Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Stony Stream (stony + stream)
Selected AbstractsDay,night changes in the spatial distribution and habitat preferences of freshwater shrimps, Gammarus pulex, in a stony streamFRESHWATER BIOLOGY, Issue 4 2005J. M. ELLIOTT Summary 1. As many invertebrates are nocturnal, their spatial distribution and habitat preferences may change from day to night. Both aspects are examined for Gammarus pulex by testing the hypotheses: (i) a power function was a suitable model for the spatial distribution of the shrimps in both day and night; (ii) diurnal and nocturnal spatial distributions were significantly different; (iii) diurnal and nocturnal habitat preferences were significantly different. Five different life-stages were treated separately. To ensure that the conclusions were consistent, large samples were taken near midday and midnight in April, June and November over 4 years at two sites about 3 km apart in a stony stream: downstream (n = 30) and upstream (n = 50). 2. The first and second hypotheses were supported at both sites. A power function, relating spatial variance (s2) to mean (m), was an excellent fit in all analyses (P < 0.001, r2 > 0.91), i.e. the spatial variance was density-dependent. All five life-stages were aggregated in the day. At night, the degree of aggregation increased for juveniles at higher densities but decreased for juveniles at lower densities, increased for immature females and males, but decreased slightly for mature females and especially mature males, the latter being close to a random distribution. There were no significant differences between sites, in spite of the lower numbers at the downstream site. 3. The third hypothesis was tested at only the upstream site and supported by comparisons between shrimp densities and 13 physical variables (distance from bank, water depth, water velocity, ten particle size-classes), and three non-physical variables (dry weights of bryophytes, leaf material, organic detritus). During the day, densities were strongly related to particle sizes with the following preferences: 0.5,8 mm for juveniles, 8,256 mm for the other life-stages with a weaker relationship for males. There were no significant positive relationships with the other variables, apart from bryophytes for immature shrimps and adults. At night, densities were unrelated to particle size; juveniles and immature shrimps preferred low water velocities near the banks, often where leaf material and organic detritus accumulated, females often preferred medium water velocities slightly away from the banks, and males showed no habitat preferences. 4. Day samples do not provide a complete picture of habitat preferences and probably identify refuge habitats. Day,night changes in spatial distribution and habitat preferences are an essential part of the behavioural dynamics of the shrimps and should be investigated in other species. [source] A comparative study of the dispersal of 10 species of stream invertebratesFRESHWATER BIOLOGY, Issue 9 2003J. M. Elliott Summary 1. Apart from downstream dispersal through invertebrate drift, few quantitative data are available to model the dispersal of stream invertebrates, i.e. the outward spreading of animals from their point of origin or release. The present study provides comparative data for 10 species, using two independent methods: unmarked animals in six stream channels built over a stony stream and marked animals in the natural stream. Experiments were performed in April and June 1973 and 1974, with initial numbers of each species varying from 20 to 80 in the stream channels and 20 to 60 for marked animals. 2. Results were the same for marked invertebrates and those in the channels. Dispersal was not density-dependent; the number of dispersing animals was a constant proportion of the initial number for each species. The relationship between upstream or downstream dispersal distance and the number of animals travelling that distance was well described by an inverse power function for all species (exponential and log models were poorer fits). Results varied between species but were similar within species for the 4 months, and therefore were unaffected by variations in mean water velocity (range 0.04,0.35 m s,1) or water temperature (range 6.7,8.9 °C in April, 12.1,14.8 °C in June). 3. Species were arranged in order, according to their dispersal abilities. Three carnivores (Perlodes, Rhyacophila, Isoperla) dispersed most rapidly (70,91% in 24 h, maximum distances 9.5,13.5 m per day), followed by two species (Protonemura, Rhithrogena) in which about half their initial numbers dispersed (50,51% in 24 h, 7.5,8 m per day), and four species (Ecdyonurus, Hydropsyche, Gammarus, Baetis) in which less than half dispersed (33,40% in 24 h, 5.5,7 m per day). Dispersal was predominantly upstream for all nine species. Few larvae (20%) of Potamophylax dispersed, with similar maximum upstream and downstream distances of 3.5 m per day. The mean time spent drifting downstream was known for seven species from previous studies, and correlated positively with their dispersal distances. Therefore, the