			Home About us Contact

Sensory Block (sensory + block)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Is nerve stimulation needed during an ultrasound-guided lateral sagittal infraclavicular block?

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 4 2010
Y. GÜRKAN
Background: The objective of the study was to evaluate the influence of ultrasound (US) guidance alone vs. neurostimulation (NS) and US (NSUS) guidance techniques on block performance time and block success rate for the lateral sagittal infraclavicular block (LSIB). Methods: In a randomized and prospective manner, 110 adult patients scheduled for distal upper limb surgery were allocated to the US or the NSUS groups. In the US group, a local anesthetic (LA) was administered only with US guidance to produce a ,U'-shaped distribution around the axillary artery. In the NSUS group, LA was administered under US guidance only after electrolocation of one of the median, ulnar or radial nerve-type responses. A total of 30 ml of LA (10 ml of levobupivacaine 5 mg/ml and 20 ml of lidocaine 20 mg/ml) was administered in both groups. Sensory block was tested at 10 min intervals for 30 min. Successful block was defined as analgesia or anesthesia of all five nerves distal to the elbow. Results: Block success rate was 94.5% in both groups. Block performance time was significantly shorter in the US than the NSUS group (157 ± 50 vs. 230 ± 104 s) (P=0.000). Block onset time was similar in both groups (12.5 ± 4.8 in the US vs. 12.8 ± 5.4 min in the NSUS groups). There were two arterial punctures in the NSUS group. Conclusions: During LSIB performance US guidance alone produces block success rate identical to both US and NS guidance yet with a shorter block performance time. [source]

Procedural pain of an ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block: a comparison of axillary and infraclavicular approaches

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 4 2010
B. S. FREDERIKSEN
Background: Ultrasound (US)-guided infraclavicular (IC) and axillary (AX) blocks have similar effectiveness. Therefore, limiting procedural pain may help to choose a standard approach. The primary aims of this randomized study were to assess patient's pain during the block and to recognize its cause. Methods: Eighty patients were randomly allocated to the IC or the AX group. A blinded investigator asked the patients to quantify block pain on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0,100) and to indicate the most unpleasant component (needle passes, paraesthesie or local anaesthetics injection). Sensory block was assessed every 10 min. After 30 min, the unblocked nerves were supplemented. Patients were ready for surgery when they had analgesia or anaesthesia of the five nerves distal to the elbow. Preliminary scan time, block performance and latency times, readiness for surgery, adverse events and patient's acceptance were recorded. Results: The axillary approach resulted in lower maximum VAS scores (median 12) than the infraclavicular approach (median 21). This difference was not statistically significant (P=0.07). Numbers of patients indicating the most painful component were similar in both groups. Patients in either group were ready for surgery after 25 min. Two patients in the IC group and seven in the AX group needed block supplementation (n.s.). Block performance times and number of needle passes were significantly lower in the IC group. Patients' acceptance was 98% in both groups. Conclusions: We did not find significant differences between the two approaches in procedural pain and patient's acceptance. The choice of approach may depend on the anaesthesiologist's experience and the patient's preferences. [source]

Sensory block without a motor block: ultrasound-guided placement of pain catheters in the forearm

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 2 2010
M. Lurf
No abstract is available for this article. [source]

The effects of clonidine on ropivacaine 0.75% in axillary perivascular brachial plexus block

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 1 2000
W. Erlacher
Introduction: The new long-acting local anesthetic ropivacaine is a chemical congener of bupivacaine and mepivacaine. The admixture of clonidine to local anesthetics in peripheral nerve block has been reported to result in a prolonged block. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of clonidine added to ropivacaine on onset, duration and quality of brachial plexus block. Methods: Patients were randomly allocated into two groups. In group I brachial plexus was performed using 40 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% plus 1 ml of NaCL 0.9%, and in group II brachial plexus was performed using 40 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% plus 1 ml (0.150 mg) of clonidine. Onset of sensory and motor block of radial, ulnar, median and musculocutaneous nerve were recorded. Motor block was evaluated by quantification of muscle force, according to a rating scale from 6 (normal contraction force) to 0 (complete paralysis). Sensory block was evaluated by testing response to a pinprick in the associated innervation areas. Finally, the duration of the sensory block was registered. Data were expressed in mean±SD. For statistical analysis a Student t -test was used. A P -value of ,0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: The duration of blockade was without significant difference between the groups. Group I: 718±90 min; Group II: 727±117 min. There was no intergroup difference in sensory and motor onset or in quality of blockade. Conclusion: The addition of clonidine to ropivacaine 0.75% does not lead to any advantage of block of the brachial plexus when compared with pure ropivacaine 0.75%. [source]

