Right Bundle Branch Block (right + bundle_branch_block)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Utilization of Retrograde Right Bundle Branch Block to Differentiate Atrioventricular Nodal from Accessory Pathway Conduction

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 7 2009
SURAJ KAPA M.D.
Introduction: Defining whether retrograde ventriculoatrial (V-A) conduction is via the AV node (AVN) or an accessory pathway (AP) is important during ablation procedures for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). With the introduction of ventricular extrastimuli (VEST), retrograde right bundle branch block (RBBB) may occur, prolonging the V-H interval, but only when AV node conduction is present. We hypothesized that when AP conduction was present, the V-A interval would increase less than the V-H interval, whereas with retrograde nodal conduction, the V-A interval would increase at least as much as the V-H interval. Methods and Results: We retrospectively reviewed the electrophysiological studies of patients undergoing ablation for AVN reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) (55) or AVRT (50), for induction of retrograde RBBB during the introduction of VEST, and the change in the measured V-H and V-A intervals. Results were found to be reproducible between independent observers. Out of 105 patients, 84 had evidence of induced retrograde RBBB. The average V-H interval increase with induction of RBBB was 53.7 ms for patients with AVRT and 54.4 ms for patients with AVNRT (P = NS). The average V-A interval increase with induction of RBBB was 13.6 ms with AVRT and 70.1 ms with AVNRT (P < 0.001). All patients with a greater V-H than V-A interval change had AVRT, and those with a smaller had AVNRT. Conclusions: Induction of retrograde RBBB during VEST is common during an electrophysiological study for SVT. The relative change in the intervals during induction of RBBB accurately differentiates between retrograde AVN and AP conduction. [source]


Electrocardiographic Differentiation between Acute Pulmonary Embolism and Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes at the Bedside

ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, Issue 2 2010
Krzysztof Jankowski M.D., Ph.D.
Background: Clinical picture of acute pulmonary embolism (APE), with wide range of electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities can mimic acute coronary syndromes. Objectives: Assessment of standard 12-lead ECG usefulness in differentiation at the bedside between APE and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Methods: Retrospective analysis of 143 patients: 98 consecutive patients (mean age 63.4 ± 19.4 year, 45 M) with APE and 45 consecutive patients (mean age 72.8 ± 10.8 year, 44 M) with NSTE-ACS. Standard ECGs recorded on admission were compared in separated groups. Results: Right bundle branch block (RBBB) and S1S2S3 or S1Q3T3 pattern were found in similar frequency in both groups (10 [11%] APE patients vs 6 [14%] NSTE-ACS patients, 27 [28%] patients vs 7 [16%] patients, respectively, NS). Negative T waves in leads V1-3 together with negative T waves in inferior wall leads II, III, aVF (OR 1.3 [1.14,1.68]) significantly indicated APE with a positive predictive value of 85% and specificity of 87%. However, counterclockwise axis rotation (OR 4.57 [2.74,7.61]), ventricular premature beats (OR 2.60 [1.60,4.19]), ST depression in leads V1-3 (OR 2.25 [1.43,3.56]), and negative T waves in leads V5-6 (OR 2.08 [1.31,3.29]) significantly predicted NSTE-ACS. Conclusions: RBBB, S1S2S3, or S1Q3T3 pattern described as characteristic for APE were not helpful in the differentiation between APE and NSTE-ACS in studied group. Coexistence of negative T waves in precordial leads V1-3 and inferior wall leads may suggest APE diagnosis. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2010;15(2):145,150 [source]


Electrocardiographic ST-segment Elevation: Correct Identification of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) and Non-AMI Syndromes by Emergency Physicians

ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 4 2001
William J. Brady MD
Abstract. Objective: To determine the emergency physician's (EP's) ability to identify the cause of ST-segment elevation (STE) in a hypothetical chest pain patient. Methods: Eleven electrocardiograms (ECGs) with STE were given to EPs; the patient in each instance was a 45-year-old male with a medical history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus with the chief complaint of chest pain. The EP was asked to determine the cause of the STE and, if due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI), to decide whether thrombolytic therapy (TT) would be administered (the patient had no contraindication to such treatment). Rates of TT administration were determined; appropriate TT administration was defined as that occurring in an AMI patient, while inappropriate TT administration was defined as that in the non-AMI patient. Results: Four hundred fifty-eight EPs completed the questionnaire; levels of medical experience included the following: postgraduate year 2-3, 193 (42%); and attending, 265 (58%). The overall rate of correct interpretation of the study ECGs was 94.9% (4,782 correct interpretations out of 5,038 instances). Acute myocardial infarction with typical STE, ventricular paced rhythm, and right bundle branch block were never misinterpreted. The remaining conditions were misinterpreted with rates ranging between 9% (left bundle branch block, LBBB) and 72% (left ventricular aneurysm, LVA). The overall rate of appropriate thrombolytic agent administration was 83% (1,525 correct administrations out of 1,832 indicated administrations). The leading diagnosis for which thrombolytic agent was given inappropriately was LVA (28%), followed by benign early repolarization (23%), pericarditis (21%), and LBBB without electrocardiographic AMI (5%). Thrombolytic agent was appropriately given in all cases of AMI except when associated with atypical STE, where it was inappropriately withheld 67% of the time. Conclusions: In this survey, EPs were asked whether they would give TT based on limited information (ECG). Certain syndromes with STE were frequently misdiagnosed. Emergency physician electrocardiographic education must focus on the proper identification of these syndromes so that TT may be appropriately utilized. [source]


Risk Factors for Requirement of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Aortic Valve Replacement

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, Issue 3 2006
Hasan Basri Erdogan M.D.
Methods: Among 465 patients operated between 1994 and 2004, 19(4.1%) patients with a mean age 49.9 ± 17.2 years required the implantation of a permanent pacemaker. Eleven of them were female (57.9%). The main indication was aortic stenosis (89.5%). Severe annular calcification was documented in 78.9% of them, and the aortic valve was bicuspid in 57.9%. Results: Risk factors for permanent pacing after aortic valve replacement (AVR) identified by univariate analysis were female sex, hypertension, preoperative ejection fraction, aortic stenosis, annular calcification, bicuspid aorta, presence of right bundle branch block (RBBB) or left bundle branch block (LBBB), prolonged aortic cross-clamp and perfusion times, and preoperative use of calcium channel blockers. Multivariate analysis showed that female sex (p = 0.01, OR; 5.21, 95% CI: 1.48-18.34), annular calcification (p < 0.001, OR; 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.24), bicuspid aortic valve (p = 0.02, OR; 0.24, 95% CI: 0.07-0.84), presence of RBBB (p = 0.009, OR; 0.03, 95% CI: 0.003-0.44) or LBBB (p = 0.01, OR; 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-0.69), hypertension (p = 0.03, OR; 0.22, 95%CI: 0.05-0.89), and total perfusion time (p = 0.002, OR; 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.08) were associated risk factors. Conclusion: Irreversible atrioventricular block requiring a permanent pacemaker implantation is an uncommon complication after AVR. Risk factors are annular calcification, bicuspid aorta, female sex, presence of RBBB or LBBB, prolonged total perfusion time, and hypertension. [source]


The Surface Electrocardiogram Predicts Risk of Heart Block During Right Heart Catheterization in Patients With Preexisting Left Bundle Branch Block: Implications for the Definition of Complete Left Bundle Branch Block

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 7 2010
BENZY J. PADANILAM M.D.
LBBB and Heart Block.,Background: Patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) undergoing right heart catheterization can develop complete heart block (CHB) or right bundle branch block (RBBB) in response to right bundle branch (RBB) trauma. We hypothesized that LBBB patients with an initial r wave (,1 mm) in lead V1 have intact left to right ventricular septal (VS) activation suggesting persistent conduction over the left bundle branch. Trauma to the RBB should result in RBBB pattern rather than CHB in such patients. Methods: Between January 2002 and February 2007, we prospectively evaluated 27 consecutive patients with LBBB developing either CHB or RBBB during right heart catheterization. The prevalence of an r wave ,1 mm in lead V1 was determined using 118 serial LBBB electrocardiographs (ECGs) from our hospital database. Results: Catheter trauma to the RBB resulted in CHB in 18 patients and RBBB in 9 patients. All 6 patients with ,1 mm r wave in V1 developed RBBB. Among these 6 patients q wave in lead I, V5, or V6 were present in 3. Four patients (3 in CHB group and 1 in RBBB group) developed spontaneous CHB during a median follow-up of 61 months. V1 q wave ,1 mm was present in 28% of hospitalized complete LBBB patients. Conclusions: An initial r wave of ,1 mm in lead V1 suggests intact left to right VS activation and identifies LBBB patients at low risk of CHB during right heart catheterization. These preliminary findings indicate that an initial r wave of ,1 mm in lead V1, present in approximately 28% of ECGs with classically defined LBBB, may constitute a new exclusion criterion when defining complete LBBB. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. pp. 781-785, July 2010) [source]


