Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Subjective Pain (subjective + pain)
Selected AbstractsComparison of Electrodessication with CO2 Laser for the Treatment of Actinic CheilitisDERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, Issue 4 2000Richard A. Laws MD Background. Actinic cheilitis is a common premalignant condition that is most often treated with destructive therapy. The most effective technique is usually considered to be CO2 laser resurfacing. Little has been written on the use of electrodessication for this condition. Objective. We designed a study to compare these two treatment modalities for the treatment of biopsy-confirmed actinic cheilitis. Methods. A random half of the lower lip was treated with electrodessication. The contralateral half was then treated with CO2 laser. Healing time, subjective pain during healing, and clinical outcome at 3 months was compared. Results. The side treated with electrodessication took significantly longer to heal than the side treated with the CO2 laser (23 versus 14 days, P < .001). There was no difference in subjective pain or clinical appearance at 3 months. Conclusion. Although the healing time is longer with electrodessication, this modality represents an inexpensive practical ablative treatment method for actinic cheilitis. [source] Comparative prospective study on splint therapy of anterior disc displacement without reductionJOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, Issue 7 2005M. STIESCH-SCHOLZ summary A prospective randomized study was carried out to compare the therapeutic success of two different types of splint in patients with painful anterior disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint. The patients in Group I (n = 20) received stabilization splint therapy and the patients in Group II (n = 20) pivot splint therapy. Clinical investigation of the craniomandibular system was performed before and 1, 2 and 3 months after therapy and this was accompanied by subjective evaluation by the patients of their symptoms, using a validated questionnaire with visual analogue scales (VAS). There was a significant increase in maximum jaw opening and a significant reduction in subjective pain in both groups during the course of therapy (Wilcoxon test, P < 0·05). Active jaw opening increased by a mean of 8·05 mm in the group of patients treated with a stabilization splint (Group I). The comparable figure with pivot splint therapy (Group II) was 8·26 mm. The VAS scale value in Group I was reduced by 30·54 units and in Group II by 39·36 scale units. However, neither of these differences between the groups was statistically significant (Mann,WhitneyU -test, P > 0·05). It can be concluded that both types of splint provided effective therapy in patients with anterior disc displacement. [source] A preliminary examination of treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder in chronic pain patients: A case studyJOURNAL OF TRAUMATIC STRESS, Issue 5 2003Jillian C. Shipherd Abstract Manualized treatments have become popular, despite concern about their use when comorbid diagnoses are present. In this report, the efficacy of manualized posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatment was examined in the presence of chronic pain. Additionally, the effect of PTSD treatment on chronic pain and additional psychiatric diagnoses was explored. Six female patients with both PTSD and chronic pain following motor vehicle accidents were treated for PTSD using a multiple baseline design. The results indicate that manualized treatment for PTSD was effective in reducing PTSD symptoms in these patients. Although there were no changes in subjective pain, there were pain-related functional improvements and reductions in other psychiatric diagnoses for the majority of patients. [source] Do Pain Patients at High Risk for Substance Misuse Experience More Pain?: A Longitudinal Outcomes StudyPAIN MEDICINE, Issue 6 2009Robert N. Jamison PhD ABSTRACT Objectives., The Screener and Opioid Assessment of Pain Patients (SOAPP v.1) has been shown to be a reliable measure of risk potential for substance misuse and to correlate with a history of substance abuse, legal problems, craving, smoking, and mood disorders among chronic pain patients. The aim of this study was to examine differences over time on a number of measures among chronic pain patients who were classified as high or low risk for opioid misuse based on scores on the SOAPP. Methods., From an initial sample of one hundred thirty-four participants (N = 134), one hundred and ten (N = 110) completed the SOAPP and were grouped as high or low risk for misuse of medication based on SOAPP scores of ,7. All subjects were asked to complete baseline measures and in-clinic monthly diaries of their pain, mood, activity interference, medication, and side effects over a 10-month study period. Results., The results showed that although those who were classified as high-risk for opioid misuse reported significantly higher levels of pain intensity, activity interference, pain catastrophizing, disability, and depressed mood at baseline (P < 0.05), only pain intensity ratings were found to differentiate groups over time (P < 0.01). These results were unrelated to perceived helpfulness of pain treatment. Conclusions., Differences in subjective pain intensity were found between those who are high risk for opioid misuse compared with those at low risk for medication misuse, implying that higher-risk patients may experience more subjective pain. Consequently, these patients may be more challenging to treat. [source] Topical versus peribulbar anaesthesia for cataract surgeryACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, Issue 6 2003Gangolf Sauder Abstract. Background:,To assess and compare the efficacy and safety of topical versus peribulbar anaesthesia in patients undergoing routine cataract surgery. Methods:,The unicentre, prospective, randomized, clinical interventional trial included 140 consecutive patients undergoing routine cataract surgery performed by one of two surgeons. The patients were randomly distributed to either peribulbar anaesthesia or topical anaesthesia. To assess intraoperative pain, each patient was asked immediately after surgery to quantitate his/her pain using a 10-point pain rating scale. Results:,The study groups did not differ significantly in pain score (p = 0.54), duration of surgery (p = 0.52), anaesthesia-related intraoperative difficulties (p = 0.17), postoperative visual acuity (p = 0.94), overall intraoperative surgical complication rate, blood pressure rise (p = 0.16) or blood oxygen saturation (p = 0.74) Conclusions:,Patient comfort and surgery-related complications did not differ between topical anaesthesia and peribulbar anaesthesia. As there are no significant differences between the two techniques in terms of subjective pain experienced by patients, intraoperative complications and postoperative visual outcome, and in view of the minimally invasive character of topical anaesthesia compared to peribulbar anaesthesia, the present study suggests the use of topical anaesthesia for routine cataract surgery. [source] | ||||||||||