Great auricular nerve blockade using high resolution ultrasound: a volunteer study

ANAESTHESIA, Issue 8 2010
A. Thallaj
Summary This prospective, observational volunteer study aimed to describe the appearance of the great auricular nerve using ultrasound and its blockade under ultrasound guidance. An in-plane needle guidance technique was used for blockade of the great auricular nerve with 0.1 ml mepivacaine 1%. Sensory block was evaluated by pinprick testing in comparison with the contralateral area propriae. The great auricular nerve was successfully seen in all volunteers and the tail of the helix, antitragus, lobula and mandibular angle were blocked in all cases whereas the antihelix and concha were never blocked. Ultrasound imaging of the great auricular nerve can be reliably achieved and successful blockade with minimal volumes of local anaesthetic is another example of the benefits of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks. [source]

The relation between skin temperature increase and sensory block height in spinal anaesthesia using infrared thermography

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 9 2010
F. G. A. M. Van HAREN
Background and objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of determining the extent of sympathetic blockade by skin temperature measurement with infrared thermography and relate the cranial extent of the temperature increase to that of the sensory block after spinal anaesthesia. Methods: Before and 5, 10 and 20 min after the administration of spinal anaesthesia, skin temperatures were measured with infrared thermography at the dermatomes T2,L3, in 12 male patients scheduled for lower limb surgery. The most cephalad dermatome at which sensory blockade occurred was related to the dermatome at which the largest temperature jump (corrected for baseline temperature) occurred. Results: The baseline temperatures showed considerable variation across the dermatomes, being lower below T12 than at the thoracic dermatomes. The mean difference between the level of the cephalad skin temperature elevation front (mean 1.03 °C, SD 0.8 °C) and cranial sensory block height was 0.10 dermatomes (SD 1.16), correlation coefficient (0.88, P<0.001). Conclusion: The varying baseline temperatures across the trunk, the limited sympathetic block-induced increase in skin temperature at the trunk and the difficult control of influences from the surroundings partly obscured the extent of the skin temperature increase and its correlation to sensory block height. These factors have to be controlled to improve the use of infrared cameras as an easy bedside tool for predicting the cranial extent of (sympathetic blockade during) spinal anaesthesia. [source]

Intrathecal sufentanil decreases the median effective dose (ED50) of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine for caesarean delivery

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 3 2010
X. CHEN
Background: The addition of opioid to local anaesthetics has become a well-accepted practice of spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery. Successful caesarean delivery anaesthesia has been reported with the use of a low dose of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine coadministered with sufentanil. This prospective, double-blinded study determined the median effective dose (ED50) of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine with and without sufentanil for caesarean delivery, to quantify the sparing effect of sufentanil on the ED50 of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine. Methods: Sixty-four parturients undergoing elective caesarean delivery with combined spinal,epidural anaesthesia were randomized into two groups: Group R (ropivacaine) and Group RS (ropivacaine plus sufentanil 5 ,g). The initial dose of ropivacaine was 13 mg in Group R and 10 mg in Group RS. The effective dose was defined as a T6 level attained within 10 min and no supplemental epidural anaesthetic required during surgery. Effective or ineffective responses determined, respectively, a 0.3 mg decrease or increase of the dose of ropivacaine for the next patient using an up,down sequential allocation. Results: The ED50 of intrathecal ropivacaine was 11.2 mg [confidence interval (CI) 95%: 11.0,11.6] in Group R vs. 8.1 mg (CI 95%: 7.8,8.3) in Group RS. Motor block was markedly more intense in Group R than in Group RS, and the incidence of shivering was lower in Group RS than in Group R. There were no differences in the onset time of sensory block or motor block, in the incidence of hypotension, nausea and vomiting. Conclusion: Intrathecal sufentanil 5 ,g produced a 28% reduction of ED50 of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine for caesarean delivery. [source]

Single stimulation of the posterior cord is superior to dual nerve stimulation in a coracoid block