Utilization of Retrograde Right Bundle Branch Block to Differentiate Atrioventricular Nodal from Accessory Pathway Conduction

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 7 2009
SURAJ KAPA M.D.
Introduction: Defining whether retrograde ventriculoatrial (V-A) conduction is via the AV node (AVN) or an accessory pathway (AP) is important during ablation procedures for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). With the introduction of ventricular extrastimuli (VEST), retrograde right bundle branch block (RBBB) may occur, prolonging the V-H interval, but only when AV node conduction is present. We hypothesized that when AP conduction was present, the V-A interval would increase less than the V-H interval, whereas with retrograde nodal conduction, the V-A interval would increase at least as much as the V-H interval. Methods and Results: We retrospectively reviewed the electrophysiological studies of patients undergoing ablation for AVN reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) (55) or AVRT (50), for induction of retrograde RBBB during the introduction of VEST, and the change in the measured V-H and V-A intervals. Results were found to be reproducible between independent observers. Out of 105 patients, 84 had evidence of induced retrograde RBBB. The average V-H interval increase with induction of RBBB was 53.7 ms for patients with AVRT and 54.4 ms for patients with AVNRT (P = NS). The average V-A interval increase with induction of RBBB was 13.6 ms with AVRT and 70.1 ms with AVNRT (P < 0.001). All patients with a greater V-H than V-A interval change had AVRT, and those with a smaller had AVNRT. Conclusions: Induction of retrograde RBBB during VEST is common during an electrophysiological study for SVT. The relative change in the intervals during induction of RBBB accurately differentiates between retrograde AVN and AP conduction. [source]


Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-Left Bundle Branch Block Morphologies

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2010
JOHN RICKARD M.D.
Introduction: In select patients with systolic heart failure, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to improve quality of life, exercise capacity, ejection fraction (EF), and survival. Little is known about the response to CRT in patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB) or non-specific intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) compared with traditionally studied patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Methods: We assessed 542 consecutive patients presenting for the new implantation of a CRT device. Patients were placed into one of three groups based on the preimplantation electrocardiogram morphology: LBBB, RBBB, or IVCD. Patients with a narrow QRS or paced ventricular rhythm were excluded. The primary endpoint was long-term survival. Secondary endpoints were changes in EF, left ventricular end-diastolic and systolic diameter, mitral regurgitation, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class. Results: Three hundred and thirty-five patients met inclusion criteria of which 204 had LBBB, 38 RBBB, and 93 IVCD. There were 32 deaths in the LBBB group, 10 in the RBBB, and 27 in the IVCD group over a mean follow up of 3.4 ± 1.2 years. In multivariate analysis, no mortality difference amongst the three groups was noted. Patients with LBBB had greater improvements in most echocardiographic endpoints and NYHA functional class than those with IVCD and RBBB. Conclusion: There is no difference in 3-year survival in patients undergoing CRT based on baseline native QRS morphology. Patients with RBBB and IVCD derive less reverse cardiac remodeling and symptomatic benefit from CRT compared with those with a native LBBB. (PACE 2010; 590,595) [source]


