Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Skin Closure (skin + closure)
Selected AbstractsBacteria of preoperative urinary tract infections contaminate the surgical fields and develop surgical site infections in urological operationsINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 11 2004RYOICHI HAMASUNA Abstract Background: The risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) following urological operations have not been clearly identified, although the presence of a preoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) is thought to be one risk factor. We studied potential risk factors to clarify when and how bacteria contaminate wounds and SSI develop. Methods: Objects of the present study were patients with SSI after open urological operations that were performed at the Department of Urology, Miyazaki Medical College Hospital, University of Miyazaki, Kiyotake, Miyazaki, Japan, during the period between June 1999 and December 2000. Endourological operations, operations on children and short operations of less than 2 h duration were excluded. Patients were screened for the presence of UTI before the operation and subcutaneous swabs for culture were collected at the end of the operation by brushing with a sterile cotton-swab just before skin closure. Results: Surgical site infections occurred in 20 of 134 patients. Bacteria from the subcutaneous swabs were detected in 15 (75.0%) of the patients with SSI. All patients received antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP), but bacteria from the subcutaneous swabs of patients with SSI were less susceptible to the agents (20.0%). Preoperative UTI were observed in 11 (55.0%) of the patients with SSI. In these patients, four had the same species of bacteria detected from urine, swab and wound, three had the same species from swab and wound and one had the same species from urine and wound. Conclusions: Preoperative UTI was the most important risk factor for SSI following urological operations. It is most likely that the bacteria in the urine contaminated the surgical fields and the AMP resistant strains produced SSI. [source] Comparison of recovery after intermediate duration of anaesthesia with sevoflurane and isofluranePEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 4 2001Pierre-Yves Le Berre MD Background:,The purpose of this study was to compare recovery from anaesthesia after sevoflurane and isoflurane were administered to children for more than 90 min. Methods:,After parental informed consent and ethical committee approval, children aged between 2 months and 6 years, ASA I or II, were randomly allocated to sevoflurane (n=20) or isoflurane (n=20) groups. Halogenated agents were discontinued following skin closure and patients were ventilated mechanically with 100% oxygen until minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) values awake were obtained (endtidal concentrations 0.6 MAC for sevoflurane and 0.4 MAC for isoflurane). Effective perioperative analgesia was provided by a caudal block. Results:,The mean (± SD) duration of anaesthesia was 132 ± 38 min and 139 ± 49 min for sevoflurane and isoflurane, respectively. Early recovery occurred sooner in the isoflurane group (time to extubation was 16 ± 7 min and 11 ± 5 min, P<0.01; Aldrete's score at 0 min was 5.5 ± 1.5 and 7.4 ± 1.8, P<0.001, respectively). But the time to be fit for discharge from recovery room was similar at 136 ± 18 min and 140 ± 20 min, respectively. Conclusions:,After intermediate duration of anaesthesia administered to children for up to 90 min, isoflurane and sevoflurane allow recovery after approximatively the same lapse of time. [source] Use of adhesive surgical tape with the absorbable continuous subcuticular sutureANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 8 2003Jeremy D. Kolt Background: The absorbable continuous subcuticular suture is frequently used to close surgical incisions where the aim is healing by primary intention. A form of adhesive surgical tape is commonly also placed over the wound but this combination closure seems to have its development based on anecdotal, rather than experimental evidence. The present study reviews the scientific literature on the development of sutureless wound closure and presents the current evidence for the use of combination wound closure. Methods: Review was undertaken of the medical literature using the PubMed Internet database and cross-referencing major articles on the subject. The following combinations of key words were searched: skin closure, wound closure, suture technique, sutureless, adhesive tape, op-site, staples, subcuticular suture, complication, infection and scars. Results: Taped closure alone has advantages of lower wound infection rates and greater wound tensile strength, but disadvantages of epidermal reaction, skin edge inversion, doubtful safety and time required for meticulous surgical technique. The use of the continuous absorbable subcuticular suture allows accurate skin edge approximation, which increases the safety margin. The combination closure has a slightly superior cosmetic result to sutureless techniques but no study has been performed to compare the results of combination subcuticular suture and tape, with tape or subcuticular suture alone. Conclusions: There is no evidence in the scientific literature to justify or support the practice of closing a surgical wound with both subcuticular suture and adhesive surgical tape. [source] Island flap perineoplasty for coverage of perineal skin defects after repair of cloacal deformityANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 8 2001Brian Draganic Background: Traumatic cloacal defect is an injury sustained during childbirth in which the anovaginal septum is completely disrupted and the anus and vagina open as a common channel. Such injuries result in complete faecal incontinence and are difficult to repair both in terms of improving function and obtaining skin closure. Methods: Four cases of traumatic cloacal defect with a delayed presentation are illustrated here. All were treated with an overlapping anterior sphincter repair in combination with island flap perineoplasty to achieve skin closure. Anorectal function before and after surgery and the success of achieving primary wound healing were evaluated. Results: In all four cases profound incontinence was found preoperatively; all patients returned to normal or near normal continence following overlapping anterior sphincter repair. Island flap perineoplasty was successful in achieving primary healing in all cases and no flaps were lost to necrosis. Conclusions: Island flap perineoplasty is an effective method of achieving skin closure after anterior sphincter repair of traumatic cloacal defects. [source] Randomised clinical trial of suture compared with adhesive strip for skin closure after HRT implantBJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 10 2002Daniel O. Selo-Ojeme To determine which method of skin closure was associated with less bleeding, 250 women were randomly allocated to have either a suture closure (3-0 Dexon II) or an adhesive strip closure (Steri-Strip) following subcutaneous insertion of hormone (HRT) implants. Data were collected via a tested questionnaire and analysed. Significantly, more women in the adhesive strip group recorded postprocedure bleeding (RR = 2.26; 95% CI 1.42,3.60) and considered the bleeding excessive (RR = 4.17; 95% CI 1.18,14.76) and unacceptable (RR = 12.52; 95% CI 1.63,96.19). Pain scores and symptoms of local infection were similar in both groups. Routine use of adhesive strips for implant skin incision closure is not recommended. [source] | ||||||||||