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 2 2010
J. RODRÍGUEZ
Background: Both multiple injection and single posterior cord injection techniques are associated with extensive anesthesia of the upper limb after an infraclavicular coracoid block (ICB). The main objective of this study was to directly compare the efficacy of both techniques in terms of the rates of completely anesthetizing cutaneous nerves below the elbow. Methods: Seventy patients undergoing surgery at or below the elbow were randomly assigned to receive an ICB after the elicitation of either a single radial nerve-type response (Radial group) or of two different main nerve-type responses of the upper limb, except for the radial nerve (Dual group). Forty milliliters of 1.5% mepivacaine was given in a single or a dual dose, according to group assignment. The sensory block was assessed in each of the cutaneous nerves at 10, 20 and 30 min. Block performance times and the rates of complete anesthesia below the elbow were also noted. Results: Higher rates of sensory block of the radial nerve were found in the Radial group at 10, 20 and 30 min (P<0.05). The rates of sensory block of the ulnar nerve at 30 min were 97% and 75% in the Radial and in the Dual groups, respectively (P<0.05). The rate of complete anesthesia below the elbow was also higher in the Radial group at 30 min (P<0.05). Conclusions: Injection of a local anesthetic after a single stimulation of the radial nerve fibers produced more extensive anesthesia than using a dual stimulation technique under the conditions of our study. [source]

Transient neurological symptoms after spinal anaesthesia with levobupivacaine 5 mg/ml or lidocaine 20 mg/ml

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 1 2010
M. GOZDEMIR
Background: Transient neurological symptoms (TNS) after spinal anaesthesia have been reported most commonly in association with lidocaine, but have been observed with other local anaesthetics. The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to investigate the incidence of TNS after spinal anaesthesia with either levobupivacaine or lidocaine. Methods: Patients undergoing inguinal hernia, appendectomy, varicose vein or minor orthopaedic operations were included in the study (60 patients; 47 male, 13 female, overall mean age 30 years). All patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of I or II. The patients were randomly assigned to receive spinal anaesthesia with either 20 mg isobaric levobupivacaine (5 mg/ml) or 80 mg isobaric lidocaine (20 mg/ml). Onset of sensory and motor block and side effects were recorded. On post-operative days 1, 2, and 3, patients were interviewed by an investigator blinded to the spinal anaesthetic used. The patients were classified as having TNS if, following recovery from anaesthesia, there was pain in the buttocks, thighs and/or lower limbs. Results: In the levobupivacaine group, one patient (3.33%) experienced TNS, whereas in the lidocaine group, eight (26.6%) experienced TNS (P=0.002). Maximum times to arrival of sensory blocks were shorter with lidocaine (P<0.001). The levobupivacaine and lidocaine groups did not differ significantly in terms of the highest dermatome included in sensory block or motor block grade. Conclusion: After spinal anaesthesia with levobupivacaine, the incidence of TNS was much less than after lidocaine. However, it appears that TNS may occur in association with levobupivacaine. [source]

Spread of spinal block in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 1 2010
K. A. LEINO
Background: In clinical practice, we noticed a greater than expected spread of sensory spinal block in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. We decided to test this impression and compared the spread of standard spinal anaesthesia in rheumatoid and non-rheumatoid control patients. Methods: Spinal anaesthesia with 3.4 ml (17 mg) of plain bupivacaine was administered to 50 patients with seropositive rheumatioid arthritis and to 50 non-rheumatoid control patients. The protocol was standardised for all patients. All the patients were undergoing lower limb surgery and the rheumatoid patients were operated on due to their rheumatoid disease. The spread of sensory block was recorded 30 min from the dural puncture using a pin prick test and a cold ice-filled container. The impact of body mass index (BMI), height and age on the spread were analysed. Results: The spread of sensory block was greater in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (15.6±3.1 dermatomes) than in non-rheumatoid patients (14.1±3.3 dermatomes) (P<0.05). Increasing BMI was related to cephalad spread of block in the rheumatoid group (P<0.05), but not in the control group. Conclusion: The mean spread of sensory block 30 min after the injection of plain bupivacaine was 1.5 segments cephalad in patients with rheumatoid arthritis than in those without this disease. BMI might be a patient-related factor contributing to the extent of the block in rheumatoid patients. These findings should be considered when performing a spinal block in rheumatoid patients. [source]

