Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Background People (background + people)
Selected AbstractsAssessing motivation to quit smoking in people with mental illness: a reviewADDICTION, Issue 5 2009Ranita Siru ABSTRACT Background People with mental health (MH) disorders smoke at higher rates, are more nicotine-dependent and suffer greater morbidity and mortality from smoking-related illnesses than the general population. Helping these people to quit smoking is a public health priority; however, many MH professionals assume that those with mental illness are not motivated to quit. Objectives To use predetermined criteria to identify, review critically and evaluate empirically all English language, peer-reviewed data on motivation to quit smoking in MH populations. Methods A systematic search was conducted and key data on subject characteristics, measures of motivation and other variables abstracted. ,2 analyses were used to compare motivation between MH and general populations, between in-patients and out-patients and between people with depression and people with psychotic disorders. Results Evidence suggests that people with MH disorders are as motivated to quit smoking as the general population, although those with psychotic disorders may be less motivated than individuals with depression. Although readiness to cease smoking was assessed in 14 studies, only two evaluated motivation to quit smoking in in-patient populations. Conclusions People with MH disorders are motivated to quit smoking, although more research is needed looking at in-patient populations. The commonly held false belief that people with MH disorders are not motivated to cease smoking means that opportunities to encourage smoking cessation among this disenfranchised group are being missed. [source] Comprehensive health assessments during de-institutionalization: an observational studyJOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, Issue 10 2006N. Lennox Abstract Background People with intellectual disability (ID) leaving institutions pass through a transition stage that makes them vulnerable to inadequate health care. They enter into community care under general practitioners (GPs) who are often untrained and inexperienced in their needs. Specifically designed health reviews may be of assistance to both them and their new GPs as they go through that phase. Methods This research aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a specially designed health review, the comprehensive health assessment program (CHAP) health review, in a group of adults as they transitioned out of the care of the last institution for people with ID in Tasmania. There were 25 residents reviewed by their GPs. Results The CHAP reviews picked up a number of health conditions and stimulated health promotion activities. Some of the findings were: a high number of abnormal Body Mass Indexes (19/23), immunizations given (13/23), vision impairment reported (2/23), mental health issues recorded (4/23) and skin abnormalities described (17/23). There were 22 referrals made to other health professionals (Australian Hearing Service 4, dentists 3, optometrists 3, psychiatrists 2, neurologists 2, ophthalmologist 1, urologist 1, ultrasound 1, mammogram 1, family planning 1, physiotherapist 1, continence nurse 1 and respiratory physician 1). These were in addition to various requests for pathology. Conclusions The CHAP health review was effective in identifying a number of health issues in the population of people with ID as they transitioned out of institutional care into the general community. [source] The outcomes of an intervention study to reduce the barriers experienced by people with intellectual disabilities accessing primary health care servicesJOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, Issue 1 2006C. A. Melville Abstract Background People with intellectual disabilities (IDs) experience significant health inequalities compared with the general population. The barriers people with IDs experience in accessing services contribute to these health inequalities. Professionals' significant unmet training needs are an important barrier to people with IDs accessing appropriate services to meet their health needs. Method A three group, pre- and post-intervention design was used to test the hypothesis that a training intervention for primary health care professionals would increase the knowledge and self-efficacy of participants. The intervention had two components , a written training pack and a 3-hour face-to-face training event. One group received the training pack and attended the training event, a second group received the training pack only, and a third group did not participate in the training intervention. Research measures were taken prior to the intervention and 3 months after the intervention. Statistical comparisons were made between the three groups. Results The participants in the training intervention reported that it had a positive impact upon their knowledge, skills and clinical practice. As a result of the intervention, 35 (81.4%) respondents agreed that they were more able to meet the needs of their clients with IDs, and 33 (66.6%) reported that they had made changes to their clinical practice. The research demonstrated that the intervention produced a statistically significant increase in the knowledge of participants (F = 5.6, P = 0.005), compared with the group that did not participate in the intervention. The self-efficacy of the participants that received both components of the intervention was significantly greater than the group that did not participate in the training (t = 2.079, P = 0.04). Participation in the two components of the training intervention was associated with significantly greater change in knowledge and self-efficacy than those receiving the training pack alone. Conclusion This intervention was effective in addressing the measured training needs of primary health care professionals. Future research should directly evaluate the positive benefits of interventions on the lives of people with IDs. [source] Specialist health services for people with intellectual disability in ScotlandJOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, Issue 8 2002E. Smiley Abstract Background People with intellectual disability (ID) are known to have a high prevalence of health needs, and to require access to specialist health services in addition to primary care and generic secondary care health services. However, there is no national database of each locality's specialist health service provision. Such a record would highlight variation in provision and enable benchmarking. Method A 15-item questionnaire was developed which included questions on ID health services and staffing levels. This was sent to the chief executive of each of the 15 identified National Health Service primary care trusts/health boards which provide ID services in Scotland. The same questionnaire was also sent to the lead clinician/clinical director of each service. The results were converted to per 100 000 population per trust and presented in cumulative frequency tables to allow benchmarking. Results A response rate of 100% was achieved. The results show a wide range in the type of services provided by each locality in Scotland. Only three services (21%) have completed the process of resettlement. There was a wide-ranging variability in the number of beds/day places and professionals employed per 100 000 population per trust. Conclusions There is widespread diversity in the service provision between different parts of Scotland. Geographical distances and responsibilities for service provision to remote and rural communities did not appear to account for these differences. [source] | ||||||||||