Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Standard Error Estimates (standard + error_estimate)
Selected AbstractsA Three-step Method for Choosing the Number of Bootstrap RepetitionsECONOMETRICA, Issue 1 2000Donald W. K. Andrews This paper considers the problem of choosing the number of bootstrap repetitions B for bootstrap standard errors, confidence intervals, confidence regions, hypothesis tests, p -values, and bias correction. For each of these problems, the paper provides a three-step method for choosing B to achieve a desired level of accuracy. Accuracy is measured by the percentage deviation of the bootstrap standard error estimate, confidence interval length, test's critical value, test's p -value, or bias-corrected estimate based on B bootstrap simulations from the corresponding ideal bootstrap quantities for which B=,. The results apply quite generally to parametric, semiparametric, and nonparametric models with independent and dependent data. The results apply to the standard nonparametric iid bootstrap, moving block bootstraps for time series data, parametric and semiparametric bootstraps, and bootstraps for regression models based on bootstrapping residuals. Monte Carlo simulations show that the proposed methods work very well. [source] The Effects of a Student Sampling Plan on Estimates of the Standard Errors for Student Passing RatesJOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, Issue 1 2003Guemin Lee Examined in this study were three procedures for estimating the standard errors of school passing rates using a generalizability theory model. Also examined was how these procedures behaved for student samples that differed in size. The procedures differed in terms of their assumptions about the populations from which students were sampled, and it was found that student sample size generally had a notable effect on the size of the standard error estimates they produced. Also the three procedures produced markedly different standard error estimates when student sample size was small. [source] Standard errors for EM estimationJOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY: SERIES B (STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY), Issue 2 2000M. Jamshidian The EM algorithm is a popular method for computing maximum likelihood estimates. One of its drawbacks is that it does not produce standard errors as a by-product. We consider obtaining standard errors by numerical differentiation. Two approaches are considered. The first differentiates the Fisher score vector to yield the Hessian of the log-likelihood. The second differentiates the EM operator and uses an identity that relates its derivative to the Hessian of the log-likelihood. The well-known SEM algorithm uses the second approach. We consider three additional algorithms: one that uses the first approach and two that use the second. We evaluate the complexity and precision of these three and the SEM in algorithm seven examples. The first is a single-parameter example used to give insight. The others are three examples in each of two areas of EM application: Poisson mixture models and the estimation of covariance from incomplete data. The examples show that there are algorithms that are much simpler and more accurate than the SEM algorithm. Hopefully their simplicity will increase the availability of standard error estimates in EM applications. It is shown that, as previously conjectured, a symmetry diagnostic can accurately estimate errors arising from numerical differentiation. Some issues related to the speed of the EM algorithm and algorithms that differentiate the EM operator are identified. [source] Multilevel Mixture Cure Models with Random EffectsBIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, Issue 3 2009Xin Lai Abstract This paper extends the multilevel survival model by allowing the existence of cured fraction in the model. Random effects induced by the multilevel clustering structure are specified in the linear predictors in both hazard function and cured probability parts. Adopting the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) approach to formulate the problem, parameter estimation is achieved by maximizing a best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) type log-likelihood at the initial step of estimation, and is then extended to obtain residual maximum likelihood (REML) estimators of the variance component. The proposed multilevel mixture cure model is applied to analyze the (i) child survival study data with multilevel clustering and (ii) chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) data on recurrent infections as illustrations. A simulation study is carried out to evaluate the performance of the REML estimators and assess the accuracy of the standard error estimates. [source] Parameter Estimation and Goodness-of-Fit in Log Binomial RegressionBIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, Issue 1 2006L. Blizzard Abstract An estimate of the risk, adjusted for confounders, can be obtained from a fitted logistic regression model, but it substantially over-estimates when the outcome is not rare. The log binomial model, binomial errors and log link, is increasingly being used for this purpose. However this model's performance, goodness of fit tests and case-wise diagnostics have not been studied. Extensive simulations are used to compare the performance of the log binomial, a logistic regression based method proposed by Schouten et al. (1993) and a Poisson regression approach proposed by Zou (2004) and Carter, Lipsitz, and Tilley (2005). Log binomial regression resulted in "failure" rates (non-convergence, out-of-bounds predicted probabilities) as high as 59%. Estimates by the method of Schouten et al. (1993) produced fitted log binomial probabilities greater than unity in up to 19% of samples to which a log binomial model had been successfully fit and in up to 78% of samples when the log binomial model fit failed. Similar percentages were observed for the Poisson regression approach. Coefficient and standard error estimates from the three models were similar. Rejection rates for goodness of fit tests for log binomial fit were around 5%. Power of goodness of fit tests was modest when an incorrect logistic regression model was fit. Examples demonstrate the use of the methods. Uncritical use of the log binomial regression model is not recommended. (© 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim) [source] | ||||||||||