Single vs. double stimulation during a lateral sagittal infraclavicular block

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 10 2009
E. AKY
Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of single vs. dual control during an ultrasound-guided lateral sagittal infraclavicular block on the efficacy of sensory block and the time of block onset. Methods: In a prospective manner, 60 adult patients scheduled for distal upper limb surgery were randomly allocated to single (Group S) or double stimulation (Group D) groups. A local anesthetic (LA) mixture of 20 ml of levobupivacaine 5 mg/ml and 20 ml of lidocaine 20 mg/ml with 5 ,g/ml epinephrine (total 40 ml) was administered in both groups. In the Group S following a median, an ulnar or a radial nerve response, the entire LA was administered at a single site. In Group D 10 ml of LA was administered following the electrolocation of the musculocutaneous nerve and 30 ml LA was injected following median, ulnar or radial nerves. A successful block was defined as analgesia or anesthesia of all five nerves distal to the elbow. Sensory and motor blocks were tested at 5-min intervals for 30 min. Results: The block was successful in 27 patients in Group S and 28 patients in Group D. The time from starting the block until satisfactory anesthesia was significantly shorter in Group D than in Group S (19.3 vs. 23.2 min) (P<0.05). Total sensory scores were significantly higher in the double stimulation group at 20 and 30 min after the block performance (P<0.05). Conclusions: Although the block performance time was longer in the double stimulation group, block onset time and extent of anesthesia were more favorable in the double stimulation group. [source]

Perineural meperidine blocks nerve conduction in a dose-related manner: a randomized double-blind study

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 6 2009
E. ÖZTÜRK
Background: Meperidine has been shown to exhibit a sensory block in peripheral nerves. However, its motor blockade ability is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate, electroneurographically, the ability of meperidine to inhibit conduction in both sensory and motor fibres in the ulnar nerve. Materials and methods: The study was conducted in a double-blind, placebo-controlled fashion. Eighteen healthy volunteers were randomized into three groups (Saline, meperidine 1% and meperidine 2%). Three millilitre of the study solution was administered to the ulnar nerve perineurally at the level of the wrist by the guidance of a nerve stimulator. Sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) and compound motor action potential (CMAP) amplitudes were recorded. At least a 20% decrease in the initial response amplitude was accepted as a block. Results: The number of individuals with sensory and motor block with saline, meperidine 1% and meperidine 2% were 0/6, 6/6, 6/6 and 0/6, 5/6, 6/6, respectively (P<0.05). The maximum decrease in the median SNAP and CMAP amplitude values were 4.7% and 8.3% with saline; 38.5% and 46.4% with meperidine 1%; and 100% and 97.8% with meperidine 2%, respectively (P<0.05). Median values for the duration of sensory and motor block with meperidine 1% and meperidine 2% were 45, 52.5 and 30, 32.5 min, respectively. Conclusion: Meperidine blocks sensory and motor nerve conduction in a dose-related manner. [source]

Unilateral spinal anaesthesia for outpatient surgery: a comparison between hyperbaric bupivacaine and bupivacaine,clonidine combination

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 6 2009
R. MERIVIRTA
Backround: Low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine has been used to produce unilateral spinal anaesthesia for outpatient surgery. Unilateral spinal anaesthesia is associated with reduction of hypotension, faster recovery and increased patient satisfaction. Small doses of clonidine have shown effectiveness in intensifying spinal anaesthesia. We investigated the effect of adding 15 ,g of clonidine to 5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine on unilaterality. Methods: Sixty patients undergoing outpatient knee arthroscopy were randomly allocated to receive either 1.2 ml (6 mg) of hyperbaric bupivacaine or a 1.2 ml solution containing 1.0 ml (5 mg) hyperbaric bupivacaine, 0.1 ml (75 ,g) clonidine and 0.1 ml sterile water. The motor block was assessed by a modified Bromage scale and the sensory block by a pinprick. Results: There was a significant difference in the spread of anaesthesia between the operated and contralateral sides in both groups. Seventy-seven per cent of the blocks were unilateral in group B and 73% in group B-C. There was no significant difference between the groups, in unilaterality. The motor block was prolonged in group B-C but it did not affect home-readiness. Patients receiving clonidine needed more vasopressors. There was a significant difference in blood pressures between the groups, being lower in group B-C after 1 h 45 min. Conclusion: Using 5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine with 15 ,g of clonidine, the unilaterality can be achieved and spinal anaesthesia intensified without affecting home-readiness. More vasopressors are needed in the beginning, but after the surgery patients experienced less pain. [source]

A comparison of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular blocks for upper extremity surgery

