			Home About us Contact

Suburethral Slings (suburethral + sling)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

A tissue-engineered suburethral sling in an animal model of stress urinary incontinence

BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 4 2005
Tracy W. Cannon
OBJECTIVE To create and evaluate the functional effects of a tissue-engineered sling in an animal model of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty female Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four equal groups: a control group (C) had no intervention before the leak-point pressure (LPP) was measured; a denervated group (D) had bilateral proximal sciatic nerve transection (PSNT) and periurethral dissection with no sling placed; group S had concomitant bilateral PSNT and a suburethral sling of small intestinal submucosa (SIS) placed; and group (M) had concomitant bilateral PSNT with implantation of a tissue-engineered sling. The suburethral sling was placed via a transabdominal approach with the sling sutured to the pubic bone. Tissue-engineered slings were prepared with muscle-derived cells obtained via the pre-plate technique and subsequently seeded for 2 weeks on a SIS scaffold. Suburethral slings were implanted 2 weeks before LPP testing, using the vertical-tilt method. RESULTS Surgically placing a suburethral sling is feasible in the female rat, with few complications. LPPs from both sling groups (S and M) were not significantly different from untreated controls (C). The S, M and C groups all had significantly higher LPPs than group D. Importantly, no rat from either sling group (S and M) had signs of urinary retention. CONCLUSIONS Placing tissue-engineered slings in an animal model of SUI resulted in LPP values that were not significantly different from those in untreated control or SIS (S) groups. These data show that incorporating muscle stem cells into SIS slings does not adversely alter the advantageous mechanical properties of the SIS sling in a model of SUI, and provide the basis for future functional studies of tissue-engineered sling materials with long-term retention. [source]

A randomised trial of a retropubic tension-free vaginal tape versus a mini-sling for stress incontinence

BJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 6 2010
M Basu
Please cite this paper as: Basu M, Duckett J. A randomised trial of a retropubic tension-free vaginal tape versus a mini-sling for stress incontinence. BJOG 2010; DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02513.x. Objective, To compare a mini-sling with a retropubic tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urodynamic stress incontinence (USI). Design, Randomised trial. Setting, Urogynaecology unit in large UK district general hospital. Population, Women with USI resistant to conservative management and requiring a suburethral sling. Methods, A total of 71 women with SUI and confirmed USI were randomised to undergo treatment with either a retropubic TVT or mini-sling. Follow-up was at 6 weeks, with a history, examination and quality of life questionnaire, and at 6 months with further subjective evaluation and twin-channel subtraction cystometry and pressure-flow studies. Main outcome measures, The presence of SUI at 6 weeks and 6 months after treatment. Results, The mini-sling was associated with a significantly higher rate of persistent SUI at 6 weeks (OR 9.49, 95% CI 2.8,32.6) and 6 months (OR 8.14, 95% CI 2.7,24.7), and of USI at 6 months (OR 7.58, 95% CI 2.7,24.7). The rate of complication was similar in the two groups. Conclusions, The mini-sling is associated with a higher failure rate than a retropubic TVT. Longer term and multicentre outcome data are necessary to explore these findings further. Until this is available, the mini-sling should be used with caution. [source]

A tissue-engineered suburethral sling in an animal model of stress urinary incontinence

Sling procedures for urinary incontinence in women

BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 5 2004
Z.G. Kassardjian
SUMMARY There are many different techniques of sling surgery for female incontinence and numerous materials are available for use as a suburethral sling. Autologous materials are associated with more success and fewer complications than cadaveric material. The objectives of this review are to identity the benefits and adverse effects of suburethral sling procedures. There is no evidence that suburethral slings are better or worse than other surgical or conservative management because no trials have addressed this comparison. [source]

Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women: A short version cochrane review,,

NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, Issue 6 2009
Marie Carmela M. Lapitan
Abstract Background Urinary incontinence is a common and potentially debilitating problem. Open retropubic colposuspension is a surgical treatment which involves lifting the tissues near the bladder neck and proximal urethra in the area behind the anterior pubic bones to correct deficient urethral closure. Objectives To assess the effects of open retropubic colposuspension for the treatment of urinary incontinence. Search Strategy We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialized Register (searched June 30, 2008) and reference lists of relevant articles. We contacted investigators to locate extra studies. Selection Criteria Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials in women with symptoms or urodynamic diagnoses of stress or mixed urinary incontinence that included open retropubic colposuspension surgery in at least one trial group. Data Collection and Analysis Studies were evaluated for methodological quality/susceptibility to bias and appropriateness for inclusion and data extracted by two of the reviewers. Trial data were analyzed by intervention. Where appropriate, a summary statistic was calculated. Main Results This review included 46 trials involving a total of 4,738 women. Overall cure rates were 68.9,88.0% for open retropubic colposuspension. Two small studies suggest lower failure rates after open retropubic colposuspension compared with conservative treatment. Similarly, one trial suggests lower failure rates after open retropubic colposuspension compared to anticholinergic treatment. Evidence from six trials showed a lower failure rate for subjective cure after open retropubic colposuspension than after anterior colporrhaphy. Such benefit was maintained over time (RR of failure 0.51; 95% CI 0.34,0.76 before the first year, RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.32,0.57 at 1,5 years, RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.32,0.75 in periods beyond 5 years). In comparison with needle suspensions there was a lower failure rate after colposuspension in the first year after surgery (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.42,1.03), after the first year (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.33,0.71), and beyond 5 years (RR 0.32; 95% CI 15,0.71). Evidence from 12 trials in comparison with suburethral slings found no significant difference in failure rates in all time periods assessed. Patient-reported failure rates in short, medium and long-term follow-up showed no significant difference between open and laparoscopic retropubic colposuspension, but with wide confidence intervals. In two trials failure was less common after Burch (RR 0.38 95% CI 0.18,0.76) than after the Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz procedure at 1,5-year follow-up. There were few data at any other follow-up time. In general, the evidence available does not show a higher morbidity or complication rate with open retropubic colposuspension, compared to the other open surgical techniques, although pelvic organ prolapse is more common than after anterior colporrhaphy and sling procedures. Authors' Conclusions The evidence available indicates that open retropubic colposuspension is an effective treatment modality for stress urinary incontinence especially in the long term. Within the first year of treatment, the overall continence rate is approximately 85,90%. After 5 years, approximately 70% of patients can expect to be dry. Newer minimal access procedures such as tension free vaginal tape look promising in comparison with open colposuspension but their long-term performance is not known and closer monitoring of their adverse event profile must be carried out. Laparoscopic colposuspension should allow speedier recovery but its relative safety and effectiveness is not known yet. Neurourol. Urodyn. 28:472,480, 2009. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Presentation and management of major complications of midurethral slings: Are complications under-reported?,

NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, Issue 1 2007
Donna Y. Deng
Abstract Aims Midurethral slings have become the mainstay of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) treatment due to their efficacy and low complication rates. The purpose of this study was to report the presentation and treatment of major complications from these minimally invasive treatments presented to a tertiary referral practice and to highlight a discrepancy in major complications between literature and the food and drug administration (FDA) device failure database. Methods From 2001 through 2005, we reviewed all cases of midurethral sling complications that presented to our institution. A literature review of all complications due to midurethral slings during the same time period was performed as was the FDA manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database queried for self-reported complications. Results A total of 26 patients referred to UCLA with voiding dysfunction after sling placement was found to have mesh in the urethra or bladder. Treatments required a combination of urethrolysis with mesh removal, urethral reconstruction with graft, and bladder excision. These were compared to major complications reported in the world literature of <1%. The MAUDE database contained 161 major complications out of a total of 928 complications reported for suburethral slings. There was significantly more major complications reported in MAUDE than in published literature. Conclusions Although rare, major complications of midurethral slings are more common than appear in literature. Devastating complications involving urethral and bladder perforations can present with mild urinary symptoms and thus are likely under-diagnosed and under-reported. Most of these cases need to be managed with additional reconstructive surgery. Neurourol. Urodynam. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Sling distress: A subanalysis of the IVS tapes from the SUSPEND trial

AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 6 2007
Siva BALAKRISHNAN
Abstract Aim:, To study the incidence of erosions and tape infections following the use of intravaginal slingplasty (IVS) treatment for stress urinary incontinence after the SUSPEND trial period of 30 months. This subanalysis was carried out because of concerns regarding high percentage of delayed sling erosions and infections during follow up of the patients who participated in the trial. Materials and methods:, The subanalysis patient group consisted of all IVS patients drawn from the SUSPEND randomised control trial that compared the safety and efficacy of three types of suburethral slings, TVT, SPARC and IVS, for the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence. Results:, A total of 62 patients were reviewed during this study conducted from April 2002 to May 2003. Continence was achieved in 88% the patients. A total of eight (13%) sling erosions were found requiring sling removal. Forty-eight (77.4%) patients were followed up at 12 months with one case of erosion (1.7%). Twenty-nine (46.8%) of the 62 patients were followed up between 12 and 34 months, and seven cases of sling erosions were diagnosed. One patient had purulent suprapubic sinus, five patients had foul-smelling discharge, and one had recurrent urinary tract infection associated with pain and discharge. After the slings were removed the patients had no further symptoms. However, three of them had recurrent stress urinary incontinence. Discussion/conclusion:, The delayed presentation of the sling erosion from this subanalysis is a concern, and pelvic reconstructive surgeons using IVS need to be aware of the delayed presentations we found in our cohort of patients. [source]

Suburethral slingplasty evaluation study in North Queensland, Australia: The SUSPEND trial

AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 1 2005
Yik Nyok LIM
Abstract Objective:, To compare the safety and efficacy of three types of suburethral slings for the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence. Methods:, Following ethics approval, 195 (3 × 65) patients with urodynamic stress incontinence were randomly assigned to undergo suburethral slingplasty with the Tension-free Vaginal Tape (TVT; Gynecare, Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA), Intravaginal Sling (IVS; Tyco Healthcare, Mansfield, MA, USA), or Suprapubic Arc Sling (SPARC; American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN, USA). The patients were blinded to the type of sling implanted. Main outcome measures were:, (1) operative and short-term complications; (2) pre- and postoperative symptomatology; and (3) pre- and postoperative urodynamic findings. Results:, There was a statistically significant increased rate of sling protrusion (13.1% vs. 3.3% and 1.7%; P = 0.04) in the SPARC group when compared to TVT and IVS. Otherwise, there were no significant differences between the groups with respect to the incidences of other operative complications, patients' main subjective outcomes, satisfaction rates, or postoperative urodynamic findings. The overall objective stress incontinence cure rates were 87.9%, 81.5% and 72.4% for the TVT, IVS, SPARC groups respectively (P = 0.11). Conclusions:, All three slings appear quite successful for the treatment of stress incontinence. The SPARC tapes showed more sling protrusion complications and a trend towards lower objective cure rates; probably as a result of the insertion method used in this study which favoured a loose SPARC sling placement. The authors recommend that the SPARC slings be left tighter than TVT, or for the cough test to be carried out. [source]