Home About us Contact | |||
Average Irradiance (average + irradiance)
Selected AbstractsGrowth rates of phytoplankton under fluctuating lightFRESHWATER BIOLOGY, Issue 2 2000Elena Litchman Summary 1The effect of light fluctuations on the growth rates of four species of freshwater phytoplankton was investigated. Experimental light regimes included constant irradiance and fluctuations of a step function form, with equal proportion of high (maximum of 240 µmol photons m -2 s -1) and low light (minimum of 5 µmol photons m -2 s -1) (or dark) in a period. Fluctuations of 1, 8 and 24-h periods were imposed over several average irradiances (25, 50, 100 and 120 µmol photons m -2 s -1). 2Growth rate responses to fluctuations were species-specific and depended on both the average irradiance and the period of fluctuations. Fluctuations at low average irradiances slightly increased growth rate of the diatom Nitzschia sp. and depressed growth of the cyanobacterium Phormidium luridum and the green alga Sphaerocystis schroeteri compared to a constant irradiance. 3Fluctuations at higher average irradiance did not have a significant effect on the growth rates of Nitzschia sp. and Sphaerocystis schroeteri (fluctuations around saturating irradiances) and slightly increased the growth rates of the cyanobacteria Anabaena flos-aquae and Phormidium luridum (when irradiance fluctuated between limiting and inhibiting levels). 4In general, the effect of fluctuations tended to be greater when irradiance fluctuated between limiting and saturating or inhibiting levels of a species growth-irradiance curve compared to fluctuations within a single region of the curve. 5The growth rates of species under fluctuating light could not always be predicted from their growth-irradiance curves obtained under constant irradiance. When fluctuations occur between limiting and saturating or inhibiting irradiances for the alga and when the period of fluctuations is long (greater than 8 h), steady-state growth-irradiance curves may be insufficient to predict growth rates adequately. Consequently, additional data on physiological acclimation, such as changes in photosynthetic parameters, may be required for predictions under non-constant light supply in comparison to constant conditions. [source] The contribution of bryophytes to the carbon exchange for a temperate rainforestGLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, Issue 8 2003Evan H. DeLucia Abstract Bryophytes blanket the floor of temperate rainforests in New Zealand and may influence a number of important ecosystem processes, including carbon cycling. Their contribution to forest floor carbon exchange was determined in a mature, undisturbed podocarp-broadleaved forest in New Zealand, dominated by 100,400-year-old rimu (Dacrydium cupressimum) trees. Eight species of mosses and 13 species of liverworts contributed to the 62% cover of the diverse forest floor community. The bryophyte community developed a relatively thin (depth <30 mm), but dense, canopy that experienced elevated CO2 partial pressures (median 46.6 Pa immediately below the bryophyte canopy) relative to the surrounding air (median 37.6 Pa at 100 mm above the canopy). Light-saturated rates of net CO2 exchange from 14 microcosms collected from the forest floor were highly variable; the maximum rate of net uptake (bryophyte photosynthesis , whole-plant respiration) per unit ground area at saturating irradiance was 1.9 ,mol m,2 s,1 and in one microcosm, the net rate of CO2 exchange was negative (respiration). CO2 exchange for all microcosms was strongly dependent on water content. The average water content in the microcosms ranged from 1375% when fully saturated to 250% when air-dried. Reduction in water content across this range resulted in an average decrease of 85% in net CO2 uptake per unit ground area. The results from the microcosms were used in a model to estimate annual carbon exchange for the forest floor. This model incorporated hourly variability in average irradiance reaching the forest floor, water content of the bryophyte layer, and air and soil temperature. The annual net carbon uptake by forest floor bryophytes was 103 g m,2, compared to annual carbon efflux from the forest floor (bryophyte and soil respiration) of ,1010 g m,2. To put this in perspective of the magnitude of the components of CO2 exchange for the forest floor, the bryophyte layer reclaimed an amount of CO2 equivalent to only about 10% of forest floor respiration (bryophyte plus soil) or ,11% of soil respiration. The contribution of