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 5 2009
Z. J. KOSCIELNIAK-NIELSEN
Background: Ultrasound (US)-guided supraclavicular or infraclavicular blocks are commonly used for upper extremity surgery. The aims of this randomized study were to compare the block performance and onset times, effectiveness, incidence of adverse events and patient's acceptance of US-guided supraclavicular or infraclavicular blocks. We hypothesized that the supraclavicular approach, being more superficial and easier to visualize using a 10 MHz transducer, will produce a faster and a more extensive sensory block. Methods: One hundred and twenty patients were randomized to two equal groups: supraclavicular (S) and infraclavicular (I). Each patient received a mixture containing equal volumes of ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml and mepivacaine 20 mg/ml with adrenaline 5 ,g/ml, 0.5 ml/kg body weight (minimum 30 ml, maximum 50 ml). The sensory score (anaesthesia , 2 points, analgesia , 1 point and pain , 0 point) of the seven terminal nerves was assessed every 10 min. Patients were declared ready for surgery when they had an effective surgical block , anaesthesia or analgesia of the five nerves below the elbow. Thirty minutes after the block, the unblocked nerves were supplemented. The block performance and latency times, surgical effectiveness, adverse events and patient's acceptance were recorded. Results: Significantly more patients in the I group were ready for surgery 20 and 30 min after the block. The mean block performance time was 5.7 min in the S group and 5.0 min in the I group (NS). Block effectiveness was superior in the I group: 93% vs. 78% in the S group (P=0.017). The S group patients had a significantly poorer block of the median and ulnar nerves, but a better block of the axillary nerve. Sensory scores at 10, 20 and 30 min were not significantly different. Thirty-two patients in the S group vs. nine patients in the I group experienced transient adverse events (P<0.0001). Patients' acceptance of the block was similar in both groups. Conclusions: Infraclavicular block had a faster onset, better surgical effectiveness and fewer adverse events. Block performance time and patients' acceptance of the procedure were similar in both groups. [source]

Comparison of intrathecal magnesium, fentanyl, or placebo combined with bupivacaine 0.5% for parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 3 2009
H. UNLUGENC
Background: Intrathecal (i.t.) administration of magnesium has been reported to potentiate opioid antinociception in rats and humans. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, study, we investigated the sensory, motor, and analgesic block characteristics of i.t. magnesium 50 mg compared with fentanyl 25 ,g and saline when added to 0.5% bupivacaine (10 mg). Methods: Ninety ASA I or II adult patients undergoing cesarean section were randomly allocated to receive 1.0 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride in group S, 50 mg of magnesium sulfate (1.0 ml) 5% in group M, or 25 ,g of fentanyl (1.0 ml) in group F following 10 mg of bupivacaine 0.5% i.t. We recorded the following: onset and duration of sensory and motor block, maximal sensory block height, the time to reach the maximal dermatomal level of sensory block, and the duration of spinal anesthesia. Results: Magnesium did not shorten the onset time of sensory and motor blockade or prolong the duration of spinal anesthesia. The duration of sensory (P<0.032) and motor (P<0.002) blockade was significantly shorter in M and S groups than in the F group. The time to reach the maximal dermatomal level of sensory block was significantly shorter in the F group than in the S and M groups (P<0.002). Conclusion: In patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia, the addition of magnesium sulfate (50 mg) i.t. to 10 mg of spinal bupivacaine (0.5%) did not shorten the onset time of sensory and motor blockade or prolong the duration of spinal anesthesia, as seen with fentanyl. [source]

Intrathecal ropivacaine 5 mg/ml for outpatient knee arthroscopy: a comparison with lidocaine 10 mg/ml

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 1 2009
G. FANELLI
Purpose: The aim of this prospective, randomised, blind study was to compare the evolution of spinal block produced with 50 mg lidocaine 10 mg/ml and 10 mg ropivacaine 5 mg/ml for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Methods: Thirty outpatients undergoing knee arthroscopy received 50 mg of lidocaine 10 mg/ml (n=15) or 10 mg of ropivacaine 5 mg/ml (n=15) intrathecally. The evolution of spinal block was recorded until home discharge, while the occurrence of transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) was evaluated through phone-call follow-ups. Results: The median onset time was 15 (10,21) min with lidocaine and 24 (11,37) min with ropivacaine (P=0.109). Spinal lidocaine resulted in a faster resolution of sensory block [148 (130,167) min vs. 188 (146,231) (P=0.022)], unassisted ambulation with crutches [176 (144,208) min vs. 240 (179,302) min (P=0.014)], and voiding [208 (163,254) min vs. 293 (242,343) min (P=0.001)] than ropivacaine. Recovery of motor function required 113 (95,131) min with lidocaine and 135 (87,183) with ropivacaine (P=0.219). Six lidocaine patients reported TNS (40%) as compared with no patient receiving ropivacaine (0%) (P=0.005). Conclusions: Spinal block produced with 10 mg ropivacaine 5 mg/ml is as effective as that produced by 50 mg of lidocaine 10 mg/ml. Recovery of unassisted ambulation and spontaneous voiding occurred earlier with lidocaine, but this was associated with a markedly higher incidence of TNS. [source]

