Home  About us  Contact
 

Sinus Floor Elevation Surgery (sinus + floor_elevation_surgery)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Kinds of Sinus Floor Elevation Surgery

  • maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery
    		•

    Selected Abstracts

    Effects of maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery on maxillary sinus physiology

    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, Issue 3 2003
    Nicolaas M. Timmenga
    In a prospective study, the effects of elevation surgery of the maxillary sinus floor on maxillary sinus physiology were assessed. Seventeen consecutive patients without preoperative anamnestic, clinical and radiological signs of maxillary sinusitis underwent sinus floor elevation surgery with iliac crest bone grafts. All patients were subjected to unilateral endoscopic examination of the maxillary sinus, taking of a biopsy specimen from the sinus floor mucosa, and collection of a sinus lavage-fluid aspirate. This triad of evaluations was performed immediately preceding the elevation procedure, and 3 months (at implant insertion) and 9 months (at uncovering of implants) postoperatively. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Preoperatively, three out of 17 patients showed pre-existing mucosal pathology endoscopically, while the 3- and 9-month results revealed the presence of mucosal pathology in four and two patients, respectively. The 3-month microbiological evaluation showed a significant increase in cultures with bacterial growth, while the 9-month culture results were comparable to the preoperative status of the maxillary sinus. Morphologically, neither fibrosis nor an altered inflammatory response or thickening of the epithelium and lamina propria was observed postoperatively. The number of goblet cells in the epithelial layer was increased. From this study it is concluded that the effect of maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery with autogenous bone grafts does not appear to have clinical consequences in patients without signs of pre-existing maxillary sinusitis. [source]

    Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-7 in maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery in 3 patients compared to autogenous bone grafts

    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, Issue 9 2000
    A clinical pilot study
    Abstract Background/Aims: This pilot study was designed to determine the clinical bone formation ability of a human recombinant DNA bone morphogenetic protein-7, also referred to as Osteogenic Protein-1 [OP-1] combined with a collagen carrier, implanted in the maxillary sinus of 3 patients. The results were compared with a group of 3 patients treated with sinus floor elevation and autogenous bonegrafts. Methods: 6 consecutive patients, 4 female and 2 male, between 48 and 57 years of age were treated by means of sinus floor elevation for insufficient bone height in the posterior maxilla for implant surgery. 3 patients, 2 female and 1 male, were treated with OP-1 attached to a collagen device. In these patients, 4 maxillary sinus grafting procedures according to Tatum's method were carried out. 1 g of collagen carrier containing 2.5 mg rhOP-1 mixed with 3 ml of saline was placed between the bony floor and the elevated mucosal lining of the most caudal part of the maxillary sinus, in order to increase the vertical bone dimension to place dental implants of a sufficient length. The 3 other patients, also 2 female and 1 male, with a total of 5 sinus sites, were treated with sinus floor elevation and autogenous iliac crest bonegrafts. After 6 months, during dental implant preparation, bone cores were taken for histology. Thus, clinical, radiological and histological results of the 2 groups of 3 patients were compared. Results: 6 months after sinus grafting with OP-1, in 1 male, well-vascularized bonelike tissue of good quality was observed clinically. This could be confirmed by histology. In the second, female, patient no bone formation was observed at all. A cyst-like granular tissue mass, without purulent content, was removed. In the 3rd, female, patient, who received bilateral sinus grafts, some bonelike formation was seen, however it showed flexible tissue which led to the decision that at 6 months after the sinus grafting, the implant placement had to be postponed. In all 5 autogenous grafted sinuses a bone appearance similar to normal maxillary bone was observed clinically as well as histologically and dental implants could be placed six months after sinus floor elevation surgery. Conclusions: These findings indicate that the OP-1 device has the potential for initiating bone formation in the human maxillary sinus within 6 months after a sinus floor elevation operation. However, the various findings in these 3 patients indicate that the behaviour of the material is at this moment insufficiently predictable, in this indication area. Further investigation is indicated before OP-1 can be successfully used instead of the "gold standard" autogenous bone graft. [source]

    RFA Values of Implants Placed in Sinus Grafted and Nongrafted Sites after 6 and 12 Months

    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 3 2009
    Marco Degidi MD
    ABSTRACT Background: Maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery is widely used as a preimplantology method to permit implant insertion. Nevertheless, very few data are available about long-term stability of dental implants inserted in grafted sites. Purpose: The aims of the present study were to evaluate the evolution of resonance frequency analysis (RFA) values at 6 and 12 months from the implant insertion in sinus grafted sites and nongrafted sites. Materials and Methods: In 14 patients, 80 Xive implants (Dentsply Friadent GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) were inserted. Sixty-three implants were inserted in a site previously treated with a sinus lift; 17 implants were inserted in healed or postextraction sites. For each implant diameter, length, bone density, insertion torque, and percentage of implant fixed to a nongrafted bone were recorded. RFA values at implant insertion after 6 and 12 months were recorded. Results: After 6 and 12 months, grafted sites showed higher RFA values than the control sites; after 12 months, the difference was statistically significant (.007). A statistically significant positive correlation was found between resonance frequency values and bone quality after 12 months (.05). No statistically significant correlation between RFA values and all the other variables considered was found. Conclusions: Sites treated with sinus lift can offer good long-term stability. After 6 and 12 months, the geometric characteristics of the implant are no longer important to obtain high RFA values, and the bone,implant interface seems to be determinant. [source]