			Home About us Contact

Root Replacement (root + replacement)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Perioperative Results of the Aortic Root Replacement in Strict Graft Inclusion Technique

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, Issue 5 2008
Niyazi Cebi M.D.
Therefore, the strict graft inclusion technique has been developed to avoid major complications. We present the early results after aortic root replacement in strict graft inclusion technique. Materials and Methods: The strict graft inclusion technique was performed in 28 patients between April 2001 and June 2006 in St-Johannes-Hospital-Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany. There were nine female and 19 male patients. The mean age was 57.78 ± 12.01 years (28 to 77 years). A type A aortic dissection and an ascending aortic aneurysm with aortic valve lesion were the indication to operation in patients. Results: There were no early mortality and postoperative rethoracotomy. The mean postoperative bleeding over mediastinal drains was 565 ± 310 mL. (100,2250 mL). In exception of the patients with preoperative double thrombocyte aggregation inhibitors therapy and postoperative consumption coagulopathy, the mean postoperative bleeding over mediastinal drain was 443.04 ± 171.59 mL (100,1100) in the first 24 hours, the transfusion rate was minimal, mean 0.39 ± 0.64 packed red blood cells (RBC) (0,4) and mean 0.14 ± 0.27 packed fresh frozen plasma (FFP) (0,4), whereas only in 18 patients (78.26%) out of 23 patients was a transfusion not necessary. The intraoperative and postoperative requirement for substitution of erythrocyte concentrate was mean 1 ± 1.28 packed RBC (0,5) and FFP concentrate was mean 1.21 ± 1.90 packed FFP (0,12). Conclusions: The strict graft inclusion technique for aortic root replacement represents a safe and feasible method to avoid bleeding from coronary ostial anastomoses, from aortic annular suture lines, and annular leak. [source]

The "Button Inside" Technique for the Aortic Root Replacement: A Modified Button Technique

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, Issue 4 2006
Carlo Canosa M.D.
Anastomosis of the coronary buttons is performed from the inside of the composite valve graft previously including the coronary buttons in the composite valve graft. Reduced tension is present between coronary arteries and the composite valve graft once the heart is beating and the systemic pressure is increasing. In this way coronary buttons are reinforced directly by the composite aortic wall graft prosthesis. The coronary ostia are perfused with lower tension at the site of the coronary anastomoses. No bleeding from the suture line of the coronary buttons occurs using this new surgical approach. [source]

Aortic Root Replacement with Stentless Xenograft for Aortic Dissection

ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, Issue 12 2002
Tetsuro Uchida
Abstract: This paper reviewed aortic root replacement with a stentless xenograft for Stanford Type A aortic dissection. Total aortic arch replacement plus aortic root reconstruction with a stentless xenograft was conducted in 2 patients with acute aortic dissection. In another 2 patients, aortic root replacement with a bioprosthesis was performed for chronic redissection of the aortic root which might be associated with the previous use of gelatin-resorcin-formalin glue. Full root replacement using this device is safe, reliable, reproducible, and technically less demanding. This device also provides a radical option for acute aortic dissection even in patients requiring concomitant aortic arch and root replacement. [source]

Selective Application of the Pediatric Ross Procedure Minimizes Autograft Failure

CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE, Issue 6 2008
David L.S. Morales MD
ABSTRACT Objective., Pulmonary autograft aortic root replacement (Ross' operation) is now associated with low operative risk. Recent series suggest that patients with primary aortic insufficiency have diminished autograft durability and that patients with large discrepancies between pulmonary and aortic valve sizes have a low but consistent rate of mortality. Therefore, Ross' operation in these patients has been avoided when possible at Texas Children's Hospital. Our objective was to report outcomes of Ross' operation when selectively employed in pediatric patients with aortic valve disease. Methods., Between July 1996 and February 2006, 55 patients (mean age 6.8 ± 5.5 years) underwent Ross' procedure. Forty-seven patients (85%) had a primary diagnosis of aortic stenosis, three (5%) patients had congenital aortic insufficiency, and five (9%) patients had endocarditis. Forty-two (76%) patients had undergone prior aortic valve intervention (23 [55%] percutaneous balloon aortic valvotomies, 12 [29%] surgical aortic valvotomies, 12 [29%] aortic valve replacements, 2 [5%] aortic valve repairs). Fourteen (25%) patients had ,2 prior aortic valve interventions. Thirty-two patients (58%) had bicuspid aortic valves. Follow-up was 100% at a mean of 3 ± 2.5 years. Results., Hospital and 5-year survival were 100% and 98%, respectively. Morbidity included one reoperation (2%) for bleeding. Median length of hospital stay was 6 days (3 days,3 months). Six (11%) patients needed a right ventricular to pulmonary artery conduit exchange at a median time of 2.3 years. Freedom from moderate or severe neoaortic insufficiency at 6 years is 97%. Autograft reoperation rate secondary to aortic insufficiency or root dilation was 0%. Conclusions., By selectively employing Ross' procedure, outcomes of the Ross procedure in the pediatric population are associated with minimal autograft failure and mortality at mid-term follow-up. [source]