The effect of adding intrathecal magnesium sulphate to bupivacaine,fentanyl spinal anaesthesia

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 10 2005
M. Özalevli
Background:, The addition of intrathecal (IT) magnesium to spinal fentanyl prolongs the duration of spinal analgesia for vaginal delivery. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study, we investigated the effect of adding IT magnesium sulphate to bupivacaine,fentanyl spinal anaesthesia. Methods:, One hundred and two ASA I or II adult patients undergoing lower extremity surgery were recruited. They were randomly allocated to receive 1.0 ml of preservative-free 0.9% sodium chloride (group S) or 50 mg of magnesium sulphate 5% (1.0 ml) (group M) following 10 mg of bupivacaine 0.5% plus 25 µg of fentanyl intrathecally. We recorded the following: onset and duration of sensory block, the highest level of sensory block, the time to reach the highest dermatomal level of sensory block and to complete motor block recovery and the duration of spinal anaesthesia. Results:, Magnesium caused a delay in the onset of both sensory and motor blockade. The highest level of sensory block was significantly lower in group M than in group S at 5, 10 and 15 min (P < 0.001). The median time to reach the highest dermatomal level of sensory block was 17 min in group M and 13 min in group S (P < 0.05). The mean degree of motor block was also lower in group M at 5, 10 and 15 min (P < 0.001). The median duration of spinal anaesthesia was longer in group M (P < 0.001). Conclusion:, In patients undergoing lower extremity surgery, the addition of IT magnesium sulphate (50 mg) to spinal anaesthesia induced by bupivacaine and fentanyl significantly delayed the onset of both sensory and motor blockade, but also prolonged the period of anaesthesia without additional side-effects. [source]

Feasibility of electromyography (sEMG) in measuring muscular activity during spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 4 2005
L. Niemi-Murola
Background:, Bromage scale (0,3) is used to measure the degree of motor block during spinal anaesthesia. However, an estimation of motor block is difficult during surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of surface EMG describing spontaneous muscular activity in the lower extremities during spinal anaesthesia. Methods:, In part I of the study, 13 patients undergoing day case surgery were studied. They received 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine at interspace L3,4. EMG, sensory and muscular block were measured at 5-min intervals during the first 30 min and then every 15 min until the patient was able to flex the knee. In part II of the study, 16 patients undergoing knee arthroplasty received 10 mg bupivacaine through spinal catheter at interspace L3,4 (Group CSA). An additional bolus of 2.5 mg was administered using EMG-guidance, if needed. Another group, 15 patients, received a single bolus of bupivacaine (15,20 mg) at L3,4 (Group Bolus). EMG, muscular and sensory block were monitored as described above. The epidural catheter was used as rescue. Results:, Part I: EMG compared to modified Bromage scale showed a significant correlation (P < 0.01, Spearman rank correlation). Part II: The amount of bupivacaine was significantly reduced with EMG guidance when compared with the single bolus group (14.0 mg vs. 17.0 mg) (P < 0.05 Mann,Whitney U). Motor block started to recover before the sensory block in 7/15 CSA patients vs. 1/15 Bolus patient. Conclusion:, Stable maximal sensory block does not necessarily correlate with adequate motor block in patients receiving spinal anaesthesia induced with small bolus doses. In spite of electrical noise, EMG-guided administration of spinal anaesthesia significantly reduced the amount of bupivacaine compared to the hospital routine. Further studies are needed to develop the method. [source]

Which administration route of fentanyl better enhances the spread of spinal anaesthesia: intravenous, intrathecal or both?

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 9 2003
A. Kararmaz
Background:, To enhance the spread of spinal anaesthesia, fentanyl may be administered intrathecally (i.t.) or intravenously (i.v.). The purpose of this prospective study was to investigate the effects of fentanyl administered i.v., i.t. or concurrently by both i.v. and spinal routes on the spread of spinal anaesthesia. Methods:, Sixty patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups. In Groups I and II, spinal anaesthesia was performed with plain bupivacaine 10 mg plus 20 µg fentanyl and in Group III with 10 mg of plain bupivacaine. The level of first peak sensory block was marked. In addition, fentanyl 50 µg was administered i.v. in Groups II and III or by saline in Group I after the sensory blockade reached the highest dermatomal level. Ten minutes after i.v. administration, the level of the second peak sensory block was marked. The distance between the first- and second-highest levels of sensory block was measured. Results:, The distance between the first- and second-highest level of sensory block was significantly different for the three groups: Group II (5.8 ± 2.6 cm) > Group III (2.9 ± 2.1 cm) > Group I (,0.15 ± 1.7 cm). The peak dermatomal level of spinal block was significantly higher in Group II [T4 (T3,T7)] than in Group I [T6 (T4,T9)] and Group III [T6 (T4-T8)]. In Groups I and II the sensory block regressed to S2 for a longer period of time than it did in Group III. Conclusion:, Both the spinal and systemic administration of fentanyl enhanced the spread of spinal anaesthesia. The co-administration of spinal and i.v. fentanyl produced a greater increase in the cephalad spread of spinal block. [source]

