Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Sexual Females (sexual + female)
Selected AbstractsThe function of mate choice in sticklebacks: optimizing Mhc genetics,JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, Issue 2003M. Milinski Sexual reproduction is an evolutionary ,puzzle'. A sexual female ,throws away' half of her genes (during meiosis), and ,fills up' what she lost with genes from a male. Thus, sexual reproduction can only be successful if the offspring with the new mixture of genes should be more than twice as fit as if she had just made a copy of herself. A challenging hypothesis assumes that infectious diseases select for females that reshuffle the immune genes for their offspring in each generation. The required increase in quality could be achieved by females selectively ,smelling out' suitable immune-genes (i.e. Mhc alleles) in potential partners, which, in combination with the female's genes, offer optimal resistance against quickly changing infectious diseases. It was found that most three spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus in natural populations around Plön, Germany, had intermediate instead of maximal numbers of different Mhc class IIB alleles. Furthermore, fish with an intermediate number of different Mhc alleles were infected with the lowest number of both parasite species and parasites per species. This suggests that Mhc heterozygosity was optimized instead of maximized. Can this immunogenetic optimum be achieved through female choice? In a flow channel design that allowed the detection of olfactory signals only, it was found that female three-spined sticklebacks that were ready to spawn preferred males as mates that in combination with their Mhc alleles would allow the production of offspring with the optimal number of Mhc alleles. Thus, mate choice in three-spined sticklebacks could have the two-fold advantage over asexual reproduction that is required to maintain sexual reproduction. The interaction of olfactory with visual signals in three-spined stickleback mate choice is discussed. The three-spined stickleback is a suitable model organism for studying the evolution of sexual reproduction in relation to optimizing offspring immune genetics although other fishes may be as suitable. [source] Use of freshwater rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus in screening assay for potential endocrine disruptorsENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY & CHEMISTRY, Issue 12 2000Benjamin L. Preston Abstract eports of the effectsofendocrinedisruptorsonaquatic invertebrates arebecoming increasingly common. However, little is known about the endocrine systems of most aquatic invertebrates, limiting the development of assays based on endocrine mechanisms. As a result, endocrine disruption is often inferred through the effects caused by the chemical of interest, making it difficult to rule out other mechanisms of toxicity. To be a good candidate for an endocrine disruptor, effects should be observed in processes known to be under endocrine control, at life stages where endocrine signals are known to be active, and at concentrations below acute and chronic toxic effects. We developed a 96-h reproductive assay using the freshwater rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus to screen for potential endocrine disruptors and examined cadmium, chlorpyrifos, naphthol, pentachlorophenol, estradiol, methoprene, precocene, nonylphenol, flutamide, and testosterone for effects on asexual and sexual reproduction. Flutamide, testosterone, and nonylphenol inhibited fertilization of sexual females at concentrations of 1, 10, and 50 ,g/L, respectively. The fertilization no-observable-effect concentrations (NOECs) for these compounds were 5 to 200 times lower than previously described reproduction NOECs for B. calyciflorus. Sexual reproduction was inhibited with no effects on asexual reproduction, increasing the likelihood that these specific reproductive effects occurred through an endocrine mechanism. Rotifer reproduction assays may be a useful, rapid, and inexpensive method for screening compounds suspected to have endocrine disrupting activity in aquatic invertebrates. [source] The maintenance of sex: host,parasite coevolution with density-dependent virulenceJOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, Issue 10 2009C. M. LIVELY Abstract Why don't asexual females replace sexual females in most natural populations of eukaryotes? One promising explanation is that parasites could counter the reproductive advantages of asexual reproduction by exerting frequency-dependent selection against common clones (the Red Queen hypothesis). One apparent limitation of the Red Queen theory, however, is that parasites would seem to be required by theory to be highly virulent. In the present study, I present a population-dynamic view of competition between sexual females and asexual females that interact with co-evolving parasites. The results show that asexual populations have higher carrying capacities, and more unstable population dynamics, than sexual populations. The results also suggest that the spread of a clone into a sexual population could increase the effective parasite virulence as population density increases. This combination of parasite-mediated frequency-dependent selection, and density-dependent virulence, could lead to the coexistence of sexual and asexual reproductive strategies and the long-term persistence of sex. [source] Reproductive performance of clonal and sexual bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in the fieldJOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, Issue 5 2000Lřyning In Ips acuminatus (Gyll.) parthenogenetic females occur together with sexual females and with sexual males upon which they depend for sperm. In a reciprocal-transplant experiment, I studied fecundity differences among parthenogenetic and sexual females from two populations that differ dramatically in the proportion of clonal females. In a second experiment, I studied competition between larvae from different mothers and between females from the two source populations. Fecundity measured by the number of eggs per egg tunnel was influenced by the ambient environment at the sites of the experiment as well as the origin of the female, and was generally higher for clonal than for sexual females at both sites. In experimental groups where larvae competed with larvae from their own population (pure treatments), the number of surviving pupae was significantly lower than in groups where females from the two source populations were mixed. The high fecundity of clonal females makes coexistence of the two types of females difficult to explain. It makes the reproductive advantage associated with clonality in I. acuminatus even higher than the two-fold difference due to asexuality per sé. The significant differences in the number of pupae in mixed vs. pure groups suggest ecological divergence between sexual and clonal females. This would make the mortality of larvae not only density dependent, but also frequency dependent, which could explain the coexistence of sexual and clonal females. [source] Can punishment maintain sex?OIKOS, Issue 2 2008Daniel J. Rankin Individuals who reproduce asexually have a two-fold advantage over their sexually-reproducing counterparts as they are able to reproduce twice as fast. Explaining why sexual reproduction is favoured over asexual reproduction therefore remains an important challenge in evolutionary biology. Various mechanisms involving resistance to parasites, adaptation to novel environments and helping to purge the genome of deleterious mutations have all been proposed as potential mechanisms which could promote the evolution of sex. A recent article has suggested that spiteful males may help to reduce the two-fold advantage of asexual females. Here I discuss this idea, and further ask whether punishment of asexual females by sexual females could be one way in which sexual reproduction could be maintained in groups of animals; in light of recent research on the repression of competition, it could be possible that asexual females which reproduce faster than their sexual counterparts will be punished for using group resources. It may therefore be possible that the behaviour of sexual individuals towards asexual females could have fitness consequences which could potentially reduce the two-fold advantage they gain from reproducing parthenogenetically. [source] | ||||||||||