forest floor bryophytes to productivity in this temperate rainforest was much smaller than in boreal forests, possibly because of differences in species composition and environmental limitations to photosynthesis. Because of their close dependence on water table depth, the contribution of the bryophyte community to ecosystem CO2 exchange may be highly responsive to rapid changes in climate. [source] Production of astaxanthin by Haematococcus pluvialis: Taking the one-step system outdoorsBIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOENGINEERING, Issue 2 2009M. Carmen García-Malea Abstract The feasibility of a one-step method for the continuous production of astaxanthin by the microalga Haematococcus pluvialis has been verified outdoors. To this end, influence of dilution rate, nitrate concentration in the feed medium, and irradiance on the performance of continuous cultures of H. pluvialis was firstly analyzed indoors in bubble column reactors under daylight cycles, and then outdoors, using a tubular photobioreactor. At the laboratory scale, the behavior of the cultures agreed with that previously recorded in continuous illumination experiences, and attested that the major factors determining biomass and astaxanthin productivity were average irradiance and specific nitrate supply. The rate of astaxanthin accumulation was proportional to the average irradiance inside the culture, provided that a nitrate limiting situation had been established. The accumulation of astaxanthin under daylight cycles was maximal for a specific nitrate input of 0.5 mmol/g,day. The recorded performance has been modeled on the basis of previously developed equations, and the validity of the model checked under outdoor conditions. Productivity values for biomass and astaxanthin of 0.7 g/L,day and 8.0 mg/L,day respectively, were obtained in a pilot scale tubular photobioreactor operating under continuous conditions outdoors. The magnitude of the experimental values, which matched those simulated from the obtained model, demonstrate that astaxanthin can be efficiently produced outdoors in continuous mode through a precise dosage of the specific nitrate input, taking also into consideration the average irradiance inside the culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009;102: 651,657. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [source] Growth rates of phytoplankton under fluctuating lightFRESHWATER BIOLOGY, Issue 2 2000Elena Litchman Summary 1The effect of light fluctuations on the growth rates of four species of freshwater phytoplankton was investigated. Experimental light regimes included constant irradiance and fluctuations of a step function form, with equal proportion of high (maximum of 240 µmol photons m -2 s -1) and low light (minimum of 5 µmol photons m -2 s -1) (or dark) in a period. Fluctuations of 1, 8 and 24-h periods were imposed over several average irradiances (25, 50, 100 and 120 µmol photons m -2 s -1). 2Growth rate responses to fluctuations were species-specific and depended on both the average irradiance and the period of fluctuations. Fluctuations at low average irradiances slightly increased growth rate of the diatom Nitzschia sp. and depressed growth of the cyanobacterium Phormidium luridum and the green alga Sphaerocystis schroeteri compared to a constant irradiance. 3Fluctuations at higher average irradiance did not have a significant effect on the growth rates of Nitzschia sp. and Sphaerocystis schroeteri (fluctuations around saturating irradiances) and slightly increased the growth rates of the cyanobacteria Anabaena flos-aquae and Phormidium luridum (when irradiance fluctuated between limiting and inhibiting levels). 4In general, the effect of fluctuations tended to be greater when irradiance fluctuated between limiting and saturating or inhibiting levels of a species growth-irradiance curve compared to fluctuations within a single region of the curve. 5The growth rates of species under fluctuating light could not always be predicted from their growth-irradiance curves obtained under constant irradiance. When fluctuations occur between limiting and saturating or inhibiting irradiances for the alga and when the period of fluctuations is long (greater than 8 h), steady-state growth-irradiance curves may be insufficient to predict growth rates adequately. Consequently, additional data on physiological acclimation, such as changes in photosynthetic parameters, may be required for predictions under non-constant light supply in comparison to constant conditions. [source] |