Basal Group (basal + group)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Fireflies with or without prespermatophores: Evolutionary origins and life-history consequences

ENTOMOLOGICAL SCIENCE, Issue 1 2003
Fumio Hayashi
Abstract During mating, some male North American fireflies produce spermatophores from prespermatophores in their paired reproductive accessory glands. Other species of fireflies have neither prespermatophores nor spermatophores. To establish a pattern of spermatophore occurrence across firefly species, we examined the male internal reproductive system in 20 Japanese species belonging to 10 genera for the presence or absence of prespermatophores. Twelve species from seven genera produced prespermatophores, while eight species from three genera did not. Superimposed on a molecular phylogeny of Japanese fireflies based on mitochondrial 16S ribosomal DNA sequences, the basal group was prespermatophore producers. Prespermatophores appear to have been lost in two different lineages. Species without prespermatophores are characterized by degeneration of both the forewings and hindwings, and by body gigantism in females. [source]


MATHEMATICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE GENEALOGICAL SPECIES CONCEPT

EVOLUTION, Issue 8 2002
Richard R. Hudson
Abstract A genealogical species is defined as a basal group of organisms whose members are all more closely related to each other than they are to any organisms outside the group ("exclusivity'), and which contains no exclusive group within it. In practice, a pair of species is so defined when phylogenies of alleles from a sample of loci shows them to be reciprocally monophyletic at all or some specified fraction of the loci. We investigate the length of time it takes to attain this status when an ancestral population divides into two descendant populations of equal size with no gene exchange, and when genetic drift and mutation are the only evolutionary forces operating. The number of loci used has a substantial effect on the probability of observing reciprocal monophyly at different times after population separation, with very long times needed to observe complete reciprocal monophyly for a large number of loci. In contrast, the number of alleles sampled per locus has a relatively small effect on the probability of reciprocal monophyly. Because a single mitochondrial or chloroplast locus becomes reciprocally monophyletic much faster than does a single nuclear locus, it is not advisable to use mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA to recognize genealogical species for long periods after population divergence. Using a weaker criterion of assigning genealogical species status when more than 50% of sampled nuclear loci show reciprocal monophyly, genealogical species status depends much less on the number of sampled loci, and is attained at roughly 4,7 N generations after populations are isolated, where N is the historically effective population size of each descendant. If genealogical species status is defined as more than 95% of sampled nuclear loci showing reciprocal monophyly, this status is attained after roughly 9,12 N generations. [source]


Cladistic analysis of Medusozoa and cnidarian evolution

INVERTEBRATE BIOLOGY, Issue 1 2004
Antonio C. Marques
Abstract. A cladistic analysis of 87 morphological and life history characters of medusozoan cnidarians, rooted with Anthozoa, results in the phylogenetic hypothesis (Anthozoa (Hydrozoa (Scyphozoa (Staurozoa, Cubozoa)))). Staurozoa is a new class of Cnidaria consisting of Stauromedusae and the fossil group Conulatae. Scyphozoa is redefined as including those medusozoans characterized by strobilation and ephyrae (Coronatae, Semaeostomeae, and Rhizostomeae). Within Hydrozoa, Limnomedusae is identified as either the earliest diverging hydrozoan lineage or as the basal group of either Trachylina (Actinulida (Trachymedusae (Narcomedusae, Laingiomedusae))) or Hydroidolina (Leptothecata (Siphonophorae, Anthoathecata)). Cladistic results are highly congruent with recently published phylogenetic analyses based on 18S molecular characters. We propose a phylogenetic classification of Medusozoa that is consistent with phylogenetic hypotheses based on our cladistic results, as well as those derived from 18S analyses. Optimization of the characters presented in this analysis are used to discuss evolutionary scenarios. The ancestral cnidarian probably had a sessile biradial polyp as an adult form. The medusa is inferred to be a synapomorphy of Medusozoa. However, the ancestral process (metamorphosis of the apical region of the polyp or lateral budding involving an entocodon) could not be inferred unequivocally. Similarly, character states for sense organs and nervous systems could not be inferred for the ancestral medusoid of Medusozoa. [source]


Placoderm fishes, pharyngeal denticles, and the vertebrate dentition

JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY, Issue 3 2003
Zerina Johanson
Abstract The correlation of the origin of teeth with jaws in vertebrate history has recently been challenged with an alternative to the canonical view of teeth deriving from separate skin denticles. This alternative proposes that organized denticle whorls on the pharyngeal (gill) arches in the fossil jawless fish Loganellia are precursors to tooth families developing from a dental lamina along the jaw, such as those occurring in sharks, acanthodians, and bony fishes. This not only indicates that homologs of tooth families were present, but also illustrates that they possessed the relevant developmental controls, prior to the evolution of jaws. However, in the Placodermi, a phylogenetically basal group of jawed fishes, the state of pharyngeal denticles is poorly known, tooth whorls are absent, and the presence of teeth homologous to those in extant jawed fishes (Chondrichthyes + Osteichthyes) is controversial. Thus, placoderms would seem to provide little evidence for the early evolution of dentitions, or of denticle whorls, or tooth families, at the base of the clade of jawed fishes. However, organized denticles do occur at the rear of the placoderm gill chamber, but are associated with the postbranchial lamina of the anterior trunkshield, assumed to be part of the dermal cover. Significantly, these denticles have a different organization and morphology relative to the external dermal trunkshield tubercles. We propose that they represent a denticulate part of the visceral skeleton, under the influence of pharyngeal patterning controls comparable to those for pharyngeal denticles in other jawed vertebrates and Loganellia. J. Morphol. 257:289,307, 2003. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


Novel features of Equisetum arvense spermatozoids: insights into pteridophyte evolution

NEW PHYTOLOGIST, Issue 1 2002
K. S. Renzaglia
Summary ,,To characterize structural diversity within Equisetum and among pteridophytes, architectural features of the sperm cell are described here in a second subgenus of Equisetum, a divergent basal group in the fern clade. ,,Transmission electron microscopy observations of prereleased spermatozoids of Equisetum arvense were correlated with three-dimensional scanning electron microscopy images of swimming cells. ,,The mature spermatozoid completes a helix of approximately 2.5 revolutions. At the cell anterior is a complex multilayered locomotory apparatus with staggered flagella. Mitochondria (elongated,rounded) are aggregated near the locomotory apparatus and organelles extend along the cell length. The spline contains up to 300 microtubules and wraps in part around the long cylindrical nucleus. In swimming sperm cells, the anterior of the cell remains tightly coiled while the posterior relaxes and extends in a trailing fashion. ,,Spermatozoids of Equisetum arvense are smaller than those of Equisetum hyemale but structurally similar, except for nuclear shape. Conservation of cellular features suggests recent radiation of the genus. Equisetum spermatozoids share several critical features with ferns, including Psilotum, and support monophyly of a fern,Equisetum assemblage. Entry of the male gametes of Equisetum in their entirety into the archegonial venters indicates possible biparental inheritance of chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes. [source]