Bradycardia and asystolic cardiac arrest during spinal anaesthesia: A report of five cases

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 1 2000
R. Z. Løvstad
Sudden, severe bradycardia/asystolic cardiac arrest are considered infrequent, but are certainly the most serious complications of spinal anaesthesia. We report four cases of primary asystole and one of severe bradycardia in young to middle-aged, healthy patients scheduled for minor surgery at the day surgery unit. Bradycardia/asystole were not related to respiratory depression or hypoxaemia/hypercarbia; they occurred at different time intervals after the onset of spinal anaesthesia (10,70 min) and, apparently, were not dependent on the level of sensory block, which varied between T3 and T8. One patient was nauseated seconds before the asystole, otherwise there was no warning signs. All the patients were easily resuscitated with the prompt administration of atropine and ephedrine and, in the case of cardiac arrest, cardiac massage and ventilation with oxygen. One patient was treated with a small dose of adrenaline. Four patients had the surgery, as planned; one had the surgery postponed. All the patients were discharged from hospital in good health and did not suffer any sequelae. [source]

The effects of clonidine on ropivacaine 0.75% in axillary perivascular brachial plexus block

Spread of local anaesthetic solution in epidural space visualisation with ultrasound in single shot caudals

PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 6 2007
K. Raghavan
Background:, Ultrasonography is becoming an important adjunct in paediatric neuraxial blockade. Ultrasound guidance helps in visualisation of relevant neuraxial structures, predicting depth of epidural space from skin, reduction in bony contact and faster epidural placement. The visibility of neuraxial structures declines in patients as age increases. To date, there are no studies looking at the extent of spread of local anaesthetic solution in the epidural space and its correlation to the volume used, under ultrasound guidance. We report the results of our audit on spread of local anaesthetic solution in the epidural space in single shot caudal blocks. This abstract is based on the first 17 patients, the presentation will be based on all 50 patients. Methods:, This audit was approved by the local audit committee. We aimed to follow the extent of the spread of local anaesthetic within the epidural space with real time ultrasonography. Patients were selected when the planned anaesthetic included a single shot caudal block. The anaesthetists performing the anaesthetic and the caudal block consented to our ultrasound visualisation. All patients were below 5 years of age. No attempt was made to standardise the technique, the dose, or the speed of injection. After the placement of the caudal cannula by the primary anaesthetist involved in patient care, a separate anaesthetist, experienced in using ultrasound, visualised the neuraxial structures and subsequent spread of the local anaesthetic solution with real time ultrasound. The spread was followed during the injection and for 10 s after the completion of the injection. A 5 cm 7.5,12 MHz linear array was used longitudinally with either midline or paramedian approach. Results:, We are reporting the preliminary results from 17 patients. Patients were aged between 1 day and 1 year 10 months. They weighed between 3.3 kg and 14.6 kg. Either 22 gauge Jelco or Abbocath were used to perform the procedure; 0.25% or 0.20% L-bupivacaine was used on all occasions. The volume administered per kg ranged between 0.33 and 1.27 ml. The visibility of neuraxial structures was good on all occasions. On calculating the Spearmans correlation coefficient, the extent of spread of local anaesthetic in the epidural space was positively correlated with the volume used by a correlation coefficient of 0.64, with a P value of 0.008. The postoperative pain score in recovery was 0 in 16 out of the 17 cases. The one failure occurred when the observed spread would not have been expected to provide analgesia for the performed operation. Conclusions:, Among children below 5 years of age, there seems to be a positive correlation between the volume of local anaesthetic injected into the epidural space and the extent of its spread. This needs to be further investigated by a prospective randomised control trial. The utility of real time ultrasound to allow a reliable achievement of a desired level of sensory block, should be investigated i.e, whether the volume used in achieving a desired level of local anaesthetic spread, as guided by ultrasound, provides superior analgesia and fewer adverse effects compared with the volume calculated using the Armitage regimen. References, 1,Rapp HJ, Folger A, Grau T. Ultrasound guided epidural catheter insertion in children. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 333,339. 2,Willschke H, Marhofer P, Bosenberg A, et al. Epidural catheter placement in children: comparing a novel approach using ultrasound guidance and a standard loss of resistance technique. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97: 200,207. 3,Marhofer P, Bosenberg A, Sitzwohl C et al. Pilot study of neuraxial imaging by ultrasound in infants and children. Pediatr Anesth 2005; 15: 671,676. [source]

