are unaware of any data quantifying and characterizing their use in emergency departments. Objectives To characterize clinicians' knowledge of and attitudes toward two commonly used CDRs for PE. Methods By using a modified Delphi approach, the authors developed a two-page paper survey including 15 multiple-choice questions. The questions were designed to determine the respondents' familiarity, frequency of use, and comprehension of the Canadian and Charlotte rules. The survey also queried the frequency of use of unstructured (gestalt) pretest probability assessment and reasons why physicians choose not to use decision rules. The surveys were sent to physicians, physician assistants, and medical students at 32 academic and community hospitals in the United States and the United Kingdom. Results Respondents included 555 clinicians; 443 (80%) work in academic practice, and 112 (20%) are community based. Significantly more academic practitioners (73%) than community practitioners (49%) indicated familiarity with at least one of the two decision rules. Among all respondents familiar with a rule, 50% reported using it in more than half of applicable cases. A significant number of these respondents could not correctly identify a key component of the rule (23% for the Charlotte rule and 43% for the Canadian rule). Fifty-seven percent of all respondents indicated use of gestalt rather than a decision rule in more than half of cases. Conclusions Academic clinicians were more likely to report familiarity with either of these two specific decision rules. Only one half of all clinicians reporting familiarity with the rules use them in more than 50% of applicable cases. Spontaneous recall of the specific elements of the rules was low to moderate. Future work should consider clinical gestalt in the evaluation of patients with possible PE. [source] Triage Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department Using a Portable Ultrasound DeviceECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Issue 5 2008Nicolas Mansencal M.D. The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) is difficult, despite validated diagnostic models. We sought to determine the value of a portable ultrasound device for triage of patients with suspected PE referred to the emergency department, using simplified echo criteria. We prospectively studied 103 consecutive patients with suspected PE, referred to our emergency department. After D-dimer screening, 76 patients were prospectively enrolled in this ultrasound study and underwent helical chest tomography, transthoracic echocardiography, and venous ultrasonography. Among patients with PE (n = 31), a right ventricular dilation was detected in 17 patients (55%), a direct visualization of clot in the lower limbs was present in 18 patients (58%), and 8 patients (26%) had both right ventricular dilation and deep venous thrombosis. The sensitivity and specificity of a combined ultrasound strategy using echocardiography and venous ultrasonography were respectively 87% (95% confidence interval 74% to 96%), and 69% (95% confidence interval 53% to 82%). The sensitivity of this combined strategy was significantly improved as compared to venous ultrasonography alone (P = 0.01) or echocardiography alone (P = 0.005). In patients with dyspnea or with high clinical probability of PE, this combined strategy was particularly relevant with high sensitivities (respectively 94% and 100%). Echocardiography combined with venous ultrasonography using a portable ultrasound device is a reliable method for screening patients with suspected PE referred to an emergency department, especially in patients with dyspnea or with high clinical probability. [source] Bedside Transthoracic Sonography in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A New Tool for Emergency PhysiciansACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 9 2010Beatrice Hoffmann MD First page of article [source] Accuracy of Very Low Pretest Probability Estimates for Pulmonary Embolism Using the Method of Attribute Matching Compared with the Wells ScoreACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 2 2010Jeffrey A. Kline MD Abstract Objectives:, Attribute matching matches an explicit clinical profile of a patient to a reference database to estimate the numeric value for the pretest probability of an acute disease. The authors tested the accuracy of this method for forecasting a very low probability of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in symptomatic emergency department (ED) patients. Methods:, The authors performed a secondary analysis of five data sets from 15 hospitals in three countries. All patients had data collected at the time of clinical evaluation for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). The criterion standard to exclude VTE required no evidence of PE or deep venous thrombosis (DVT) within 45 days of enrollment. To estimate pretest probabilities, a computer program selected, from a large reference database of patients previously evaluated for PE, patients who matched 10 predictor variables recorded for each current test patient. The authors compared the outcome frequency of having VTE [VTE(+)] in patients with a pretest probability estimate of <2.5% by attribute matching, compared with a value of 0 from the Wells score. Results:, The five data sets included 10,734 patients, and 747 (7.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.5% to 7.5%) were VTE(+) within 45 days. The pretest probability estimate for PE was <2.5% in 2,975 of 10,734 (27.7%) patients, and within this subset, the observed frequency of VTE(+) was 48 of 2,975 (1.6%, 95% CI = 1.2% to 2.1%). The lowest possible Wells score (0) was observed in 3,412 (31.7%) patients, and within this subset, the observed frequency of VTE(+) was 79 of 3,412 (2.3%, 95% CI = 1.8% to 2.9%) patients. Conclusions:, Attribute matching categorizes over one-quarter of patients tested for PE as having a pretest probability of <2.5%, and the observed rate of VTE within 45 days in this subset was <2.5%. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:133,141 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine [source] High D-dimer levels increase the likelihood of pulmonary embolismJOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, Issue 2 2008L. W. Tick Abstract. Objective., To determine the utility of high quantitative D-dimer levels in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Methods., D-dimer testing was performed in consecutive patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. We included patients with suspected pulmonary embolism with a high risk for venous thromboembolism, i.e. hospitalized patients, patients older than 80 years, with malignancy or previous surgery. Presence of pulmonary embolism was based on a diagnostic management strategy using a clinical decision rule (CDR), D-dimer testing and computed tomography. Results., A total of 1515 patients were included with an overall pulmonary embolism prevalence of 21%. The pulmonary embolism prevalence was strongly associated with the height of the D-dimer level, and increased fourfold with D-dimer levels greater than 4000 ng mL,1 compared to levels between 500 and 1000 ng mL,1. Patients with D-dimer levels higher than 2000 ng mL,1 and an unlikely CDR had a pulmonary embolism prevalence of 36%. This prevalence is comparable to the pulmonary embolism likely CDR group. When D-dimer levels were above 4000 ng mL,1, the observed pulmonary embolism prevalence was very high, independent of CDR score. Conclusion., Strongly elevated D-dimer levels substantially increase the likelihood of pulmonary embolism. Whether this should translate into more intensive diagnostic and therapeutic measures in patients with high D-dimer levels irrespective of CDR remains to be studied. [source] An alternative diagnostic strategy in young women with suspected pulmonary embolismJOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, Issue 4 2009R. A. DOUMA [source] Contribution of indirect computed tomographic venography to the diagnosis of postpartum venous thromboembolismJOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, Issue 9 2008M. P. REVEL Summary.,Background:,The diagnostic value of indirect computed tomographic venography (CTV), following thoracic computed tomographic angiography (CTA), has not been specifically evaluated in postpartum patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Objectives: To assess the diagnostic value of CTV in postpartum venous thromboembolism. Methods: We reviewed all CTA and CTV procedures performed during the last 7 years in our institution for suspected pulmonary embolism during the postpartum period. We focused on the quality of CTA, the rates of positive CTA and isolated positive CTV findings, and alternative diagnoses provided by CTV. Results: Fifty-five CTA and 33 CTV procedures were performed for suspected pulmonary embolism in 47 patients referred between 24 h and 2 months after Cesarean (34 patients) or vaginal (13 patients) delivery. Of the 33 patients who had both CTA and CTV, seven had positive CTA findings and four had isolated positive CTV findings. Thus, the absolute increase in the venous thromboembolism detection rate following CTV was 12.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0,29.1]. Subcapsular hematoma of the liver or spleen was found on CTV in another two patients without venous thromboembolism. Consequently, CTV had a direct impact on clinical management in six of 33 patients (18%). Conclusion: Our results suggest that postpartum patients with suspected pulmonary embolism have a significant rate of pelvic vein thrombosis and that the use of CTV leads to a 31% relative increase in the detection rate of venous thromboembolism as compared to CTA alone in these patients. [source] Clinical probability and alveolar dead space measurement for suspected pulmonary embolism in patients with an abnormal D-dimer test resultJOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, Issue 7 2006O. SANCHEZ Summary.,Background: Most patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) have a positive D-dimer test and undergo diagnostic imaging. Additional non-invasive bedside tests are required to reduce the need for further diagnostic tests. Objectives: We aimed to determine whether a combination of clinical probability assessment and alveolar dead space fraction measurement can confirm or exclude PE in patients with an abnormal D-dimer test. Methods: We assessed clinical probability of PE and alveolar dead space fraction in 270 consecutive in- and outpatients with suspected PE and positive D-dimer. An alveolar dead space fraction < 0.15 was considered normal. PE was subsequently excluded or confirmed by venous compression ultrasonography, spiral computed tomography and a 3-month follow-up. Radiologists were unaware of the results of clinical probability and capnography. Results: PE was confirmed in 108 patients (40%). Capnography had a sensitivity of 68.