Home  About us  Contact
 

Bank Capital (bank + capital)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Business, Economics, Finance and Accounting75%

Terms modified by Bank Capital

  • bank capital requirement
    		•

    Selected Abstracts

    A MODEL OF BANK CAPITAL, LENDING AND THE MACROECONOMY: BASEL I VERSUS BASEL II,

    THE MANCHESTER SCHOOL, Issue 2006
    LEA ZICCHINO
    The revised framework for capital regulation of internationally active banks (known as Basel II) introduces risk-based capital requirements. This paper analyses the relationship between bank capital, lending and macroeconomic activity under the new capital adequacy regime. It extends a model of the bank capital channel of monetary policy,developed by Chami and Cosimano,by introducing capital constraints à la Basel II. The results suggest that bank capital is likely to be less variable under the new capital adequacy regime than under the current one, which is characterized by invariant asset risk-weights. However, bank lending is likely to be more responsive to macroeconomic shocks. [source]

    A Theory of Bank Capital

    THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE, Issue 6 2000
    Douglas W. Diamond
    Banks can create liquidity precisely because deposits are fragile and prone to runs. Increased uncertainty makes deposits excessively fragile, creating a role for outside bank capital. Greater bank capital reduces the probability of financial distress but also reduces liquidity creation. The quantity of capital influences the amount that banks can induce borrowers to pay. Optimal bank capital structure trades off effects on liquidity creation, costs of bank distress, and the ability to force borrower repayment. The model explains the decline in bank capital over the last two centuries. It identifies overlooked consequences of having regulatory capital requirements and deposit insurance. [source]

    Prudential Regulation and the "Credit Crunch": Evidence from Japan

    JOURNAL OF MONEY, CREDIT AND BANKING, Issue 2-3 2007
    WAKO WATANABE
    credit crunch; capital crunch; prudential regulation; instrumental variable The underlying causes of sharp declines in bank lending during recessions in large developed economies, as exemplified by the U.S. in the early 1990s and Japan in the late 1990s, are still being debated due to the lack of any convincing identification strategy of the supply side capital,lending relationship from lending demand. Using within bank share of real estate lending in the late 1980s as an instrumental variable for bank capital, we find that Japanese banks cut back on their lending in response to a large loss of bank capital in fiscal year 1997. [source]

    Optimal auditing in the banking industry

    OPTIMAL CONTROL APPLICATIONS AND METHODS, Issue 2 2008
    T. Bosch
    Abstract As a result of the new regulatory prescripts for banks, known as the Basel II Capital Accord, there has been a heightened interest in the auditing process. Our paper considers this issue with a particular emphasis on the auditing of reserves, assets and capital in both a random and non-random framework. The analysis relies on the stochastic dynamic modeling of banking items such as loans, reserves, Treasuries, outstanding debts, bank capital and government subsidies. In this regard, one of the main novelties of our contribution is the establishment of optimal bank reserves and a rate of depository consumption that is of importance during an (random) audit of the reserve requirements. Here the specific choice of a power utility function is made in order to obtain an analytic solution in a Lévy process setting. Furthermore, we provide explicit formulas for the shareholder default and regulator closure rules, for the case of a Poisson-distributed random audit. A property of these rules is that they define the standard for minimum capital adequacy in an implicit way. In addition, we solve an optimal auditing time problem for the Basel II capital adequacy requirement by making use of Lévy process-based models. This result provides information about the optimal timing of an internal audit when the ambient value of the capital adequacy ratio is taken into account and the bank is able to choose the time at which the audit takes place. Finally, we discuss some of the economic issues arising from the analysis of the stochastic dynamic models of banking items and the optimization procedure related to the auditing process. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

    A Theory of Bank Capital

    THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE, Issue 6 2000
    Douglas W. Diamond
    Banks can create liquidity precisely because deposits are fragile and prone to runs. Increased uncertainty makes deposits excessively fragile, creating a role for outside bank capital. Greater bank capital reduces the probability of financial distress but also reduces liquidity creation. The quantity of capital influences the amount that banks can induce borrowers to pay. Optimal bank capital structure trades off effects on liquidity creation, costs of bank distress, and the ability to force borrower repayment. The model explains the decline in bank capital over the last two centuries. It identifies overlooked consequences of having regulatory capital requirements and deposit insurance. [source]

    A MODEL OF BANK CAPITAL, LENDING AND THE MACROECONOMY: BASEL I VERSUS BASEL II,

    THE MANCHESTER SCHOOL, Issue 2006
    LEA ZICCHINO
    The revised framework for capital regulation of internationally active banks (known as Basel II) introduces risk-based capital requirements. This paper analyses the relationship between bank capital, lending and macroeconomic activity under the new capital adequacy regime. It extends a model of the bank capital channel of monetary policy,developed by Chami and Cosimano,by introducing capital constraints à la Basel II. The results suggest that bank capital is likely to be less variable under the new capital adequacy regime than under the current one, which is characterized by invariant asset risk-weights. However, bank lending is likely to be more responsive to macroeconomic shocks. [source]

    Continuous-time stochastic modelling of capital adequacy ratios for banks

    APPLIED STOCHASTIC MODELS IN BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, Issue 1 2006
    Casper H. Fouche
    Abstract Regulation related to capital requirements is an important issue in the banking sector. In this regard, one of the indices used to measure how susceptible a bank is to failure, is the capital adequacy ratio (CAR). We consider two types of such ratios, viz. non-risk-based (NRBCARs) and risk-based (RBCARs) CARs. According to the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), we can further categorize NRBCARs into leverage and equity capital ratios and RBCARs into Basel II and Tier 1 ratios. In general, these indices are calculated by dividing a measure of bank capital by an indicator of the level of bank risk. Our primary objective is to construct continuous-time stochastic models for the dynamics of each of the aforementioned ratios with the main achievement being the modelling of the Basel II capital adequacy ratio (Basel II CAR). This ratio is obtained by dividing the bank's eligible regulatory capital (ERC) by its risk-weighted assets (RWAs) from credit, market and operational risk. Mainly, our discussions conform to the qualitative and quantitative standards prescribed by the Basel II Capital Accord. Also, we find that our models are consistent with data from FDIC-insured institutions. Finally, we demonstrate how our main results may be applied in the banking sector. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]