Exact Location of the Branching Bundle in the Living Heart

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 2009
MASAMITSU ADACHI M.D., Ph.D.
Aims: The His bundle electrogram is believed to reflect the exact location of the His bundle. However, the distinction between distal His bundle potential and proximal right bundle branch potential is challenging. The aim of this study was to pinpoint the location of the branching point of the His bundle, and to compare that site with the site of recording of the largest His bundle electrogram (LH) during sinus rhythm. Methods: We hypothesized that the site of earliest His activation (EH) during retrograde conduction via the left bundle branch is the branching point. We studied 15 nonconsecutive patients (mean age = 40 ± 22 years; eight men). We performed a programmed stimulation from right ventricular apex until retrograde right bundle branch block appeared. At that point we measured (1) the distance between antegrade LH site and retrograde EH site and (2) the atrial-to-ventricular amplitude ratio (A/V ratio) at both sites. Results: EH was recorded at the proximal electrode of the His bundle catheter in all patients. Mean distance between EH and LH was 9.8 ± 2.5 mm. The mean A/V ratios at the EH site and the LH site were 1.01 ± 0.42 and 0.08 ± 0.06, respectively. Discussion: This study showed that the EH site is located approximately 10-mm proximal to the LH site. The mean A/V ratio at the EH site during sinus rhythm is approximately 1.0. These observations suggest that the majority of His potentials reflect proximal right bundle activation. Before delivering radiofrequency energy in the para-Hisian area, attention should be paid to the presence of a His potential and to the A/V ratio, rather to the amplitude of the His electrogram. [source]


Evidence for Electrical Remodeling of the Native Conduction System with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2007
CHARLES A. HENRIKSON M.D.
Background:Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves hemodynamics and decreases heart failure symptoms. However, the potential of CRT to bring about electrical remodeling of the heart has not been investigated. Methods and Results:We studied 25 patients, of whom 17 had a nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and 8 had an ischemic cardiomyopathy; 16 had left bundle branch block (LBBB), 1 right bundle branch block (RBBB), and 8 nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay. During routine device clinic visits, patients with chronic biventricular pacing (>6 months) were reprogrammed to VVI 40 to allow for native conduction to resume. After 5 minutes of native rhythm, a surface electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded, and then the previous device settings were restored. This ECG was compared to the preimplant ECG. Preimplant mean ejection fraction was 19% (range, 10%,35%), and follow-up mean ejection fraction was 35% (12.5%,65%). Mean time from implant to follow-up ECG was 14 months (range, 6,31). The QRS interval prior to CRT was 155 ± 29 ms, and shortened to 144 ± 31 ms (P = 0.0006), and the QRS axis shifted from ,1 ± 59 to ,26 ± 53 (P = 0.03). There was no significant change in PR or QTc interval, or in heart rate. Conclusion:CRT leads to a decrease in the surface QRS duration, without affecting other surface ECG parameters. The reduced electrical activation time may reflect changes in the specialized conduction system or in intramyocardial impulse transmission. [source]


Sudden Cardiac Death with Left Main Coronary Artery Occlusion in a Patient Whose Presenting ECG Suggested Brugada Syndrome

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 11 2003
TADAYOSHI HATA
This article describes a patient who died suddenly during Holter ECG monitoring. A ventricular premature systole with an extremely short coupling interval of 240 ms was immediately followed by torsades de pointes, soon degenerating into ventricular fibrillation. Retrospective survey of the patient's medical records revealed an incomplete right bundle branch block (iRBBB) configuration with fluctuating saddle back-type ST elevation in leads V1 and V2, these suggesting Brugada syndrome. Autopsy showed complete thrombotic occlusion of the left main coronary artery. (PACE 2003; 26:2175,2177) [source]


Intravenous Administration of Class I Antiarrhythmic Drug Induced T Wave Alternans in an Asymptomatic Brugada Syndrome Patient

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2003
KIMIE OHKUBO
A 53-year-old man with an abnormal ECG was referred to the Nihon University School of Medicine. The 12-lead ECG showed right bundle branch block and saddleback-type ST elevation in leads V1,V3 (Brugada-type ECG). Signal-averaged ECG showed positive late potentials. Double ventricular extrastimuli (S1: 500 ms, S2: 250 ms, S3: 210 ms) induced VF. Amiodarone (200 mg/day) was administered for 6 months and programmed ventricular stimulation was repeated. VF was induced again by double ventricular stimuli (S1: 600 ms, S2: 240 ms, S3: 170 ms). Intravenous administration of class Ic antiarrhythmic drug, pilsicainide (1 mg/kg), augmented ST-T elevation in leads V1,V3, and visible ST-T alternans that was enhanced by atrial pacing was observed in leads V2 and V3. Visible ST-T wave alternans disappeared in 15 minutes. However, microvolt T wave alternans was present during atrial pacing at a rate of 70/min without visible ST-T alternans. (PACE 2003; 26:1900,1903) [source]