Home About us Contact | |||
Routine EEG (routine + eeg)
Selected AbstractsAdding Video Recording Increases the Diagnostic Yield of Routine Electroencephalograms in Children with Frequent Paroxysmal EventsEPILEPSIA, Issue 5 2005Nathan Watemberg Summary:,Purpose: To report on the usefulness of adding video recording to routine EEG studies of infants and children with frequent paroxysmal events. Methods: We analyzed the efficacy of this diagnostic means during a 4-year period. The decision whether to add video recording was made by the pediatric EEG interpreter at the time of the study. Studies were planned to last between 20 and 30 min, and, if needed, were extended by the EEG interpreter. For most studies, video recording was added from the beginning of EEG recording. In a minority of cases, the addition of video was implemented during the first part of the EEG test, as clinical events became obvious. In these cases, a new study (file) was begun. The success rate was analyzed according to the indications for the EEG study: paroxysmal eye movements, tremor, suspected seizures, myoclonus, staring episodes, suspected stereotypias and tics, absence epilepsy follow-up, cyanotic episodes, and suspected psychogenic nonepileptic events. Results: Video recording was added to 137 of 666 routine studies. Mean patient age was 4.8 years. The nature of the event was determined in 61 (45%) of the EEG studies. Twenty-eight percent were hospitalized patients. The average study duration was 26 min. This diagnostic means was particularly useful for paroxysmal eye movements, staring spells, myoclonic jerks, stereotypias, and psychogenic nonepileptic events. About 46% of 116 patients for whom cognitive data were available were mentally retarded. EEG with added video recording was successfully performed in all 116 cases and provided useful information in 29 (55%) of these 53 patients. Conclusions: Adding video recording to routine EEG was helpful in 45% of cases referred for frequent paroxysmal events. This technique proved useful for hospitalized children as well as for outpatients. Moreover, it was successfully applied in cognitively impaired patients. Infants and children with paroxysmal eye movements, staring spells, myoclonic jerks, stereotypias, and pseudoseizures especially benefited from this diagnostic means. Because of its low cost and the little discomfort imposed on the patient and his or her family, this technique should be considered as a first diagnostic step in children with frequent paroxysmal events. [source] Improved Prediction of Nonepileptic Seizures with Combined MMPI and EEG MeasuresEPILEPSIA, Issue 3 2000D. Storzbach Summary: Purpose: Nonepileptic seizures (NESs) are frequently mistaken for epileptic seizures (ESs). Improved detection of patients with NESs could lead to more appropriate treatment and medical cost savings. Previous studies have shown the MMPI/MMPI-2 to be a useful predictor of NES. We hypothesized that combining the MMPI-2 with a physiologic predictor of epilepsy (routine EEG; rEEG) would result in enhanced prediction of NES. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing CCTV-EEG monitoring underwent rEEG evaluation and completed an MMPI-2. Patients were subsequently classified as having epilepsy (n = 91) or NESs (n = 76) by using standardized criteria. Logistic regression was used to predict seizure type classification. Results: Overall classification accuracy was 74% for rEEG, 71% for MMPI-2 Hs scale, and 77% for MMPI-2 Hy scale. The model that best predicted diagnosis included rEEG, MMPI-2, and number of years since the first spell, resulting in an overall classification accuracy of 86%. Conclusions: The high accuracy achieved by the model suggests that it may be useful for screening candidates for diagnostic telemetry. [source] Seizures in children after kidney transplantation: Has the risk changed and can we predict who is at greatest risk?PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 5 2008Lorie D. Hamiwka Abstract:, Children undergoing kidney transplantation are at increased risk for symptomatic seizures with a previously reported incidence of approximately 20%. Little data exist to help predict which children may be at risk. We retrospectively reviewed all children who underwent kidney transplantation evaluation at our center between October 1993 and August 2007 and identified 41 children who had an EEG prior to transplant. Demographic data as well as the following were collected: immunosuppressive medications, developmental status, history of seizures, family history of seizures, post-transplant seizures and EEG results. EEGs were classified as normal or abnormal. Prior to transplantation, one child had a history of febrile