Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Sheep Numbers (sheep + number)
Selected AbstractsCarnivore-Livestock Conflicts: Effects of Subsidized Predator Control and Economic Correlates on the Sheep IndustryCONSERVATION BIOLOGY, Issue 3 2006KIM MURRAY BERGER Canis latrans; coyotes; depredación; evaluación de política Abstract:,Despite the importance of carnivores in terrestrial ecosystems, many nations have implemented well-coordinated, state-funded initiatives to remove predators, largely because of conflicts with humans over livestock. Although these control efforts have been successful in terms of the number of carnivores removed, their effects on the viability of the industries they seek to protect are less understood. I assessed the efficacy of long-term efforts by the U.S. government to improve the viability of the sheep industry by reducing predation losses. I used regression analysis and hierarchical partitioning of a 60-year data set to explore associations among changes in sheep numbers and factors such as predator control effort, market prices, and production costs. In addition, I compared trends in the sheep industry in the western United States, where predator control is subsidized and coyotes (Canis latrans) are abundant, with trends in eastern states that lack federally subsidized predator control and that were (1) colonized by coyotes before 1950 or (2) colonized by coyotes between 1950 and 1990. Although control efforts were positively correlated with fluctuations in sheep numbers, production costs and market prices explained most of the model variation, with a combined independent contribution of 77%. Trends in sheep numbers in eastern and western states were highly correlated (r ,0.942) independent of the period during which they were colonized by coyotes, indicating either that control has been ineffective at reducing predation losses or that factors other than predation account for the declines in both regions. These results suggest that government-subsidized predator control has failed to prevent the decline in the sheep industry and alternative support mechanisms need to be developed if the goal is to increase sheep production and not simply to kill carnivores. Resumen:,A pesar de la importancia de carnívoros en los ecosistemas terrestres, muchos países han implementado iniciativas bien coordinadas, financiadas por el gobierno, para remover depredadores, principalmente debido a conflictos entre humanos y ganado. Aunque estos esfuerzos de control han sido exitosos en términos del número de carnívoros removidos, sus efectos sobre la viabilidad de las industrias que se busca proteger son poco comprendidos. Evalué la eficacia de los esfuerzos a largo plazo del gobierno de E.U.A. para mejorar la viabilidad de la industria ovina mediante la reducción de pérdidas por depredación. Utilicé análisis de regresión y partición jerárquica de un conjunto de datos de 60 años para explorar asociaciones entre cambios en el número de ovejas y factores como el esfuerzo de control de depredadores, precios de mercado y costos de producción. Adicionalmente comparé las tendencias en la industria ovina en el oeste de Estados Unidos, donde el control de depredadores está subsidiado y los coyotes (Canis latrans) son abundantes, con las tendencias en los estados orientales que carecen de control subsidiado federalmente y que fueron (1) colonizados por coyotes antes de 1950 o (2) colonizados por coyotes entre 1950 y 1990. Aunque los esfuerzos de control se correlacionaron positivamente con las fluctuaciones en el número de ovejas, los costos de producción y los precios de mercado explicaron la mayor parte de la variación del modelo, con una contribución independiente combinada de 77%. Las tendencias en el número de ovejas en los estados orientales y occidentales estaban muy correlacionadas (r , 0.942) independientemente del período en que fueron colonizados por coyotes, lo que indica que el control ha sido ineficiente en la reducción de depredación o que factores, distintos a la depredación, son responsables de las declinaciones en ambas regiones. Estos resultados sugieren que el control subsidiado por el gobierno ha fallado en prevenir la declinación de la industria ovina y que se necesitan desarrollar mecanismos de soporte alternativos si la meta es incrementar la producción de ovejas y no simplemente matar carnívoros. [source] 100 years of change: examining agricultural trends, habitat change and stakeholder perceptions through the 20th centuryJOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, Issue 2 2009Martin Dallimer Summary 1The 20th century has witnessed substantial increases in the intensity of agricultural land management, much of which has been driven by policies to enhance food security and production. The knock-on effects in agriculturally dominated landscapes include habitat degradation and biodiversity loss. We examine long-term patterns of agricultural and habitat change at a regional scale, using the Peak District of northern England as a case study. As stakeholders are central to the implementation of successful land-use policy, we also assess their perceptions of historical changes. 