Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Size Vs (size + v)
Selected AbstractsStimulus size and the variability of the threshold response in the central and peripheral visual fieldOPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, Issue 6 2002L. S. Kim Purpose:, The investigation of the peripheral visual field has shown considerable interest for the investigation of field loss attributed to anticonvulsant therapy. The purpose was to determine the within-visit between-subject, the between-visit between-subject, and the between-location variability of the threshold response in the normal eye with increase in stimulus eccentricity out to 60° as a function of stimulus size. Methods:, Forty-eight normal subjects attended for a total of three visits (mean age = 49.5 years, SD = 18.9, range 22,84 years). At the first visit, one randomly assigned eye of each subject was examined with the Humphrey Field Analyzer 750 (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and the Full Threshold algorithm using Programs 30,2 and 60,4 and stimulus sizes III and V. The combination of stimulus size and of program, and the order of the combination within- and between-sessions, were randomized for each subject. The results of the first visit were considered as a familiarization period and were discarded. The protocol at the second and third visits was identical to that at the first visit for each subject. Results:, The ratio of the SD of the group mean sensitivity was determined at each stimulus location for stimulus size III compared with stimulus size V for Programs 30,2 and 60,4 at visit 3. The SDs were greater than unity for Program 30,2 (p < 0.0001) and for Program 60,4 (p < 0.0001) indicating greater variability for the size III stimulus. The SDs were also greater than unity for the central inner zone (p < 0.0001), central outer zone (p < 0.0001) and peripheral inner zone (p < 0.0001). The ratios in the peripheral outer zone were not quite greater than unity (p = 0.054). The ratios increased with increase in eccentricity by up to 2.7 times between 15° and 30° eccentricity and by up to 2.7 times between 30° and 60° eccentricity. The group mean ratio did not vary significantly between the two visits for Program 30,2 stimulus size III (p = 0.563), Program 60,4 stimulus size III (p = 0.935) and for Program 60,4 stimulus size V (p = 0.005). However, the group mean SD was lower at visit 3 compared with visit 2 for Program 30,2 stimulus size V (p = 0.0004). The SDs associated with the extreme peripheral locations in the superior and nasal fields were smaller for stimulus size III because the threshold was frequently attenuated by lid and facial contour. Conclusions:, Considerably narrower confidence limits for normality for the peripheral regions of Program 30,2 and for 60,4 are demonstrated with the use of Goldmann size V. [source] Mixing of components in two-component aggregationAICHE JOURNAL, Issue 9 2006Themis Matsoukas Abstract The problem of binary component aggregation with kernels that are independent of composition is considered. The bivariate distribution as the product of two distributions is studied, one that refers to the size of the aggregates, and one that describes the distribution of the component of interest (solute), and obtain the governing equations for all three. The distribution of solute within aggregates of size v has a steady-state solution, that is independent of the size distribution: it is a Gaussian function whose mean and variance are both proportional to the aggregate size v. To quantify the degree of blending, the sum-square X2, of the deviation of the amount solute from its mean, is studied. Two cases are identified for which X2 is constant during aggregation: (a) "partially mixed" seeds regardless of kernel; and (b) sum-type kernels regardless of seed distribution. Simulations confirm the results for these two cases, and further indicate that in the general case, X2 is nearly constant. The degree of mixing is determined solely by the initial distribution of components, but does not depend on the kernel. Optimum initial conditions that minimize the time required to reach a desired level of homogeneity between components are identified. © 2006 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2006 [source] Size traits and site conditions determine changes in seed bank structure caused by grazing exclusion in semiarid annual plant communitiesECOGRAPHY, Issue 1 2006Yagil Osem 1. Contrasting patterns of change in the seed bank of natural grasslands are frequently found in response to grazing by domestic herbivores. Here, we studied the hypotheses that a) patterns of change in seed bank density and composition in response to grazing depend on spatial variation in resource availability and productivity, and b) that variation among species in patterns of seed bank response to grazing is linked to differences in species size traits (i.e. size of plant, dispersal unit and seed). 2. Effects of sheep grazing exclusion on the seed bank were followed during five years in a semiarid Mediterranean annual plant community in Israel. Seed bank density and composition were measured in autumn, before the rainy season, inside and outside fenced exclosures in four neighboring topographic sites differing in vegetation characteristics, soil resources and primary productivity: Wadi (dry stream terraces, high productive site), Hilltop, South- and North-facing slopes (less productive sites). 3. Topographic sites differed in seed density (range ca 2500,18000 seed m,2) and in seed bank response to grazing exclusion. Fencing increased seed density by 78, 51 and 18% in the Wadi, South- and North-facing slopes, respectively, but had no effect in the Hilltop. At the species level, grazing exclusion interacted with site conditions in determining species seed bank density, with larger or opposite changes in the high productive Wadi compared to the other less productive sites. 4. Changes in seed bank structure after grazing exclusion were strongly related to species size traits. Grazing exclusion favored species with large size traits in all sites, while seed density of tiny species decreased strongly in the high productive Wadi. Species with medium and small size traits showed lesser or no responses. 5. The size of plants, dispersal units and seeds were strongly correlated to each other, thus confounding the evaluation of the relative importance of each trait in the response of species to grazing and site conditions. We propose that the relative importance of plant size vs seed size in the response to grazing changes with productivity level. [source] The effect of twig architecture and seed number on seed size variation in subtropical woody speciesNEW PHYTOLOGIST, Issue 4 2009Hong Chen Summary ,,This study aims to determine the effect of twig (current year shoot) size on seed size variation and to test whether a seed size vs number tradeoff occurs for the twigs of subtropical broad-leaved species. ,,Fruit-bearing twigs were sampled for 55 woody species (including 33 evergreen and 22 deciduous dicot species) from a southwest Chinese forest. Twig size, fruit size and number, and seed size and number were measured for each species. The relationships among these functional traits were determined both across species and across correlated phyletic divergences. ,,Total fruit mass and total seed mass were positively correlated with twig size. Seed size was positively associated with fruit size, which was, in turn, positively correlated with twig diameter, but negatively correlated with the ratio of twig length to diameter. The effect of twig size on seed size variation was not significant, possibly as a result of the large variation in seed number per fruit. Cross-species and across-phyletic divergence analyses revealed that seed size was negatively and isometrically correlated with seed number per twig mass in both the evergreen and deciduous species groupings, demonstrating the existence of tradeoff between seed size and number. ,,A seed size vs number tradeoff is detectable in the twigs of woody species. Comparatively little of the variance in seed size was attributable to twig size variation. [source] | ||||||||||