Ultrasonographic guided axillary plexus blocks with low volumes of local anaesthetics: a crossover volunteer study

ANAESTHESIA, Issue 3 2010
P. Marhofer
Summary Our study group recently evaluated an ED95 local anaesthetic volume of 0.11 ml.mm,2 cross-sectional nerve area for the ulnar nerve. This prospective, randomised, double-blind crossover study investigated whether this volume is sufficient for brachial plexus blocks at the axillary level. Ten volunteers received an ultrasonographic guided axillary brachial plexus block either with 0.11 (,low' volume) or 0.4 (,high' volume) ml.mm,2 cross-sectional nerve area with mepivacaine 1%. The mean (SD) volume was in the low volume group 4.0 (1.0) and 14.8 (3.8) ml in the high volume group. The success rate for the individual nerve blocks was 27 out of 30 in the low volume group (90%) and 30 out of 30 in the high volume group (100%), resulting in 8 out of 10 (80%) vs 10 out of 10 (100%) complete blocks in the low vs the high volume groups, respectively (NS). The mean (SD) sensory onset time was 25.0 (14.8) min in the low volume group and 15.8 (6.8) min in the high volume group (p < 0.01). The mean (SD) duration of sensory block was 125 (38) min in the low volume group and 152 (70) min in the high volume group (NS). This study confirms our previous published ED95 volume for mepivacaine 1% to block peripheral nerves. The volume of local anaesthetic has some influence on the sensory onset time. [source]

Effect of epidural saline washout on regression of sensory and motor block after epidural anaesthesia with 2% lidocaine and fentanyl in elderly patients

ANAESTHESIA, Issue 3 2009
E. Y. Park
Summary Seventy elderly males received lumbar epidural anaesthesia with 12 ml of 2% lidocaine containing fentanyl 50 ,g. At the end of transurethral surgery, the washout group (n = 33) received an epidural bolus of 30 ml saline while the control group (n = 34) did not. Mean (SD) times to 1-grade (17.2 (11.9) vs 32.7 (11.3) min) and 2-grade regression (23.8 (12.2) vs 56.0 (23.9) min) of motor block, 3-dermatomal sensory regression (31.4 (11.6) vs 42.2 (14.4) min for cold and 30.8 (15.6) vs 40.6 (14.2) min for pinprick), and regression to S1 (57.7 (16.1) vs 76.2 (20.2) min for cold and 56.8 (17.3) vs 69.2 (16.2) min for pinprick) were significantly shorter in the washout group than the control group. There were no differences in postoperative pain scores and side effects between the two groups. We concluded that epidural washout facilitates regression of both motor and sensory block following epidural anaesthesia without reducing the postoperative analgesic benefit. [source]

The use of low dose plain solutions of local anaesthetic agents for spinal anaesthesia in the prone position: bupivacaine compared with levobupivacaine

ANAESTHESIA, Issue 1 2009
O. Cuvas
Summary In this study, we aimed to test the hypothesis that 1-ml plain solution of 0.5% bupivacaine or 0.5% levopubivacaine administered in a subarachnoid block can provide adequate anaesthesia and operating conditions for pilonidal cyst/sinus operations performed in the prone position. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of patient demographic data, duration of operation, patient-surgeon satisfaction, haemodynamic changes and side effects. There were no significant differences found in the onset time, highest block level achieved, two segment regression, time to S2 regression of sensory block and the number of anaesthetised dermatomes, between the two groups (p = 0.077, 0.057, 0.091, 0.084 and 0.057 respectively). The incidence of complete motor blockade was 16% and 8% in Group B at the start and at the end of the operation. There was no complete motor blockade in Group L (p = 0.110 and 0.490 respectively). We conclude that both regimens are effective and safe for use in subarachnoid anaesthesia for pilonidal cyst/sinus operations performed in the prone position. [source]