Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Strong Views (strong + views)
Selected AbstractsComparison of the performances of decision aimed algorithms with Bayesian and beliefs basisINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, Issue 8 2001François Delmotte There are strong views in the literature between the advocates of the Bayesian approach on one hand and the advocates of the belief functions on the other. This paper refers to a few previously published studies showing that, for decision-aimed problems, algorithms using belief functions were much slower than those using a Bayesian approach. Thus, if beliefs are appealing intellectually, they are in fact useless for real applications. This article shows that most of these studies are simply false, because they are based on an erroneous use of the belief functions. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [source] Practitioner assessments of ,good enough' parenting: factorial surveyJOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, Issue 8 2009Julie Taylor Aim., The aim of this study was to measure health visitors' professional judgements on ,good enough' parenting and identify what factors and combinations of these are important when making such judgements. Background., The relationship between parenting and child health is unclear. Whilst agreement exists that ,good enough' parenting requires boundary setting, consistency and putting the child's needs first, attempting to define ,good enough' parenting in precise terms is complex. When faced with a complex situation, practitioners rely on relatively few factors to form judgements. Design., Factorial survey methods were employed using vignette techniques. Methods., Vignettes were constructed using previous research on those variables, which may influence nurses' judgements, for example, accommodation and child dentition. The level of factors was randomly varied. Two thousand vignettes were administered to a sample of 200 health visitors in two Health Boards who then made a judgement about this scenario. Analysis., Data were analysed through multiple regression with dummy variables and one-way analysis of variance. Regression equations for both good enough mothering and good enough parenting are reported. Results., The models used are significant predictors of parenting and mothering. Significant predictors on health visitor judgements' were boundary setting in sleep behaviours, type of housing inhabited and health behaviours. Although parenting and mothering are often conflated, health visitors appear to separate these aspects when making judgements based on type of housing. Conclusions., Most professionals can articulate what makes a ,good' parent, equally they may have strong views regarding what constitutes ,poor' parenting. The difficulty is in determining when parenting is ,good enough' to provide a child with a nurturing environment. Relevance to clinical practice., This study suggests that practitioners move their thresholds of what is ,good enough' depending on a narrow range of factors. Awareness of the factors, which influence individuals' judgements is important in safeguarding children. [source] Evaluation of the NITV CVSAJOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, Issue 1 2008Harry Hollien Ph.D. Abstract:, The purpose of this study was to evaluate a commonly used voice stress analyzer, the National Institute of Truth Verification's (NITV) Computer Voice Stress Analyzer (CVSA), using a speech database containing materials recorded (i) in the laboratory, while highly controlled deceptive and shock-induced stress levels were systematically varied, and (ii) during a field procedure. Subjects were 24 each males/females (age range 18,63 years) drawn from a representative population. All held strong views on an issue and were required to make sharply derogatory statements about it. The CVSA system was then evaluated in a double-blind study using three sets of examiners: (i) two UF scientists trained/certified by NITV in CVSA operation, (ii) three experienced NITV operators provided by the manufacturer and (iii) five experimental phoneticians. The results showed that the "true positive" (or hit) rates for all examiners ranged from chance to somewhat higher levels (c. 50,65%) for all conditions and types of materials (e.g., stress vs. unstressed, truth vs. deception). However, the false-positive rate was just as high , often higher. Sensitivity statistics demonstrated that the CVSA system operated at about chance level. [source] The place of suxamethonium in pediatric anesthesiaPEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 6 2009MARCIN RAWICZ MD Summary Suxamethonium is a drug that promotes very strong views both for and against its use in the context of pediatric anesthesia. As such, the continuing debate is an excellent topic for a ,Pro,Con' debate. Despite ongoing efforts by drug companies, the popular view still remains that there is no single neuromuscular blocking drug that can match suxamethonium in terms of speed of onset of neuromuscular block and return of neuromuscular control. However, with this drug the balance of benefit vs risk and side effects are pivotal. Suxamethonium has significant adverse effects, some of which can be life threatening. This is particularly relevant for pediatric anesthesia because the spectrum of childhood diseases may expose susceptible individuals to an increased likelihood of adverse events compared with adults. Additionally, the concerns related to airway control in the infant may encourage the occasional pediatric anesthetist to use the drug in preference to slower onset/offset drugs. In the current environment of drug research, surveillance and licensing, it is debatable whether this drug would achieve the central place it still has in pediatric anesthesia. The arguments for and against its use are set out below by our two international experts, Marcin Rawicz from Poland and Barbara Brandom from USA. This will allow the reader an objective evaluation with which to make an informed choice about the use of suxamethonium in their practice. [source] | ||||||||||