Ridge Pattern (ridge + pattern)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Does Imiquimod Histologically Rejuvenate Ultraviolet Radiation,Damaged Skin?

DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, Issue 12 2007
KATHLEEN SMITH MD
BACKGROUND Imiquimod (IMI) 5% is believed by some to result in an improved cosmetic appearance of chronically ultraviolet radiation (UV)-damaged skin. OBJECTIVE The objective was to determine what histologic and immunohistologic changes were present in actinically damaged skin after treatment with IMI. METHODS AND MATERIALS Pre- and posttherapy biopsies of 12 patients with histories of actinic keratoses were evaluated with routine histology and immunohistochemical stains including p53, p63, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), c-kit, and Factor XIIIa. RESULTS After IMI therapy there was less compact hyperkeratosis, a more uniform rete ridge pattern with a more ordered proliferation of the epidermis, and a decrease in sun-damaged melanocytes. The papillary dermis showed a more uniform cellularity, and there was increased cellularity within the area of solar elastosis. After therapy, staining for p53, p63, and PCNA was decreased within the epidermis; staining for c-kit was decreased but more uniform in the basal cell; and Factor XIIIa expression was increased within the papillary dermis with a more ordered pattern of staining. CONCLUSION These morphologic and immunohistochemical patterns may explain some of the improvement in overall skin appearance after IMI therapy and may be related to the spectrum of signaling pathways induced by the imidazoquinolines. [source]


Comparison of High Resolution Magnifying Endoscopy and Standard Videoendoscopy for the Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Gastritis in Routine Clinical Practice: A Prospective Study

HELICOBACTER, Issue 1 2009
Can Gonen
Abstract Background:, It has been shown that standard endoscopic features often labeled as gastritis has a poor correlation with histopathology. Recently, high resolution magnifying endoscopy has been reported to be an effective method to diagnose gastritis. The aim of the present study was to compare standard endoscopy with magnifying endoscopy for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori gastritis, and to determine whether gastritis can be diagnosed based on findings at magnification endoscopy. Materials and Methods:, A total of 129 patients were enrolled into the study. Erythema, erosions, prominent area gastrica, nodularity, and regular arrangement of collecting venules (RAC) were investigated by standard endoscopy. Standard endoscopy was followed by magnifying endoscopy in all patients, and repeated in 55 patients after indigo carmine spraying. Results:, None of the standard endoscopic features showed a sensitivity of more than 70% for H. pylori gastritis, except RAC pattern analysis. Absence of a corporal RAC pattern had 85.7% sensitivity and 82.8% specificity for predicting H. pylori infection. Under magnification, the sensitivity and specificity of regular corporal pattern (regular collecting and capillary vascular structures with gastric pits resembling pinholes) for predicting normal histology were 90.3% and 93.9%, respectively. Loss of collecting venules, or both collecting and capillary structures was correlated with chronic inflammation and activity. With the progression of mucosal atrophy, irregular collecting venules became visible. The values for irregularly arranged antral ridge pattern for the prediction of antral gastritis were 89.3% and 65.2%, respectively. Indigo carmine staining increased sensitivity and specificity up to 97.6% and 100% for corporal gastritis, and up to 88.4% and 75.0% for antral gastritis, respectively. Indigo carmine staining significantly increases the detection of intestinal metaplasia. Conclusions:, High resolution magnifying is superior to standard endoscopy for the diagnosis of H. pylori gastritis, and identification of specific histopathologic features such as atrophy and intestinal metaplasia seems possible. [source]


Characteristic endoscopic and magnified endoscopic findings in the normal stomach without Helicobacter pylori infection

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 1 2002
KAZUYOSHI YAGI
Abstract Background and Aims: The aim of this study was to clarify the endoscopic features of the Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) -free stomach by examining the arrangement of minute points visible on the corpus. Since these points were clarified by magnifying endoscopy as collecting venules, this finding was termed ,regular arrangement of collecting venules (RAC)'. The findings from more endoscopic studies are presented and the differences between magnified views of the normal and H. pylori -infected corpus and antrum are described in particular. Methods: The study group consisted of 557 patients who were subjected to endoscopy and checked for H. pylori. The RAC in each patient was assessed. Magnifying endoscopy in 301 patients was used to examine the corpus and in 94 patients to examine the antrum. Results: One hundred and fifty-eight patients had normal stomachs without H. pylori. We diagnosed 389 patients with H. pylori gastritis. In 10 patients H. pylori was not detected, but inflammation was present. Of the 158 patients with H. pylori -negative normal stomachs, 151 had RAC. As a determinant of the normal stomach without H. pylori infection, the presence of RAC had 93.8% sensitivity and 96.2% specificity. All 30 patients with H. pylori -negative normal stomachs had a well-defined ridge pattern (wDRP) on the antrum as observed under magnifying endoscopy. As a determinant of the normal stomach without H. pylori infection, wDRP had a specificity of 100%, but a sensitivity of only 54.5%. Conclusions: The presence of RAC is characteristic of a normal stomach without H. pylori. Magnified views of the normal antrum were different from that of the normal corpus. [source]


Reassessment of histopathology and dermoscopy findings in 145 Japanese cases of melanocytic nevus of the sole: Toward a pathological diagnosis of early-stage malignant melanoma in situ

PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, Issue 2 2010
Ling Jin
Recently, dermoscopic visualization has been improved, allowing for the identification of malignant melanoma (MM) of the sole in situ. When the parallel ridge pattern is evident on dermoscopy, the proliferation of solitarily arranged melanocytes in the crista profunda intermedia should be examined histologically, since this may be a clue to the early diagnosis of MM in situ. We reviewed 145 Japanese cases of melanocytic nevus on the sole, and investigated several useful histological features for the diagnosis of MM in situ using a recent proposal as well as several standard histological criteria of MM in situ. Five cases were considered to be an early-stage MM in situ out of 145 cases previously diagnosed as melanocytic nevi of the sole. These cases showed several specific features, including solitarily arranged melanocytes or melanocyte nests comprising fewer than four cells. Our findings indicate that early-stage MM of the sole in situ can be diagnosed by using new dermoscopy-related histological findings. They are (i) irregular distribution of solitary melanocytes at the crista profunda intermedia with or without small nests (up to three melanocytes) on the slope of rete ridges; and (ii) larger melanocytes with a halo around the nucleus. [source]


Malignant Melanoma on the Sole: How to Detect the Early Lesions Efficiently

PIGMENT CELL & MELANOMA RESEARCH, Issue 2000
TOSHIAKI SAIDA
Early detection of malignant melanoma (MM) is essential to improve the prognosis. In non-white populations, including Japanese, the sole is the most prevalent site of MM. On the sole, however, melanocytic nevus is also frequently found. Clinical differentiation of early MM from benign melanocytic nevus on the sole is sometimes difficult because both are observed as a brownish-black macule. For the effective early detection of MM on the sole, the author has proposed guidelines based on the data of hundreds of melanocytic lesions on the sole. The algorithmic guidelines are as follows: when you see a pigmented lesion on the sole, first exclude congenital melanocytic nevus and some other specified disorders, and then measure the maximum diameter of the lesion. If it is more than 7 mm, biopsy it for histopathologic evaluation. If it is 7 mm or less, just follow the course of the lesion and advise the patient to come back if it enlarges to more than 7 mm. Even when the lesion is 7 mm or less, a biopsy is recommended on it, if it shows marked irregularity in shape and/or color or it shows the parallel ridge pattern with epiluminescence microscopy (ELM). The author believes the guidelines surely work efficiently in screening early MM on the sole. [source]