species formed a continuum from rapid to very slow dispersers. These interspecific differences should be considered when evaluating the role of dispersal in the maintenance of genetic diversity in stream invertebrates, and in their ability to colonise or re-colonise habitats. [source] A quantitative study of day,night changes in the spatial distribution of insects in a stony streamJOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, Issue 1 2002J. M. Elliott Summary 1As many invertebrates are nocturnal, their spatial distribution may change from day to night. This behavioural aspect of their population dynamics has been ignored, but is now examined for the first time by testing the hypotheses: (i) a power function was a suitable model for the spatial distribution of common species of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera in a stony stream; (ii) the spatial distribution varied between species but was similar within species for larvae greater and smaller than half-size; (iii) diurnal and nocturnal spatial distributions were significantly different for each species. To ensure that the conclusions were consistent, large samples (n = 30) were taken near midday and midnight in April, June and November over 4 years. 2Twenty,one species were taken in sufficient numbers for the analyses; seven species were too sparse to be included. The first hypothesis was supported. A power function, relating spatial variance (s2) to mean (m), was an excellent fit in all the analyses (P < 0·001, r2 > 0·95), i.e. the spatial variance was density,dependent. The power b, often used as an ,index of aggregation', varied in the range 0·88,2·50. 3Most analyses supported the second hypothesis. For four species, the difference between the two size groups was just significant (P < 0·05), but was due to inadequate data for three species. Large larvae of the fourth species, the caddis Odontocerum albicorne, were less aggregated than small larvae at night, and were the only group with a b -value less than one. 4The third hypothesis was partially supported. The distribution did not change significantly (P > 0·05) for nine species; five burrowers in gravel, moss or mud, two highly mobile predators, one sedentary, case,building, Trichoptera species, and one net,spinning Trichoptera species. Aggregation was reduced significantly (P < 0·001) at night for four species, all case,building Trichoptera larvae. Aggregation increased significantly (P < 0·001) at night, except at low densities, for the remaining eight species, one being a nocturnal predator and the others being herbivorous species; all occurred frequently in night samples of invertebrate drift. Day,night changes in spatial distribution were therefore an essential part of the behavioural dynamics of 12 of the 21 species, and should be investigated in other species, including terrestrial species. [source] Hierarchical patterns of invertebrate assemblage structure in stony upland streams change with time and flow permanenceFRESHWATER BIOLOGY, Issue 6 2005B. J. ROBSON Summary 1. Studies in several parts of the world have examined variation in univariate descriptors of macroinvertebrate assemblage structure in perennially flowing stony streams across hierarchies of spatial scale using nested analyses of variance. However, few have investigated whether this spatial variation changes with time or whether these results are representative of habitats other than riffles or of other stream types, such as intermittently flowing streams. 2. We describe patterns in taxon richness and abundance from two sets of samples from stony streams in the Otway Range and the Grampians Range, Victoria, Australia, collected using hierarchical designs. Sampling of riffles was repeated in the Otways, to determine whether spatial patterns were consistent among times. In the Grampians, spatial patterns were compared between intermittent and perennially flowing streams (stream type) by sampling pools. 3. In the Otways streams, most variation in the dependent variables occurred between sample units. Patterns of variation among the other scales (streams, segments, riffles, groups of stones) were not consistent between sampling times, suggesting that they may have little ecological significance. 4. In the Grampians streams, variation in macroinvertebrate taxon richness and abundance differed significantly between replicate streams within each stream type but not between stream types or pools. The largest source of variation in taxon richness was stream type. Little variation occurred among sample units. 5. The pattern of most variation occurring among sample units is robust both to differences in the method of sampling and different dependent variables among studies and increasingly appears to be a property of riffles in stony, perennial upland streams. High variation among sample units (residual variation) limits the explanatory power of linear models and therefore, where samples are from a single sampling time, small but significant components of variation are unlikely to represent features of assemblage structure that will be stable over time. [source] | ||||||||||