seizures and six experienced afebrile seizures. Nine (22%) children identified had an abnormal EEG prior to transplant. In eight cases the EEG was non-epileptiform and in one case was epileptiform. Abnormal EEGs did not correlate with a family history of seizures. Delayed development was noted in seven children and was not associated with an epileptiform EEG. Following kidney transplantation, no child experienced a seizure. Our single center study suggests that current rates of seizures following kidney transplantation are lower than previously reported and that routine EEG as part of the pretransplant evaluation in these children is of limited use to predict those at risk. [source] Operative Results without Invasive Monitoring in Patients with Frontal Lobe Epileptogenic LesionsEPILEPSIA, Issue 10 2001A. Mariottini Summary: ,Purpose: To further explore the still controversial issues regarding whether all or most candidates for epilepsy surgery should be investigated preoperatively with invasive long-term video-EEG monitoring techniques (ILTVE). Methods: We studied five patients with intractable seizures since early childhood using the same protocol: clinical evaluation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences, long-term video-EEG (LTVE) monitoring with scalp electroencephalogram (EEG), interictal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), and neuropsychological testing. The patients' seizures had clinical features suggesting a frontal lobe (FL) origin. MRI scans revealed focal cortical dysplasia (CD) in four patients and a probable gliotic lesion in the fifth. The findings in both PET and SPECT images were congruent with those of the MRI. Scalp LTVE failed to localize the ictal onset, although the data exhibited features suggestive of both CDs and FL seizures. On the basis of these results, surgery was performed with intraoperative corticography, and the cortical area exhibiting the greatest degree of spiking was ablated. Results: Histopathologic study of four of the resected specimens confirmed the presence of CD, whereas in the fifth, there were features consistent with a remote encephaloclastic lesion. There were no postoperative deficits. Seizures in three of the patients were completely controlled at 2,3.5 years of follow-up; a fourth patient is still having a few seizures, which have required reinstitution of pharmacotherapy, and the fifth has obtained 70% control. All patients have had significant improvement in psychosocial measures. For comparison, five patients with generally similar clinical and neuroradiologic features to the previous group underwent preoperative ILTVE monitoring. The surgical outcomes between the two groups have not differed significantly. Conclusions: We conclude that patients with FL epilepsies may be able to undergo successful surgery without preoperative ILTVE monitoring, provided there is high concordance between neuroimaging tests (MRI, SPECT, PET) and the seizure phenotypes, even when routine EEGs and scalp LVTE fail to localize ictal onset unambiguously. The surgical outcomes of these patients generally paralleled those of the other subjects who also had FL epilepsy but who were operated on only after standard ILTVE monitoring. [source] Usefulness of the Head-Upright Tilt Test for Distinguishing Syncope and Epilepsy in ChildrenEPILEPSIA, Issue 6 2001J. Eirís-Puñal Summary: ,Purpose: Episodic loss of consciousness in children, whether or not associated with hypertonia or short-duration clonic movements, presents a diagnostic challenge to the pediatrician and child neurologist. We provide some evidence of the usefulness of the head-upright tilt test for investigating the causes of transient loss of consciousness in children, and for distinguishing between syncope, convulsive syncope, and epilepsy. Methods: We studied nine children previously diagnosed as epileptic on the basis of compatible clinical events and epileptiform findings in routine EEGs who were treated over the long term with antiepileptic drugs, but whose clinical records suggested syncope or convulsive syncope rather than epilepsy on reevaluation. All subjects underwent head-upright tilt testing. Results: The tilt-test result was positive in all nine cases, with the patients reporting the same symptoms as in the previously considered epileptic attacks. Conclusions: Inadequate histories and misuse/overinterpretation of EEG results often lead to misdiagnosis of epilepsy in children. The head-upright tilt test is a useful and reliable diagnostic technique, allowing syncopal events to be induced and evaluated under controlled conditions. In a subset of patients, it may help to distinguish epilepsy from simple or convulsive syncope. [source] |