			Home About us Contact

Scalpel Blade (scalpel + blade)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Mechanical removal of necrotic periodontal ligament by either Robinson bristle brush with pumice or scalpel blade.

DENTAL TRAUMATOLOGY, Issue 6 2007
Histomorphometric analysis, scanning electron microscopy
Abstract,,, One of the important factors accounting for successful delayed replantation of avulsed teeth is seemingly the type of root surface treatment. Removal of necrotic cemental periodontal ligament remnants may prevent the occurrence of external root resorption, which is the major cause of loss of teeth replanted in such conditions. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of two mechanical techniques for removal of root-adhered periodontal ligament. Preservation or removal of the cementum layer concomitantly with these procedures was also assessed. Forty-five roots of healthy premolars extracted for orthodontic purposes were selected. After extraction, the teeth were kept dry at room temperature for 1 h and then immersed in saline for rehydration for an additional 10 min. Thereafter, the roots were assigned to three groups, as follows: group 1 (control) - the cemental periodontal ligament was preserved; group 2 - removal of the periodontal ligament by scraping root surface with a scalpel blade (SBS); group 3 - periodontal ligament remnants were removed using a Robinson bristle brush at low-speed with pumice/water slurry (RBP). The specimens were analysed histomorphometrically and examined by scanning electron microscopy. The quantitative and qualitative analyses of the results showed that the RBP technique was significantly more effective than the SBS technique for removal of the periodontal ligament remnants adhered to root surface. Both techniques preserved the cementum layer. [source]

Donor Harvesting: A New Approach to Minimize Transection of Hair Follicles

DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, Issue 4 2000
Damkerng Pathomvanich MD
Background. There are several methods for harvesting donor hairs, including punch excision, single-bladed knife excision, and multibladed knife excision. All of these procedures are blind and thus result in transection of hair follicles. Transection of hair follicles during harvesting results in fewer follicles being available for transplantation, detrimentally affecting the final cosmetic result. Objective. To explore a new method of donor hair harvesting called "donor dissecting." This new procedure is an open technique because hair follicles are directly visualized during the harvesting process. Methods. The technique of donor dissecting utilizes a #15 scalpel blade to excise the donor hair ellipse from the occiput while maintaining meticulous hemostasis. This enables individual hair follicles to be visualized and protected from transection during the harvesting process. Once the donor ellipse is harvested, it is then further divided into individual mini- and micrografts using direct visualization of individual follicles to again prevent transection. Results. The technique of donor dissecting was utilized in 50 consecutive hair transplant patients. Utilizing this new technique, only 1.9% of hair follicles in the donor ellipse were transected during the harvesting process. The dissection of the donor ellipse 1.2% follicles being transected in the graft cutting process. Combining the donor dissection technique with dissection of the individual grafts, we were able to transect 1.59% of hair follicles harvested for transplantation. Conclusion. The technique of donor dissection minimizes the transection of hair follicles in the donor hair harvesting phase of hair transplantation. This technique is superior to the blind methods of donor harvesting which have been plagued by the problem of hair follicle transection. [source]

Simple modification to the punch biopsy technique to minimize handling and crush artefact

AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, Issue 4 2005
Alexander J Chamberlain
SUMMARY A number of techniques have been described to retrieve the tissue core after punch biopsy. We describe a simple modification to the punch-biopsy technique that minimizes instrumentation, handling and the subsequent risk of crush artefact. Our technique is simple, quick and economical and essentially involves rotation of the punch through 90° then lateral extraction with a degree of upward traction, which usually leaves the tissue core deposited beside the skin defect. At this point it can be easily grasped with a square of gauze or detached if required using scissors or a scalpel blade. [source]