2In the period 1900 to 2000, there was a fivefold rise in sheep density, along with higher cattle density. We found a reduction in the number of farms, evidence of a shift in land ownership patterns, and increased agricultural specialization, including the virtual disappearance of upland arable production. 3Despite previous studies showing a substantial loss in heather cover, we found that there had been no overall change in the proportion of land covered by dwarf shrub moor. Nonetheless, turnover rates were high, with only 55% of sampled sites maintaining dwarf shrub moor coverage between 1913 and 2000. 4Stakeholders identified many of the changes revealed by the historical data, such as increased sheep numbers, fewer farms and greater specialization. However, other land-use changes were not properly described. For instance, although there had been no overall change in the proportion of dwarf shrub moor and the size of the rural labour force had not fallen, stakeholders reported a decline in both. Spatial heterogeneity of the changes, shifting baselines and problems with historical data sources might account for some of these discrepancies. 5Synthesis and applications. A marked increase in sheep numbers, combined with general agricultural intensification, have been the dominant land-use processes in the Peak District during the 20th century. Stakeholders only correctly perceived some land-use changes. Policy and management objectives should therefore be based primarily on actual historical evidence. However, understanding stakeholder perceptions and how they differ from, or agree with, the available evidence will contribute to the successful uptake of land management policies and partly determine the costs of policy implementation. [source] Quantifying the grazing impacts associated with different herbivores on rangelandsJOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, Issue 6 2007S. D. ALBON Summary 1Rangelands, produced by grazing herbivores, are important for a variety of agricultural, hunting, recreation and conservation objectives world-wide. Typically, there is little quantitative evidence regarding the magnitude of the grazing impact of different herbivores on rangeland habitats to inform their management. 2We quantified the grazing and trampling impact of sheep, cattle, red deer Cervus elaphus, rabbits Oryctolagus cuniculus, mountain hares Lepus timidus and red grouse Lagopus lagopus on open-hill habitats in 11 areas of upland Scotland. The degradation of heather in upland Scotland Calluna vulgaris -dominated habitats, of conservation significance at a European scale, has been attributed, anecdotally, to increasing sheep and red deer populations. 3Field indicators of habitat condition were used to generate a five-point scale of impact in vegetation polygons of seven habitats. The presence of each herbivore species was attributed on the basis of ,signs' of occupancy. A Bayesian regression model was used to analyse the association of herbivore species with grazing impact on plant communities, controlling for environmental attributes. 4Overall the presence of sheep was associated with the largest increase (7/11 areas) in grazing and trampling impact of all herbivores. Cattle had the second largest impact but generally this was restricted to fewer areas and habitats than sheep. In contrast, impacts associated with wild herbivores tended to be small and only significant locally. 5Although red deer presence was associated with a significantly lower impact than sheep, this impact increased with increasing deer density at both land-ownership and regional scales. For sheep there was little or no evidence of density dependence. 6Synthesis and applications. The higher impact associated with sheep presence probably reflects their greater aggregation because of their limited ranging behaviour, exacerbated by sheep being herded in places convenient for land managers. Consequently, future reductions in sheep numbers as a result of reform of European Union farming policies may limit the extent of their impact, but not necessarily the local magnitude. However, reductions in sheep stocks may lead to increases in deer densities, with greater impact, particularly in heather-dominated habitats. Where habitat conservation is a priority this may well require a reduction in deer numbers. [source] Empirical investigation of investment behaviour in Australia's pastoral region,AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, Issue 1 2005Frank W. Agbola Optimal intertemporal investment behaviour of Australian pastoralists is modelled using panel data for the period 1979,1993. Results indicate that quasi-fixity of inputs of labour, capital, sheep numbers and cattle numbers is characteristic of production in the pastoral region. It takes about two years for labour, four years for capital and a little over two years for both sheep numbers and cattle numbers to adjust towards long-run optimal levels. Results also indicate that, after accounting for adjustment costs, own-price product supply and input demand responses are inelastic in both the short and long run. [source] | ||||||||||