Home About us Contact | |||
Separate Procedure (separate + procedure)
Selected AbstractsSafety, Efficacy, and Cost Advantages of Combined Coronary Angiography and AngioplastyJOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 3 2003CLAUDE LE FEUVRE M.D., F.E.S.C. Aim: The safety and efficacy of ad hoc PTCA has been previously reported and this approach is performed in many angioplasty centers as a routine procedure. The aim of this study is to examine whether this approach reduces the length, and cost of hospital stay. Methods and results: To determine the hospital costs we studied 2,440 PTCAs over 11 years in our institution (1990,2000). Urgent PTCA for acute coronary syndromes refractory to medical treatment were excluded. In 1809 patients (74%) angioplasty was performed immediately after coronary angiography, while separate procedures were performed in 631 patients. Indication for PTCA was unstable angina in 1342 patients (55%). In the ad hoc PTCA group, 92% of the culprit lesions were successfully treated; complications included myocardial infarction (2%), urgent bypass surgery (0.6%) and death (0.9%). The rate of combined procedure progressively increased from 54% in 1990 to 88% in 2000, with a significant decrease in the rate of complications. After adjusting for clinical and angiographic differences between combined and separate procedures, angiographic success and complication rates were not statistically different in the two groups. Mean length of hospital stay decreased all along the years, and was 45% less in the ad hoc PTCA group (11.4 ± 6.9vs18.2 ± 7.7in 1990,5.4 ± 4.3vs10.8 ± 5.7in 2000,P < 0.0001). The cost was 40% lower in the ad hoc PTCA group. For patients with stable angina, the savings were 49%, and for those with unstable angina, they were 29%. Conclusion: In the era of coronary stenting, ad hoc PTCA can be performed in most of the patients as safely and successfully as a separate procedure. It reduces the length, and the cost of hospital stay in patients with stable or unstable angina. (J Interven Cardiol 2003;16:195,199) [source] Combined radioguided occult lesion and sentinel node localization for breast cancerANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 7 2004Joon Kim Introduction: The incidence of non-palpable breast lesions requiring intraoperative localization has greatly increased, particularly because of the widespread use of mammographic screening. These lesions have previously been localized preoperatively using hook-wire or carbon track techniques. In the era of increasing acceptance of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) a separate procedure would be required for sentinel node localization (SNL). The present study describes an experience with ultrasound guided radionucleotide occult lesion localization (ROLL) as a reliable alternative that enables SNL synchronously. Methods: Twenty-two patients with proven breast malignancy on core biopsy were enrolled in the present study. Preoperatively, technetium-99m was injected around the lesion under radiological guidance. A ,-probe was then used to locate the lesion and guide its surgical removal. Complete excision was then confirmed immediately by verifying minimal residual radioactivity in the cavity wall tissue. Appropriate SNB then proceeded. Results: The primary breast lesion was identified in all cases except in one, where the radiotracer was injected into the wrong site, giving a miss rate of 1/22 (4.5%). The average size of the tumour was 13 mm (range 6,22 mm) and the closest margins ranged from 0 (1 patient) to 22 mm (mean 7 mm). Two patients had inadequate margins and required further excision giving a re-excision rate of 2/21 (9.5%). SNB specimens included a median of 3.7 nodes/patient Conclusion: Radionucleotide occult lesion localization/SNL is a simple, accurate and reliable method of combining localization of impalpable breast lesions with the localization required for SNB. The miss and re-excision rates compare favourably with the needle-wire systems and carbon tracking techniques. There are significant resource efficiency and time advantages. [source] Safety, Efficacy, and Cost Advantages of Combined Coronary Angiography and AngioplastyJOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 3 2003CLAUDE LE FEUVRE M.D., F.E.S.C. Aim: The safety and efficacy of ad hoc PTCA has been previously reported and this approach is performed in many angioplasty centers as a routine procedure. The aim of this study is to examine whether this approach reduces the length, and cost of hospital stay. Methods and results: To determine