Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Standard Laparoscopic Approach (standard + laparoscopic_approach)
Selected AbstractsRobotic vs. laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysisTHE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, Issue 2 2010S. R. Markar Abstract The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare clinical outcome following laparoscopic and robotic Nissen fundoplication. A systematic literature search of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases was performed. Primary outcome measures were the requirement for re-operation, postoperative mortality and postoperative dysphagia. Secondary outcome measures were operative time, length of hospital stay, operative complications and cost. Six randomized trials, of 226 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in requirement for re-operation or in postoperative dysphagia. There was a significantly reduced total operative time in the laparoscopic group (weighted mean difference = 4.154; 95% CI = 1.932,6.375; p = 0.0002). There was no significant difference between robotic and laparoscopic groups for hospital stay or operative complications. Clinical results from robotic Nissen fundoplication were comparable to the standard laparoscopic approach, but there was associated increased operative time and procedure cost. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Single-port laparoscopic right colonic resectionANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 1-2 2010Anil Keshava Abstract Background:, The laparoscopic approach is a recognized treatment option for colonic resection. We present the first single-port operation for colonic resection using standard laparoscopic equipment and techniques. Methods:, A single-port laparoscopic right colonic resection was successfully performed using GelPort (Applied Medical, Orange County, CA, USA) and a standard laparoscopic approach. Results:, The procedure was completed in 105 min through a single periumbilical incision. There was minimal blood loss and no post-operative problems. Conclusion:, Single-port laparoscopic techniques can be applied to colonic surgery. It negates morbidity associated with trochar insertion and port sites. It should be performed by surgeons familiar with laparoscopic colorectal techniques. [source] Laparoscopic ureterolysis with omental wrap for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosisBJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 5 2010Robert J. Stein Study Type , Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 OBJECTIVE To describe various approaches for ureterolysis with an omental wrap using minimally invasive techniques, as surgery for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis includes tissue biopsy, ureterolysis, and intraperitonealization or omental wrap. PATIENTS AND METHODS Since 2006 we have performed ureterolysis in four patients diagnosed with retroperitoneal fibrosis in two institutions. The ureterolysis in two cases was bilateral, using a standard laparoscopic approach for one case and a hand-assisted technique for the other. Unilateral ureterolysis was completed using a standard laparoscopic approach in one case and was converted to a hand-assisted technique in the other due to difficulty with ureteric identification. An omental wrap was used after ureterolysis for all renal units. RESULTS A minimally invasive technique was used for all ureterolysis procedures and none required open conversion. There was fascial dehiscence after surgery at the hand-port site in one patient, and required re-operation for wound closure. The median (range) hospital stay for all patients was 2.5 (2,10) days and the median blood loss was 100 (50,550) mL. No patient required a blood transfusion. At a median 16.5 (12,32) months of follow-up, there was symptomatic and radiographic success in all patients. CONCLUSIONS Ureterolysis can be a challenging operation depending on the extent of the retroperitoneal mass. An understanding of various laparoscopic techniques can provide the flexibility for successful completion of nearly all of these procedures using a minimally invasive approach. [source] Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy with Vaginal Extraction: Initial ReportAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2010M. E. Allaf The recent decrease in the total number of living kidney transplants coupled with the increase in the number of candidates on the waiting list underscores the importance of eliminating barriers to living kidney donation. We report what we believe to be the first pure right-sided laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy with extraction of the kidney through the vagina. The warm ischemia time was 3 min and the renal vessels and ureter of the procured kidney were of adequate length for routine transplantation. The donor did not receive any postoperative parenteral narcotic analgesia, was discharged home within 24 h and was back to normal activity in 14 days. The kidney functioned well with no complications or infections. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy with vaginal extraction may be a viable alternative to open and standard laparoscopic approaches. Potential advantages include reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and convalescence and a more desirable cosmetic result. These possible, but yet unproven, advantages may encourage more individuals to consider live donation. [source] | ||||||||||