Perioperative Results of the Aortic Root Replacement in Strict Graft Inclusion Technique

Contemporary Results of Total Aortic Arch Replacement

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, Issue 3 2004
Thoralf M. Sundt M.D.
The results of surgical intervention reported from large centers are improving; however, the degree to which these results are reproducible by other surgeons is less clear. We therefore reviewed our recent experience with total aortic arch replacement. Methods: Between July 1, 1997 and July 1, 2001 19 patients underwent complete aortic arch replacement, with or without concomitant procedures. We retrospectively reviewed perioperative results retrieved from the computerized database and clinical records. Results: The mean age of the study population was 68 ± 8.3 years (range 52 to 82), with women predominating (11 women, 8 men). All patients had hypertension. Patient history indicated active or past tobacco abuse in 16 patients (80%); cerebrovascular disease in 3, and peripheral vascular disease in 7 patients. Associated procedures included an elephant trunk in 12 (63%), replacement of the upper descending thoracic aorta in 5 (26%), concomitant coronary artery bypass in 5 (26%), and aortic root replacement in 3 (16%). One patient underwent replacement of the entire aorta from sinotubular ridge to iliac bifurcation in a single procedure. Brachiocephalic reconstruction with a "Y-graft" permitting early antegrade cerebral perfusion was performed in 12 patients. Retrograde cerebral perfusion was performed in ten patients (53%). Perioperatively, death occurred in two patients (11%) and stroke in two (11%). Conclusions: With cautious application, techniques developed in high-volume centers can also achieve satisfactory results when used at centers with a more modest case volume. (J Card Surg 2004;19:235-239) [source]

Long-Term Effectiveness of Operative Procedures for Stanford Type A Aortic Dissections

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, Issue 3 2004
Rudolf Driever
Methods: From 1990 to 1999, 50 patients (32 men (64.07%); 18 women, (36.0%); mean age 57.4 ± 11.1 years) underwent operation for ascending aortic dissection. Surgical strategies included aortic root replacement with a composite graft (21/50; 42.0%), valve replacement with supracoronary ascending aortic graft (3/50, 6%), and valve preservation or repair (26/50; 52.0%). Results: Overall hospital mortality rate was 18.0%. Follow-up was completed for 47 patients (94.0%) and ranged from 1 month to 10.5 years (mean 28.8 months). Actuarial survival for patients discharged from the hospital was 84% at 1 year, 75% at 5 years, and 66% at 10 years. There was no significant difference between the various procedures regarding mortality, neurological complications, long-term survival, and proximal reoperations. The ascending aorta alone was replaced in 8 of 50 patients (16%), ascending and hemiarch in 30 of 50 patients (60%), and arch and proximal descending aorta in 12 of 50 patients (24%). Hospital mortality (11.5%, 20.0%, and 16.7%, respectively; p > 0.05) and 5- and 10-year survival (p > 0.05) were not statistically dependent on the extension of the resection distally. Residual distal dissection was not associated with a decrease in late survival. With regard to emergency surgery (36/50) there was no significant difference in hospital mortality (p > 0.05) and 5-year survival (p > 0.05) between those who had undergone coronary angiography (19/36; 52.8%) on the day of surgery with those who had not (17/36; 47.2%). Conclusions: Preservation or repair of the aortic valve can be recommended in the majority of patients with type A dissection. Distal extension of the resection does not increase surgical risk. Residual distal dissection does not decrease late survival. Preoperative coronary angiography may not affect survival in patients undergoing emergency surgery. (J Card Surg 2004;19:240-245) [source]

Mid-term Results of the Ross Procedure

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, Issue 4 2001
Domenico Paparella M.D.
Although the Ross procedure has been performed for over three decades, its role in the management of patients with aortic valve disease is not well established. This study reviews our experience with this operation. From 1990 to 1999, 155 patients underwent the Ross procedure. The mean age of 106 men and 49 women was 35 years. Most patients (85%) had congenital aortic valve disease. The pulmonary autograft was implanted in the subcoronary position in 2 patients, as an aortic root inclusion in 78, and aortic root replacement in 75. The follow-up extended from 9 to 114 months, mean of 45 ± 28 months, and it was complete. All patients have had Doppler echocardiographic studies. There was only one operative and one late death. The survival was 98% at 7 years. The freedom from 3+ or 4+ aortic insufficiency was 86% at 7 years and the freedom from reoperation on the pulmonary autograft was 95% at 7 years. Dilation of the aortic annulus and/or sinotubular junction was the most common cause of aortic insufficiency. One patient required three reoperations on the biological pulmonary valve. Most patients (96%) have no cardiac symptoms. The Ross procedure has provided excellent functional results in most patients, but progressive aortic insufficiency due to dilation of the aortic annulus and/or sinotubular junction is a potential problem in a number of patients. [source]