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.9,77.1%) and a specificity of 81.5% (95% CI: 74.6,87.1%) for PE. Forty-five patients (16.6%) had both a low clinical probability and normal capnography (sensitivity: 99.1%, 95% CI: 94.9,100%) and 34 patients (12.6%) had both a high clinical probability and abnormal capnography (specificity: 100%, 95% CI: 97.7,100%). Conclusion: Capnography alone does not exclude PE accurately. The combination of clinical probability and capnography accurately excludes or confirms PE and avoids further testing in up to 30% of patients. [source] Site and clinical outcome of deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs: an epidemiological studyJOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, Issue 7 2005C. SEINTURIER Summary., Clinical outcomes of patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolic disease (VTED) have rarely been assessed on large series of patients from single institutions. This was work based on our practice to routinely screen all suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) patients with bilateral proximal and distal venous US was designed to evaluate survival, recurrence and cancer occurrence in patients diagnosed with symptomatic or asymptomatic DVT and to assess their relationship with the site of the DVT (proximal vs. distal, bilateral vs. unilateral). Our study is based on the cross-matching of the VTED register of the Grenoble University Hospital with the local Cancer Register and community mortality data. Survival analyses were performed with the Kaplan,Meier method; prognostic variables were tested using the log,rank test. A total of 1913 patients with a DVT of the lower limbs from 1993 to 1998 were included (57% women; mean age, 69 years). Of these, 1018 patients were diagnosed with proximal DVT (156 bilateral) and 895 distal DVT (112 bilateral). PE was associated in 760 patients. Patients with PE and no detected DVT were not included. At 2 years, adjusted survival rates were 80% in patients with unilateral-distal DVT, 67% in bilateral-distal, 72% in unilateral-proximal and 65% in bilateral-proximal DVT patients. The cumulated VTED recurrence rates were 7.7% in unilateral-distal DVT, 13.3% when DVT was bilateral-distal, 14% when unilateral-proximal and 13.2% when bilateral-proximal. The rate of new cancer was 6.4% in unilateral-distal DVT, 10.8% when it was bilateral-distal, 6.5% when unilateral-proximal and 6.1% when bilateral-proximal. Based on a large series of unselected patients, our results show that the site of the DVT and principally the bilaterality provides important prognostic information that may be used in the setting up of medical strategies. [source] D-Dimer test in cancer patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolismJOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, Issue 6 2005M. DI NISIO Summary.,Background:,The safety of a D-dimer (DD) measurement in cancer patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) is unclear. Objectives:,The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of the DD test in consecutive patients with clinically suspected PE with and without cancer. Methods:,The diagnostic accuracy of DD (Tinaquant D-dimer) was first retrospectively assessed in an unselected group of patients referred for suspected PE (n = 350). Subsequently, the predictive value of the DD was validated in a group of consecutive inpatients and outpatients with clinically suspected PE prospectively enrolled in a management study (n = 519). The results of the DD test in cancer patients were assessed according to the final diagnosis of PE and the 3-month clinical follow-up. Results:,In the first study group, DD showed a sensitivity and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% and 100% in patients with cancer and 97% and 98% in those without malignancy, respectively. In the validation cohort, the sensitivity and NPV of DD were both 100% (95% CI 82%,100% and 72%,100%, respectively), whereas in patients without malignancy, the corresponding estimates were 93% (95% CI 87%,98%) and 97% (95% CI, 95%,99%), respectively. The specificity of DD was low in patients with (21%) and without cancer (53%). Conclusions:,A negative DD result safely excludes the diagnosis of PE in patients with cancer. Because of the low specificity, when testing 100 patients with suspected PE, a normal DD concentration safely excludes PE in 15 patients with cancer and in 43 patients without cancer. [source] Potential Impact of Adjusting the Threshold of the Quantitative D-dimer Based on Pretest Probability of Acute Pulmonary EmbolismACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 4 2009Christopher Kabrhel MD Abstract Objectives:, The utility of D-dimer testing for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) can be limited by test specificity. The authors tested if the threshold of the quantitative D-dimer can be varied according to pretest probability (PTP) of PE to increase specificity while maintaining a negative predictive value (NPV) of >99%. Methods:, This was a prospective, observational multicenter study of emergency department (ED) patients in the United States. Eligible patients had a diagnostic study ordered to evaluate possible PE. PTP was determined by the clinician's unstructured estimate and the Wells score. Five different D-dimer assays were used. D-dimer test performance was measured using 1) standard thresholds and 2) variable threshold values: twice (for low PTP patients), equal (intermediate PTP patients), or half (high PTP patients) of standard threshold. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) within 45 days required positive imaging plus decision to treat. Results:, The authors enrolled 7,940 patients tested for PE, and clinicians ordered a quantitative D-dimer for 4,357 (55%) patients who had PTPs distributed as follows: low (74%), moderate (21%), or high (4%). At standard cutoffs, across all PTP strata, quantitative D-dimer testing had a test sensitivity of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 91% to 97%), specificity of 58% (95% CI = 56% to 60%), and NPV of 99.5% (95% CI = 99.1% to 99.7%). If variable cutoffs had been used the overall sensitivity would have been 88% (95% CI = 83% to 92%), specificity 75% (95% CI = 74% to 76%), and NPV 99.1% (95% CI = 98.7% to 99.4%). Conclusions:, This large multicenter observational sample demonstrates that emergency medicine clinicians currently order a D-dimer in the majority of patients tested for PE, including a large proportion with intermediate PTP and high PTP. Varying the D-dimer's cutoff according to PTP can increase specificity with no measurable decrease in NPV. [source] | ||||||||||