the hospital costs we studied 2,440 PTCAs over 11 years in our institution (1990,2000). Urgent PTCA for acute coronary syndromes refractory to medical treatment were excluded. In 1809 patients (74%) angioplasty was performed immediately after coronary angiography, while separate procedures were performed in 631 patients. Indication for PTCA was unstable angina in 1342 patients (55%). In the ad hoc PTCA group, 92% of the culprit lesions were successfully treated; complications included myocardial infarction (2%), urgent bypass surgery (0.6%) and death (0.9%). The rate of combined procedure progressively increased from 54% in 1990 to 88% in 2000, with a significant decrease in the rate of complications. After adjusting for clinical and angiographic differences between combined and separate procedures, angiographic success and complication rates were not statistically different in the two groups. Mean length of hospital stay decreased all along the years, and was 45% less in the ad hoc PTCA group (11.4 ± 6.9vs18.2 ± 7.7in 1990,5.4 ± 4.3vs10.8 ± 5.7in 2000,P < 0.0001). The cost was 40% lower in the ad hoc PTCA group. For patients with stable angina, the savings were 49%, and for those with unstable angina, they were 29%. Conclusion: In the era of coronary stenting, ad hoc PTCA can be performed in most of the patients as safely and successfully as a separate procedure. It reduces the length, and the cost of hospital stay in patients with stable or unstable angina. (J Interven Cardiol 2003;16:195,199) [source] ORIGINAL RESEARCH,SURGERY: A Large Multicenter Outcome Study of Female Genital Plastic SurgeryTHE JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, Issue 4pt1 2010Michael P. Goodman MD ABSTRACT Introduction., Female Genital Plastic Surgery, a relatively new entry in the field of Cosmetic and Plastic Surgery, has promised sexual enhancement and functional and cosmetic improvement for women. Are the vulvovaginal aesthetic procedures of Labiaplasty, Vaginoplasty/Perineoplasty ("Vaginal Rejuvenation") and Clitoral Hood Reduction effective, and do they deliver on that promise? For what reason do women seek these procedures? What complications are evident, and what effects are noted regarding sexual function for women and their partners? Who should be performing these procedures, what training should they have, and what are the ethical considerations? Aim., This study was designed to produce objective, utilizable outcome data regarding FGPS. Main Outcome Measures., 1) Reasons for considering surgery from both patient's and physician's perspective; 2) Pre-operative sexual functioning per procedure; 3) Overall patient satisfaction per procedure; 4) Effect of procedure on patient's sexual enjoyment, per procedure; 5) Patient's perception of effect on her partner's sexual enjoyment, per procedure; 6) Complications. Methods., This cross-sectional study, including 258 women and encompassing 341 separate procedures, comes from a group of twelve gynecologists, gynecologic urologists and plastic surgeons from ten centers in eight states nationwide. 104 labiaplasties, 24 clitoral hood reductions, 49 combined labiaplasty/clitoral hood reductions, 47 vaginoplasties and/or perineoplasties, and 34 combined labiaplasty and/or reduction of the clitoral hood plus vaginoplasty/perineoplasty procedures were studied retrospectively, analyzing both patient's and physician's perception of surgical rationale, pre-operative sexual function and several outcome criteria. Results., Combining the three groups, 91.6% of patients were satisfied with the results of their surgery after a 6,42 month follow-up. Significant subjective enhancement in sexual functioning for both women and their sexual partners was noted (p = 0.0078), especially in patients undergoing vaginal tightening/perineal support procedures. Complications were acceptable and not of major consequence. Conclusions., While emphasizing that these female genital plastic procedures are not performed to correct "abnormalities," as there is a wide range of normality in the external and internal female genitalia, both parous and nulliparous, many women chose to modify their vulvas and vaginas. From the results of this large study pooling data from a diverse group of experienced genital plastic surgeons, outcome in both general and sexual satisfaction appear excellent. Goodman MP, Placik OJ, Benson RH III, Miklos JR, Moore RD, Jason RA, Matlock DL, Simopoulos AF, Stern BH, Stanton RA, Kolb SE, and Gonzalez F. A large multicenter outcome study of female genital plastic surgery. J Sex Med 2010;7:1565,1577. [source] |