Subacute Stent Thrombosis (subacute + stent_thrombosis)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Day case transradial coronary angioplasty: A four-year single-center experience

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 4 2006
A. Wiper MRCP
Abstract We examined the safety and feasibility of elective outpatient transradial coronary angioplasty (PCI). Four hundred and forty two patients underwent procedures over a 4-year period. Over 95% had an excellent angiographic result and 85% were discharged the same day. Radial access was successful in 417 (94%) patients. There were no major vascular complications. One patient died of a subacute stent thrombosis. Outpatient transradial PCI is safe and feasible for the majority of elective PCI cases. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


Use of Taxus polymer-coated paclitaxel-eluting stents for treatment of in-stent restenosis in real world patients: Results of clinical and angiographic follow-up at six months in a single-center registry

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 3 2006
Victor Y. Lim MRCP
Abstract Objective:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Taxus paclitaxel-eluting stents in a real world group of unselected patients with coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions. Methods: This is a prospective single-center registry of a consecutive series of 94 patients with 104 ISR lesions, without previous brachytherapy, over a period of 1 year. Quantitative coronary angiographic analyses were performed at baseline and at 6-month angiographic follow-up. Clinical follow-up were obtained at 6 months. Results:Pre-intervention mean reference vessel diameter was 2.62 ± 0.50 mm and mean lesion length was 13.95 ± 6.78 mm. Baseline ISR patterns were mostly either Type I focal (32.7%) or Type II diffuse intrastent (48.1%). At 6-month angiographic follow-up, the in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis was 3.8% (4/105) and 7.6% (8/105) respectively, and the in-stent and in-segment late loss was 0.30 ± 0.50 mm and 0.57 ± 0.54 mm, respectively. Seven of these eight restenosed lesions had a diffuse or proliferative ISR pattern prior to intervention. Lesions that restenosed had longer mean stent length per lesion (37.3 mm vs. 22.5 mm in nonrestenosed group; P = 0.001) and more likely to have had a pattern of total occlusion pre-intervention (25.0% vs. 3.1% in nonrestenosed group; P = 0.046). At 6-month clinical follow-up, the MACE rate was 8.5% and target lesion revascularization rate was 7.4%. There was no death but subacute stent thrombosis occurred in 1 patient (1.1%) at 3 days after intervention. Conclusions: Paclitaxel-eluting Taxus stent for the treatment of ISR effectively suppresses recurrent neointimal proliferation, and was safe and efficacious at 6-month follow-up. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


Impact of sirolimus-eluting stents on outcomes of patients treated for acute myocardial infarction by primary angioplasty

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 4 2005
Edouard Cheneau MD
Abstract Sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) are currently being used in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). SESs have not been evaluated in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction by primary angioplasty. We report our initial experience with SESs implanted during primary angioplasty. One hundred and three patients were treated within 12 hr after onset of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with primary angioplasty and SES implantation. Those patients were compared to 504 patients treated with bare metal stents (BMSs). Angiographic success (TIMI flow grade 3 and residual stenosis < 50%) was completed in 98% of patients with SESs and no subacute stent thrombosis was reported. In-hospital outcomes were similar in the SES and BMS groups. At 6 months, major cardiac events were less frequent in the SES group than in the BMS group (9% vs. 24%, respectively; P < 0.001), driven by a lesser need for repeat revascularization with SESs (1% vs. 10.3% with BMSs; P = 0.014). Mortality at 6 months was 7% with SESs and 11% with BMSs (P = 0.14). SESs are safe and effective for the treatment of AMI by primary angioplasty. As compared to BMSs, SESs improve long-term outcome after AMI, mainly by reducing the need for repeat revascularization. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


Sirolimus-eluting stents for the prevention of restenosis in a worst-case scenario of diffuse and recurrent in-stent restenosis

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 3 2004
Gerald S. Werner MD
Abstract For recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR), surgical revascularization or brachytherapy is still the principal therapeutic options. The present investigation explores the efficacy of a sirolimus-eluting stent to prevent restenosis in these lesions with a high risk of recurrence. In 22 consecutive patients with a recurrent and diffuse ISR, a sirolimus-eluting stent was implanted to cover the restenotic lesion. All patients were followed clinically for at least 1 year and underwent a repeat angiography after 7 months. A quantitative coronary angiographic analysis was done. The target vessel failure was 14% in the sirolimus-eluting stent group, with an angiographic late loss of only 0.39 ± 0.54. No subacute stent thrombosis was observed, and the 1-year event-free survival was 86%. The three cases with restenosis were all focal and could be successfully treated by additional drug-eluting stent implantation. This study showed the efficacy of a sirolimus-eluting stent for the prevention of restenosis in a worst-case scenario of recurrent and diffuse ISR. The observed restenosis rate is lower than that reported after brachytherapy and suggests that sirolimus-eluting stents are a promising treatment option for ISR. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;63:259,264. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


Resistance to thienopyridines: Clinical detection of coronary stent thrombosis by monitoring of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 3 2003
Paul Barragan MD
Abstract We carried out a prospective evaluation of a new vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay in order to detect patients with high-risk coronary subacute stent thrombosis (SAT) despite thienopyridine regimen. Twenty healthy donors (group 1) without any medication were compared to 16 stented patients (group 2) treated by ticlopidin or clopidogrel initiated 2 days before stenting and aspirin (250 mg/day). No difference in platelet reactivity was noted between group 1 and group 2 treated only with aspirin (72.00% ± 4.17% vs. 69.73% ± 5.62%, respectively; P = NS). Significant differences were found between patients of group 2 treated with aspirin alone (69.73% ± 5.62%), after 2.0 days (60.14% ± 9.60%; P < 0.05), and after 4.8 ± 1.3 days (48.37% ± 11.19%; P < 0.05) with thienopyridine-aspirin. Among 1,684 consecutive stented patients, 16 patients who presented an SAT (group 3) were compared with 30 other stented patients free of SAT (group 4). We found a significant difference between group 3 (63.28% ± 9.56%) and group 4 (39.80% ± 10.9%; P < 0.0001). VASP phosphorylation analysis may be useful for the detection of coronary SAT. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2003;59:295,302. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


Antiplatelet Strategies: Evaluating Their Current Role in the Setting of Acute Coronary Syndromes

CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue S1 2008
Eugene Braunwald
Abstract Numerous clinical trials have established the value of antiplatelet therapies for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Aspirin (ASA), thienopyridines (i.e., clopidogrel and ticlopidine) and GP IIb/IIIa antagonists comprise the major classes of antiplatelet therapies demonstrated to be of benefit in the treatment of ACS and for the prevention of thrombotic complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clopidogrel is beneficial when administered before and after PCI, and is more effective when combined with either ASA or GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in preventing post-PCI complications, coronary subacute stent thrombosis, and thrombotic events in general. It is currently unclear whether a higher loading dose of clopidogrel (600 mg) is better than the standard loading dose (300 mg), how long therapy should continue, and which maintenance dose is optimal. The role of the GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in ACS is less clear due to conflicting data from several studies with different patient populations. Currently, it appears that the use of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists might be most beneficial in high-risk ACS patients scheduled to undergo PCI, who demonstrate non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and elevated troponin levels. Copyright © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [source]