Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Severe Coronary Artery Disease (severe + coronary_artery_disease)
Selected AbstractsThe effects of exercise during hemodialysis on adequacyHEMODIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, Issue 1 2005C. Caner Pedalling during hemodialysis (HD) has been shown to increase solute clearance in a previous study. In the present study, we aimed to test whether an easy to perform exercise program, not requiring a special device, could yield similar outcomes. Fifteen HD patients with the mean age of 48.4 ± 3.8 years were enrolled into the study. Patients with significant access recirculation (>10%), moderate to severe coronary artery disease, moderate to severe heart failure, severe chronic obstructive lung disease, and history of lower extremity surgery during last three month period were excluded. All patients were studied on two consecutive HD sessions with identical prescriptions. At the first session, standard HD was applied without exercise, whereas in the second session lower extremity exercise of 30 minutes duration was added. Reduction rates and rebound for urea, creatinine, and potassium and Kt/V were calculated. Wilcoxon signed rank test was applied in analysis and p < 0.05 was accepted as significance level. All patients completed the study. When both sessions were compared, mean arterial blood pressure (97 ± 3 mmHg vs 120 ± 4 mmHg, p < 0.001) and heart rate (77 ± 1 beats/min vs 92 ± 3 beats/min, p < 0.001) were higher in the exercise group. On the other hand, urea reduction rates, rebound values of urea, creatinine, and potassium were similar in both groups. Conclusion:,In the study, we did not observe any changes in solute rebound and clearance with the exercise. Shorter duration of the exercise may be the explanation of failure to achieve desired outcomes. Increasing patients' tolerance and fitness levels by means of steadily increasing exercise programs may be of help. Additionally, mode of exercise may also be responsible for different outcomes. [source] Identifying women with severe angiographic coronary diseaseJOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, Issue 1 2010C. Kreatsoulas Abstract., Kreatsoulas C, Natarajan MK, Khatun R, Velianou JL, Anand SS (McMaster University; CARING Network, McMaster University; Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences; Interventional Cardiology, Hamilton Health Sciences; Eli Lilly Canada,May Cohen Chair in Women's Health, McMaster University; Michael G. DeGroote-Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario Chair in Population Health Research, McMaster University; Population Genomics Program, McMaster University; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada). Identifying women with severe angiographic coronary disease. J Intern Med 2010; 268:66,74. Objectives., To determine sex/gender differences in the distribution of risk factors according to age and identify factors associated with the presence of severe coronary artery disease (CAD). Design., We analysed 23 771 consecutive patients referred for coronary angiography from 2000 to 2006. Subjects., Patients did not have previously diagnosed CAD and were referred for first diagnostic angiography. Outcome measures., Patients were classified according to angiographic disease severity. Severe CAD was defined as left main stenosis ,50%, three-vessel disease with ,70% stenosis or two-vessel disease including proximal left anterior descending stenosis of ,70%. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association between risk factors and angina symptoms with severe CAD. Results., Women were less likely to have severe CAD (22.3% vs. 36.5%) compared with men. Women were also significantly older (69.8 ± 10.6 vs. 66.3 ± 10.7 years), had higher rates of diabetes (35.0% vs. 26.6%), hypertension (74.8% vs. 63.3%) and Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class IV angina symptoms (56.7% vs. 47.8%). Men were more likely to be smokers (56.9% vs. 37.9%). Factors independently associated with severe CAD included age (OR = 1.05; 95% CI 1.05,1.05, P < 0.01), male sex (OR = 2.43; CI 2.26,2.62, P < 0.01), diabetes (OR = 2.00; CI 1.86,2.18, P < 0.01), hyperlipidaemia (OR = 1.50; CI 1.39,1.61, P < 0.01), smoking (OR = 1.10; CI 1.03,1.18, P = 0.06) and CCS class IV symptoms (OR = 1.43; CI 1.34,1.53, P < 0.01). CCS Class IV angina was a stronger predictor of severe CAD amongst women compared with men (women OR = 1.82; CI 1.61,2.04 vs. men OR = 1.28; CI 1.18,1.39, P < 0.01). Conclusions., Women referred for first diagnostic angiography have lower rates of severe CAD compared with men across all ages. Whilst conventional risk factors, age, sex, diabetes, smoking and hyperlipidaemia are primary determinants of CAD amongst women and men, CCS Class IV angina is more likely to be associated with severe CAD in women than men. [source] Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in Chinese patients with severe coronary artery diseaseANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 9 2010Jensen T. C. Poon Abstract Background:, The Asian population is believed to have lower incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), and hence, the benefit of screening is uncertain. The size of native aorta in Asians, which shall affect the definition of AAA, has also never been reported. Our study investigated the prevalence of AAA and the infra-renal aortic diameter (AD) in Chinese patients with severe coronary artery disease. Methods:, This is a prospective observational study of infra-renal aortic size for patients who had coronary artery bypass surgery by ultrasound. The patients' demographics, important co-morbidities and maximum AD were recorded. Results:, The study included 624 consecutive Chinese patients (mean age = 63.2 years). The mean maximum infra-renal AD was 17.5 mm for men and 14.8 mm for women. The presence of AAA was defined as maximum AD greater than 30 mm. The result was also compared with an alternate definition that defines AAA as maximum AD of greater than 1.5 times of the group's mean. Eleven patients had an AD greater than 30 mm, and the prevalence of AAA was only 1.8%. With AAA defined as maximum AD of 1.5 times greater than the group's mean, 19 patients had AAA. The prevalence of AAA in this high-risk group would become 3% overall. Conclusion:, The prevalence of AAA in Chinese patients was low, and the result did not support routine screening. The smaller mean infra-renal AD in Chinese merits validation by large-scale study and consideration when deciding threshold for small AAA repair in our locality. [source] Clinical Outcomes for Single Stent and Multiple Stents in Contemporary PracticeCLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 9 2009Qiao Shu Bin MD Background Stents had been demonstrated to be safe and effective in the treatment of severe coronary artery disease (CAD); however, the current knowledge on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in treating patients requiring 2 or more stents placements is still limited. Hypothesis Patients who required 2 or more stents might have worse clinical outcomes. Methods A total of 2371 patients who underwent stenting were divided into a single stenting group (n = 1233) and a multiple stenting group (n = 1138). We assessed the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events (death, acute myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization) and stent thrombosis during 1-year follow-up. Results The 1-year unadjusted cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events was 7.7% in the multiple stenting group and 5.4% in the single stenting group (P = 0.02 by log-rank test). After adjustment, there was a trend toward a lower rate of 1-year major adverse cardiac events in the single stenting group than in the multiple stenting group (P = 0.09). A nonsignificant trend was also detected in favor of the single stenting group, as compared with the multiple stenting group, at the rate of acute myocardial infarction (1.3% vs 1.7%, P = 0.89) and at the rate of target-vessel revascularization (4.5% vs 5.4%, P = 0.08). Conclusions Although the use of a single stent in coronary artery disease has less incidence of adverse cardiac events at 1 year as compared with the use of multiple stents, the difference was not statistically significant. Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [source] | ||||||||||